logo
The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada

The biggest political fights over Trump's megabill are converging in Nevada

NBC Newsa day ago
When it comes to President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill, ' few places could be impacted more significantly than Nevada — one of the country's most closely divided swing states.
For starters, Nevada is expecting the law's changes to Medicaid and food assistance to boot hundreds of thousands of residents from crucial social safety net programs.
Like other states in similar predicaments, lawmakers will have to scramble to figure out how to find money in the state budget to keep many of those people covered. But the impacts of the law on that budget and the state's broader finances could be even more significant than in many others because Nevada has no state income tax, and therefore is extremely limited in how it can find new revenues.
Then there are the new law's tax provisions related to tipped employees and gamblers that will have an outsize effect on a state whose economy relies almost exclusively on casinos and hospitality.
The implementation of the new law in the coming months and years will occur as Nevada is set to play a key role in the next midterm and presidential elections.
In 2026, Gov. Joe Lombardo — who has walked a fine line between offering praise for certain aspects of the megabill while pushing back against others — is seen as the most vulnerable Republican governor up for re-election. And Nevada's battleground 3rd District, represented by Democratic Rep. Susie Lee, will be a key race in the fight for the House majority.
And in 2028, Nevada will likely again host critical contests for the White House and Senate.
Democrats are already eager to go on offense against the law. State Rep. Steve Yeager, the Democratic speaker of the state Assembly, said he's already been contacted by many constituents who have expressed 'concern about what this bill might mean for them' and how they could be impacted by its changes to Medicaid, food assistance, energy credits, taxes on tips and gambling.
Yeager added he was going 'to make sure that every single voter who goes to the ballot box here next year in 2026 knows about this bill and knows about the impact.'
'A low-revenue state'
Approximately 1 in 3 Nevadans are on Medicaid, according to data from the state and KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, due in part to a massive expansion of the program back in 2013 by then-Gov. Brian Sandoval, one of the first Republican governors to embark on Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act.
Trump's law will institute steep cuts to Medicaid and food aid benefits mostly by establishing new work requirements, restrict state-levied fees on health care providers that are mostly used to fund Medicaid, and preclude the federal government from being responsible for reimbursing states any longer. In Nevada, as many as 100,000 people could fall off Medicaid as a result, according to the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
But unlike some other states, which may be able to shift funds around in their budgets to build financial support for affected residents, Nevada's hands are largely tied. It has no state income tax and has a state constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority to raise revenue.
'We don't have the funds to be able to fill these critical gaps,' Yeager said. 'We're a low-revenue state. … We're in a really tough place.'
Nevada is also likely to be uniquely impacted by a pair of tax provisions.
Starting in 2026, gamblers will have to pay more taxes under the GOP's new law. That's because the law will limit what gamblers can deduct from their yearly taxes to 90% of their losses. Bettors can currently deduct the entirety of their losses — up until their winnings.
Bettors have expressed concerns that the provision could cause professional gambling in the U.S. to fold. And Nevada Democrats say it's all but certain to impact the bustling and crucial industry in the casino-laden state.
'This means if someone wins a big jackpot in Las Vegas and then loses that one jackpot later on, they would still be liable for 10% in taxes on gaming 'income,' even though they had not brought home anything,' Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., said last week on the chamber floor. 'That's not just bad math, it's bad policy.'
Meanwhile, Trump and Republicans have boasted of the law's provision that they call 'no tax on tips.' Trump unveiled the concept during a 2024 campaign event in Nevada, which is among the states with the highest concentration of service workers who rely on tips.
'If you're a restaurant worker, a server, a valet, a bellhop, a bartender, one of my caddies … your tips will be 100% yours,' Trump said of the policy idea during a January visit to Las Vegas shortly after he was sworn in for his second term.
The law allows for a deduction on federal taxes of up to $25,000 in tipped income. At first glance, it appears it could be a boon for workers who rely heavily on tips.
But economists at the Yale Budget Lab have written that 37% of all tipped workers don't earn enough money to even pay federal income tax, meaning that these people wouldn't gain from the new deduction.
In addition, critics note the cap is relatively small and that it phases out once workers enter a higher income bracket ($150,000 per year). Plus, the provision only runs through 2028.
Democrats also note that the law froze nearly all of the clean energy funds the state had received under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Nevada, where scorching temperatures have led to soaring energy costs for voters and businesses, was among the states that claimed the most IRA funds used to incentivize clean energy investments and jobs, as well as home energy rebates.
As those funds dry up, so too could financial relief for residents and businesses.
'With the undoing of some of the Inflation Reduction Act, losing monies that were in the bill, we're going to lose solar jobs — and I am confident that our power bills are going to increase,' Yeager said.
A key gubernatorial race
Those impacts will loom particularly large in next year's governor's race in Nevada. Even before Trump enacted the law, Lombardo, who won his 2022 election over Democrat Steve Sisolak by just 1.5 percentage points, was the only Republican governor up for re-election next year whose race was rated by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report as a 'toss-up.'
Nevada Democrats have already aggressively sought to link Lombardo to the 'big, beautiful bill.'
'Lombardo will have to reckon with the damage done to Nevadans' lives and livelihoods because he was too cowardly to stand up to Trump,' said Nevada Democratic Party Chair Daniele Monroe-Moreno.
Lombardo, for his part, has praised some of the tax provisions in the law, but he also warned Congress not to make changes to Medicaid funding ahead of its passage.
'While my administration continues to assess this bill as it moves to get signed into law, Nevadans should be excited about the potential impacts of tax cuts, investments in small businesses and American manufacturing, and efforts to help secure our border,' Lombardo wrote on X the day before Trump signed it into law.
A spokesperson for Lombardo declined to comment for this story but referred to that post on X, in which Lombardo also lauded the law's 'no tax on tips' provision. The spokesperson also referred to the letters Lombardo wrote to Congress and state legislators expressing his concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid, plus a letter he wrote to Trump urging him to reconsider the gambling losses provision.
Lombardo was also among just seven Republican governors who did not sign a May letter in support of Trump's proposed 'big, beautiful bill.'
That tension underscores the bind many Republican incumbents are likely to find themselves in during next year's midterms as they seek to take credit for some of the tax-saving mechanisms of the bill while distancing themselves from the cuts that Democrats are already hammering them on — all while trying to avoid running afoul of Trump.
Responding to questions about the political impacts of the law, John Burke, a spokesperson for the Lombardo-supporting Better Nevada state PAC, said in an email, 'Under Governor Lombardo's leadership, Nevada is finally getting back on track, and the people of our state are seeing results.' He pointed specifically to accomplishments on affordable housing and education.
'The Governor has been vocal about his support for eliminating taxes on tips and supports a return to previous law on gambling losses,' Burke added.
State Attorney General Aaron Ford, who is so far the only Democrat who's entered the race against Lombardo, slammed the law for its impacts on health care and food assistance. He said 'servers and bartenders and hospitality workers are going to be getting played' by Republicans' 'no tax on tips' claims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial
Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's team wanted Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face ‘American justice.' He could be deported again before trial

Donald Trump's White House is doing everything it can to make sure Kilmar Abrego Garcia never steps foot on U.S. soil as a free man – even if that means setting him free in another country while he faces criminal charges in this one. Federal prosecutors want to bring his smuggling case to trial as soon as possible. But if he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him before a trial even begins, according to government lawyers. Abrego Garcia has pleaded not guilty, and his trial is set to begin January 27, 2026. He could be in another country by then. The administration spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back to the country after admitting he was wrongfully deported in March. Yet he was abruptly flown back to the United States from El Salvador last month to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee. At a press conference announcing his return, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Abrego Garcia would face 'American justice.' In recent court hearings in two different states, where judges are presiding over a criminal case and his wrongful removal lawsuit, Justice Department lawyers said they would only move forward with his criminal prosecution if he remains in custody while awaiting trial. If he is released on bail, they would let Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrest him and send him out of the country, again. Maryland District Judge Paula Xinis hauled Trump administration officials to court this month to understand what, if anything, the government intends to do with Abrego Garcia when he's released from pretrial custody. Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that ICE intends to arrest him, but they don't yet know where he will be deported. Government attorneys had previously announced plans to deport him to a 'third country' instead of his native El Salvador. 'There's been no decision made, as he is not in ICE custody,' Thomas Giles, assistant director for ICE enforcement and removal operations, testified last week. ICE intends to take custody of Abrego Garcia 'as soon as possible,' Giles said. Where he will await his removal from the country will depend on available space in immigration detention centers, according to Giles. Last month, Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes determined there is no legal basis to keep him in pretrial detention. She set potential conditions for his release, including wearing an ankle bracelet and living with his brother in Maryland. The federal judge overseeing his criminal case will decide next week whether to uphold that ruling. On July 16, Tennessee District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. said his decision will not be determined by what ICE wants to do. 'Frankly we don't know what is going to happen to him in that regard,' the judge said. But he said he was 'having a hard time understanding' arguments from federal prosecutors that there were no conditions under which Abrego Garcia — who does not have a criminal record — could be out of jail while awaiting trial. Holmes also appeared to reject the government's characterization of Abrego Garcia as a dangerous MS-13 gang member, human trafficker and serial abuser following claims from administration officials and government attorneys that 'defy common sense.' Under cross examination from defense attorney Sean Hecker, Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Peter Joseph admitted that he did not know that one of the government's central informants in the case gave conflicting statements about Abrego Garcia's alleged gang ties in several interviews with federal agents. He also testified that he didn't know that the informants were in contact with other potential cooperators — at least three of whom sought deals with the government to legally remain in the United States in exchange for their testimony. Three of the witnesses are related, and Joseph admitted it was 'always a possibility' that they coordinated their stories to secure a better deal for themselves. 'They're family,' Crenshaw shot back. 'Family talk.' But it won't be Crenshaw's decision that decides whether Abrego Garcia walks free. That will be up to Judge Xinis in Maryland. She is expected to decide whether to block the Trump administration from deporting him a second time. Xinis has signaled that she will order the government to give him at least two days' notice, should the judge overseeing his criminal case release him from pretrial custody. Abrego Garcia was 16 years old when he fled gang violence in El Salvador and illegally entered the United States in 2011. Abrego Garcia, now 29, was living and working in Maryland with his wife and child, both American citizens, and two children from a previous marriage, when ICE agents arrested him in March. After government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error, federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. A 2019 order from an immigration judge had blocked his removal to El Salvador over humanitarian concerns, and Supreme Court justices unanimously agreed the Trump administration had 'illegally' defied that order. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States as they characterized him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. But emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show Trump administration and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines causing major headaches for the White House. Erez Reuveni, a 15-year veteran of the Justice Department who was working in the Office of Immigration Litigation, was closely involved with several high-profile immigration cases in the first months of Donald Trump's presidency when he was fired in April. He supplied members of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a massive trove of internal messages showing the lengths the administration was taking to label Abrego Garcia a member of MS-13 as they tried to figure out if they were violating court orders by keeping him in El Salvador. Before the case exploded into a national story at the center of the president's anti-immigration agenda, administration officials spent several days discussing the feasibility of returning Abrego Garcia or ensuring that he would be protected from the gang violence he fled as a teenager. The messages also revealed simmering tensions between Justice Department attorneys who worked the cases in court and lawyers for Homeland Security who were directed to advance the president's agenda, regardless of legal risks. Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia was , according to his legal team. His attorneys alleged he experienced 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' while locked up inside. 'Last time they put Kilmar Abrego Garcia on a plane, he didn't know where that plane was going until it landed at the airport in El Salvador,' his attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters last week. 'That's more or less what they want to do again, and that's what we're here to stop.'

Trump tariffs land 100-year-old Stilton maker with £800k bill
Trump tariffs land 100-year-old Stilton maker with £800k bill

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump tariffs land 100-year-old Stilton maker with £800k bill

Donald Trump's trade war has landed one of Britain's oldest Stilton cheese makers with an £800,000 bill. Bill Mathieson, chief executive of the 114 year-old Long Clawson Dairy, in Leicestershire, said the company would be forced to pay almost £1m in extra levies because of new US tariffs – despite Sir Keir Starmer signing a trade deal with Donald Trump. Mr Mathieson said: 'We've got about £10m of sales going into the US … you take that and we've ended up with an increase of just under £800,000. The trade deal has had no impact in terms of benefit for dairy [producers]. It's certainly not helpful.' Under the terms of Sir Keir's trade deal with the US, tariffs on British steelmakers were reduced to zero, but a 10pc levy remained on other goods including cheese such as Long Clawson's. Mr Mathieson said the company would be forced to increase the price of some of its cheese exports as a result, but that it would be unlikely it could fully recover the impact of the tariffs through price rises. However, he added: 'We might take a bit of a hit, but actually we're very positive about the opportunities that exist in the US. Our strategy will be to try and offset [tariffs] by going out and winning new business.' Founded in 1911, Long Clawson Dairy is Britain's largest producer of Stilton cheese and produces a significant amount of the world's supply. Mr Mathieson also warned that the company faces a barrage of extra costs closer to home owing to tax rises on employers brought in from April. He said: 'Just through National Insurance (NI) contributions and [a 6.7pc increase in the] National Living Wage, it impacted us to the tune of about £1.5m.' He said the company was having to raise its prices as a result. Food bosses have repeatedly warned that raising the cost of employment will fuel inflation. Food prices rose by 4.5pc in the year to June, climbing from a rate of 4.4pc in May. This was the fastest rate of food inflation since February last year. Mr Mathieson added: 'We have to pass this on, because we don't have the margins, and we don't want to be another Stilton that goes to the wall because we no longer make money in our business.' Many of Britain's Stilton makers have closed in recent years as the cheese has suffered from a lack of demand. Arla, the UK's biggest dairy company, said last year it would end production at its 244-year-old Tuxford & Tebbutt Creamery in Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, if it was unable to find a buyer. Long Clawson has spent recent years battling to rejuvenate the image of Stilton and convince Gen Z shoppers of its merits, working with celebrity chefs and social media influencers. Mr Mathieson said this project was now bearing fruit and that sales of Stilton and blue cheeses were growing strongly. He added that the company was working on developing a more mild Stilton to help appeal to younger people who have not developed a taste for the intense flavour of traditional Stilton. He said: 'What we've been told is that a younger generation, they'd like something that's a bit more of an entry point into blue cheese. So we've developed a Stilton that is milder and a lot more buttery.'

Trump says he will help Afghans stuck in the UAE
Trump says he will help Afghans stuck in the UAE

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump says he will help Afghans stuck in the UAE

WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Sunday he would help Afghans detained in the United Arab Emirates for years after fleeing their country when its Taliban leaders extended control over it. Trump, a Republican who has criticized high levels of immigration, suspended refugee resettlement after he took office in January. In April, the Trump administration terminated temporary deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the U.S. "I will try to save them, starting right now," Trump said in a post on Truth Social that linked to an article on the Afghans held in limbo there. The UAE, a close security partner of the United States, agreed in 2021 to temporarily house several thousand Afghans evacuated from Kabul as the Taliban ousted the U.S.-backed government during the final stages of the U.S.-led withdrawal. Canada agreed in 2022 to resettle about 1,000 of the Afghans still held in the UAE after a U.S. request. It is unclear how many remain in the Gulf country. Nearly 200,000 Afghans have been brought to the U.S. by former President Joe Biden's administration since the chaotic U.S. troop withdrawal from Kabul. Refugees include family members of Afghan-American U.S. military personnel, children cleared to reunite with their parents, relatives of Afghans already admitted and tens of thousands of Afghans who worked for the U.S. government during the 20-year war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store