How £1.1bn was lost to fraud in 2024 as purchase scams soar
Fraud continues to blight the nation with more than £1billion stolen by criminals in 2024 for the second year in a row, according to new figures from UK Finance.
Britons lost £1.17billion to fraud last year, a figure which remains at similar levels to 2023 when £1.2billion was stolen.
UK Finance divides fraud into two categories: authorised and unauthorised.
Authorised fraud is when someone is tricked into paying money to a scammer's account, or handing over a password.
In other words, they take some kind of action or volunteer information which makes the fraud possible.
Unauthorised fraud refers to cases where the victim is not directly involved, for example purchases being made on a stolen credit card - this type of activity jumped last year.
When this happens, banks and credit card companies are legally obliged to protect them from losses. But within the last year they have also had to reimburse victims of authorised fraud.
In October 2024 the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) introduced new reimbursement rules for APP scam victims.
In total, £267.1million of APP fraud was reimbursed to victims by banks in 2024, around 59 per cent of all money stolen from APP fraud.
When the new rules came into force on 7 October 2024, within first three months of the rules being in place 86 per cent of money stolen through APP fraud was returned to victims.
Unauthorised fraud makes up bulk of fraud losses
Within the total figure of £1.2billion, unauthorised fraud losses reached £722million in 2024, up 2 per cent on to 2023. While cases of unauthorised reports climbed to 3.13million in 2024, up 14 per cent on 2023.
UK Finance said the rise in cases and losses was due to a jump in remote purchase fraud, a trend which had been falling in recent years.
In this type of fraud, criminals use stolen card details to buy something on the internet, over the phone or through mail order.
Overall, remote purchase fraud case numbers increased 22 per cent to nearly 2.6million, and losses increased 11 per cent to just under £400million.
Card ID theft - which involves stealing personal details - saw cases and losses drop after a spike in 2023. Losses fell 26 per cent to £58.7million, with case volumes falling 23 per cent to just over 109,000.
Contactless card fraud losses fell by one per cent - the first time a reduction has been reported for this category since 2020. Remote banking losses also fell by seven per cent, with cases dropping by 17 per cent.
Banks stopped £1.45billion of unauthorised fraud losses in their tracks through impletmenting advanced security systems.
Yet Santander's fraud boss said Chris Ainsley said £1billion being lost to fraud in 2024 was 'a real let down'.
He said: 'while banks prevented that figure more than doubling by the amount of unauthorised fraud they stopped; it is yet another clear sign that we need significantly more cross industry collaboration to put the brakes on this harrowing crime.'
APP fraud cases ease to lowest level since 2020
APP fraud losses dropped in 2024, falling two per cent to £450.7million.
The number of APP fraud cases fell by 20 per cent to under 186,000 - the lowest figure since 2020.
UK Finance said the drop was driven by banks investing in technology that can identify and flag fraudulent activity and raising awareness of scams among customer.
Investment fraud - when a criminal convinces their victim to move their money to a fictitious fund or to pay for a fake investment - was responsible for the most APP fraud losses.
Some £144.4 million was stolen through this type of fraud in 2024, an increase of 34 per cent from 2023, despite a 24 per cent reduction in cases.
Purchase scams, when a victim pays in advance for goods or services that never arrive, continues to be the most common type of authorised fraud.
Purchase scam losses rose by one per cent to £87.1 million, though case numbers fell 16 per cent.
The number of impersonation scams, where criminals impersonate a bank or the police and convince someone to transfer money, fell again in 2024 with losses and case numbers dropping 16 per cent and 32 per cent respectively.
There was an uptick in international payments made as part of APP fraud, with criminals likely trying to get people to send money outside of the UK. International payments accounted for 11 per cent of APP losses in 2024, up from 6 per cent in 2023.
The report found that 70 per cent of of authorised push payment cases started online - for example on a website or social media, and 16 per cent emerged through telecoms networks.
Fraud remains 'chronically unreported'
Under reporting of fraud remains a problem when it comes to fraud prevention.
One in seven are exposed to potentially fraudulent suspicious emails every day. Yet 43 per cent of people wouldn't report fraud if they were the victim or witnessed it, research from Nationwide found.
Nationwide fraud boss Jim Winters says: 'While it's positive to see authorised push payment cases coming down following regulatory changes and investment in technology, fraud related crimes remain chronically unreported.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
15 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Human rights group loses legal challenge over exports of jet parts to Israel
Al-Haq took legal action against the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) over its decision to continue licensing exports of components for F-35 fighter jets, telling a hearing in May that it was unlawful and 'gives rise to a significant risk of facilitating crime'. In September last year, the Government suspended export licences for weapons and military equipment following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law in the conflict. But an exemption was made for some licences related to parts for F-35s, which are part of an international defence programme. The DBT defended the challenge, with its barristers telling a four-day hearing in London that the carve-out is 'consistent with the rules of international law'. In a 72-page ruling on Monday, Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn dismissed the legal challenge. The senior judges said that 'the conduct of international relations' is a matter for the executive, rather than the courts, and that it would be unnecessary to decide whether there was a 'significant risk' that the carve-out could facilitate crimes. They added: 'The grave risk to life in the ongoing military operations in the Gaza Strip is not created by the F-35 carve-out, and would not be removed by suspension of the export from the UK of F-35 parts into the F-35 programme.' The High Court was previously told that the decision to 'carve out' licences related to F-35 components followed advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'. The F-35 programme is an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets, with the UK contributing components for both assembly lines and an international pool. Israel is not one of the 'partner nations' of the programme, the court heard, but is a customer and can order new F-35 aircraft and draw on a pool for spare parts. The two judges later said they agreed with barristers for the DBT, who said it was not possible for the UK to 'unilaterally' ensure that UK-made parts did not reach Israel. Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn said: 'In short, the Secretary of State reasonably concluded that there was no realistic possibility of persuading all other partner nations that F-35 exports to Israel should be suspended.' 'Accordingly he was faced with the blunt choice of accepting the F-35 carve-out or withdrawing from the F-35 Programme and accepting all the defence and diplomatic consequences which would ensue,' they added. The two judges also said the case was about a 'much more focused issue' than the carve-out itself. They continued: 'That issue is whether it is open to the court to rule that the UK must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration which is reasonably regarded by the responsible ministers as vital to the defence of the UK and to international peace and security, because of the prospect that some UK manufactured components will or may ultimately be supplied to Israel, and may be used in the commission of a serious violation of international humanitarian law in the conflict in Gaza. 'Under our constitution that acutely sensitive and political issue is a matter for the executive which is democratically accountable to Parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not for the courts.' Following the ruling, Al-Haq director general Shawan Jabarin said the long-running case had caused a 'significant impact'. He continued: 'Despite the outcome of today, this case has centred the voice of the Palestinian people and has rallied significant public support, and it is just the start. 'This is what matters, that we continue on all fronts in our work to defend our collective human values and work towards achieving justice for the Palestinians.' A Government spokesperson said: 'The court has upheld this Government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter. 'This shows that the UK operates one of the most robust export control regimes in the world. We will continue to keep our defence export licensing under careful and continual review.'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mother and friend of teenage drowning victim urge people to stay safe in the sea
The mother and best friend of a teenager who drowned in a 'fierce' rip current on Bournemouth beach, which also killed a 12-year-old girl, have backed Coastguard advice to help people enjoy the sea safely this summer. Joe Abbess, from Southampton, Hampshire, and Sunnah Khan, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, drowned during the incident at the Dorset seaside resort on May 31 2023. Now, the mother of the 17-year-old trainee chef, Vanessa Abbess, has issued a warning that anyone could be caught out like her son, who was a regular gym-goer. She said: 'Joe was incredibly loved by his family and friends, and I feel it is so important to tell his story. He was being so sensible and safe. He was healthy. He was strong. He could swim. 'It is so shocking that Joe died and shows you're never entirely safe in the sea – but there are ways to reduce the risk, which we want everyone to know.' She added: 'Even two years on, the world doesn't feel quite right because there's a great big Joe-shaped hole in our lives. Joe is, and will always be, loved and very missed every day. 'We live on an island; people should know the dangers. You wouldn't cross the road without thinking about it – don't enter the sea without thinking about it. You need to think, what could happen? What do I do in an emergency? 'Joe was a very caring young man – he would want people to know what happened that tragic day. 'And if by telling his story I can prevent this heartbreak happening to another family, that has got to be a benefit, in a strange way, because it's absolutely awful to lose somebody you love like this.' His friend, Joe Green, 19, said: 'It 100% has affected my life. I mean, you just never think this would happen to your best friend. 'I miss him loads. Somehow, after more than two years, it still doesn't feel real. It still feels like he's going to come into my life whenever I turn a corner. 'I think he'd be very proud. I think he'd be very happy that I'm doing this for him, and his mum is doing this for him, because we just want to get the message across that this can happen to anyone.' The pair have backed safety tips issued by the Coastguard to choose a lifeguarded beach and to swim between the flags and to go into the sea with a buddy. They also advise that in a rip current to not struggle but instead 'float to live' by floating with head back and ears submerged. They also urge people to call 999 and ask for the Coastguard if they see an emergency by the coast. James Instance, Coastguard divisional commander, said: 'Vanessa and Joe have shown real bravery in reliving their loss to highlight hidden risks at the beach and how you can stay safe. 'As we approach the summer holidays and our seaside gets busier, it's a perfect time to remind everyone of a few simple tips to ensure your fun trip ends with good memories.' Earlier this month, Darren Paffey, Labour MP for Southampton Itchen, spoke in the Commons, calling on the Government to increase swimming safety in schools and highlighting that 150 children had lost their lives to drowning in the past three years. He said that just 74% of children leave school with the ability to swim 25 metres, and those from the most deprived areas are twice as likely to drown. Dorset coroner Rachael Griffin also wrote to the Education Secretary calling for better water safety for children following the inquests into the deaths of Joe and Sunnah. Responding to the debate in Parliament, education minister Catherine McKinnell said: 'Data from Sport England's active life survey reported in 2024 that 95.2% of state primary schools surveyed reported that they do provide swimming lessons, and we do want all pupils to have the opportunity to learn to swim.' She added: 'We are working to ensure that teaching pupils the water safety code at primary and secondary school will feature in our new RSHE (relationships, sex and health education) statutory guidance, which will be published shortly.'
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Savers should be warned about potential pitfalls of Lifetime Isas, MPs say
The complexity of Lifetime Isas could increase the risk of savers making poor financial decisions and the products may need to carry warnings for some people, according to a committee of MPs. The savings accounts enable people to save for their first home or their retirement in one pot. But the Treasury Committee said the dual-purpose design of the Lifetime Isa, or Lisa, may be diverting people away from more suitable products. MPs found that the objectives to help people save for both the short and long term make it more likely that people will choose unsuitable investment strategies. Lisas held in cash may suit those saving for a first home, but may not achieve the best outcome for those using accounts as a retirement savings product, as they are unable to invest in higher-risk but potentially higher-return products such as bonds and equities, the committee said. It also described current rules penalising benefit claimants as 'nonsensical'. Under the current system, any savings held in a Lisa can affect eligibility for universal credit or housing benefit, despite this not being the case for other personal or workplace pension schemes, the committee said. The report said: 'The Government provides higher levels of contribution through tax relief to many other pension products that are not included in the universal credit eligibility assessment, such as workplace pensions and Sipps (self-invested personal pensions). Treating one retirement product differently from others in that regard is nonsensical.' The report added: 'If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime Isa with other Government-subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime Isa products must include warnings that the Lifetime Isa is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of universal credit. 'Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling.' Savers can put in up to £4,000 into a Lisa each year, until they reach 50. They must make their first payment into their Lisa before the age of 40. The Government will add a 25 per cent bonus to Lisa savings, up to a maximum of £1,000 per year. People can withdraw money from their Lisa if they are buying their first home, aged 60 or over or terminally ill with less than 12 months to live. People withdrawing money from a Lisa for any other reason face a 25 per cent withdrawal charge, and can end up with less money than they put in. The report said: 'The withdrawal charge of 25 per cent is applied to unauthorised withdrawals, causing Lisa holders to lose the Government bonuses that they have received, plus 6.25% of their own contributions. 'Several witnesses described that loss of 6.25% as a 'withdrawal penalty'.' There are also restrictions on when Lisas can be used to buy a first home, including that the property must cost £450,000 or less. The report said: 'Many people have lost a portion of their savings due to a lack of understanding of the withdrawal charge or because of unforeseen changes in their circumstances, such as buying a first home at a price greater than the cap. 'However, the case for reducing the charge must be balanced against the impact on Government spending. The Lifetime Isa must include a deterrent to discourage savers from withdrawing funds from long-term saving.' It also added: 'Before considering any increase in the house price cap, the Government must analyse whether the Lifetime Isa is the most effective way in which to spend taxpayers' money to support first-time buyers.' The committee noted that in the 2023-24 financial year, nearly double the number of people made an unauthorised withdrawal (99,650) compared to the number of people who used their Lisa to buy a home (56,900). This should be considered a possible indication that the product is not working as intended, the committee said. At the end of the tax year 2023–24, around 1.3 million Lisa accounts were open, the report said. The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts spending on bonuses paid to account holders will cost the Treasury around £3 billion over the five years to 2029-30 – and the committee questioned whether this product is the best use of public money given the current financial strain. MPs also raised concerns that the product may not be well enough targeted towards those in need of financial support and could be subsidising the cost of a first home for wealthier people. It said the data on this issue remains unclear. The report also highlighted the benefits of certain elements of the Lisa, including being an option for the self-employed to save for retirement. Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier said: 'The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime Isa, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age. The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals. 'We know that the Government is looking at Isa reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it. 'We are still awaiting further data that may shed some light on who exactly the product is helping. What we already know, though, is that the Lifetime Isa needs to be reformed before it can genuinely be described as a market-leading savings product for both prospective home buyers and those who want to start saving for their retirement at a young age.' Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Lifetime Isa provider Moneybox said: 'The report marks a further opportunity to engage with policymakers and continue the conversations needed to ensure the Lisa continues to offer the best level of support to those that need it most.' He added: 'While it is right that the Government ensures the Lisa provides value for money as part of its review of the product, it is our view that it absolutely does… 'The Lisa has proven particularly valuable for first-time buyers on lower to middle incomes, with 80 per cent of Moneybox Lisa savers earning £40,000 or less.' He continued: 'We firmly believe that by future-proofing the house price cap and amending the withdrawal penalty, the Lisa would continue to serve as a highly effective product, helping young people build and embed positive saving behaviours early in life, get more people onto the property ladder, and prepare for a more secure retirement.'
