
Tyran Stokes, Jordan Smith and the best — and most underrated — players at Peach Jam
NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. — Well, we got spoiled.
Between Cooper Flagg and Dylan Harper Jr., then AJ Dybantsa and Cameron Boozer, the 2024 and 2025 high school basketball recruiting classes featured multiple players with the potential to go No. 1 in the NBA Draft. Beyond that, each class had depth: tens of instant-impact prospects who either did, or are poised to, influence the college hoops landscape.
Advertisement
The 2026 class, though? Not so much.
This weekend at Peach Jam — the nation's preeminent grassroots event, which draws hundreds of NCAA coaches, NBA scouts and agents — The Athletic surveyed 31 college coaches, all of whom were granted anonymity because NCAA rules prevent them from speaking publicly about unsigned players. Nearly all were in agreement: 2026 doesn't hold a candle to the last two cycles … or, frankly, many in recent memory.
'One of the weakest classes in the last decade,' said one high-major head coach.
Still, there is talent to be had and gems to be uncovered, even if those players aren't as obvious as they've been. Here are 15 of the players our staff found most interesting this weekend in North Augusta. That isn't to say these are the 15 best players in 2026 — just the ones we found ourselves drawn to, for one reason or another.
All recruiting rankings are via 247Sports.
Tyran Stokes (No. 1 in 2026): Stokes has had 2026's top spot locked down, and while questions persist about his maturity — even from teams heavily recruiting him — there's no doubting his undeniable talent and physical prowess. At 6-foot-7 and 245 pounds, the Louisville, Ky., native is a wrecking ball going downhill, with a near-unstoppable combination of strength and explosiveness. His 22.2 points per game were the second-most at Peach Jam (behind only Oakland Soldiers teammate and fellow five-star Jason Crowe Jr.), while his 10.4 rebounds per game led all players.
Specifically, his 35-point outburst against MoKan Elite — when he shot 5-of-10 from 3-point range, showcasing an improved jumper — was one of the most dominant single-game efforts of the entire event. I've watched Stokes in this setting for three summers, and while he's always been impressive physically, this year he looked like a high-level college player … at 17 years old.
Advertisement
What gives Stokes such high upside is that his game has moved beyond raw strength and leaping ability. Stokes appeared much more comfortable as a decision-maker, especially when doubled, and despite finishing with more turnovers (21) than assists (16), there are still-unrefined point-forward skills that a college staff can unlock. His motor defensively, like many top high school prospects, can use work at times, but his 1.8 steals and 1.6 blocks per game prove he can be a difference-maker on that end, too.
Whichever college lands him — Kentucky, Louisville and Kansas are the front-runners — is getting one of the few instant-impact guys in this class, and someone whose raw talent is befitting of a future top-five NBA pick. — Marks
Jordan Smith (No. 2 in 2026): When we asked coaches which 2026 player they would most like to coach, Smith was the clear winner. Their reason? He's a winner. He does not care about statistics. He's an elite defender, elite loose-ball getter and can score efficiently without chasing points. The only thing he lacks is a consistent outside jumper, but he's not out trying to prove he can shoot. He's best driving to the basket or scoring on pull-ups, so that's exactly what he does. He has great touch around the basket, knows how to bump into defenders to create an advantage and can rise in the midrange and get his jumper off because the release is so high. Add in all the put-backs he gets from hustling, and he scores plenty.
Defensively, he is awesome on and off the ball. He understands positioning and uses the proper hand on closeouts and strips. He's a coach's dream because he rarely fouls but plays with physicality. His hands are ridiculously strong. That's why he ends up with so many loose balls and rebounds. His 6-9 wingspan also helps. He is only 6-2 but plays bigger.
He could step in and start tomorrow and look like an experienced player for any college program. It's rare to see a player with his combination of physical and emotional maturity. — Moore
Advertisement
Jason Crowe Jr. (No. 5 in 2026): Guys like Steph Curry and Trae Young have made it much more common to shoot from well beyond the 3-point line. The problem is that most players cannot hit that shot at an acceptable rate to justify it. Crowe is one of the exceptions.
The ball comes off his fingertips with ease, even when he's 10 feet beyond the 3-point line. Defenders also have to be wary of his ability to get to the rim, and he can hit from the midrange as well. Making it even tougher on defenders, he's a lefty. He is built to score and led EYBL at 26.5 points per game.
Crowe committed to Mizzou on Friday, and he should thrive in Dennis Gates' up-tempo system, where he'll likely get the freedom to shoot in transition. I'm curious to see if he can facilitate and make the game easier for others. Sometimes it's hard to play with such a high-volume scorer, and the Oakland Soldiers had two with Crowe and Stokes. At times, it looked like they were just taking turns shooting while their teammates watched, and the Soldiers failed to make the quarterfinal round of Peach Jam, even though they had the most talented combo on the circuit. But there's no denying Crowe is special, especially from the wrist to the fingertips. — Moore
Arafan Diane (No. 15 in 2026): Diane was playing at an off-site tournament in Augusta, and we decided to go see the player many coaches believe is the best big man in this class. He's reminiscent of former Kansas star Udoka Azubuike in his size, strength and desire to try to dunk everything and bring pain to the rim in the process. In 13 games logged by Synergy this summer, he had 36 dunks. He runs the floor hard and should be elite at early duck-ins. He's got more game than Azubuike in that he's capable of making a 3 and flashed the ability to pass, too.
What I love about Diane is how he communicates. He's always talking, especially on the defensive end. He has heavy feet, and my biggest question is how he'll slide on the perimeter and in ball-screen coverage, but the way he communicates will help him on that end. Like Smith, he also has strong hands and wins most loose balls and rebounds. He needs to work on his body and ideally improve his foot speed, but he has a chance to be a star at the college level. — Moore
Caleb Gaskins (No. 16 in 2026): Gaskins looks like an NBA 2K create-a-player come to life: 6-8, 210 pounds and already toned beyond what should be possible for a high schooler. He's productive, too. By recording 20 points and 10.2 rebounds per game, the Florida native was one of just four players at Peach Jam to average a double-double. Gaskins isn't as physically overpowering as Stokes or Smith, but he uses his size to get to his spots and finish efficiently. I loved the footwork on his turnaround midrange jumper, and given his frame, he's a tough cover as a cutter, too. His shot needs refining — Gaskins' rotation is inconsistent, even if he made five of his 14 3-point attempts — but it isn't broken, either. Everything about Gaskins screams high-level future high-major player.
Gaskins already has an official visit scheduled for Texas, but after picking up an offer from Florida this month, his recruitment is far from over. Expect Miami — who just hired Gaskins' former Columbus High coach Andrew Moran as an assistant — to be heavily involved, too. — Marks
Advertisement
JaShawn 'JJ' Andrews (No. 13 in 2026): Talk about fearless. No matter who was guarding him, Andrews was getting downhill to the basket — and probably drawing a foul once he got there. This was especially true in the semifinals, where he shot 11 free throws, finishing with 16 points. He scored 20 in the final, going a perfect 6-for-6 from the line, leading his team to the Peach Jam championship.
An Arkansas commit, the 6-7 Andrews is unbelievably strong and loved showing it off, battling for rebounds and dishing to open teammates when he got doubled. He's flat-out tough … and no one was brave enough to step in front of him and take a charge. Honestly, I don't blame them. — Schnell
Anderson Diaz (No. 26 in 2027): Diaz, one of the few 2027 players who played at the under-17 level, helped the New York Rens reach the championship game as their super sixth man. The lefty was one of the cleverest handlers in the EYBL. He has an advanced feel for his age and plays with a slow heartbeat. He reminds me of former Marquette star Kam Jones in his ability to make hard below-the-rim shots look easy. Not surprisingly, he already has a long list of high-major offers. — Moore
Miles Sadler (No. 34 in 2026): Scoring point guards are the norm now, but there's nothing like a true floor general. That's where the (generously listed) 6-foot Sadler comes in. He's always trying to get the ball to the right people, whether he's the one passing it or telling his teammates what to do.
He can score when necessary — including off his own misses, which he did a few times in Augusta — but he's a distributor first and foremost. In a win Friday during pool play, he finished with 15 points, nine assists, three steals and zero turnovers. — Schnell
Maximo Adams (No. 41 in 2026): Adams had one of the cleanest shots I saw all weekend, and the fact that he made 40 percent of his 3s — on a solid sample size of six attempts per game — more than backed up the eye test. Some college team is going to be happy to have the 6-6, 200-pound wing spacing the floor from the corners. But Adams, whose older brother, Marcus, is currently at Arizona State, is more than just a shooter. He's a willing rebounder, nabbing 10.2 boards per game, and should only keep improving on the glass as he packs muscle onto his frame. High-major offers abound, including additions this weekend from Alabama, Houston and Texas. — Marks
Jasiah Jervis (No. 62 in 2026): I was kind of 'meh' on Jervis the first few quarters I watched him, but then he turned it on, and my jaw was on the floor. Jervis was dominant late in the Rens' final pool play game, scoring nine points in less than two minutes during a crucial stretch midway through the fourth quarter. Then he capped his offensive flurry by snagging a huge steal, proving he can impact the game at both ends.
Advertisement
Jarvis finished that game with 28 points, including 6-of-13 from 3, four rebounds and two steals. In the quarterfinals, he scored a quiet 16 points, also dishing four assists and hit a huge 3 when Team Melo was making a run. He lives for the big moment and should climb up the rankings accordingly. — Schnell
Kalek House (No. 117 in 2026): It's tough to stand out playing alongside two top-five recruits in Stokes and Crowe, but House did so while looking like one of the better shooters I saw all weekend. The 6-3, 180-pound guard averaged 18 points and shot 38.9 percent from 3 on 7.2 attempts per game, making multiple 3s in four of five contests. That'll play at the next level. House's genes don't hurt. His father, Eddie, spent a decade in the NBA after starring at Arizona State, and his older brother Jaelan was the Mountain West Defensive Player of the Year at New Mexico. House also has a twin brother, Kaden, ranked 35th in the class. Beyond the shooting, House has some wiggle with the ball in his hands, and like his older brother, is an incredibly willing defender. He's a candidate to rise up the rankings and is likely high-major bound after picking up offers from Oklahoma State and Wake Forest earlier this summer. — Marks
Jamyn Sondrup (No. 141 in 2026): Sondrup, who checks in at 6-10, has a nice, big frame and impressive footwork in the paint. He's not the star of his team but was efficient Friday night (20 points in 26 minutes), though he should grab more rebounds for his size. He's a little foul-prone, but given how well he moves his feet, that can improve. — Schnell
Desmond Bellot Jr. (unranked in 2026): I could watch this kid guard the ball all day. Talk about a defensive menace. Offensively, his handle is a little loose, and he has a bad habit of dribbling into some dicey situations. Still, he can knock down open perimeter looks and has a good nose for the ball as a rebounder.
His calling card is defense, though, and college coaches will love his ability to create havoc on that end of the floor. Bottom line: If he's guarding you, you're uncomfortable. He's not ranked, but that means someone is going to get a steal. He's a borderline power-conference guy, but could be a mid-major star. — Schnell
Lyndell Buckingham Jr. (unranked in 2026): What's fun about covering events like Peach Jam is watching a player you really like, going to 247Sports to see where he ranks in his class and what schools are recruiting him, then discovering he doesn't have a page. It's like coming across an awesome indie band before they blow up.
Let me let you all in on a little secret. Buckingham, who has no 247Sports page, is the hidden gem of this class. He's a lightning bolt with the ball. He's one of the hardest players on the circuit to keep in front with his burst, ability to slither through tight spaces and then explode off the ground. He has a skinny frame, but he plays through contact well. The jumper is solid, too. Defensively, he's a gambler who comes away with a lot of steals. He averaged 16.2 points and 2.2 steals at Peach Jam. He has just one Division-I offer, from Jacksonville. I'd expect a lot more soon. — Moore
Advertisement
Jackson Kiss (unranked in 2026): I'm calling my shot here with Kiss, who, beyond having an incredible sports name, was one of the best unheralded players I saw all weekend. The New Zealander doesn't have a 247Sports page, and most coaches had no clue who he was before this weekend … but that's why you watch the games. Kiss' hustle was ridiculous, and despite playing with several highly-ranked teammates, he seemed to always be in the right place at the right time. He made 65.3 percent of his shots, the seventh-best percentage of any player, and averaged 14.6 points through sheer will. Kiss has no discernible perimeter game and isn't overly strong, but if I were a college coach, I'd be all-in on the 6-8 forward who does whatever it takes to win. — Marks
(Photo of Tyran Stokes: Katie Goodale / Imagn Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Warriors' Steph Curry Gets Honest About Future Retirement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Steph Curry has been the face of the Golden State Warriors for years. Even at 37 years old, he is still playing at an elite superstar level and has shown no signs of slowing down. Last season, he was able to lead the Warriors to the playoffs once again. He led an upset in the first round of the playoffs against the Houston Rockets, who were the No. 2 seed in the Western Conference. Unfortunately, he suffered a hamstring injury in the second round against the Minnesota Timberwolves. Following Curry's injury against the Timberwolves, Golden State was quickly eliminated in five games. Stephen Curry #30 of the Golden State Warriors celebrates during the third quarter in game seven of the Western Conference First Round Playoffs against the Sacramento Kings at Golden 1 Center on April 30, 2023... Stephen Curry #30 of the Golden State Warriors celebrates during the third quarter in game seven of the Western Conference First Round Playoffs against the Sacramento Kings at Golden 1 Center on April 30, 2023 in Sacramento, California. More Photo byAs time rolls on, the future has become a question mark for Curry. How much longer will he keep playing in the NBA? Read more: Former NBA Star Fires Shade at Spurs' Victor Wembanyama That is a question that he has started speaking out about. During a recent appearance with Complex, Curry opened up again about his NBA future. "I'm kind of just taking it in two-year chunks. I just want to be in a position where I've put myself in a position where I can say I've done everything I can," Curry said. "I'm not nowhere close to that." Fans will love to hear that news. Curry has become a fan favorite across the league. When he chooses to hang up his shoes and retire, it will be an incredibly sad day for the NBA. He also opened up about the most difficult part of the NBA grind for him these days. The offseason has become more difficult. "Mostly the offseason for me are the hardest than the like in season experience because once you get into the 82 games like it's repetition," he said. "You know what you need to do — practice, off days, you love playing and the games are the most fun... the games are so much fun. Like you get lost in the game. Like that's the easy part." Read more: Lakers' Marcus Smart Sends Bold Luka Doncic Message Throughout his 1,026-game career thus far, Curry has averaged 24.7 points per game to go along with 6.4 assists, 4.7 rebounds, and 1.5 steals. He has also shot 47.1 percent from the floor and 42.3 percent from the three-point line. Curry will play most of the 2025-26 NBA season at 37 years old. He will turn 38 on March 14 of 2026. Hopefully, he's able to stay healthy and continue his career on his terms. He sounds ready to play for at least two more years and possibly more past that. For more on the Golden State Warriors and general NBA news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.


USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
OKC Thunder mailbag: How should Lu Dort's possible contract extension be handled?
The calendar nears August, which means the NBA is in its driest part of the year. Rosters are mostly set as front offices head into vacations for the next couple of months before training camps start. The Oklahoma City Thunder will enter the 2025-26 season with the hopes of being repeat NBA champions. They had one of the greatest seasons ever with a 68-14 regular-season record and captured the Larry O'Brien trophy. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren were all signed to new contract extensions this offseason. But what about another Thunder starter who is sneakily extension-eligible? With plenty of time to kill, Thunder Wire will conduct regular mailbags to answer questions that fans have. One question being asked is if the Thunder should go four-for-four with big extensions this summer and sign Lu Dort to a new deal. There's no straightforward answer as OKC's payroll situation gets dicey after next season. Dort has two years, $36.4 million left on his current deal. The second year is a 2026-27 team option for $18.2 million. Considering the 26-year-old had his best season yet as he finally earned All-Defensive Team honors and stepped up in the playoffs, he's being criminally underpaid. That should change soon. If the Thunder feel confident enough about their payroll situation and comfortable with an expensive roster, they could go ahead and sign him this summer. But considering their recent history of decline-and-sign deals, they could wait until the next offseason to ink him to a long-term contract. Considering what other top defenders make, Dort could get in the $20 million to $30 million salary range pretty easily. He could surpass that, too. As currently constructed, that would place the Thunder with quite an expensive payroll. Gilgeous-Alexander, Williams and Holmgren are set to take up around 85% of OKC's cap space once the 2026-27 season starts. It'd be tough to pencil in another decent-sized salary before running into roster construction problems. You also have to consider other contract situations with Dort. Isaiah Hartenstein has a $28.5 million team option for the 2026-27 season. Cason Wallace will be eligible for an extension next summer. Alex Caruso will start a four-year, $81.1 million extension this upcoming season. It's a lot to tie up. The Thunder may need to decline Hartenstein's option anyway to avoid being punished with the first and second aprons. That doesn't even include the possibility of keeping Dort or Wallace. Just ballparking OKC's long-term cap sheet, it may be one or the other. Which is a tough decision to make. But if the Thunder hope to keep both, Caruso could be a trade candidate to make that possible. Even though he's on the wrong side of the age curve, the 31-year-old has a tradeable contract that averages around $20 million per season. He should easily have a market. If the Thunder move on from him and let Hartenstein walk, that could signal their hope to keep Dort and Wallace. I think the Thunder should do what they do best. Kick the can down the road. Make any long-term decisions on that group of four role players after next season. Dort has been a fixture since he arrived in 2019. He's been one of OKC's best gems ever as an undrafted rookie. Who knows how the Thunder prioritizes their upcoming contract situations outside of their Big 3, but Dort would be worth the headache to keep on a new extension. He's that valuable on both ends of the floor and is still in his prime. Extend Dort now or wait until next offseason before deciding what to do?What will happen with Dieng's contract? Salary dump him at the deadline and convert Barnhizer or Carlson to a standard deal? Trade Dieng for a win-now veteran?Will Chet's minutes be managed this reg szn?


Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Caitlin Clark's Trading Card Selling For Nearly Double The WNBA Max Salary Proves Players Deserve More
of the Washington Mystics, Gabby Williams #5 of the Seattle Storm, Jackie Young #0 of the Las Vegas Aces, Sonia Citron #2 of the Washington Mystics and Brittney Sykes #15 of the Washington Mystics wear shirts saying "Pay us what you owe us" prior to the 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 19, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) Less Getty Images Caitlin Clark's rookie trading card sold for $366,000 four months ago. That figure represents over $150,000 more than the maximum WNBA single-season salary and $28,000 more than Clark will earn across her entire four-year rookie contract. This disparity reveals a fundamental disconnect between market demand and player compensation that undermines the league's growth potential. Trading card valuations can offer a unique market assessment of fan interest and player marketability, untainted by the structural constraints that artificially suppress WNBA salaries. Yet whenever salary negotiations surface in public discourse, social media erupts with predictable refrains about players not deserving more money because "the revenue isn't there." This oversimplified argument not only ignores decades of systematic underinvestment but fails to recognize the league's current growth trajectory and future potential. As collective bargaining negotiations intensify and players articulate their demands for equitable sharing, it becomes essential to examine the flawed economic logic that has constrained women's professional basketball. Clarks's record trading card price demonstrates market demand not just for individual stars, but for the high-quality basketball that emerges when more players can focus exclusively on their craft over the course of a single season rather than seeking overseas supplements to inadequate salaries. For that reason, the players' positions reflect strategic thinking about capturing value from continued anticipated growth while recognizing that individual marketability depends on collective play and competitiveness among all players and teams. of a trading card is shown as Caitlin Clark #22 of the Indiana Fever signs autographs before the game against the Dallas Wings at College Park Center on September 01, 2024 in Arlington, Texas. (Photo by) Less Getty Images According to Dr. David Berri, professor of economics at Southern Utah University, "the WNBA has $200 million in revenue today. Adjusted for inflation, per team revenue in the WNBA today appears to exceed where the NBA was at back in the early 1970s when the NBA was the same age as the WNBA is today. The WNBA appears to be on the same path as the NBA." Berri has also noted, "WNBA players get less than 7% of (league) revenue. The top salary in the WNBA right now is less than $250,000. The NBA 50 years ago was paying its top players $400,000 a year, and that was (at a time) when the NBA only had $30 million in revenue 50 years ago. The WNBA is at $300 million in revenue, at least, and we also know that with the new television deal, it'll be at least $500 million." This comparison refutes the common myth that the WNBA operates in some fundamentally different economic reality from the NBA. Yet the treatment of players couldn't be more different and at no time in NBA history, including throughout the 1950s when the NBA was a very small operation with very few fans (roughly a fifth of the size and scope of the WNBA in 2025) were NBA players being treated as poorly as current WNBA players. of the Las Vegas Aces and Jackie Young #0 of the Las Vegas Aces wear shirts saying "Pay us what you owe us" prior to the 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 19, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) Less Getty Images WNBA players are positioning themselves for the future of the league. These players are negotiating their fair portion of the profits that growth trends suggest are becoming more realistic, not asking for a larger share of losses. The revenue sharing structure established now will determine whether players benefit from the success their talent and marketability are driving into the future. As union president Nneka Ogwumike articulated during recent negotiations, "We see the growth in the league and as it stands, the current salary system is not really paying us what we're owed. We want to be able to have that fair share moving forward, especially as we see all of the investment going in." The key phrase from Ogwumike is "moving forward." Current negotiations are not simply about adjusting salaries to match existing revenue, but about creating structures that allow players to benefit from the growth trajectory for the league. Further, the "revenue isn't there" argument collapses under scrutiny because it conflates current constrained revenue with market potential. Every metric suggests the WNBA operates well below its revenue ceiling due to strategic choices rather than market limitations. Engelbert acknowledged this reality, "we want to significantly increase their salary and benefits while balancing with our owners, their ability to have a path to profitability, as well as continued investment." The path to profitability runs directly through maximizing the product's appeal, which requires treating players as valuable assets rather than cost centers. As Liberty guard Natasha Cloud noted, "We're fighting for what we're due, what we're worth, our value. They're going to be fighting for what they think protects the business. Our job is to find the common ground." That common ground exists in recognizing that player compensation and league growth aren't competing interests. These components of the business of women's sport are complementary strategies to be used to capture the massive market opportunity that current trends have revealed. The question isn't whether the WNBA can afford to pay players what they're worth; it's whether the league can afford not to make the investments necessary to realize its full potential. sign saying "Pay the players" during the 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 19, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) Less Getty Images Schedule Expansion: While the NBA generates revenue across 82 regular season games from October through June (a span of nearly nine months) the WNBA season encompasses only 44 games compressed into five months from May to September. This means the WNBA has 46% fewer games to sell tickets, concessions, and merchandise, while also offering broadcasters less than half the inventory of live content. Expanding the WNBA season to even 60 games would increase revenue opportunities by 36%, without accounting for the multiplier effect of sustained fan engagement across a longer season. Yet the current CBA caps the season at 44 games, creating an artificial ceiling on revenue generation that has nothing to do with market demand and everything to do with ownership's investment priorities. Commissioner Cathy Engelbert has indicated flexibility for seasons extending into November, particularly with the 2026 FIBA World Cup creating scheduling considerations. A longer season means more games, more broadcast inventory, and more opportunities for the viewership growth the league is already experiencing. Strategic Time Slot Optimization: When games receive proper placement and promotion, the numbers speak volumes about untapped demand. Weekend afternoon games between 1:00 and 3:00 p.m. ET consistently deliver exceptional ratings, with four of the five highest-rated games airing at 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays and averaging 2.16 million viewers. Yet this proven time slot represents less than 25 percent of the national schedule. Meanwhile, only 25 percent of WNBA games currently air during traditional primetime windows, and many of those are relegated to cable networks with limited reach. The May 17 Chicago Sky at Indiana Fever game drew 2.7 million viewers on ABC at 3:00 p.m., which made it the most-watched regular season game since 2000. Shifting just half of the games to these proven time slots could increase average viewership from around one million to between 1.5 and 2 million per game. Expansion Economics: The league has already approved franchises for Cleveland, Detroit, and Philadelphia at the record $250 million expansion fee. Each new market brings additional revenue streams through ticket sales, local sponsorships, and regional media rights. The expansion trajectory suggests demand far exceeds current supply, creating artificial scarcity that limits overall league revenue potential. of the Indiana Fever and Sabrina Ionescu #20 of the New York Liberty wears a shirt saying "Pay us what you owe us" prior to the 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 19, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) Less Getty Images 'Pay Us What You Own Us' When a trading card commands more market value than the athletes themselves can earn, the system isn't simply unfair, it's also inefficient. The WNBA's current revenue-sharing model represents a fundamental misallocation of resources that constrains the very growth it claims to seek. Players receiving less than 10% of league revenue while generating record viewership, sold-out arenas, and $250 million expansion fees defies basic economic principles that govern every other major sports league. The "Pay Us What You Owe Us" movement isn't about charity or special treatment. It's about applying standard sports economics to a league that has operated under artificial constraints for too long. When players can focus exclusively on their craft without being forced to compete overseas for additional income, when games air in optimal time slots, and when the season expands to meet demand, it's more than likely that the revenue ceiling will experience a significant rise. When a piece of cardboard sells for more than the maximum salary, it reveals the WNBA's fundamental failure to invest in the very players whose talent and marketability have generated and will continue to generate historic growth and fan demand.