
Lahore zoo offers 50% discount on recreational facilities
While entry and parking fees remain unchanged, notable discounts have been introduced for key attractions, including the Reptile House, Fish Aquarium, Holoverse, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality experiences.
Under the revised pricing, tickets for the Reptile House and Fish Aquarium—previously priced at Rs200—are now available for Rs100. Similarly, tickets for Holoverse (formerly Rs300), Virtual Reality (Rs200), and Mixed Reality (Rs100) are also being offered at half price.
Read: Lahore zoo returns to govt control after private firm exits contract
Although the Holoverse, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality sections are temporarily closed due to ongoing maintenance and sanitation, the zoo administration has assured the public that these facilities will reopen following the completion of the necessary upgrades.
The decision to introduce discounted rates was made with the approval of the Captive Wildlife Management Committee (CWMC). Zoo officials stated that the initiative aims to offer economic relief to citizens and renew public interest in zoo-based recreational activities.
This development comes just a day after the private firm previously managing the zoo withdrew from its contractual role. As a result, the Lahore Zoo administration has assumed direct control over ticketing and operational matters.
Officials emphasised that the discounts reflect a broader commitment to making the zoo more accessible and enjoyable for families and nature enthusiasts throughout the city.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Revised business plan: PIA buyer required to invest Rs70bn in 5 years: PC
ISLAMABAD: Privatization Commission Secretary Usman Akhtar Bajwa, Tuesday, informed the Senate Standing Committee on Privatization that the buyer of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited (PIACL) will be required to invest Rs70 billion over five years period under revised business plan of privatisation of PIA. A meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Privatization was held under the chairmanship of Senator Dr Afnanullah Khan. The meeting was attended by senators Zeeshan Khanzada, Bilal Ahmed Khan, Nadeem Ahmed Bhutto, Mohsin Aziz and other officials from Ministry from Privatization, Power Division and Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (ZTBL). Aviation panel told: PIACL sell-off process almost over Secretary Privatization Commission, while sharing the revised business plan of privatization of the national flag carrier, stated that the due diligence process has begun for pre-qualified companies in the PIA privatization. Starting next week, site visits and expert sessions will begin for pre-qualified companies. Expert sessions will include briefings on aircraft conditions and routes, said Usman Bajwa. To a query, he said that a decision has been taken to launch PIA flights to Manchester starting from August 14. However, there are security concerns for PIA's North American routes. Efforts will be made to resolve security concerns regarding North American routes. He stated that PIA's current business model is not sustainable. In the previous bidding round, investors backed out because their demands were not met. He further briefed that now, investors will receive sales tax exemption on aircraft purchases. The government had to inject Rs100 billion annually to keep PIA running. The services of the previous financial advisor have been re-engaged for PIA's privatisation. During the meeting, the committee reviewed a report highlighting complaints of the pensioners of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited (PIACL). It was also revealed that currently pension liabilities for 6,625 employees of PIACL amount to Rs14.87609 billion. Expressing concern, Chairman Committee Senator Dr Afnanullah Khan remarked that the pension amount is extremely low, asking how people are expected to survive. In response, the Ministry of Privatization stated that pension policies are regularly revised and updated annually in line with allowances. The chairman directed that Grade/Scale wise pension details, including the amount received and the distribution process, be presented in the next meeting. Privatization Commission informed the committee that the Board of the Privatisation Commission in its July 2025 meeting resolved as under:a) Pre-qualified the following interested parties as prospective bidders/pre-qualified bidders (PQBs): (i) Consortium comprising Lucky Cement Limited, Hub Power Holdings Limited, Kohat Cement Company Limited and Metro Ventures (Private) Limited; (ii) Consortium comprising Arif Habib Corporation Limited, Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited, City Schools (Private) Limited and Lake City Holdings (Private) Limited; iii) Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited, and iv) Air Blue Limited. b) Consortium comprising ASIL and Serene Air (Private) Limited, Bahria Foundation, Mega C&S Holding, Equitas Capital LLC, was not pre-qualified, as it did not meet the requirements of the Request for Statement of Qualification (RSOQ). The PQBs have been invited to conduct buy-side due diligence by giving access to Virtual Data Room. The PQBs will also be invited for pre-bid conference/meetings for finalisation of bid documents, Privatization Commission added. About the privatisation of power distribution companies, secretary Privatization Commission stated that the DISCOs face issues related to asset transfers, ownership of grid stations, and recoveries from government departments. The DISCOs are also facing challenges related to regulatory frameworks, payments to government entities, and pension liabilities and payments. He further said that 51 percent to 100 percent assets of the DISCOs' will be sold. Three DISCOs will be privatised between January and June of the current fiscal year. The committee was informed that the Pakistan Minerals Development Corporation (PMDC) is not yet included in Privatization list. Senator Zeeshan Khanzada questioned why this institution is being Privatized and asked about the purpose behind it. Senator Bilal Ahmed Khan also raised concerns, questioning why land is being granted/allotted if the government plans to privatise the institution. He further asked about the area under PMDC's operation and the quantity of mineral output. Senators further queried the basis of the privatization decision, noting that the Petroleum Ministry lacks the mandate to privatise the PMDC. In response, the minister clarified that the Cabinet Committee on SOEs is responsible for evaluating organisations and that the Petroleum Ministry can better explain its mandate. The committee was briefed on the privatisation process, which involves recommendations to the Board, Cabinet's approval, and hiring of financial/legal advisors through advertisements. The evaluation criteria will then be assessed before final approval. The Chairman Committee Senator Dr Afnanullah Khan proposed that PMDC be invited to the next meeting to further deliberate on this matter. Regarding ZTBL, the committee was informed that it is included in Phase One of the privatisation list approved by the government in August 2024. A total of 24 organisations are to be privatised. ZTBL is currently in the process of hiring a financial adviser. The ministry stated that the negotiations are in progress to finalise how ZTBL will be privatised. Moreover, Senator Dr Afnanullah Khan questioned the delay in hiring a financial adviser, noting that the last meeting was held on January 31st, when the bids were submitted and evaluated. He expressed concern that nearly six months had passed without finalizing the appointment. The ministry responded that the process typically takes six to eight weeks but was delayed due to high fee demands by one party nearly Rs500 million forcing a restart of the process. The ministry assured the committee that the complete privatisation process is now targeted to be completed within nine months. Furthermore, Senator Zeeshan Khanzada raised a critical point upon the overall privatisation process of the entities. He further questioned the rationale behind privatizing the entities while highlighting the performance of the Privatization Commission. He urged that this issue be thoroughly discussed in the committee. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
COAS Munir instructs FBR to have dialogue with businessmen over arrest powers, penalties: FPCCI
While focusing on the recently enacted expansions of the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) powers, Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) President Atif Ikram Sheikh with the trade and industry's delegation met Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, NI (M). who assured them of his full support for the economic growth of the country, according to a FPCCI statement on Tuesday. The development comes days after Pakistan's two largest cities - Karachi and Lahore - faced partial and complete market closures over a strike call by traders against what they called 'anti-business' tax measures introduced in the Finance Act 2025. Karachi, Lahore hit by strike against 'anti-business' tax measures In the Finance Act, the government expanded the FBR powers with Sections 37A and 37B, which empower the tax authority officials with arbitrary arrests; Section 21(S), which imposes harsh penalties on cash transactions of Rs200,000 or more; mandatory digital invoicing under SRO 709; and the imposition of e-Bilty under Section 40(C). 'Mr Atif Ikram Sheikh maintained that the business community is immensely thankful to Field Marshal Asim Munir for immediately directing that the new provisions; particularly those added under Sections 37A and 37B of the Sales Tax Act 1990, pertaining to arrest and detention; be held in abeyance; and, for instructing the FBR to enter meaningful and solution-oriented dialogue with stakeholders and address their concerns,' the FPCCI statement read. The statement further said the delegation had presented a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by the industrial sector – with particular emphasis on the recently enacted expansions of the FBR's powers. 'Additionally, the GHQ will support economic activities in the country through the platform of Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC); fostering an environment of collaboration and trust.' The business community's delegation also called for interest rates to be brought down in line with inflation to stimulate businesses and economic activities. It also highlighted the delay in notification of the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) amendments relating to exclusion of cotton and cotton yarn from the scheme; and, imposition of an 18% sales tax on their imports, according to FPCCI statement.


Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sugar, power and patronage
In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity as a transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. Photo: file Listen to article Pakistan's recurring sugar crises have become a telling reflection of how entrenched elite interests continue to manipulate the economy under the guise of policy. The latest surge in sugar prices, now hitting between Rs180 and Rs210 per kilogramme despite official claims of intervention, shows just how far removed state actions are from public welfare. What is unfolding isn't simply mismanagement. It's a system that protects the powerful and punishes the public. In July 2024, the federal government announced with much fanfare that it had reached an agreement with sugar mills to sell sugar to wholesalers at Rs165 per kg. This was framed as a breakthrough deal. But within days, the mills began violating the agreed price, resuming supply at Rs175, not Rs165. Even at inflated rates, sugar remains scarce in wholesale markets. The public, meanwhile, continues to pay well over Rs200 per kg in major cities like Karachi and Lahore. This was not just a policy failure. It was the illusion of reform – an orchestrated move to deflect public outrage without touching the roots of the problem. And at the root lies one uncomfortable fact: the sugar sector is not regulated by the government. It is effectively governed by itself. The concentration of political and economic power is stark. The Sharif family, which sits at the core of the current ruling coalition, owns major sugar mills. That the same actors who draft economic policies also control production and pricing of sugar reveals a conflict of interests so blatant that it no longer shocks. This overlap turns policy into patronage, and governance into a tool for private gain. Earlier this year, the government allowed sugar exports even as domestic stocks were under pressure. Predictably, local prices soared. Then came the tax-free import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar; a move that drew criticism from the International Monetary Fund, which questioned both its timing and its lack of transparency. No one has explained who received import licences, under what conditions, or how the decision was justified while government revenues continue to bleed. What the country witnessed was a two-way windfall: profits made on the export side and further gains through duty-free imports. Also there is an issue of price collapse when the shipments arrive in November; around the time sugar mills will be buying from growers, giving them leverage to manipulate buying prices. Throughout all this, regulators have remained silent. The Competition Commission has issued no inquiry into possible cartelisation. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has not released any audits on sugar mill compliance or tax contribution. No action has been taken against mills for openly breaching their agreement with the government. When institutions with legal mandates refuse to act, the market ceases to be a marketplace. It becomes a racket. This isn't new. But it's become more brazen. The previous PTI-led government also faced sugar price hike in 2020. However, its response was markedly different. Then prime minister Imran Khan ordered a wide-ranging inquiry, involving the FIA, SECP, FBR, and other agencies. The investigation looked into hoarding, tax fraud, price manipulation, and the misuse of subsidies. Importantly, it didn't shy away from naming allies or investigating politically connected individuals within PTI itself like Jahangir Tareen. The inquiry report was published in full. While it triggered backlash, it also marked a rare moment where the state asserted its regulatory role over an entrenched industrial elite. The investigation was abandoned and charges dropped when the PTI government was removed. What we are seeing now is the opposite. Instead of confronting the sugar mafia, the current government has aligned itself with it. Instead of enforcing transparency, it has shielded its members from scrutiny. At every step, decisions have served the interests of the few at the expense of many. This has real human costs. Sugar is not just a luxury good. It is a daily essential for households and a critical input for small businesses. Rising sugar prices drive up food inflation, burden already stretched family budgets, and hurt bakeries, tea stalls, and street vendors across the country. When a government facilitates price spiral through weak enforcement and preferential trade decisions, it doesn't just fail the economy. It abandons its moral claim to serve the people. To fix this, Pakistan must first acknowledge that the sugar crisis is not a temporary market blip. It is a symptom of a deeper structural disease: the collusion between political elites and monopolistic interests. The solution begins with cutting these links. Public officeholders, and their immediate families, must be barred from owning or profiting from industries they are in a position to regulate. This principle is basic in any functioning democracy. Without it, policy becomes an instrument of personal enrichment, not public service. Next, regulatory institutions must be depoliticised and empowered. Agencies like the CCP, FBR, and SECP should have independent boards, professional leadership, and the authority to publish findings without seeking ministerial approval. If sugar mills are in violation of tax laws or pricing agreements, the public has a right to know. Trade policy must also be demystified. Export and import decisions, especially for essentials like sugar, should not be made behind closed doors. They must be based on evidence, presented in parliament, and subjected to public scrutiny. Import licences should be granted through open bidding, and their recipients disclosed proactively. In the digital age, there's no excuse for opacity. A transparent digital dashboard that tracks sugar from mills to wholesalers to retailers would make it harder for hoarders and profiteers to operate undetected. It would also empower consumers and watchdog groups with real-time data. Finally, subsidies and tax exemptions must be subjected to rigorous review. No tax waiver or import concession should be granted without a clear, documented public interest rationale. Otherwise, they will continue to be used as vehicles for elite enrichment. The sugar industry has become a symbol of how deeply elite capture runs in Pakistan. But it can also become a turning point. If the state can confront the sugar mafia – not with hollow deals but with real accountability – it can begin to rebuild public trust and economic fairness. If it cannot, the crisis will return. Prices may dip briefly, but the profiteering will continue. This is not just about sugar. It is about who the system is designed to serve and who it leaves behind. The writer is a graduate of the University of British Columbia