Philadelphia Eagles snubbed Trump in 2018. Will they do it again?
Snubbing Trump and other public acts of defiance were all the rage during his first term, but things have changed. Now, everyone from billionaire CEOs to Super Bowl champions are reportedly lining up to bend the knee.
According to sports reporting site Outkick, a source at the Eagles said the team "would be honored to visit the White House."
"It's one of the things we had looked forward to doing, and we look forward to receiving that information," the source reportedly said.
The team declined the offer in 2018 over Trump's opposition to players kneeling during the National Anthem, which was used at the time as a silent protest against police brutality, especially against minorities.
After learning that the team was planning to boycott the visit, the White House rescinded its invitation.
Rumors were reportedly swirling on social media that the Eagles had once again rejected their invitation, but Clay Travis, Outkick's founder, said that the reports were "fake news" and that Eagles hadn't yet received an invitation.
That changed on Tuesday when a reporter asked Trump if he planned to invite the Eagles to the White House.
'They will be. We haven't yet, but we will be,' Trump said.
The president went on to praise the team's performance at the Super Bowl.
'I thought it was a great performance by them, and absolutely they'll they'll be extended that invitation,' Trump said, according to CNN. 'We'll do it right away, we're gonna do it sometime today, and they deserve to be down here. We hope to see them.'
A number of Trump supporters were furious after the rumor began circulating that the team was going to skip the White House visit, including Fox News host Megyn Kelly, who now hosts a conservative podcast.
She said she rooted for the Eagles to beat the Kansas City Chiefs during this year's Super Bowl, but became irate when she bought into the reports that the team was snubbing Trump again.
Another user who believed the rumors said they wish they hadn't backed the Eagles, and Kelly agreed.
'SAME. GO F YOURSELVES EAGLES," she wrote.
She said she jumped on the Eagles bandwagon because her husband, Doug Brunt, is a fan.
'But F this BS,' she said.
SAME. GO F YOURSELVES EAGLES. My husband is a fan so I got onboard but F this BS https://t.co/KemoC67QEu
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) February 24, 2025
Kelly updated her X page on Monday, noting that the White House hadn't sent out invitations and hoping that the reports of a snub were 'fake news.'
The rumor appears to have been started by the US Sun, which earlier this month cited a "well-placed insider" who reportedly told the paper the team had decided to again decline an invite to the White House.
'We focus on the game for now, but if we win the Super Bowl, we wouldn't go to the White House,' the source reportedly told the Sun at the time.
The paper also cited a current player who allegedly said that "pretty much everyone" on the team decided against taking the invitation, if it were offered.
'We represent a city and a state that is pushing for equal rights, respect, and values that respect every human being," the player reportedly said. 'We won't forget what happened and the criticism we received for taking a stand against racism, and we won't back down from our values of respect, integrity, and equality.'
These quotes — including the source cited by Outkick — are all attributed to anonymous individuals. They may be accurate and something may have changed since that report, or they may inaccurate.
All that's known for certain is that Trump plans to extend the invite. Once the Eagles have the ball, they'll have to decide what to do with it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
18 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Smoky air should not become a permanent hallmark of Chicago summers
We're more than two-thirds of the way through Chicago's meteorological summer, and so far when the weather hasn't been suffocatingly hot and humid, it's featured air that's dangerous for too many of us to breathe. Sweltering conditions are a normal part of summer in Chicago — some years more so than others, of course — but when the winds blow from the north, Chicagoans are supposed to be able to breathe a sigh of relief and head for the tennis courts or the baseball/softball diamonds or the bike trails. Or, at the very least, their patios and porches. For the past three years, that temperature relief has been accompanied by plumes of smoke from wildfires raging all the summer long in Canada. The end of last week's heat wave brought daily warnings of poor air quality, with Chicago tabbed Thursday as having the worst air quality in the entire world. The warnings continued through most of the weekend. For many, the conditions made our eyes itchy and were just sort of bothersome. But for those who suffer from asthma and other pulmonary ailments, the air was downright hazardous. If this situation were a one-off — just a uniquely awful set of circumstances north of the border — we'd be inclined to give Canada a pass. But this is becoming a regular ordeal, and it's time people who can do something about it acknowledge the issue — and act. That means Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office earlier this year and will have no such excuses next summer. That also means President Donald Trump. We mention our president because he has spent much of his first six months in office bullying and trolling Canada over trade, national defense and whether that sovereign nation ought to become just another U.S. state. We've criticized Trump for treating one of this country's most stalwart friends on the world stage as an adversary. Among other things, the natural offense Canadians have taken to Trump's provocations and threats has led many to boycott travel to the U.S. One look at Las Vegas' underwhelming summer traffic suggests this needless antagonism with Canada is costing the U.S. directly. We'd love to see Trump abandon his self-defeating economic battle with Canada over products such as lumber and focus instead on a Canadian export that truly is damaging America — wildfire smoke. A large swath of the U.S. — essentially the entire Upper Midwest, including states such as Wisconsin and Michigan that were key to Trump's 2024 victory — is enduring unacceptable health and other risks because of these blazes. While wildfires are common in Canada given that vast geographic territory's abundance of unsettled areas, it's only been in recent years that the conflagrations have grown so large. Unlike the U.S., which long has supported a substantial force to fight wildfires, primarily in the West, Canada's firefighters are mainly focused on blazes in municipalities. Essentially, Canada has said it doesn't have the capacity to battle these wildfires before they get so out of control that they must burn themselves out or rage on for months until the seasons change. The U.S. has sent hundreds of firefighters to help in recent years, but the efforts haven't been sufficient. This is not a new summertime status quo to which Chicagoans and other Upper Midwesterners simply should be told to get accustomed. It's unacceptable and should be treated as such. We're not saying that solving a problem driven by large-scale climatic changes is simple — or cheap. There's a reason Canada isn't equipped like the U.S. to battle fires sparked in wilderness areas. Our neighbor to the north hasn't needed the capability in the past. It does now. To be fair, the United States has faced its own reckoning with increasingly destructive wildfires, especially in the West. But we've built up a robust federal firefighting infrastructure over decades in response — something Canada is only now beginning to consider on a national scale. What's needed is for leaders to make this scourge a priority. Where there's a will there's a way, especially given the wealth held in North America. Surely, in coming summers, the U.S. could contribute expertise and even personnel while Canada invests in early detection and extinguishment of these fires. In return, Trump could drop his trade-related threats and demands and focus on a U.S.-Canadian problem that directly affects millions of American lives. How about if both countries committed to action that truly would be beneficial on both sides of the border? A win-win. What a novel concept.
Chicago Tribune
18 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Daniel DePetris: Taiwan's president is not having an easy time of it at home or with the US
With the exception of Israel, no foreign entity elicits as much bipartisan support in Washington as Taiwan. The self-ruled democratic island is David to China's Goliath, a relatively small pseudo-country (the United States and much of the world don't recognize Taiwan as a state) under constant threat from the Chinese Communist Party that has long striven to reunify the island with mainland China. If anything, Chinese President Xi Jinping is even more intent on reunification than his predecessors, ordering the People's Liberation Army to have the military assets in place to invade Taiwan by 2027. But that's only the half of it for Taiwan's political leadership. While Taipei's relations with the United States remain strong at an institutional level, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te has faced multiple speed bumps, internally and externally, that have raised alarms among Taiwan experts back in Washington. A highly polarized Taiwanese political scene, coupled with an unpredictable Donald Trump administration, has led to the fundamental question: Can Taiwan afford a business-as-usual mentality? Internally, Taiwanese politicians are at one another's throats. Lai's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is at loggerheads with the main opposition party, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the upstart Taiwan People's Party over everything from the defense budget to the basic functions of how the Taiwanese government should work. Despite Lai's support for a hefty increase in military spending, partly due to the urgings of the Trump administration, the Legislative Yuan, dominated by the opposition, has stonewalled the request and in fact voted in January to freeze the defense budget by billions of dollars. Lai has called the parliament's actions a deliberate attempt to block his agenda; the opposition says it's merely an exercise in oversight. The DPP's frustrations with the KMT have boiled over. Sympathizers of the party organized a recall vote on one-fifth of the KMT's lawmakers, hoping voters will kick them out of office and replace them with DPP representatives. But the effort failed. Every KMT lawmaker survived the recall effort, which means that Lai will either be forced to work with the opposition to get anything passed in the legislature or spend the remainder of his term as a lame-duck leader. Then there are Trump's tariffs. On July 31, the White House announced a 20% tariff on Taiwanese goods entering the United States, part of Trump's global tariff regime in a bid — so he says — to inject fairness into the global trading system. Although Lai's administration played down the tariffs and called them a temporary aberration on the way to a trade deal, the levies will have at least a short-term impact on the Taiwanese economy. The United States is Taiwan's largest buyer of goods, having imported more than $116 billion in Taiwanese products last year. While it's likely Washington and Taipei will eventually strike an agreement lessening the tariff rate, it's going to take significant concessions on the Taiwanese side to move past the finish line. Those concessions will include throwing tens of billions, if not hundreds of billions, of dollars into the United States over a long period of time in the form of investments. This is precisely what Japan and South Korea did to finalize their own trade deals with Washington, and it's something Taiwan will be hard-pressed to avoid. Even then, it might not mollify Trump; whenever he talks about Taiwan, Trump never ceases to remind people about how the island 'stole' America's chip-making business. Then there's the Trump administration decision to block Lai from traveling to the United States on his way to Central America. Such stops in the United States are quite common, with Lai's predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen, doing it multiple times. They've so common that Beijing isn't particularly shocked when they occur. Even so, stopovers in the United States by Taiwanese ministers, let alone presidents, always get China riled up because in Beijing's mind, they connote U.S. recognition of Taiwan as a sovereign state. Therefore, the White House's veto of Lai's travel schedule, in addition to the Pentagon's cancellation of defense talks with Taiwan's defense minister, will come as welcome signs to Xi. If Joe Biden as president had made a similar move, the Taiwanese political and security establishment would have rested easy, knowing that U.S. support was unquestionable. Can Taiwan assume this is the case now, particularly when Trump's priorities are finalizing a comprehensive trade accord with China and pushing U.S. allies around the world to do more for themselves on the defense front? Ultimately, the best policy for the United States is to drag out the status quo for as long as possible. This includes a number of key elements: China and Taiwan refrain from unilateral moves that could jeopardize the balance of power and heighten the odds of a cross-strait conflict; U.S. arms sales to Taiwan continue in keeping with U.S. law; Taipei stays away from declaring independence; and Washington makes it abundantly clear to Taiwan's political leadership that unhelpful actions breaking from the status quo could result in a change to U.S. policy. Regardless of what Washington does, it's on Taiwan — and Taiwan alone — to get its own house in order. The United States may be the best foreign friend it has, but not even a superpower can force Taiwan's politicians to pass legislation, ensure the defense budget is adequate for the times and get the machinery of government working again. Otherwise, nothing else that follows will matter.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republicans fear Trump tariffs are cutting into economy
Republicans on Capitol Hill are feeling jittery about the economy after the latest jobs report showed the economy added far fewer jobs than previously estimated over the past three months. President Trump and his economic team insist that the economy is going strong and poised for significant growth, but their bullish projections are meeting skepticism from some in the GOP who worry Trump's trade regime is creating economic headwinds. 'It definitely is indicative of a weakened economy, an economy that's not acting in a robust fashion. I've all along felt like there's a lag between tariffs and actual economic downturn,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Trump announced a new round of tariffs, including steep tariff increases on Canada and Brazil, the same day the jobs report was released. Paul argued the impact of tariffs are often delayed because companies usually sign contracts to set the prices of imports months in advance. Once those contracts expire, the higher prices of imported raw materials or finished goods are then reflected in the next round of business agreements, he said. 'I've had retailers telling me that they think their prices will have to change in the fall. As their initial contracts change, their input price is higher [and] goods will go higher, too,' he said. 'I think it is worrisome and I do worry that the news has been relatively benign on tariffs so far,' Paul said. 'The proof is really in the next couple months. 'I think there's more to come. I don't think we've seen the full impact of tariffs,' he said. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) warned that Trump's fluctuating tariff rates are increasing costs for consumers and creating uncertainty among businesses and employers. 'My view is that there's no question that consumers, Americans, pay a price for tariffs. It increases the price of the goods coming into the United States. The question is, 'Is there a reason that tariffs in a temporary way can solve trade barriers that have been artificially created against our products going somewhere else?'' he said. The Kansas senator said Trump's tariffs could have 'a beneficial outcome' if they can get other countries to open their markets to U.S. goods but cautioned 'there's no question tariffs are a tax on the cost of a product, a good.' 'A tax raises the cost of living for everybody,' he said. Asked about the impact on job creators, Moran replied: 'I know enough to know that certainty matters and at the moment there's not very much certainty about what's happening next.' 'Therefore, businesses delay decisions to expand, to hire, to spend money. So uncertainty creates a challenge for a growing economy,' he warned. A third Republican senator who requested anonymity said Friday's weak jobs report creates a significant political problem for Trump and Republicans in Congress. 'I don't think that the administration can ignore them,' the senator said of the jobs report. 'You have to see that connection, that link' between the disappointing jobs report and Trump's tariff policies, the senator said. 'I don't think spinning it is good enough,' the source added. The president responded to the negative jobs report by firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Erika McEntarfer. The report revised down the number of jobs gained in May and June by 258,000. But that move is also getting a skeptical response form some Republicans. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) warned that the shake-up at the data-reporting agency could undermine confidence in future economic data. 'The numbers are what the numbers are,' Tillis said. 'If we get to a point to where BLS [and] all these organizations that are considered to be the gold standard for data, if we start undermining them or people start losing their jobs because we don't like the result, that's a big boo-boo.' 'There are a lot of government-reporting agencies that are like the gold standard for financial markets,' he said, warning 'there better just be very clear evidence' of misconduct to support McEntarfer's termination. 'If they don't' provide that evidence, 'I think they're making a huge mistake,' he said. Several major U.S. employers have reported substantial business losses in recent weeks. Ford Motor reported last week a net loss of $36 million from April through June, compared with a profit of $1.8 billion a year ago. The automotive giant projects tariffs will cost it $2 billion this year alone. Omaha-based Berkshire Hathaway on Saturday reported that its earnings dropped by 4 percent compared with a year ago, in part because of tariffs. The company warned in its second-quarter earnings report that the 'adverse consequences' of international trade policies and tariffs 'could significantly affect our future results.' United Parcel Services's stock dropped last week after it reported weaker-than-expected earnings. The company said it would no longer provide forward guidance on revenues and profits, citing the lack of certainty in the economic outlook for the rest of this year. Appliance maker Whirlpool also announced disappointing second-quarter earnings and said it would lower its quarterly dividend payout. Some Republicans on Capitol Hill have said for months that they could support tariffs for a short period of time to put pressure on foreign trading partners to negotiate better deals for U.S. exporters but warned against putting long-term tariffs in place. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) warned in April that 'high tariffs in perpetuity' would be bad for the economy. 'I am not a fan of tariffs,' Cruz told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow at the time. 'My hope is these tariffs are short-lived and they serve as leverage to lower tariffs across the globe,' he said. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett dampened Republican hopes that high tariff rates would be transient when he told NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday that many rates are already locked in Asked by NBC's Kristen Welker if Trump would change tariff rates if the financial markets dive, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out because these are final deals.'
