TD Cowen Sticks to Its Buy Rating for Altice Usa (ATUS)
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Williams covers the Communication Services sector, focusing on stocks such as AT&T, Charter Communications, and T Mobile US. According to TipRanks, Williams has an average return of -2.2% and a 45.81% success rate on recommended stocks.
In addition to TD Cowen, Altice Usa also received a Buy from Raymond James's Frank Louthan in a report issued on July 9. However, on July 2, Bank of America Securities maintained a Sell rating on Altice Usa (NYSE: ATUS).
Based on Altice Usa's latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $2.15 billion and a GAAP net loss of $75.68 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $2.25 billion and had a GAAP net loss of $21.19 million
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Circle Internet Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Stablecoins offer many of the benefits of crypto without the drastic price swings, making them strong candidates for broader financial adoption. Circle's USDC is the second most popular stablecoin on the market. Circle's revenue is highly dependent on factors completely outside of its control. 10 stocks we like better than Circle Internet Group › Since its initial public offering (IPO) last month, Circle Internet Group (NYSE: CRCL) stock has skyrocketed 140% as excitement builds around the possibility that stablecoins could see widespread adoption across traditional finance. Considering the company issues USDC (CRYPTO: USDC), one of the most popular stablecoins around, many investors believe Circle's stock is just getting started. So, could Circle Internet be a millionaire maker? Stablecoins are a class of cryptocurrencies designed to hold their value relative to a traditional "fiat" currency -- often the U.S. dollar. Where coins like Bitcoin and Dogecoin are subject to dramatic swings in price, stablecoins are intended to never deviate more than a small fraction of a percent from the currency they are "pegged" to. Though other crypto ventures have tried more complicated mechanisms, Circle maintains USDC's peg to the U.S. dollar by simply holding $1 in cash or short-term Treasury papers for every USDC it issues. Any USDC in circulation is redeemable at any time for $1 in cash. So what is the point? USDC and other stablecoins provide many of the benefits of certain cryptocurrencies -- transactions are fast, cheap, and nearly frictionless -- without the fear of wild price swings. Like cash, they're intended to be used, not hoarded. Despite the shiny technology exterior, Circle's revenue stream is simple. The company makes money through holding U.S. Treasuries. Circle, much like a bank, knows that only a fraction of all the USDC in circulation will be redeemed at any one time, so it only needs to keep a portion of reserves in cash to be instantaneously redeemable by USDC holders. It invests the rest in short-term U.S. Treasuries. That's still a relatively liquid asset, but one that earns Circle interest income. This is functionally the entirety of Circle's revenue source; of the $1.68 billion revenues the company collected in 2024, $1.66 billion was from reserve interest. So, to be clear, Circle's revenue is directly tied to two main factors: how many USDC are in circulation (and therefore the size of the reserves from which it is earning interest) and U.S. Treasury rates. There are currently 62.8 billion USDC in circulation. The company believes that it will grow significantly as adoption progresses throughout the wider economy. There's ample reason to believe that is true. The GENIUS Act, a landmark bill that creates a regulatory framework for stablecoins and allows for their use in the banking industry, is working its way through Congress. Though some of the finer details may change, it's more than likely it will be signed into law this year as it's one of the few pieces of legislation today that has robust bipartisan support. An analysis from Citi lays out a bear, base, and bull case for the stablecoin market through 2030. Its base case sees roughly $1.6 trillion stablecoins in circulation five years from now, up from today's 234 billion. There is clearly a massive potential here. It's also likely that USDC captures a significant portion of this total market. It's currently second only to Tether, but its rival wouldn't qualify under the GENIUS Act -- its reserve practices are somewhat opaque, and it uses volatile assets like Bitcoin as collateral. That puts USDC in a prime position. There are some key things to consider that complicate the issue, however. First, I think USDC could face significant competition not from Tether or other "crypto native" issuers, but from legacy institutions. It's been reported that some of the largest banks, like JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America, have been in talks to create their own stablecoins. This would undermine the core of USDC's growth thesis. Circle and USDC could even face an official U.S. dollar central bank digital currency (CBDC) issued by the Federal Reserve itself. Here's another thing to consider. Circle's revenue is directly tied to yields from U.S. Treasuries, which in turn are tied to the interest rate set by the Federal Reserve. We are in an environment of relatively high interest rates, at least in the context of recent history. If rates are cut, which they likely will be later this year, Circle's income will take a hit. According to an analysis by Sean Farrell, head of digital asset strategy at the firm Fundstrat, every 0.25% drop in the Fed's rate will equal a 10% drop in Circle's revenue. That's pretty significant. While I think stablecoin adoption will grow, I think investors are getting ahead of themselves. Right now, the stock is overvalued. I think that there are too many long-term risks and not enough of a moat to call Circle a millionaire-maker. Before you buy stock in Circle Internet Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Circle Internet Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Citigroup, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase are advertising partners of Motley Fool Money. Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bank of America, Bitcoin, and JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Circle Internet Stock a Millionaire Maker? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ford Says Its Quality Is Improving; Why Is This Number Going in the Wrong Direction?
Ford checked in just below industry average in J.D. Power's 2025 Initial Quality Study. The auto industry has gradually experienced more problems with new vehicles. Ford's quality improvement will take time to see as new vehicles replace old models. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › One of the big knocks against Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) over the past few years has been its recalls, and the sometimes higher warranty costs associated with them. When automakers such as Ford have a large recall, which sometimes requires customers to bring vehicles in for service, it can ring up a hefty bill on its financials. In the past, the warranty costs spiked enough to hinder the company's earnings. Ford's stance has been that it's made substantial improvements on quality, but if that's the case, why isn't it scoring better in J.D. Power's 2025 Initial Quality Study? Let's dig in. J.D. Power's Initial Quality Study (IQS) is in its 39th year and collects responses from over 90,000 customers of 2025 new vehicle models, who were then surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study's goal is to gauge how many problems per 100 vehicles, sorted by brand. It's a simple way to evaluate the quality of new vehicles, with the lower the score, the better. And this year's winner is, drum roll: Lexus (owned by Toyota)! Lexus was the highest-ranking brand overall in the study, with a score of 166 PP100. For premium brands, Lexus was followed by Jaguar and Genesis, with respective scores of 175 PP100 and 183 PP100. For mass-market brands, Nissan might have shocked a few investors in ranking highest, or scoring lowest, at 169 PP100. Hyundai and Chevrolet (part of General Motors) rounded out the top three for mass-market brands with scores of 173 PP100 and 178 PP100, respectively. Now, gathering all of a parent company's brands under their respective umbrellas -- for example, General Motors owns brands Cadillac, Chevrolet, Buick, and GMC -- the OEM with the most model-level awards was GM with five, followed by Ford with four, and Honda with three. Now let's take a closer look at Ford and see if we can extrapolate any IQS data for perhaps a preview of future issues and potential recalls. As you probably noted in the graphic, Ford checked in just below industry average. That's respectable and raises no red flags, but it's worth glancing through some history to better understand trends. Ford's score of 193 PP100 in 2025 was noticeably worse than last year's score of 178 PP100, which was good enough to rank in the top third of all brands. Taking it a little bit further, let's rewind the clock to 2020, when Ford scored an even better 174 PP100. In 2015, Ford scored a far better 107 PP100. This brings up an important question: Is Ford's vehicle quality really improving? And if it isn't, should investors expect rising warranty costs and hindered earnings? Not so fast! There are a couple of important factors to consider before jumping to conclusions regarding Ford's trending scores. First, the industry average has moved in similar a similar trend line. That's because over the past decade, vehicles have grown far more complex in terms of innovation, driver assistance systems, and infotainment services, among others. As those new technologies debut, rarely does it happen without initial problems that eventually get worked out over time. Second, we also have to consider the severity of these problems. J.D. Power noted that the infotainment category remains the most problematic vehicle category. In fact, half of the top problems industrywide remain infotainment issues. Another consumer issue: cupholder size. That's right, one of the biggest and most reoccurring complaints is that the size of cupholders often doesn't fit reusable containers. Ford won't miss earnings this quarter because of infotainment system or cupholder size recalls. The J.D. Power study scores aren't likely correlated to recalls, or accompanying warranty costs, because it's looking for initial problems within the first 90 days -- not a time frame there's likely to be a major repair/recall needed. Does this study have value? Absolutely. It's a wonderful resource to gauge consumer feedback on new vehicle models that will become the bloodline of automakers. But can we take Ford's worsening scores to mean that its vehicle quality isn't improving, at least the important things (looking at you, cupholders)? No, not in my opinion. It takes time for Ford's more recent push on quality to work through the process, and for newer cars to replace older, more problematic models. At the end of the day, while investors would love to see Ford improve year after year and even overtake Lexus at the top, these scores don't raise any real red flags when it comes to potential recalls or potential earnings hits. Before you buy stock in Ford Motor Company, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Ford Motor Company wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Ford Says Its Quality Is Improving; Why Is This Number Going in the Wrong Direction? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Sabra Healthcare REIT (SBRA) Receives a Buy from Bank of America Securities
In a report released on July 8, Jeffrey Spector from Bank of America Securities reiterated a Buy rating on Sabra Healthcare REIT, with a price target of $20.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at $18.46. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Spector covers the Real Estate sector, focusing on stocks such as Agree Realty, Cousins Properties, and Welltower. According to TipRanks, Spector has an average return of 3.2% and a 46.63% success rate on recommended stocks. The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for Sabra Healthcare REIT with a $19.67 average price target. The company has a one-year high of $20.03 and a one-year low of $15.60. Currently, Sabra Healthcare REIT has an average volume of 2.55M. Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 68 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is negative on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders selling their shares of SBRA in relation to earlier this year. Most recently, in May 2025, Michael J Foster, a Director at SBRA sold 11,000.00 shares for a total of $200,310.00.
