UK construction sector tumbles, costs pressure and job cuts intensify, PMI shows
There was also concern among firms about the impact of the increase in social security contributions paid by employers, the weak outlook for the economy, and geopolitical uncertainty.
The S&P Global/CIPS UK Construction Purchasing Managers' Index stood at 46.4 in March up from 44.6 in February and slightly above economists' average expectation of 46.0 in a Reuters poll.
Still, the index remained rooted below the 50 dividing line for growth and contraction.
"March data highlighted a challenging month for UK construction companies as sharply reduced order volumes continued to weigh on overall workloads," Tim Moore, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said.
"A lack of new projects, alongside pressure on margins from rising payroll costs, led to hiring freezes and the non-replacement of departing staff in March."
Total new orders declined for the third month in a row, although at a slower rate than in February with firms citing weak demand and market conditions.
The survey showed just 40% of construction firms expected to see output to rise in the coming 12 months - the weakest in 17 months.
Civil engineering contracted at the sharpest rate since October 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, and commercial building fell at the fastest pace since January 2021.
But house-building shrank less sharply than in February when it hit a 57-month low.
Construction firms reported the fastest pace of job shedding in nearly four and half years, attributed to higher payroll costs and business confidence slipped to its lowest since October 2023.
The all-sector PMI, which combines the services, manufacturing and construction industries, rose to its highest since October last year at 51.0 in March from 50.0 in February, thanks to a strong performance from the services industry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trading Day: Bond blues mar stocks' joy
ORLANDO, Florida, July 15 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist The S&P 500 and Nasdaq leaped to new highs on Tuesday thanks to a surge in Nvidia shares, but closed mixed as investors digested a pick-up in U.S. inflation, a raft of major U.S. financial firms' earnings and spiking bond yields around the world, especially in Japan. More on that below, but in my column today I ask whether there is a sense of tariff complacency creeping into markets, as investors increasingly bet on the 'TACO' trade. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Bond blues mar stocks' joy It was a mixed bag on world markets on Tuesday. Two of Wall Street's three main indices, Britain's FTSE 100 and the MSCI World index hit fresh peaks, yet U.S. inflation rose, bond yields marched higher and investors gave a thumbs down to seemingly solid earnings from U.S. financial firms. Equity market strength was mostly in tech, after AI darling and chipmaker Nvidia said overnight it plans to resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China. Hong Kong's tech index got the ball rolling with a 2.8% rise, and tech was the only sector on the S&P 500 to close in the green. But if the market's glass was half full at the start of the day, it was half empty by the end of it. U.S. inflation was broadly in line with expectations, yet investors focused on the upside risks; U.S. bank earnings were solid, but financials were among the biggest decliners. The shadow of higher bond yields is beginning to lengthen as worries over governments' fiscal health, tariff-driven inflation and investor appetite for fixed income assets pick up again. The 30-year U.S. Treasury yield is back above 5.00%, but the eye of the bond market hurricane appears to be in Japan. Investor angst around an Upper House election on Sunday is bubbling up. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's sliding popularity suggests even his modest goal of retaining a majority is out of reach, and defeat could bring anything from a shift in the makeup of Ishiba's coalition to his resignation. Japanese government bond yields are surging, but that's proving to be a headwind for the yen rather than a tailwind as extra pressure on the country's already strained public finances, a straight-jacketed Bank of Japan and stagflation fears more than offset any potential carry for yen investors. The yen slumped to a three-month low on Tuesday, back within sight of the 150 per dollar mark. The raft of economic indicators from China overnight, meanwhile, generally showed activity in June held up better than economists expected, and second quarter GDP growth was slightly stronger than forecasts too. But Beijing is still under pressure to inject more stimulus into the economy. The property bubble continues to deflate, with new home prices falling at their fastest pace in eight months, and more broadly, China's economic surprises index is its lowest in three months. If incoming data is beating forecasts, it is because expectations have been lowered so much. Tariff 'doom loop' hangs over global equities The astonishing rebound in stocks since early April largely reflects investors' bet that U.S. President Donald Trump won't follow through on his tariff threats. But the market's very resilience may encourage the president to push forward, which could be bad news for equities in both the U.S. and Europe. Investors appear to believe that the April 2 "reciprocal" tariffs were mostly a tactic to bring countries to the negotiating table, and Washington's levies will end up being much lower than advertised. Tariffs may end up much higher than they were before Trump's second term began, but the situation will still be better than the worst-case scenarios initially priced in after Trump's so-called "Liberation Day". Monday's equity moves were a case in point. Trump's threat on Saturday to impose 30% levies on imports from the European Union and Mexico - two of America's largest trading partners - was met with a collective market shrug. European and Mexican stocks dipped a bit, but Wall Street closed in the green and the Nasdaq hit a new high. This follows threats in recent days to place a 50% tariff rate on goods imported from Brazil and a 35% levy on goods from Canada not covered under the USMCA agreement. Brazilian stocks have slipped 5%, but Canadian stocks have hit new peaks. The question now is whether the line between complacency and the "TACO" trade - the bet that "Trump always chickens out" - is getting blurred. The scale of the recovery since April 7 is truly eye-popping. It took the S&P 500 less than three months to move from the April bear market lows to a new all-time high, as Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at Creative Planning, recently noted on X. This was the second-fastest recovery in the last 75 years, only bested by the bear market recovery in 1982 that took less than two months. On a 12-month forward earnings basis, the S&P 500 index is now near its highest level in years and well above its long-term average. The tech sector, which has propelled the rally, has rarely been more expensive in the last quarter century either. None of that means further gains cannot materialize, and one could argue that the valuations are justified if AI truly delivers the promised world-changing productivity gains. Regardless, it is hard to argue that the rally since April is not rooted in the belief that tariffs will be significantly lower than the levels announced on Liberation Day. If many countries' levies do end up around 10% like Britain's and the aggregate rate settles around 15%, then equity pricing might very well be reasonable. But if that's not the case, growth forecasts will likely have to be revised a lot lower. "We stay overweight U.S. stocks, but don't rule out more sharp near-term market moves. Uncertainty on who will bear tariff costs means yet more dispersion in returns – and more opportunity to earn alpha, or above-benchmark returns," BlackRock Investment Institute analysts wrote on Monday. One concern is that a loop is potentially being created, whereby Wall Street's resilience and strength in the face of heightened trade uncertainty actually emboldens Trump to double down on tariffs. Most analysts still believe cooler heads will prevail, however. Trump's tolerance for equity and bond market stress, and therefore U.S. economic pain, appears "limited", according to Barclays. But if markets have gotten too complacent and Trump does increase tariffs on EU goods to 30%, potential retaliation would risk a repeat of something similar to the post-Liberation Day selloff, sending European equities down by double digits, Barclays warns. It may also be that when it comes to tariffs, investors are focusing so intently on China that not much else moves the dial. This may be short-sighted though. China accounted for 13.4% of U.S. goods imports last year, the lowest in 20 years. In contrast, the U.S. imported $605.7 billion of goods from the European Union, or 18.6% of all imports and the most from any single jurisdiction. As Trump sees it, Europe is "ripping off" America almost as much as China. Bilateral U.S.-China trade last year totaled $582 billion, compared with bilateral U.S.-EU trade flows of $975 billion, U.S. Census data shows. America's $235.9 billion goods deficit with the EU was smaller than its $295.5 billion gaps with China, but that's still comfortably America's second-biggest trade deficit. What could move markets tomorrow? Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Brazil looks to solve US tariff issue before deadline
BRASILIA, July 15 (Reuters) - Brazil will work to get the United States to reverse 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods before they are set to take effect on August 1, Vice President Geraldo Alckmin said on Tuesday. Speaking to reporters in Brasilia after meeting with business leaders to discuss the tariffs, Alckmin said the government aims to resolve the issue "as quickly as possible." Earlier in the day, following a first round of meetings, he acknowledged that Brazil faced a tight deadline for negotiations and did not rule out the possibility of requesting an extension if necessary.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Analysts react to increase of US consumer prices in June
WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - U.S. consumer prices picked up in June, likely marking the start of a long-anticipated tariff-induced increase in inflation that has kept the Federal Reserve cautious about resuming its interest rate cuts. The Consumer Price Index increased 0.3% last month after edging up 0.1% in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Tuesday. That was the largest gain since January. In the 12 months through June, the CPI advanced 2.7% after rising 2.4% in May. Economists polled Reuters had forecast the CPI would climb 0.3% and increase 2.6% on a year-over-year basis. MARKET REACTION: STOCKS: U.S. stock futures extended gains following the CPI data. BONDS: U.S. Treasury yields pared declines, 10-year yield flat. FOREX: U.S. dollar gains on the yen COMMENTS: 'This is a great number for the bond market. Bonds hate inflation; they love low inflation numbers. I've said since the beginning of the tariff turmoil that tariffs are not inflationary. Technically, tariffs are a tax, and no tax is ever inflationary. All taxes are deflationary. They take away spending power. But in this case, I don't think the Fed have seen the full impact of tariffs yet...I think we still we still need to wait and see on the Fed. It does increase the chance that the Fed cuts in September. But I think we need to realize that unemployment is still low, and the economy is still growing. So, you still have to ask yourself: why would the Fed cut? Would this be a preemptive cut to get ahead of a possible uptick in unemployment? I'm still not including a Fed cut in my outlook.' GINA BOLVIN, PRESIDENT, BOLVIN WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP, BOSTON: "Inflation's not going quietly. June's 2.7% CPI reading tells us the road back to 2% won't be smooth and gives the Fed reason to pause before cutting rates. Markets expecting an aggressive pivot may be disappointed. For investors, patience pays—stick to diversification, favor quality, and use short-term fixed income to your advantage." BRIAN JACOBSEN, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ANNEX WEALTH MANAGEMENT, MENOMONEE FALLS, WISCONSIN: "Tariffs are in the data, but it's not as devastating as many feared. Appliances and household equipment and furnishings prices jumped nearly 2%, but those only make up around 1% of the consumer price index. Services make up the bulk of the consumption basket and there is scant sign of accelerating inflation there. Rent rose 0.2%, lodging away from home fell 2.9%. It's not that tariffs don't matter, it's just that they don't matter to inflation as much or as mechanically as many feared." 'It's basically good news because core, on a monthly basis, up 0.2% is in line. The yearly number is a little bit higher than expected. What we're seeing in the headline numbers is that some of the tariff inflation is probably creeping in.' 'So it's a little bit hotter than expected, but it's not all bad news. there is a slight bit evidence of tariff inflation kicking in.' 'This data bails out the Fed and it puts them on hold in July. They will have to look at the July and August numbers to make a decision in in September.' CHRIS ZACCARELLI, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, NORTHLIGHT ASSET MANAGEMENT, CHARLOTTE: "Traders were keeping a close eye on this morning's CPI report and the Fed was probably looking even more closely at it as the internal debate continues into whether or not they should be cutting interest rates right now." "Fortunately, the report this morning was mostly in line with expectations and the core (ex-food and energy) numbers told a story of inflation that was in check (e.g. month-over-month lower than expected and year-over-year inline with +2.9% consensus)." "If it's true that inflation is staying in check, then the Fed can go ahead and cut interest rates – potentially as early as September – but if subsequent reports show a different story, then the Fed is going to have to stay on hold even longer."
