
How the war in the Middle East could see airfares soar
Never one to mince his words, the US president had a withering response to Monday night's Iranian missile assault on Qatar – 'a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered.' But while Tehran may have failed to land a punch this time around, could their actions end up having negative consequences for your next holiday?
If you were planning on a summer break in lovely Tel Aviv, you probably already know the answer to that. But the bigger question for the aviation sector is likely to be what the conflict means for fuel prices – and by extension the price of our plane tickets.
According to former British Airways boss Willie Walsh – now head of the global airline industry body, IATA – there is a 'direct correlation' between the price of oil and the cost of our flight tickets. Indeed, Mr Walsh told journalists earlier this month that falling oil costs (at least at the time) could soon see airlines reducing their prices in order to stimulate demand this summer.
Of course, that was before the events in the Middle East, when an unexpected Israeli attack on Iranian military targets saw the oil price jump some 8 per cent. Since then, markets have been rushing to process the rapidly developing situation, as the Trump administration has gone from launching its own attack on Tehran to later declaring an official ceasefire between the warring parties.
What happens next is anyone's guess. Though City forecasts have been clear that escalation will be bad news for those betting on oil prices. Analysts at Goldman Sachs say that any Iranian action to blockade the Straits of Hormuz – the narrow strip of water through which 20 per cent of oil supply flows – could send prices spiking to the levels not seen since the immediate wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
'A 10 or 20 per cent rise in the jet fuel price is going to have a big impact on airlines,' says John Gradek, an aviation management expert at Montreal's McGill University. Indeed, the IATA estimates that the global aviation sector spends around one third of its entire revenues on jet fuel, making it the single biggest variable for the industry.
Bad news, then, that the jet fuel spot price is currently trading 10 per cent higher than before those first Israeli missiles ten days ago. At the same time, though, short-term energy price spikes aren't exactly unprecedented these days and most airlines will have planned for these kinds of scenarios.
Hedging your bets
One of the most common ways that airlines can prepare for price volatility is to 'hedge' their exposure to the markets by locking in a price well in advance. Given that markets can be volatile, the tactic isn't entirely risk-free – and it also requires airlines to have enough cash to spend it up front – but it can help airlines avoid paying over the odds in times of strife.
'Hedging is there to provide budget certainty for airlines,' says Chris Tarry, founder of aviation consultancy CTAIRA. He points to the example of Ryanair, which recently reported that it had taken advantage of the dip in oil prices in the spring in order to lock in much of its fuel needs for the next three years – a move that now looks very shrewd in the circumstances.
This kind of financial planning is one of the reasons why previous fuel price spikes (like the one after Russia's invasion of Ukraine) haven't resulted in the kind of system shock that we saw back in the 1970s. Back then, airlines had no way of avoiding the 400 per cent jump in oil prices, resulting in carriers having to ground their planes or absorb heavy losses.
Of course, the longer the higher prices endure, the more problems it will cause for airlines. Right now, markets seem satisfied by the Trump administration's conciliatory tone around a ceasefire – though history shows that things can change quickly. As for whether sustained price pressures would necessarily mean more expensive flights, the jury is still out.
On one hand, we know that plenty of airlines have taken that step in the past. Back in 2022, full-service carriers like Emirates, AirAsia and Japan Airlines responded to higher fuel prices post-Ukraine invasion by adding a temporary surcharge (around 10 per cent) on all passenger bookings.
Then again, the aviation market remains highly price-sensitive and analysts say that airlines have other ways of mitigating the hit that don't risk losing customers. 'There are lots of things airlines can do in that situation,' says John Gradek. 'Rather than increasing ticket prices, you might see airlines delaying the launch of new routes or reducing services.'
Airspace headaches
Then there's the other big question posed by the conflict: what happens when it is no longer too safe to fly over parts of the Middle East? Right now, we've seen flights being directed away from Iran and over Saudi Arabia – something that Lufthansa says has added one hour to its Europe-to-Asia flights – but that isn't without consequences for the industry.
'Even a slight rerouting can be an issue for the bottom line,' says Chris Tarry. The longer that planes have to spend in the sky, the more fuel they are using, without any additional revenue to make up the difference. What's more, delayed arrival times also cause issues with turnaround, the all-important process of getting planes ready to depart again.
All things considered, then, airline bosses will have even more reason to keep their eyes on how events develop in the coming weeks and whether that much-vaunted ceasefire can hold. And at least they can rest assured that they have a powerful ally on that particular front.
'Everyone, keep oil prices down. I'm watching!' posted Donald Trump on his social media platform on Monday. If you're planning on taking a long-haul flight this autumn, you might want to hope that he gets his way.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Warren Buffett gives away staggering $6 BILLION
Billionaire Warren Buffett announced that he'll be giving away an additional $6 billion of his company's stock to five different charities, one of which is run by Bill Gates. Buffett, still worth $152 billion, is donating upwards of 12 million shares of Berkshire Hathaway stock to the Gates Foundation and four other foundations controlled by his wife and three children. This marks his biggest charitable contribution since 2006, when he pledged he'd give away the bulk of his fortune before he died. The 94-year-old investor is giving 9.43 million Berkshire Hathaway shares to the Gates Foundation. Another 943,384 shares are being directed to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, the organization named for his wife, who died in 2004. Finally, another 660,366 shares will sent to each of the three charities led respectively by his children Howard, Susie, and Peter: the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, Sherwood Foundation and NoVo Foundation. The donations will be officially made on Monday. Buffett converted 8,239 class A shares - each worth a staggering $730,000 - into 12,358,500 class B shares. The vast majority of those newly created class B shares - worth about $485 apiece - were donated to the five foundations Buffett has been consistently donating to for decades.


Reuters
33 minutes ago
- Reuters
G7 strikes deal to shield US multinationals from higher global taxes, FT reports
June 28 (Reuters) - The G7 has reached an agreement that would exempt U.S. multinational companies from paying more corporate tax overseas, the Financial Times reported on Saturday, citing people familiar with the discussions. The deal, backed by Washington and other G7 members, would allow U.S. companies to avoid certain overseas taxes due to levies already paid in the United States, the report said.


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
PETER HITCHENS: Donald Trump's attack on Iran was lawless and we'll all regret it soon enough. But it was his actions afterwards that everyone has missed
Donald Trump 's allies are more afraid of him than his enemies are. There are plenty of examples in Washington DC of former critics who now serve at his court, so crushed that they would clean his shoes for him in public if asked. Last week he treated the US constitution like a used paper bag, making a lawless attack on Iran which he was specifically not allowed to do by an overwhelming resolution of Congress, passed when that body still had some guts, in 1973.