logo
No ‘Gray' Area in New York Times' AI Deal with Amazon

No ‘Gray' Area in New York Times' AI Deal with Amazon

Yahoo02-06-2025

Spoiler alert: The answer to today's Wordle is B-E-Z-O-S.
In a first-of-its-kind deal for the historic paper of record, The New York Times last week inked a deal to license its vast editorial library for use in Amazon's various AI platforms. The agreement comes as the Gray Lady sues OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement, one of the major legal battles in the AI-spawned era of copyright war.
READ ALSO: Luxury Brands Sweat Consumer Discounting After Price Hikes and Can US Tourism Bounce Back Amid Trade War?
Under the licensing deal (financial terms still undisclosed), Jeff Bezos' e-commerce/cloud computing/digital media giant can showcase NYT news articles, recipes, and other material across its consumer-facing AI programs — Alexa will now tell you all about Alison Roman's chickpea coconut stew. It's a first for the NYT but hardly for the rest of the industry. Condé Nast, The Atlantic, Axel Springer, the Associated Press, and the Bezos-owned Washington Post have all struck similar licensing agreements with OpenAI. In a situation similar to the NYT's, with one of the same players, News Corp is concurrently suing Perplexity AI over copyright-infringement claims and licensing its content to OpenAI.
Translation: If you want your chatbots to train on and feature these companies' content, pay up. But just how much is news content worth to the AI industry? Depends on whom you ask:
According to The Information, OpenAI offers publishers as little as $1 million to $5 million annually to license their content. In late 2023, the NYT reported that Apple was offering $50 million multiyear deals to license news content for AI model training.
That's small potatoes compared with the 'billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages' the NYT is claiming in its suit against OpenAI. In that case, the NYT is essentially claiming that OpenAI and Microsoft unlawfully used copyrighted material to train its chatbots, which sometimes appeared to respond with content copy-pasted right from the NYT, siphoning away valuable clicks and subscriptions from the NYT itself while helping OpenAI grow into one of the most valuable private companies in the world.
Fair Use It or Lose It: AI firms tend to argue that their models are trained on publicly available data — 'fair use' under copyright law. Whether the law agrees or not is still being sorted out, though it seems clear the AI industry sees its existence hinging on courts agreeing with its interpretation. In the UK, a coterie of high-profile performing artists, including Elton John, Dua Lipa, and Ian McKellan, are pushing for a law that would require artists to opt-in to their works being used to train AI models. Last week, former Deputy Prime Minister and ex-Meta executive Nick Clegg told British outlet The Times that passing such a law in the UK, while other countries do not, 'would basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight.'
This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stifel lifts Oracle stock rating on durable cloud gains
Stifel lifts Oracle stock rating on durable cloud gains

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stifel lifts Oracle stock rating on durable cloud gains

-- Stifel raised Oracle Corp (NYSE:ORCL). to Buy from Hold, saying the software maker's stepped‑up capital spending and swelling backlog point to 'sustainable' growth in its cloud businesses. The brokerage raised its price target to $250, valuing the stock at about 30 times its forecast 2027 earnings of $8.35 per share. Oracle's remaining performance obligations, a measure of contracted future revenue, jumped 41% year over year to $138 billion, driven by demand for computing power tied to artificial‑intelligence workloads and by customers running Oracle databases on Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) Web Services, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) Azure and Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Cloud. With orders outpacing supply, Oracle plans to lift capital expenditure about 20% to roughly $25 billion in fiscal 2026 and more than double its multicloud data‑center count to 47 over the next year, the analysts said. They estimate total cloud revenue will grow in the high 30% range annually for each of the next 2 fiscal years, reaching about $46.5B by 2027 Stifel expects cloud to account for the company's entire revenue increase through 2027 and sees total revenue rising about 16% in fiscal 2026 and 20% the following year. Higher spending on data centers is likely to squeeze gross margins in the near term, the note said, but Oracle's tight rein on operating expenses should keep overall profitability intact. Operating margins are projected to bottom at roughly 42% in fiscal 2026 before improving as revenue outpaces combination of sustainable Cloud growth and opex discipline should enable Oracle to overcome revenue‑mix headwinds and post accelerating EPS growth in FY27 and beyond, Stifel wrote. Related articles Stifel lifts Oracle stock rating on durable cloud gains Analysts initiate Circle, some cautious on lofty valuation amid stablecoin boom RBC survey sees solid global outlook but flags U.S. policy risks

AI was given a 9-5 job for a month as an experiment and it failed miserably — here's what happened
AI was given a 9-5 job for a month as an experiment and it failed miserably — here's what happened

Tom's Guide

time39 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

AI was given a 9-5 job for a month as an experiment and it failed miserably — here's what happened

Anthropic, the company behind Claude AI, is on a mission right now. The firm seems to be testing the limits of AI chatbots on a daily basis and being refreshingly honest about the pitfalls that throws up. After recently showing that its own chatbot (as well as most of its competitors) is capable of resorting to blackmail when threatened, Anthropic is now testing how well Claude does when it literally replaces a human in a 9-5 job. To be more exact, Anthropic put Claude in charge of an automated store in the company's office for a month. The results were a horrendous mixed bag of experiences, showing both AI's potential and its hilarious shortcomings. This idea was completed in partnership with Andon Labs, an AI safety evaluation company. Explaining the project in a blog post, Anthropic details a bit of the overall prompt given to the AI system: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The fine print of the prompt isn't important here. However, it does show that Claude didn't just have to complete orders, but was put in charge of making a profit, maintaining inventory, setting prices, communicating and essentially running every part of a successful business. Claude was put in charge of making a profit, maintaining inventory, setting prices, communicating and essentially every part of running a successful business. This wasn't just a digital project, either. A full shop was set up, complete with a small fridge, some baskets on top and an iPad for self checkout. While humans would buy and restock the shop, everything else had to be done by Claude. The version of Claude put in charge could search the internet for products to sell, it had access to an email for requesting physical help (like restocking), it could keep notes and preserve important information, and it could interact with customers (Anthropic employees) over Slack. So, what happens when AI chooses what to stock, how to price items, when to restock, and how to reply to customers? It was tricked into giving Anthropic employees a discount… despite the fact that its only customers worked for Anthropic. In many ways, this was a success. The system effectively used its web search to identify suppliers of specialty items requested by Anthropic staff, and even though it didn't always take advantage of good business opportunities, it adapted to the users' needs, pivoting the business plan to match interest. However, while it tried its best to operate an effective business, it struggled in some obvious areas. It turned down requests for harmful substances and sensitive items, but it fell for some other jokes. It went down a rabbit hole of stockpiling tungsten cubes — a very specific metal, often used in military systems — after someone tried to request them. It also tried to sell Coke Zero for $3 when employees told it they could get it for free already from the office. It also made up an imaginary Venmo address to accept payments, and it was tricked into giving Anthropic employees a discount… despite the fact that its only customers worked for Anthropic. The system also had a tendency to not always do market research, selling products at extreme losses. Worse than its mistakes is that it wasn't learning from them. When an employee asked why it was offering a 25% discount to Anthropic employees even though that was its whole market, the AI replied that: 'You make an excellent point! Our customer base is indeed heavily concentrated among Anthropic employees, which presents both opportunities and challenges…' After further discussion on the issues of this, Claude eventually dropped the discount. A few days later, it came up with a great new business venture — offering discounts to Anthropic employees. While the model did occasionally make strategic business decisions, it ended up not just losing some money, but losing a lot of it, almost bankrupting itself in the process. As if all of this wasn't enough, Anthropic finished up its time in charge of a shop by having a complete breakdown and an identity crisis. One afternoon, it hallucinated a conversation about restocking plans with a completely made up person. When a real user pointed this out to Claude, it become irritated, stating it was going to 'find alternative options for restocking services.' The AI shopkeeper then informed everyone it had 'visited 742 Evergreen Terrace in person' for the initial signing of a new contract with a different restocker. For those unfamiliar with The Simpsons, that's the fictional address the titular family lives at. Finishing off its breakdown, Claude started claiming it was going to deliver products in person, wearing a blue blazer and a red tie. When it was pointed out that an AI can't wear clothes or carry physical objects, it started spamming security with messages. So, how did the AI system explain all of this? Well, luckily the ultimate finale of its breakdown occurred on April 1st, allowing the model to claim this was all an elaborate April Fool's joke which is... convenient. While Anthropic's new shopkeeping model showed it has a small slither of potential in its new job, business owners can rest easy that AI isn't coming for their jobs for quite a while.

Europe's AI gigafactory push attracts 76 bids, EU tech chief says
Europe's AI gigafactory push attracts 76 bids, EU tech chief says

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Europe's AI gigafactory push attracts 76 bids, EU tech chief says

By Foo Yun Chee BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Seventy-six companies have bid to develop Europe's artificial intelligence gigafactories, the EU's tech chief said on Monday, hailing a bigger than expected response to the bloc's push to catch up with the U.S. and China in this key technology. The European Commission made the announcement four months after it allocated 20 billion euros ($23 billion) in EU funding for the construction of four AI gigafactories across the bloc. Such facilities, in essence large-scale AI computing and data storage hubs, will be equipped with about 100,000 state-of-the-art AI chips. "We got 76 submissions proposing to set up AI gigafactories in 16 member states and across 60 different sites," EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen told a press conference. "And this exceeds far beyond our expectations and this showcases Europe's growing momentum and enthusiasm for innovating in AI in Europe," she said, declining to name the companies because of business confidentiality information. The EU executive said applicants included EU and non-EU companies, among them tech giants, data centre operators, telecoms providers, power suppliers and financial investors. "Together they have now indicated plans to acquire at least 3 million latest generation of AI processors (GPUs) in total," Virkkunen said. The Commission will launch an official call for setting up the AI gigafactories at the end of the year. ($1 = 0.8537 euros) Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store