Ten Bagger: Is your explorer serious? This could be the sign they're onto something real
This month, John looks at the confidence boost ASX juniors are giving investors by investing in underground exploration declines.
Everyone is hoping to find the real deal when it comes to an exploration stock, one that's looking to turn dollars to gold and back again, not just a well oiled PR machine that's "mining the market".
But how do you know your board has serious confidence in the quality of their deposit.
Lowell Resources Fund (ASX:LRT) CIO John Forwood is seeing one telltale sign that management has real conviction when it comes to an underground development.
And it's a trend that's emerging more and more in recent times.
"In terms of exploration there are probably not too many more significant things you can do than put in an exploration decline," he told Stockhead.
An exploration decline is a big upfront capital investment for a junior explorer or miner.
At an average cost of $15,000 per metre, a 700m decline down to 100m below surface on a 1:7 incline gradient could chew up $10m, Forwood roughly estimates.
But it has the potential to both save costs down the line and massively increase the confidence an investor can have that a resource or reserve will hold up once mining begins.
By getting closer to the source of the mineralisation, the explorer can drill more holes at shorter distances and closer spacings, and have more certainty that drill holes won't be disrupted by unknown ground conditions.
With discoveries made deeper under cover these days, that could deliver major savings and spare the embarrassment of poor grade reconciliation down the line.
"You don't have to avoid doing too many thousand metre drill holes to make an exploration decline, just pay for itself if you like," Forwood said.
"If you get underground you can do much shorter holes like 50 metres or a couple hundred metres deep for long holes.
"You're saving on drilling costs. You've got that big upfront capital, of course, but if you really believe in your deposit, you've got a reason to do that."
The Spartan lesson
Among the most prominent examples of the exploration decline method in action came from Spartan Resources (ASX:SPR), which was established via an $18.3m contract with underground mining experts Barminco.
The decision to sink the Juniper decline was dual train. It was blasted wide enough to become a production decline in the future, short circuiting the company's path back to production at the Dalgaranga gold project in WA.
It also provided access to drill on tight spacings at the emerging Never Never and Pepper discoveries, now comprising 2.3Moz at over 9g/t.
But there was another advantage.
Explorers who strike it big commonly follow what's called the Lassonde Curve, a chart named after well-known mining investor Pierre Lassonde that suggests the fast lift in a company's share price which follows a discovery is followed by a plateau as it moves into feasibility studies, which present risks if results disappoint.
But continuing to drill, Spartan was able to continue catching the upside from growing its resource base and was eventually picked up at a premium in a $2.4bn takeover by Ramelius Resources (ASX:RMS).
"The market still maintained that interest in Spartan because they were still exploring and they still had lots of blue sky," Forwood said.
" Often when you put a resource around something and you move your focus from exploration to development, the blue sky disappears from your share price and then your shares go through that valley of death."
Exploration declines also show investors that by going the extra yards juniors are willing to derisk their future reserve base.
"We always used to think of that approach as the way that the Russians did it," Forwood said.
"The Russians wouldn't classify what we call reserves until they had actually driven drives, multiple drives through an orebody and could touch and feel the actual ore."
Companies taking the plunge
Not every explorer has the goodwill with investors and capacity to fund an ambitious initiative like an exploration decline.
But those that can stand to reap the rewards.
Southern Cross Gold (ASX:SX2), which has dual listings in Australia and Canada, has pledged to spend C$27m on a 1km long decline at its highly touted Sunday Creek gold and antimony project in Victoria, where a long-anticipated maiden resource is due in 2027.
C$53m will be spent on drilling to establish the inferred resource out of a C$143m ($162m) private placement led by Stifel Nicolaus Canada, Aitken Mount Capital partners and co-managed by Jett Capital Advisors.
For SX2, Forwood says the exploration decline will provide a signal to the market for the company's ability to get permitted in a jurisdiction known for its regulatory complexity.
"Once you can get the decline permitted, it is so much easier to then do the drilling. So you don't have to go and licence individual drill pads on surface," Forwood said.
" You're ... almost unconstrained by permitting once you've done that."
Also in Victoria, Catalyst Metals (ASX:CYL) has touted plans to seek approval from the State Government for an "exploration tunnel" at the Four Eagles gold project.
Surface drilling has so far outlined a resource at the JV with Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting of 163,000oz at 7.7g/t.
That includes 70,000oz at an outrageous 26g/t at the Boyd's Dam project. Catalyst, in its deal to sell the Henty gold mine in Tasmania to Kaiser Reef (ASX:KAU), also secured a 12-year option to acquire 50% of KAU's 200,000tpa processing plant.
Forwood says the access to the processing plant capacity means material stockpiled from the decline development could cover some of its costs if it contains economic but sub-resource grade gold.
Meanwhile, over in Arizona in the USA, New World Resources (ASX:NWC) is considering the establishment of the single decline at its Antler deposit to expand its copper dominant resource, with some of the best grades hit in deep drilling.
A DFS is due later this year with the company expecting the high grade project to be fully-permitted by early 2026.
'One of the highest grade holes ever drilled at Antler is the deepest hole drilled, but they're very expensive holes to drill from the surface,' Woolrych told Stockhead in a recent interview.
' One of the reasons we're looking to advance our decline and get that started later this year is we are looking to drill from underground. For every metre we can drill from surface we can drill four from underground.'
Lowell holds a small stake in NWC, with Forwood saying the early development of the decline would assist in getting the company ahead of the curb as it waits for permitting for the full project.
The views, information, or opinions expressed in the interviews in this article are solely those of the interviewee and do not represent the views of Stockhead.
Stockhead does not provide, endorse or otherwise assume responsibility for any financial product advice contained in this article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX to fall, but week hinges on RBA speech and Wall Street earnings
The ASX is poised to open lower, but investors hope a dovish sentiment in Reserve Bank of Australia minutes and a speech from governor Michele Bullock will lock in a rate cut next month and drive markets higher. The local stockmarket's performance will also be heavily influenced by a string of results from major global companies including Alphabet and Tesla, which will set the direction of Wall Street and drive Australian shares.

ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Coalition willing to discuss further savings to NDIS
The Coalition says it stands ready to revisit NDIS spending for a second time, after the prime minister flagged further savings may be needed. Earlier this month, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government "[would] always look for spending to produce better value", after he was asked whether he would revisit NDIS spending, which is projected to cost $64 billion a year by 2029. "We need to make sure that it is made more sustainable … the vision of the NDIS wasn't that those sort of numbers that you just quoted go on the system," he said. "But you've got to be responsible about how you do it and work through with the sector because it's very easy for vulnerable people to feel like their support is threatened. We don't want that." Asked this morning whether the Coalition was prepared to have a conversation with the government on further reforms to cut costs, Shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien responded: "Yes, we would". "Let's see what the government brings forward. But it is absolutely key that they have to stop their spending spree," Mr O'Brien told Sky News. Last term, the government and opposition acknowledged that the cost of the NDIS was rising so quickly that it would rapidly become "unsustainable" without change. The major parties agreed to a suite of reforms designed to slow its growing expense from 13.8 per cent a year to 8 per cent by 2026. Those changes set stricter rules for what supports were available, how plans were managed, and laid the groundwork for a new scheme to be run by the states that could support some people with milder disability, who were joining the NDIS in the absence of more appropriate supports. The reforms are projected to save the budget $19.3 billion over four years. But while costs are falling, the latest data from the NDIS shows the scheme's expense is growing at a rate of 10.6 per cent a year — on track to reach the government's target, but still well above it. The federal budget is forecasted to remain in deficit for the next decade. Leaked Treasury advice to Treasurer Jim Chalmers, revealed by the ABC last week, warned that the budget cannot be fixed without raising taxes and cutting spending. And after securing a dominant majority in the parliament, Labor is turning its mind to how to restructure the budget and put it on a more sustainable trajectory. The treasurer has said he is prepared to lose some political skin to do so. "I am personally willing to grasp the nettle … I am prepared to do my bit," Mr Chalmers said in an address to the National Press Club last month. Speaking on Sky News, Mr O'Brien said all options should remain on the table for the coming productivity roundtable, where the issues of tax reform and fixing the budget will feature. Mr Albanese said the government was not considering a proposal to lift the goods and services tax in exchange for lowering income taxes — a move that would flatten how much tax individuals pay. Mr O'Brien warned the government against dismissing ideas out of hand. "The prime minister and the treasurer claimed to be open-minded on everything, but since then, we find out actually: 'We're open-minded, but we don't want to talk about industrial relations. We're open-minded on tax, but we don't want to talk about the GST.' And so my fear here is Labor might actually have an agenda already, and that this is nothing but a talk fest," he said. "[We support tax reform] if it's done holistically, if it's looking at more efficient taxation, if you're looking at fixing up what is currently a mess with Labor being overly reliant on income taxes."

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Important': Senior Labor minister defends PM's China trip, says ties collapsed under Coalition
A senior Labor minister has hit back at the opposition for criticising Anthony Albanese's lengthy state visit to China, saying the relationship with Australia's biggest trading partner had 'broken down' on the Coalition's watch. The Prime Minister spent much of the last week touting Australia's tourism, trade and research offerings in Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu as part of a five-day business and diplomatic blitz. But the Opposition has argued the trip did not produce any tangible outcomes, despite several agreements being signed. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said on Sunday she found the 'criticism quite extraordinary considering that since we came to government we have removed some $20 billion of trade impediments with China'. China imposed trade restrictions during a trade war with the Morrison-Coalition government. 'We now have in everything from wine to lobster, not to mention the fact that China is our single biggest trading partner,' Ms Rowland told Sky News. 'Our resources sector relies on that relationship.' She noted that Mr Albanese's visit was 'at the invitation … of China'. 'He went with a significant business delegation,' Ms Rowland. 'This is about creating jobs and extra trade opportunities for Australia, and it's important that we maintain this vital relationship.' The business community, represented by the Business Council of Australia (BCA), has praised the trip. The BCA was central to many of Mr Albanese's engagements in China, including high-level talks with Chinese officials and business leaders. With Mr Albanese meeting with Xi Jinping while a face-to-face with Donald Trump elusive, Ms Rowland was asked how she thought the China trip would go down in Washington. 'Our relationship with China is obviously important, as is our relationship with the United States,' she said. 'But here, there are different purposes. 'We will engage in the national interest wherever we can with China. 'We will always act in the national interest, and often we will disagree. 'But this is important from the perspective of our trade and of stabilising that relationship, which, quite frankly, had broken down under successive Liberal governments. 'And it's important that we have a government now that's acting in our national interest, in the interest of jobs and trade and certainty.' Ms Rowland, who sits on the National Security Committee, also downplayed concerns around the Trump administration's demand to hike Australian defence spending and its commitment to AUKUS – a $360bn submarine pact with the US and UK underpinning Canberra's defence strategy for the first half of the 21st century. While Mr Albanese was in China, the man leading the US review of AUKUS hinted Australia would need to guarantee support for the US if a conflict broke out in the Indo-Pacific over Taiwan. It came after the Financial Times reported Mr Colby asked Australia and Japan what they would do to defend the democratically self-governed island from China. Ms Rowland said she was 'not going to engage in hypotheticals' but that the Albanese government did 'not support a unilateral change' on Taiwan. 'What I will note, in going to a related issue about defence spending, that we recognise the US has called for this of a number of its allies,' she said. 'But again, I would point out that we are spending some $10bn over the forwards and nearly $60bn over the next decade on defence spending. 'We will act always in the national interest, and we will ensure that our capabilities are up to scratch.' She refused to comment on National Security deliberations on the US' AUKUS review, but said that 'there is nothing unusual about a new administration having a review of these relationships'. 'But again, we view AUKUS as fundamental to our relationship with the United States, and we are confident in its execution,' Ms Rowland said.