The Take: How ICE raids echo US wars abroad, with Viet Thanh Nguyen
In this episode:
Episode credits:
This episode was produced by Chloe K Li, Sonia Bhagat, and Haleema Shah with Phillip Lanos, Spencer Cline, Mariana Navarrete, Sari el-Khalili, Kisaa Zehra, Remas Alhawari, Marcos Bartolome, and guest host Natasha Del Toro. It was edited by Noor Wazwaz. Joe Plourde mixed this episode.
The Take production team is Marcos Bartolome, Sonia Bhagat, Sari el-Khalili, Tamara Khandaker, Phillip Lanos, Chloe K Li, Ashish Malhotra, Haleema Shah, Khaled Soltan, Amy Walters, and Noor Wazwaz. Our editorial interns are Remas Alhawari, Kingwell Ma, Mariana Navarrete, and Kisaa Zehra. Our guest host is Kevin Hirten. Our engagement producers are Adam Abou-Gad and Vienna Maglio. Aya Elmileik is lead of audience engagement.
Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Joe Plourde mixed this episode. Our video editors are Hisham Abu Salah and Mohannad al-Melhem. Alexandra Locke is The Take's executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera's head of audio.
Connect with us:
@AJEPodcasts on Instagram, X, Facebook, Threads and YouTube
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
15 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
The UK's Gaza double standard
At Glastonbury, Britain's biggest music festival, two artists called out Israel's genocide in Gaza and accused the British government of complicity. On-stage remarks by one of them – Bob Vylan – plunged the country's public broadcaster, the BBC, which livestreamed the performance, into yet another Gaza-shaped row. Contributors: Des Freedman – Author, The Media Manifesto Peter Oborne – Journalist and broadcaster Karishma Patel – Former newsreader, BBC Justin Schlosberg – Professor of Media and Communications, University Of Westminster
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Diddy verdict raises questions over domestic abuse, power and coercion
The trial of music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs has culminated in a verdict, after more than seven weeks of intense media scrutiny and testimony about drug-fuelled celebrity sex parties. But beneath the salacious details, advocates say there are critical takeaways about how sexual violence is understood – and sometimes tolerated – within the criminal justice system. On Wednesday, a federal jury in the United States delivered a split decision. It found Combs guilty of transporting individuals to engage in prostitution, but not guilty of the weightier question of whether he engaged in sex trafficking or racketeering for flying girlfriends and sex workers to the parties he organised. Prosecutors had described Combs's activity as a 'criminal enterprise' in which he leveraged money, power and physical violence to force former girlfriends into abusive circumstances. The split ruling has, in turn, divided opinion about what the case means for the beleaguered #MeToo movement, which emerged in the early 2010s to bring accountability to cases of sexual violence. For Emma Katz, a domestic abuse expert, the jury's decision indicates there are still yawning gaps in public understanding about sexual violence. That understanding, she maintains, is necessary to assess the behaviours that accompany long-term abuse and coercion, particularly between intimate partners. 'I think a ruling like this would be a good news kind of day for perpetrators,' she told Al Jazeera. 'The jury seems to have concluded you can be a victim, a survivor, whose boss beats you in hotel corridors and has control over your life, but that you're not being coerced by him.' 'So much of what perpetrators do that enables them to get away with their abuse – and what makes their abuse so horrific and so sustained – has not been acknowledged and has disappeared from the picture in this verdict,' she added. A 'botched' decision How the jury arrived at its decision remains unknown. But prosecutors had been tasked with proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Combs used 'force, fraud, or coercion' to compel his girlfriends into commercial sex acts. The case was centred largely on the testimony of two women: singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura Fine and a woman identified only by the pseudonym 'Jane'. Both were identified as former girlfriends of Combs. The prosecution argued that Combs had used his financial influence, violence and threats of blackmail to coerce Ventura and the other woman to perform sex acts during parties known as 'freak-offs'. The evidence included surveillance video from March 2016 of Combs beating Ventura in a hotel hallway and then dragging her away. Ventura herself gave harrowing testimony at the trial, saying she felt 'trapped' in a cycle of abuse. She explained that cycle involved regular threats and violence, including Combs 'stomping' her on the face in a 2009 incident. But the defence's arguments throughout the proceedings appear to have swayed the jury, according to Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor. The defence blatantly admitted that Combs was abusive towards Ventura, as the surveillance footage had shown. But Combs's lawyers maintained there was no evidence he coerced Ventura into committing sexual acts against her will. The Los Angeles Times even quoted defence lawyer Teny Geragos as saying, 'Domestic violence is not sex trafficking.' 'The big question in the case is: If you're sexually abused or assaulted, why did you stay with your abuser for more than a decade?' Rahmani said. 'I understand the psychology of abuse, but jurors don't necessarily buy it'. Rahmani broadly assessed that prosecutors 'botched' the sex-trafficking portion of the case. That included how prosecutors approached a series of messages from Ventura that indicated affection for Combs and active participation in sexual situations, which Rahmani noted were not revealed until cross-examination by the defence. According to experts like Katz, such behaviour can be common in abusive relationships, in which an abuser expects a 'performance of happiness' to avoid physical, financial or psychological repercussions. 'It would never surprise me to see a victim survivor sending loving texts and enthusiastic texts to somebody who they said was abusing them, because that's all part and parcel of domestic abuse,' Katz said. 'Stain on criminal justice' From Katz's perspective, the verdict underscores the reality of what has happened since the #MeToo movement emerged. While #MeToo helped workplace harassment become more widely understood, the general public still struggles with the complexities of intimate partner violence. 'I think that the public has shown more willingness to consider how somebody might be harmed by an acquaintance, a work colleague, somebody who's hiring them for a job,' Katz said. By contrast, intimate partner abuse consistently raises victim-blaming questions like: Why did someone remain with an abusive partner? 'There's still a lot of stigma around when you chose this person,' Katz explained. The thought process, she added, is often: 'It can't have been that bad if you stayed in the relationship.' But domestic violence experts point to complicating, often unseen factors. Abuse can have psychological consequences, and abusers often attempt to wield power over their victims. Children, housing and financial circumstances can also prevent survivors from leaving and seeking help. People experiencing such abuse might also fear an escalation of the violence – or retaliation against loved ones – should they leave. Experts, however, say it can be hard to illustrate those fears in court. Still, on Wednesday, Ventura's lawyer, Douglas Wigdor, struck a positive tone about the outcome of the Combs trial. In a statement, he said Ventura's legal team was 'pleased' with the verdict and that her testimony helped to assure that Combs has 'finally been held responsible for two federal crimes'. 'He still faces substantial jail time,' Wigdor noted. The prostitution transportation charges each carry a maximum of 10 years. Several advocacy groups also praised Ventura and others for coming forward with their experiences. The verdict 'shows that even when power tries to silence truth, survivors push it into the light,' Lift Our Voices, a workplace advocacy group, wrote on the social media platform X. 'The #MeToo movement hasn't waned, it's grown stronger.' Fatima Goss Graves, head of the National Women's Law Center (NWLC), echoed that Ventura's and Jane's testimonies were accomplishments in and of themselves. 'Coming forward and seeking accountability took extraordinary bravery and no jury can take that away,' she said. Others were less optimistic about the jury's split verdict. Arisha Hatch, interim executive director of UltraViolet, a gender-justice advocacy organisation, called the verdict a 'decisive moment for our justice system' – and not in a good way. 'Today's verdict is not just a stain on a criminal justice system that for decades has failed to hold accountable abusers like Diddy,' Hatch said. 'It's also an indictment of a culture in which not believing women and victims of sexual assault remains endemic.'
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs convicted on two of five counts in sex abuse trial
A jury in the United States has found musician Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty of prostitution-related offences but cleared him of more serious charges after a federal criminal trial. Combs, a celebrated figures in hip hop music, was convicted on Wednesday of transportation to engage in prostitution but acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and two counts of sex trafficking. The verdict culminates seven weeks of trial in which two of the music mogul's former girlfriends – singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a second woman referred to as 'Jane' – testified that Combs physically and sexually abused them. The jury's decision also represents a partial win for the former billionaire known for elevating hip hop in US culture, through his work with artists like Notorious BIG and Usher. After the jury read its verdict, defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo asked US District Judge Arun Subramanian to release Combs on bail. 'This is his first conviction and it's a prostitution offence, and so he should be released on appropriate conditions,' Agnifilo said. Subramanian will determine Combs' sentence at a later date. The acquittals on the sex trafficking counts mean he will avoid a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence. He could have faced life in prison if he were convicted of sex trafficking or racketeering conspiracy. Prosecutors say that, for two decades, Combs used his business empire to force his romantic partners to take part in drug-fuelled, days-long sexual performances with male sex workers in hotel rooms. These performances were sometimes referred to as 'freak-offs'. During raids of Combs's homes, authorities found drugs and 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant that he would use in the performances, prosecutors said. Combs, 55, had pleaded not guilty to all five counts. His lawyers acknowledged that the Bad Boy Records founder, once famed for hosting lavish parties, was at times violent in his domestic relationships. But they argued the sexual activity described by prosecutors was consensual. The musician has previously faced a number of civil lawsuits accusing him of abuse. Ventura, for example, sued Combs in November 2023 for sex trafficking. Combs, also known throughout his career as Puff Daddy and P Diddy, settled with Ventura for $20m. He has denied all wrongdoing. At the trial, jurors saw surveillance footage from 2016 showing Combs kicking and dragging Ventura in the hallway of an InterContinental hotel in Los Angeles, where she said she was trying to leave a 'freak-off'. Jane later testified that Combs, in June 2024, attacked her and directed her to perform oral sex on a male entertainer, even though she told him she did not want to. That alleged attack took place a month after Combs apologised on social media for his 2016 attack on Ventura, footage of which had been broadcast on CNN. 'The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,' prosecutor Christy Slavik said in her closing argument on June 26. 'He doesn't take no for an answer.' Combs's defence lawyers argued that, while he may have committed domestic violence in the context of volatile romantic partnerships, his conduct did not amount to sex trafficking. His defence team said Ventura and Jane were strong, independent women who voluntarily took part in the sexual performances because they wanted to please Combs. They also suggested that Ventura and Jane were retrospectively accusing Combs of forcing their participation in the performances because they were jealous he was seeing other women. Both women testified they spent time with Combs and took part in sexual performances after he beat them. 'If he was charged with domestic violence, we wouldn't all be here,' defence lawyer Agnifilo said in his closing argument on June 27. 'He did not do the things he's charged with.' Ventura's lawyer Doug Wigdor, meanwhile, praised his client's courage to speak up, saying she 'paved the way' for Combs's conviction. 'By coming forward with her experience, Cassie has left an indelible mark on both the entertainment industry and the fight for justice,' Wigdor said in a statement. Separately, the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York published remarks underscoring the lasting impact of sexual violence. 'Sex crimes deeply scar victims, and the disturbing reality is that sex crimes are all too present in many aspects of our society,' the statement read. 'New Yorkers and all Americans want this scourge stopped and perpetrators brought to justice.'
