Election observers can view signature verification process, says Maricopa County Recorder
Changes are coming to Maricopa County voting law, starting with the May 2025 election.
Recorder Justin Heap says election observers will be allowed to view the signature verification process.
PHOENIX - Maricopa County recorder, Justin Heap, announced key changes to the signature verification process for voters on the Active Early Voter List.
Beginning with an election in May, no party identification or personal identifying data will be displayed on the signature verification screen.
The backstory
In the past, this wasn't allowed because of privacy concerns.
"Previously, voters were assured by election officials that no party or personally identifying data was available to signature verifiers," said Heap. "In my review of our election processes I have discovered this was not the case. Signature verification workers who scrolled down the page would still see this information on the scans of older ballots."
What they're saying
Heap says since the data will no longer be displayed, election observers will now be allowed to view the signature verification process and the change should increase trust in the final result.
"Removing that data will accomplish two important things: it brings bi-partisan observers back into the room to scrutinize the process and ensures that verifiers do not know the party affiliation of the voters whose signatures they are verifying," stated Heap. "This will be the first of many commonsense improvements we will be making to ensure that future elections in Maricopa County are run in a trustworthy, transparent, and efficient manner."
The Source
Maricopa County Recorder's office
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Without papers: Ghost lives of millions of Pakistanis
Ahmed Raza is invisible in the eyes of his government, unable to study or work because, like millions of other Pakistanis, he lacks identification papers. In the South Asian nation of more than 240 million people, parents generally wait until a child begins school at the age of five to obtain a birth certificate, which is required for enrolment in most parts of Pakistan. Raza slipped through the cracks until the end of elementary school, but when his middle school requested documentation, his mother had no choice but to withdraw him. "If I go looking for work, they ask for my ID card. Without it, they refuse to hire me," said the 19-year-old in the megacity of Karachi, the southern economic capital. He has already been arrested twice for failing to present identification cards when stopped by police at checkpoints. Raza's mother Maryam Suleman, who is also unregistered, said she "didn't understand the importance of having identity documents". "I had no idea I would face such difficulties later in life for not being registered," the 55-year-old widow told AFP from the single room she and Raza share. Pakistan launched biometric identification cards in 2000 and registration is increasingly required in all aspects of formal life, especially in cities. In 2021, the National Database and Registration Authority estimated that around 45 million people were not registered. They have declined to release updated figures or reply to AFP despites repeated requests. To register, Raza needs his mother's or uncle's documents -- an expensive and complex process at their age, often requiring a doctor, lawyer or a newspaper notice. The paperwork, he says, costs up to $165 -- a month and a half's income for the two of them, who earn a living doing housework and odd jobs in a grocery shop. Locals whisper that registration often requires bribes, and some suggest the black market offers a last resort. "Our lives could have been different if we had our identity cards," Raza said. - 'No time or money' - In remote Punjab villages like Rajanpur, UNICEF is trying to prevent people from falling into the same fate as Raza. They conduct door-to-door registration campaigns, warning parents that undocumented children face higher risks of child labour and forced marriage. Currently, 58 percent of children under five have no birth certificate, according to government figures. Registration fees depend on the province, ranging from free, $0.70 to $7 -- still a burden for many Pakistanis, about 45 percent of whom live in poverty. "Our men have no time or money to go to the council and miss a day's work," said Nazia Hussain, mother of two unregistered children. The "slow process" often requires multiple trips and there is "no means of transport for a single woman," she said. Saba, from the same village, is determined to register her three children, starting with convincing her in-laws of its value. "We don't want our children's future to be like our past. If children go to school, the future will be brighter," said Saba, who goes by just one name. Campaigns in the village have resulted in an increase of birth registration rates from 6.1 percent in 2018 to 17.7 percent in 2024, according to UNICEF. This will improve the futures of an entire generation, believes Zahida Manzoor, child protection officer at UNICEF, dispatched to the village. "If the state doesn't know that a child exists, it can't provide basic services," she said. "If a child does not have an identity, it means the state has not recognised their existence. The state is not planning for the services that the child will need after birth." Muhammad Haris and his brothers, who have few interactions with the formal state in their border village in the mountainous province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, have not registered any of their eight children. "The government asks for documents for the pilgrimage visa to Mecca," a journey typically made after saving for a lifetime, he told AFP. For him, this is the only reason worthy of registration. sam-jma-la-vid/sbh/ecl/lb/dhw Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
18 hours ago
- The Hill
ICE chief will continue to permit mask use by agents
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) acting Director Todd Lyons said agents can continue to use masks in the field, even as the agency has increasingly come under fire for moves that limit identification of its personnel. In an interview on CBS's 'Face the Nation' on Sunday, Lyons defended the practice despite some misgivings, citing rising threats against ICE agents. 'I've said it publicly before, I'm not a proponent of the masks. However, if that's a tool that the men and women of ICE to keep themselves and their family safe, then I will allow it,' he said. Lyons said some ICE agents have been 'severely doxxed,' while there has also been a sharp uptick in assaults on officers. ICE has faced significant criticism for wearing masks, as well as carrying out more operations with plainclothes officers. In Los Angeles, where ICE raids sparked widespread protests, Mayor Karen Bass (D) has condemned the practice, saying 'for the average citizen, it looks like it's a violent kidnapping.' Masked, plainclothes officers have also been conducting arrests at immigration courthouses. ICE attorneys will move to dismiss a case, a practice that most migrants interpret as the agency dropping efforts to deport them but opens the agency to then arrest them and place them in expedited removal proceedings that largely receive no court review. Lyons disputed that agents are not identifiable, saying they should be wearing clothing with some kind of ICE insignia. But he also said he wants more backing from critical lawmakers as ICE agents have faced doxxing. 'I would push back on the notion that we aren't identifying themselves. Now, what I would advocate for, and I've said this many times, is I know a lot of elected officials have put forward legislation or proposed legislation about banning of the masks, things like that. I would also want, you know, elected officials to help us hold those people accountable that do doxx or threaten an ICE officer or agent or their family,' Lyons said. 'If we had that kind of support and had those laws or regulations in place, that we can hold those folks accountable to give ICE agents and officers and other law enforcement officers the peace of mind that someone that does threaten their life or their families or doxxes them will be held accountable. I think that'd go a long way.' Reps. Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat, both New York Democrats, have introduced legislation that would ban ICE agents from using masks. 'If you uphold the peace of a democratic society, you should not be anonymous. DHS and ICE agents wearing masks and hiding identification echoes the tactics of secret police authoritarian regimes – and deviates from the practices of local law enforcement, which contributes to confusion in communities,' Espaillat said in a statement at the time. 'Many immigrants come to America seeking opportunities, hope, and freedom to escape Draconian practices, and under no circumstance should they, or anyone, fear being disappeared by masked and armed individuals in unmarked vehicles. If you are upholding the law, you should not be anonymous, and our bill aims to safeguard from tyranny while upholding the values of our nation.' Lyons also confirmed that ICE has been given access to Medicaid databases, a set that includes information like addresses of the limited number of non-U.S. citizens eligible for the program in some states. 'Under the last administration, we have so many known got-aways, or individuals that came into the United States and just totally disappeared off the grid. What ICE is doing is working with all of our other federal partners to try to gain intelligence, to locate these individuals that have been ordered deported by a judge or have been released from a sanctuary jurisdiction like we talked about,' he said. 'That is what ICE is using that data for, whether it be data from the Department of Labor, data from health and service- Health and Human Services, Medicaid, we are using that data to try to locate, again, the worst of the worst, those people that have been lawfully deported. So I think that's what you're going to see that data used for.'
Yahoo
11-07-2025
- Yahoo
Maine Supreme Judicial Court upholds language of voter ID referendum
Jul. 11—The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed on Friday that the language of an upcoming statewide referendum question on whether to require photo identification in order to vote does not need to change. A group campaigning in support of the referendum sued the Maine secretary of state this spring, arguing that the wording the office released in May is too confusing to understand and that it could mislead voters. The lawsuit also argued it was not written "in a clear, concise and direct manner." The ballot question reads: "Do you want to change Maine election laws to eliminate two days of absentee voting, prohibit requests for absentee ballots by phone or family members, end ongoing absentee voter status for seniors and people with disabilities, ban prepaid postage on absentee ballot return envelopes, limit the number of drop boxes, require voters to show certain photo ID before voting, and make other changes to our elections?" The referendum qualified for the November ballot in February. A Superior Court justice ruled last month that the wording did not need to change, and Maine's top court backed the ruling on Friday, stating "a ballot question is fatally misleading only if a voter would be led to vote contrary to the voter's intent." "Here, although the question is longer than most have been in the past, that is because it lists the salient features of the legislation in short, easily understood phrases," the recent ruling states. "The wording may be complex but it is not complicated." Secretary of State Shenna Bellows and other opponents of the referendum have criticized advocates for promoting the measure only as a voter ID mandate when it would also make it harder to vote absentee and make other changes to election laws that officials say would be difficult and expensive to implement. Supporters of the referendum, Voter ID for ME, claimed in a statement in May that the referendum wording misrepresents their proposal, saying it "buries the core intent" and that "it fails to meet the constitutional and statutory standards of clarity, accuracy and impartiality." "Because we conclude that the secretary's question is 'understandable to a reasonable voter reading the question for the first time and will not mislead a reasonable voter who understands the proposed legislation into voting contrary to that voter's wishes,' we affirm the judgment of the Superior court," the decision concludes. Copy the Story Link
