Universities and artists face funding threat under antisemitism plan being considered by Australian government
The federal Labor government has not committed to the plan in full, with prime minister Anthony Albanese saying he would consider the recommendations of his handpicked envoy Jillian Segal, which also propose her office would 'monitor' media coverage and bolster education in schools and workplaces.
But Albanese indicated he was open to parts of the plan, saying some components – which he wouldn't name at a launch event on Thursday – could be implemented quickly. Government sources expect some parts would be put into motion soon.
'There is no place in Australia for antisemitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we have seen on our streets recently is despicable and it won't be tolerated and I want those responsible to face the full force of the law,' Albanese said.
Segal's report claimed antisemitism is 'ingrained and normalised' in academia and cultural spaces, and said young Australians were being 'raised on a diet of disinformation and misinformation about Jews'.
Albanese said responding would require 'a long-term approach', including working with state governments and civil society. He denied the plan would see legitimate criticism of the Israeli government, including its military actions in Gaza and the deaths of thousands of Palestinian civilians, treated as antisemitism.
'I have released statements with other leaders that have been critical of the actions of the Netanyahu government … But you can put forward those views respectfully,' he said.
'Whatever your issue in the Middle East, it is not advanced by attacking people here in Australia because of who they are, because of their faith, because of their identity.'
The report recommended all levels of government adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism. However that definition is contested in some quarters, with some concerns it was increasingly being used to conflate antisemitism with criticism of Israel.
Segal had worked on the plan for around nine months, with some Jewish community leaders eager for the government to implement a more comprehensive package of structural changes, such as to education and policing, rather than simply putting more funds into security and CCTV. The plan, launched on Thursday with Albanese and home affairs minister Tony Burke, states that antisemitism erodes 'the very foundations of a thriving democracy' and 'poses a threat not just to Jewish Australians, but to our entire nation.'
'It addresses antisemitism in many places in our laws, classrooms, universities, media, workplaces, online spaces and public institutions,' Segal said of the plan.
With the report noting arson attacks at synagogues, and vandalism of Jewish schools or cultural sites, Segal said it was time to consider whether to strengthen hate crimes laws to better address incitement, vilification and 'the speaking of hatred'.
The report suggests strengthening federal and state legislation on antisemitic conduct, including vilification, and 'intimidating protest activity', as well as tougher screening of visa applicants for antisemitic views, with a focus on addressing visa refusals or cancellations.
Segal also wants to establish what she calls a 'report card' on universities' handling of antisemitism on campus, suggesting blocking government funding if they fail to act. Grants to universities, academics, and arts organisations could also be torn up, under the envoy's suggestions.
It also calls for boosting education of antisemitism in school curriculums, using 'trusted voices to publicly refute antisemitic views' on social media, and a plan to 'monitor media organisations… to avoid accepting false or distorted narratives'.
In an interview on Sky News, Segal wouldn't nominate examples of media coverage she felt breached that standard, but said Australian media outlets should represent the situation in the Middle East with 'fairness and balance'.
She also raised media coverage that could boost the 'vitality of Jewish life', suggesting media organisations produce 'additional stories about the Jewish community.
Government sources said they welcomed the report, and would now take time to consider its recommendations before giving a formal response and action plan.
The report claims research commissioned by the Special Envoy 'highlights a stark divide between Australians under 35 and those over 35' on attitudes toward the Jewish community and 'the existence of the state of Israel', claiming younger Australians were more likely to hold antisemitic views.
The envoy attributed this to differences in media consumption, noting 'generational differences in the understanding of the Holocaust and its impacts on society'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
School children with SEN or free school meals more likely to be excluded, according to DfE stats
Figures released by the Department For Education on Thursday show children with special educational needs (SEN) or with an Education, Health, and Care (EHC) plan are far more likely to be suspended or permanently excluded from school. Last year, more than 950,000 pupils were suspended from school, a 21% increase from the previous year. More than 10,000 pupils were excluded, a 16% increase from the year before. Combined, this equates to just over 11% of all pupils being suspended or permanently excluded from school at some point in their education. A breakdown of the figures shows the situation for SEN children or those on free school meals is far worse. As has been the case in previous years, they remain far more likely to be removed from school classes. According to the figures, children with SEN or an EHC plan are eight times more likely to be permanently excluded and seven times more likely to face suspension. Children eligible for free school meals are six and five times more likely to be excluded or suspended respectively. There were around one and a half more boys suspended from school than girls and more pupils from year nine were suspended than any other. While persistent disruptive behaviour remains the most common reason given for a pupil's suspension, all reasons bar "theft" have increased in prevalence since last year. If you can't view this table on your mobile device you can do so here. A school suspension is characterised as an exclusion from mainstream education for a fixed period of time. A permanent exclusion occurs either in response to a "serious or persistent breach of behaviour policy" or when it is deemed remaining in mainstream education could seriously harm the pupil or other's learning and welfare. Typically a permanent exclusion will result in alternative education provisions being provided, usually from the sixth school day (or earlier) of their suspension. Alternative provision includes pupil referral units, alternative provision academies, free schools, and hospital schools, as well as a variety of independent, registered, unregistered and further education. Early Education Minister, Stephen Morgan, blamed Labour's inheritance from the Conservatives for the rising number of school exclusions. 'Every moment in the classroom counts - but with almost one million suspensions in the 2023 academic year, the evidence is clear that this government's inheritance was classrooms in chaos, with swathes of the next generation cut off from the opportunity to get on in life," he said. He added Labour were investing in several initiatives aimed at easing the root causes of behaviour warranting exclusions, including mental health support, free breakfast clubs and "launching our new Attendance and Behaviour Hubs which will directly support the 500 schools that need the most help." 'We're also continuing to listen to parents as we reform the SEND system, while already putting in place better and earlier support for speech and language needs, ADHD and autism and £740 million to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools,' he said.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australian envoy's antisemitism plan criticised as ‘Trumpian' over concerns changes could be used to silence dissent
The antisemitism envoy's recommendations to remove funding from universities, charities and cultural bodies if they promote or fail to act against antisemitism have sparked concerns among academics and peak bodies that funding could be weaponised to censor opinion and silence dissent. Jillian Segal's 20-page plan, released on Thursday, made a series of sweeping recommendations, including launching a 'university report card' and withholding government funding from universities, cultural institutions and festivals that 'facilitate, enable or fail to act against antisemitism' – a move she later clarified was a 'last resort'. The powers would also allow public grants provided to university centres, academics or researchers to be terminated 'where the recipient engages in antisemitic or otherwise discriminatory or hateful speech or actions'. Peak Jewish groups backed the envoy's plan. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry 'strongly endorsed' the 'urgently needed' measures. The federal government has not committed to the plan in full, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, saying he 'wouldn't like to put a deadline on something' when asked by the media on Thursday if institutions could have funding withdrawn within the year. The Jewish Council of Australia's executive officer, Max Kaiser, said if the government did so it would function as a tactic that 'echoes the authoritarian playbook used by figures like Donald Trump – using funding as a weapon to enforce ideological conformity'. The Trump administration has successfully cut billions in funding to several universities – including Columbia, on the grounds it tolerated antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus – and warned dozens more that it is investigating them. 'Tying public funding to vague and politically loaded criteria and definitions is not only undemocratic, it's deeply dangerous,' Kaiser said. 'Threatening to impose surveillance, censorship or punitive funding measures fundamentally undermines the autonomy of universities, cultural organisations and charities. 'These are the very institutions that nurture critical thinking, creativity and democratic engagement – and they must remain free from political pressure and ideological control.' Universities Australia's CEO, Luke Sheehy, said the peak body had been 'working constructively' with the special envoy and welcomed the 'significant body of work', and would liaise with members to consider the recommendations. 'Academic freedom and freedom of expression are core to the university mission, but they must be exercised with responsibility and never as a cover for hate or harassment,' he said. The Group of Eight, representing Australia's research-intensive sandstone universities, said its members were 'determined to take all necessary actions to both respond to and prevent antisemitism on campus'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email But the president of the National Union of Students (NUS), Ashlyn Horton, described the plan as 'Trumpian', and a 'serious overreach' that undermined the independence of higher education institutions. 'It's authoritarian, not anti-racist,' she said. Dr Jordana Silverstein, a cultural historian at the University of Melbourne, said the plan was a 'clear attack' on university education and research, including the Australian Research Council (ARC), while Daniel Angus, a professor of digital communication at Queensland University of Technology, said the report set a 'dangerous precedent' by 'threatening academic independence and informed and open debate'. Angus, who has researched hate speech and misinformation for decades, said antisemitism must be taken seriously but that the strategy released on Thursday 'risks collapsing legitimate political critique, especially that of the state of Israel, into hate speech'. Segal's plan appeared to take aim at the media and the ABC, and said the envoy would 'monitor media organisations to … avoid accepting false or distorted narratives'. 'Publicly funded media organisations should be required to uphold clear editorial standards that promote fair, responsible reporting to avoid perpetuating incorrect or distorted narratives or representations of Jews,' the plan said. A spokesperson for the ABC said it had a 'strong and transparent system of self-regulation' and 'a transparent complaint system available to audiences through an independent ombudsman.' The plan would also remove the deductible gift recipient status from any charitable institution that 'promotes speakers or engages in conduct that promotes antisemitism', and enable funding to be stopped for any cultural institution or festival that 'promotes, facilitates or does not deal effectively with hate or antisemitism'. The CEO of the Community Council for Australia (CCA), David Crosbie, said he had seen 'no evidence' that the legislative change was necessary or would add anything to existing charity provisions. Crosbie said it was difficult to think of any charity that could be seen to be pursuing its purpose by promoting antisemitism, or any form of racist or religious discrimination. 'Existing accountability and reporting requirements of charities are strong enough … to investigate and remove the charitable status of any charity involved in what would amount to promotion of unlawful and violent behaviour,' he said. 'I should also note that peaceful protest is at the heart of our democracy … We need to be careful that we are not silencing dissent for the sake of silencing dissent.' Prof Jo Caust, a principal fellow at the University of Melbourne's school of culture and communication, said it would be a 'disaster' for Australia to go down the path of the US on questions of censorship, adding that it all depended on how the plan was interpreted and actioned. 'It certainly will put pressure on cultural institutions in a way that may be very difficult for them to address,' she said. 'When there's not very clear guidelines of where the lines are, then the risk is self censorship … reconsidering certain artists or certain ideas. The most challenging thing is that it might make organisations much more risk averse.' A spokesperson for Creative Australia said it would 'work constructively with all government stakeholders', adding it was already a condition of its funding that recipients complied with all applicable anti-discrimination laws.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump's copper tariffs won't lift US output, will boost costs
LAUNCESTON, Australia, July 10 (Reuters) - The planned 50% tariff on copper imports may turn out to be the biggest own goal of U.S. President Donald Trump's ongoing trade war with the rest of the world. Trump announced the tariff on Wednesday, saying it would become effective on August 1. While Trump seemed quite definitive in his statement, there is a lack of detail of what products will be included in the definition of copper, and whether there is scope for exemptions or lower rates for some major suppliers to the United States, such as Chile and Canada. But even if some concessions are made before the implementation date, the end result is likely to be that copper imports are slugged with a considerably higher tariff than what prevailed prior to Trump's return to power in January. As with Trump's other tariffs the motivation behind the tariffs on copper is to encourage more domestic mining and smelting of the industrial metal, which is key to making electric vehicles, military hardware, semiconductors and a wide range of consumer goods. The problem for Trump's somewhat naive economic vision is that the reality of the U.S. copper market is that it will be extremely difficult to get a meaningful boost to copper mining and processing in both the short and long terms. The United States produces just over half of its annual copper requirements, and its imports of refined metal were 810,000 metric tons in 2024. It's possible that copper miners such as Freeport McMoRan and Rio Tinto ( opens new tab could run their existing mines harder and lift output, but that would only provide a short-term lift in ore supply and would unlikely be sustainable. Importing copper ore and refining it is also unlikely, as it would take time and money to re-commission idle smelter capacity, with the only viable candidate being the Grupo Mexico-owned Asarco plant in Hayden, Arizona, which has been mothballed for more than four years. There are new mines in the planning stage, with the most significant being Rio's Resolution Copper in Arizona, which has been delayed by legal challenges by the indigenous Apache people. A Supreme Court ruling in May in favour of Rio and its partner in Resolution BHP Group ( opens new tab, would appear to clear the way for the mine's development, but even if this is fast-tracked it will still take several years before first production. In the meantime, the United States is going to be reliant on copper imports, meaning that buyers of the metal have limited choices. They can either pay the tariff or lower copper consumption by producing less of whatever they are making. This means that car makers, home builders and electronics manufacturers will likely face higher costs, as domestic copper prices will rise to match the level of imported metal. How those costs get absorbed or passed on will depend on the market power of the companies involved, but the overall impact is likely to be higher inflation if costs are passed to consumers, or lower investment and employment if companies do what Trump has suggested and "eat the tariffs." The impact of the tariffs will also affect copper pricing and movements around the globe, both in the short and long terms. The United States has sucked in vast quantities of copper so far in 2025, with analysts at Macquarie estimating imports totalled 881,000 tons in the first half of this year compared to an underlying requirement of roughly 441,000 tons. This means that once the tariff is implemented U.S. imports are likely to plunge as the stockpiled, and cheaper, metal is used up. This is likely to drag global copper prices lower, reversing a trend of rising prices since Trump's return to the White House. Benchmark London copper contracts ended at $9,630.50 a ton on Wednesday, up almost 10% since the end of last year. U.S. copper contracts rose to a 26% premium over their London equivalent on Wednesday from a 13% premium before Trump's announcement. That 26% premium is still well short of the 50% tariff, likely indicating the uncertainty in the market as to what types of copper products will be subject to tariffs or the risk of a lower rate for some countries. But once clarity is reached on the final form of the copper tariff, and once the existing stockpile is used up, it's likely that U.S. prices will rise to a premium that reflects the tariff level. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
