Exclusive: US-backed aid group proposed 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' for Palestinians in Gaza
The $2 billion plan, created sometime after February 11 for the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, was submitted to the Trump administration and recently discussed in the White House, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The plan, reviewed by Reuters, describes the camps as "large-scale" and "voluntary" places where the Gazan population could 'temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so.'
The Washington Post made a reference to GHF plans to build housing compounds, opens new tab for Palestinian non-combatants in May.
A slide deck seen by Reuters goes into granular detail on the "Humanitarian Transit Zones," including how they would be implemented and what they would cost.
It calls for using the sprawling facilities to "gain trust with the local population" and to facilitate U.S. President Donald Trump's "vision for Gaza."
Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, who submitted it, or whether it is still under consideration.
The aid group, responding to questions from Reuters, denied that it had submitted a proposal and said the slides "are not a GHF document." GHF said it had studied "a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza," but that it "is not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs)."
Rather, the organization said it is solely focused on food distribution in Gaza.
A spokesperson for SRS, a for-profit contracting company that works with GHF, told Reuters "we have had no discussions with GHF about HTAs, and our 'next phase' is feeding more people. Any suggestion otherwise is entirely false and misrepresents the scope of our operations."
The document included the GHF name on the cover and SRS on several slides.
On February 4 Trump first publicly said that the U.S. should "take over" the war-battered enclave and rebuild it as "the Riviera of the Middle East" after resettling the population of 2.3 million Palestinians elsewhere.
Trump's comments angered many Palestinians and humanitarian groups about the possible forced relocation from Gaza. Even if the GHF proposal is no longer under consideration, the idea of moving a large portion of the population into camps will only deepen such worries, several humanitarian experts told Reuters.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
The proposal was laid out in a slide presentation that a source said was submitted to the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem earlier this year.
The U.S. State Department declined to comment. A senior administration official said, "nothing of the like is under consideration. Also, no resources are being directed to that end in any way."
The source working on the project said that it had not moved forward due to a lack of funds. Reuters previously reported that GHF had attempted to set up a Swiss bank account from which to solicit donations, but UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to work with the organization.
The Israeli Embassy in the U.S. did not respond to a request for comment.
Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Hamas-run Gaza government media office, to told Reuters it "categorically" rejects the GHF, calling it "not a relief organization but rather an intelligence and security tool affiliated with the Israeli occupation, operating under a false humanitarian guise."
The undated slide presentation, which includes photos dated February 11, said that the GHF is "working to secure" over $2 billion for the project, to "build, secure and oversee large-scale Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs) inside and potentially outside Gaza strip for the population to reside while Gaza is demilitarized and rebuilt."
The Humanitarian Transit Areas described in the slides would be the next phase in an operation that began with GHF opening food distribution sites in the enclave in late May, according to two sources involved in the project.
GHF coordinates with the Israeli military and uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get food aid into Gaza. It is favored by the Trump Administration and Israel to carry out humanitarian efforts in Gaza as opposed to the U.N.-led system which it says let militants divert aid.
Hamas denies this and says Israel is using hunger as a weapon.
In June U.S. State Department approved $30 million in funding for the GHF and called on other countries to also support the group.
The United Nations has called GHF's operation "inherently unsafe" and a violation of humanitarian impartiality rules. The U.N. human rights office says it has recorded at least 613 killings at GHF aid points and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups including the U.N.
One slide outlining a timeline said a camp would be operational within 90 days of the launch of the project and that it would house 2,160 people, along with a laundry, restrooms, showers and a school.
A source working on the project said that the slide deck is part of a planning process that began last year and envisions a total of eight camps, each one capable of sheltering hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.
The proposal did not specify how the Palestinians would be relocated into the camps, or where the camps could be built outside Gaza, but a map shows arrows pointing to Egypt and Cyprus as well as other points labeled "Additional Destination?"
GHF would 'oversee and regulate all civil activities required for construction, deradicalization and temporary voluntary relocation,' the proposal said.
Responding to questions from Reuters, three humanitarian experts expressed alarm over details of the plan to build camps.
'There is no such thing as voluntary displacement amongst a population that has been under constant bombardment for nearly two years and has been cut off from essential aid,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, president of the Refugees International advocacy group and a former senior U.S. Agency for International Development official who reviewed the plan.
The source who worked on planning for the camps told Reuters that the intent "is to take the fear factor away," enabling Palestinians to "escape control of Hamas" and providing them "a safe area to house their families."
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, caused a hunger crisis, and displaced nearly Gaza's entire population internally.
(This story has corrected to say 'Humanitarian,' not 'Human,' in the headline)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Israel's ‘humanitarian city' plan paves way for Trump's Gaza Riviera
One by one, displaced Gazans would pass through security checkpoints where they would be searched for weapons or signs of links to Hamas before being allowed into a new 'humanitarian city' built on ruins. Once inside, they would not be allowed to leave unless they want to follow a Trump-approved 'emigration plan' to start the mass deportation out of the Strip. That is the latest plan proposed by one of Israel's hard-line leaders, the foreign minister Israel Katz. Critics say it would amount to ethnic cleansing. Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, described Mr Katz's plan as 'a crime against humanity'. 'It is nothing less than that,' he said. 'It is all about population transfer to the southern tip of the Gaza Strip in preparation for deportation outside the strip.' About 600,000 people, mostly those who are already displaced, would be moved in the initial phase, followed by the rest of the roughly two-million-strong population. The hawkish Mr Katz, an ally of Benjamin Netanyahu's, presented the scheme on Monday as part of the overall mission to finally defeat Hamas. It is difficult to know with any certainty what such an unprecedented undertaking would look like in practice. One analyst said Mr Katz had, in effect, just ordered the construction of the largest tented area in the world. However, clues can arguably be found in the ongoing initiative to feed civilians via a US backed firm, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), not least because some of its purpose-built distribution sites are in and around Rafah. According to eyewitness reports and some videos that have emerged, civilians are forced to walk for miles through a militarised wasteland where nearly all the buildings have been destroyed by the bombs or bulldozers of the IDF. They are typically corralled between large man-made berms of earth or high metal fences fringed with barbed wire while they wait for ID checks. Hundreds of civilians have been killed in mass-shootings near the sites, with Palestinians accusing Israeli troops. The IDF blames Hamas for deliberately sowing chaos. Mr Katz's comments have prompted alarm not only because of the added suffering it could inflict on ordinary Gazans, but because, some fear, the plan will be used to facilitate the forced displacement of the population. In other words, the highly controversial vision for Gaza as announced by Donald Trump in February. According to the president's so-called Middle East 'Riviera' idea the population would be moved in order to redevelop the Strip into a richman's paradise resembling Las Vegas or Dubai. In more recent months, particularly as he visited Arab leaders in the Gulf, Mr Trump had gone noticeably quiet on this topic. This led commentators to conclude that he had never meant it seriously, but instead used the provocative idea to force the Middle East into coming up with its own plan for post-war Gaza. However, during Mr Netanyahu's visit to the White House this week, the spectre of a 'Trump Gaza' has, arguably, re-emerged. One Israeli official in Washington was reported as saying that Mr Trump was still keen on the idea (although the president dodged the question at a press conference). Mr Netanyahu himself praised the president's 'brilliant vision' and said Israel was close to agreements with third countries to receive Gazan civilians. The prime minister was clear, as he has been since February, to frame the idea as a one of voluntary relocation. 'If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave,' he told reporters, fresh from having handed Mr Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. 'It shouldn't be a prison,' Mr Netanyahu continued. 'It should be an open place, and give people a free choice.' Human rights organisations say life is now so grim for Gazans civilians that, if even a half-safe third country was prepared to take them, they would have to agree to go. In other words, in practical terms, there would be nothing voluntary about it. That is the main reason why Mr Katz's plan for a so-called humanitarian city has caused such a stir. Often the most bellicose in Mr Netanyahu's Right-wing cabinet when it comes to the subject of Palestinians, he has consistently been the biggest cheerleader for the idea of relocation, other than the ultra-nationalist coalition partners. As defence minister, he previously ordered officials to prepare a mechanism to allow Gazans to resettle elsewhere. It is no coincidence that the subject of population transfer has re-emerged as formal talks continue with Hamas on a ceasefire and hostage release deal. It does Israel no harm to posit an extreme scenario for what might happen to the enclave if Hamas does not play ball. Although Mr Katz spoke of forcing civilians to the south in the context of a 60-day deal, Hamas will have several potent reasons to reject the proposal. The terror group thrives when surrounded by ordinary civilians – it is their preferred means of fighting. The Katz proposal would also cut them off entirely from incoming aid, emptying their already drained coffers and allowing the IDF to effectively starve them out over months. The humanitarian city would be run by international organisations, Mr Katz said, but did not specify which ones. Finally, their self-styled status as the Palestinian people's legitimate arm of resistance risks being trashed if they consented to rendering the entire population refugees within their own land, let alone – potentially – outside it. However, some analysts believe that Hamas, ground down by the relentless IDF assault, is gasping for a ceasefire and may show some flexibility on these points. An official close to the talks in Qatar said that while agreement had not yet been reached, the 'gaps are small'. If the multiple recent leaks from Israel's security cabinet in the last couple of weeks are to be relied on, the army's leadership is extremely sceptical of any plan that involves their long-term presence in Gaza as a governing power. The Israeli chief of staff, major-general Eyal Zamir, is said to have told ministers that his troops have gone as far as they can go without putting the remaining hostages – 20 are thought to be alive – at grave risk. It would take three brigades at least to secure Mr Katz's proposed 'humanitarian city'. To whatever extent Hamas has been causing unrest at the aid distribution sites, Israeli troops have a tendency to react aggressively when Palestinians come close. Having to police the entire population in a relatively small area raises the risk of further mass shootings and international outrage. Despite the potential for a deal in the coming days, or further down the line, it is clear that for the ultra-nationalists in Mr Netanyahu's government, and indeed others on the Right, population transfer in Gaza is not just a bargaining chip, but a goal. Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and Itamar Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, are enthusiastically behind it, and can bring down Mr Netanyahu's coalition if they choose. On Monday it was reported that a $2 billion (£1.5 billion) plan to create 'humanitarian transit areas' inside – and possibly outside Gaza – were already presented to the White House, possibly months ago. According to Reuters, the proposal bore the name of GHF, although the group denies any involvement. Either way, there are powerful forces who want this to happen.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Macron brands Brexit 'regrettable' but says UK and Europe united against threats
French President Emmanuel Macron was invited to give a speech to MPs and peers during his state visit, who gathered in the packed-out Royal Gallery in Parliament French President Emmanuel Macron has said Brexit was "deeply regrettable" but quitting the bloc doesn't mean Britain has left Europe. In an address to Parliament on the first day of a lavish state visit, he warned the peaceful world order is being "attacked on a daily basis" and the UK and France were united in facing down these threats. Mr Macron was invited to give a speech to MPs and peers, who gathered in the packed-out Royal Gallery. To laughter, he joked: "We love monarchy, especially when it's not at home." His address turned sombre as he said France would never forget Britain's support during the First and Second World Wars, and praised Sir Winston Churchill's vision in building a post-war order. But he said this vision of "a world order based on law, justice and respect for territorial integrity" was "today being attacked on a daily basis as we witness direct attacks on our democracies, the return of war on our continent, the resurgence of imperial impulses and the flouting of international rules by destabilising powers". He warned that "every time Vladimir Putin's Russia advances in Ukraine, the threat moves closer to us all". But he vowed: "Europeans will never abandon Ukraine, never." Mr Macron also called for a ceasefire in Gaza without conditions, and urged Hamas to release all the hostages it has held since the October 7 attacks. The French President also put pressure on the UK to recognise a Palestinian state, saying it was the only way to peace. He also pointed to the "burden" on both Britain and France from the small boats crisis and promised there would be tangible results to end the vile trade of people smugglers trafficking desperate people across the Channel. Brexit was "deeply regrettable", he said, but he said he respected the UK's decision to leave the European Union. He said it had taken a few years but both sides have agreed to the basis of a new relationship - and praised Mr Starmer's efforts to build closer ties. Heads of state and visiting dignitaries are occasionally invited to address Parliament, with US Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, as well as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, previously speaking to MPs and peers in this room. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky gave a speech in Westminster Hall in 2023, where he urged Britain to give him "wings for freedom" to counter Russian aggression. The choice of venue for Mr Macron's speech raised eyebrows as the grand setting features large murals of the Battle of Trafalgar and the Battle of Waterloo, two great 19th century military defeats for the French at the hands of the British and their allies. Passing peers told journalists that a previous French president requested the murals were covered during a past state visit. Some claimed it was Charles de Gaulle, others insisted it was Jacques Chirac. Mr Macron's state visit is the first by a French President in 17 years, when Nicolas Sarkozy was a guest of the late Queen Elizabeth. The French President and his wife Brigitte were greeted by the Prince and Princess of Wales when they arrived at RAF Northolt this morning before travelling to Windsor Castle to join the King and Queen for lunch. He also visited Westminster Abbey, where he laid a wreath at the tomb of the Unknown Warrior, and then travelled the short distance to Parliament. Mr Macron's visit to Britain comes comes amid talks between the UK and France on a deal to stem the flow of small boats crossing the Channel. Negotiations are expected to go down to the wire over a so-called "one in, one out" deal to allow the UK to send Channel migrants back to France in return for allowing asylum seekers from Europe with a legitimate claim to join relatives in Britain. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister hailed investment by French energy giant EDF in the Sizewell C nuclear plant as "a vote of confidence in the UK as an investment destination". However the company appears to be reducing its stake for 16.2% to 12.5%.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
New Israeli report says Hamas used sexual violence as a 'weapon of war' in Oct. 7 attack
Newly released interviews and documentation further bolster evidence that Hamas systematically used sexual violence as a weapon of war during its Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack, according to a report by a group of Israeli gender and law experts unveiled Tuesday. The report, titled "A Quest for Justice," was published by the Dinah Project, a legal research initiative led by law professor and women's rights activist Ruth Halperin-Kaddari of Tel Aviv's Bar-Ilan University, Sharon Zagagi-Pinhas, a lawyer and the former chief military prosecutor at the Israel Defence Forces, and Nava Ben-Or, a former judge and deputy attorney general. Partly funded by the British government and Jewish non-profit organizations, the report contains previously unheard testimony from 15 returned hostages from Gaza, along with a rape survivor from the Nova music festival, one of at least six different locations where Hamas carried out its attacks. It also includes eyewitness testimony from at least 17 different incidents of sexual assault, as well as accounts from first responders, forensic evidence, and audio and visual documentation. The issue of sexual assault and rape during the Oct. 7 attacks is highly emotive and charged, with some in Israel accusing United Nations observers of betraying survivors by downplaying the issue. Meanwhile, some international observers, including a U.N. official appointed to investigate, say that while there is evidence of cases where rape and sexual assault took place, it does not point to those incidents having been systematic or directed by militant leaders. Hamas has denied its militants committed sexual crimes on Oct. 7, 2023. The report states that clear patterns emerged of sexual violence being perpetrated, including victims who were found 'partially or fully naked with their hands tied, often to structures like trees or poles; evidence of gang rapes followed by execution; genital mutilation; and public humiliation.' The details add to and corroborate past reporting on sexual violence that took place during the attacks. The sexual violence "continued in captivity, with many returnees reporting forced nudity, physical and verbal sexual harassment, sexual assaults and threats of forced marriage,' the report adds. The victims also include two returned male hostages who were released in January and February after being held captive for about 500 days, where they were subjected to "sexual humiliation, which included forced nudity and physical abuse when naked," according to the report. In light of the testimonies, the report aims to have the sexual violence acknowledged as crimes against humanity and to hold the perpetrators accountable. Notably, it calls on the U.N. to send a fact-finding mission and blacklist Hamas as a group. 'We hence call upon the U.N. Secretary-General to blacklist Hamas as an organization responsible for the tactical use of sexual violence as a weapon of war,' it states. Reem Alsalem, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, said in a statement that she and fellow rapporteurs and experts emphasized that reports of such violence needed to be independently verified and investigated and perpetrators be held accountable. She added that the U.N. special commission appointed to investigate "found patterns indicative of sexual violence against Israeli women at different locations. The Commission was also unable to independently verify specific allegations of sexual and gender-based violence due to Israel's obstruction of its investigations." "It is my understanding that neither the Commission nor any other independent human rights mechanism established that sexual or gender-based violence was committed against Israelis on or since the 7th of October as a systematic tool of war or as a tool of genocide," Alsalem wrote in the statement. The Dinah Project report's findings follow previously published reports by the U.N. and the International Criminal Court on sexual violence and gang rape during the attack. In March 2024, a report compiled by Pramila Patten, the U.N. Special Representative on sexual violence in conflict, stated that it had found 'reasonable grounds' to believe some victims of the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7 were raped and sexually assaulted. There was 'clear and convincing' information that some of those taken captive were subjected to sexual violence, the U.N. team of experts said in their report, including rape and sexualized torture — violence it said 'may be ongoing.' In December 2023, NBC News published a separate report which reviewed evidence suggesting that dozens of Israeli women were raped, sexually abused or mutilated during the Oct. 7 attack, where more than 1,200 people were killed in Israel. Since then, Israel's ongoing military offensive in Gaza has killed more than 56,000 people and seriously injured thousands more, according to health officials in the enclave. It also comes after a U.N.-backed body, the Human Rights Council, released an extensive report in March this year which accused Israel of 'the systematic use of sexual, reproductive and other gender-based violence' in the Gaza Strip. The report by the found that the widespread destruction of Gaza, the use of heavy explosives in civilian areas, and Israeli attacks on hospitals and health facilities had led to 'disproportionate violence against women and children.'
