Access top AI tools in one spot with this $30 tool
Each AI model has its own strengths, and it can be tough to keep up with their unique advantages. 1min.AI aims to make working with AI a whole lot easier by uniting them on one platform.
1min.AI gives you access to ChatGPT, Gemini, Midjourney, Mistral, and more in one spot. Whether you need to create an image for social media, whip up a blog post, or optimize your business's website, 1min.AI can do it all. (Just remember to give things a human once-over, as editing may still be required.)
This lifetime subscription lets you enjoy all the perks of these platforms at a one-time low price, with no subscription fees required. And aside from saving you money, it saves time since you won't have to switch between different AI services constantly.
This Pro Plan gives you 1,000,000 monthly credits, with an unlimited prompt library and storage. Curious about what a million credits can get you? You can generate 805,555 words, 161 images, or 12 videos with that amount. If you need more, earning free credits is easy by visiting the web app daily, referring a friend, or leaving a review.
Take advantage of all AI has to offer with 1min.AI, now only $29.97 (reg. $234) until June 1.
StackSocial prices subject to change.
1min.AI: Lifetime Subscription
See Deal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CoreWeave Commits $6 Billion for Data Center in Pennsylvania; Shares Jump
CoreWeave (CRWV) shares jumped on Tuesday as the artificial intelligence cloud computing firm said i
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia stock jumps after the AI titan says it can sell some of its top chips to China again
Nvidia stock surged 5% on news that the company will be able to restart selling H20 chips to China. CEO Jensen Huang recently met with President Donald Trump to discuss AI the US' AI dominance goals. Morgan Stanley CIO Mike Wilson sees this as a highly bullish indicator for the broader AI sector. The move: Nvidia stock jumped as much as 5% on Tuesday morning, rising to $172.39 a share. After bottoming in April, the stock has regained momentum and is currently up more than 27% year-to-date. The chart: This embedded content is not available in your region. Why: The company said that the US government will clear it to start shipping its H20 chips to China again. In a July 14 blog post, Nvidia announced that it had begun filing applications to resume selling the H20 GPU in China. "The U.S. government has assured NVIDIA that licenses will be granted, and NVIDIA hopes to start deliveries soon," it added. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently met with policymakers in both the US and China, including President Donald Trump, to discuss the importance of supporting artificial intelligence infrastructure. Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent said in an interview on Tuesday morning that multiple Chinese firms are currently at work on similar chips, which could pose a threat to America's AI dominance. This decision is a stark contrast from the Trump administration's previous position on Chinese trade relations. In April 2025, NVDA stock fell as the White House announced strict controls on selling AI-enabling chips to China. What it means: Morgan Stanley CIO and chief US equity strategist Mike Wilson said he sees the development as a highly bullish indicator for the broader AI sector. He said that the AI capital expenditure (capex) cycle has been significant for the market's recovery, although it often doesn't receive much attention. "This deal is just more fuel to that fire," he said. Wilson also noted that the new Chinese revenue would be a "huge, positive kick to margins" for Nvidia. Reports indicate that Chinese firms are already rushing to buy the Nvidia chip when H20 sales resume. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI coding tools are shifting to a surprising place: The terminal
For years, code-editing tools like Cursor, Windsurf, and GitHub's Copilot have been the standard for AI-powered software development. But as agentic AI grows more powerful and vibe coding takes off, a subtle shift has changed how AI systems are interacting with software. Instead of working on code, they're increasingly interacting directly with the shell of whatever system they're installed in. It's a significant change in how AI-powered software development happens — and despite the low profile, it could have significant implications for where the field goes from here. The terminal is best known as the black-and-white screen you remember from '90s hacker movies — a very old-school way of running programs and manipulating data. It's not as visually impressive as contemporary code editors, but it's an extremely powerful interface if you know how to use it. And while code-based agents can write and debug code, terminal tools are often needed to get software from written code to something that can actually be used. The clearest sign of the shift to the terminal has come from major labs. Since February, Anthropic, DeepMind, and OpenAI have all released command-line coding tools (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and CLI Codex, respectively), and they're already among the companies' most popular products. That shift has been easy to miss, since they're largely operating under the same branding as previous coding tools. But under the hood, there have been real changes in how agents interact with other computers, both online and offline. Some believe those changes are just getting started. 'Our big bet is that there's a future in which 95% of LLM-computer interaction is through a terminal-like interface,' says Mike Merrill, co-creator of the leading terminal-focused benchmark Terminal-Bench. Terminal-based tools are also coming into their own just as prominent code-based tools are starting to look shaky. The AI code editor Windsurf has been torn apart by dueling acquisitions, with senior executives hired away by Google and the remaining company acquired by Cognition — leaving the consumer product's long-term future uncertain. At the same time, new research suggests programmers may be overestimating productivity gains from conventional tools. A METR study testing Cursor Pro, Windsurf's main competitor, found that while developers estimated they could complete tasks 20% to 30% faster, the observed process was nearly 20% slower. In short, the code assistant was actually costing programmers time. That has left an opening for companies like Warp, which currently holds the top spot on Terminal-Bench. Warp bills itself as an 'agentic development environment,' a middle ground between IDE programs and command-line tools like Claude Code. But Warp founder Zach Lloyd is still bullish on the terminal, seeing it as a way to tackle problems that would be out of scope for a code editor like Cursor. 'The terminal occupies a very low level in the developer stack, so it's the most versatile place to be running agents,' Lloyd says. To understand how the new approach is different, it can be helpful to look at the benchmarks used to measure them. The code-based generation of tools was focused on solving GitHub issues, the basis of the SWE-Bench test. Each problem on SWE-Bench is an open issue from GitHub — essentially, a piece of code that doesn't work. Models iterate on the code until they find something that works, solving the problem. Integrated products like Cursor have built more sophisticated approaches to the problem, but the GitHub/SWE-Bench model is still the core of how these tools approach the problem: starting with broken code and turning it into code that works. Terminal-based tools take a wider view, looking beyond the code to the whole environment a program is running in. That includes coding but also more DevOps-oriented tasks like configuring a Git server or troubleshooting why a script won't run. In one TerminalBench problem, the instructions give a decompression program and a target text file, challenging the agent to reverse-engineer a matching compression algorithm. Another asks the agent to build the Linux kernel from source, failing to mention that the agent will have to download the source code itself. Solving the issues requires the kind of bull-headed problem-solving ability that programmers need. 'What makes TerminalBench hard is not just the questions that we're giving the agents,' says Terminal-Bench co-creator Alex Shaw. 'It's the environments that we're placing them in.' Crucially, this new approach means tackling a problem step-by-step — the same skill that makes agentic AI so powerful. But even state-of-the-art agentic models can't handle all of those environments. Warp earned its high score on Terminal-Bench by solving just over half of the problems — a mark of how challenging the benchmark is and how much work still needs to be done to unlock the terminal's full potential. Still, Lloyd believes we're already at a point where terminal-based tools can reliably handle much of a developer's non-coding work — a value proposition that's hard to ignore. 'If you think of the daily work of setting up a new project, figuring out the dependencies and getting it runnable, Warp can pretty much do that autonomously,' says Lloyd. 'And if it can't do it, it will tell you why.' Sign in to access your portfolio
