
Ramco Cements: A cyclical turnaround in the making?
Owing to excess capacity, per bag prices of cement have increased by only 1.7% CAGR over the last 10 years, well below the average inflation rate over the period. Nowhere has this impact been felt more than in South India, where excess capacity has been the highest among regions.
But the silver lining is that prices are expected to inch up owing to the consolidation drive by Ultratech Cement and Ambuja Cement. If there is recovery in pricing, one major player in the southern region – The Ramco Cements – could be a major beneficiary.
While the stock is barely above the peak price it hit in 2017 of Rs 866 per share, there are enough reasons to dig deeper into the company.
A climb and then a dip in sales and volumes
From FY21 to FY24, Ramco Cements more than doubled cement volumes — from 8.3 million metric tonnes (MMT) to 18.0 MMT — driving revenue from Rs 5,303 crore to Rs 9,483 crore. However, despite surging volumes, EBITDA margins slid from ~29.8 percent in FY21 to ~15 percent in FY22 as global coal, petcoke, and diesel prices rose faster than selling prices in South India.
By FY23, improving energy costs helped margins recover to around ~15 percent, and revenue climbed to Rs 8,172 crore. In FY24, volumes hit 18 MMT and revenue reached Rs 9,483 crore, with EBITDA margins at ~16 percent.
Yet, in FY25, volumes plateaued near 18.2 MMT and revenue dipped 9 percent to Rs 8,554 crore, as renewed input inflation outpaced modest price hikes.
Ramco's aggressive capacity additions fuelled top-line growth, but fluctuating energy costs and competitive pricing kept margins under pressure throughout FY21-25. At 14%, Ramco Cements' EBITDA margins are where they were nearly 10 years ago in 2014. With expected improvement in pricing discipline, margins should inch up from here.
Profits and cash flow: Volatile but resilient
While sales has been in an uptrend, owing to declining EBITDA margins (29-14%) and surging interest payments (Rs 88 crore-459 crore), profit after tax (PAT) has shrunk significantly from Rs 784 crore to Rs 270 crore (after exceptional items – other income of Rs 199 crore).
But cash flows tell a different story. Cash flow from operations (CFO) remains strong. Though much of the CFO is used for debt servicing and capex, it reflects operational health. Hence, EV/EBITDA, not P/E, is a more appropriate valuation metric.
Debt and interest coverage: A tight corner
In a bid to maintain market share, Ramco has grown capacities aggressively, which it funded through debt. When margins were healthy, interest was a small blip (FY21, FY22). But as profitability dropped, interest coverage (EBITDA ÷ interest expense) tumbled from 14x in FY2021-22 to 3x in FY2024-25. Put simply, that means Ramco now has to spend a much larger share of its profit on interest. Management has sold non-core land assets (about Rs 455 crore realised so far, with another Rs 545 crore expected soon) to reduce debt and ease pressure. But until EBITDA climbs back up, investors must be watchful of the coverage ratio.
Ramco financed its expansion with debt. As margins shrank, interest coverage dropped from 14x in FY22 to 3x in FY25 — a clear sign of stress.
Understanding Ramco's business and the cement cycle
How Ramco makes money: The basics
Ramco sells bagged cement (OPC, blended cements) to builders, contractors, and cement distributors. It also sells ready-mix concrete and dry mortar (a small part of revenue). Its core markets are Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Odisha, and West Bengal.
Ramco's advantage historically comes from:
Scale & Integration: 11 plants, 22 MTPA capacity, captive limestone mines — this helps control costs.
Green Power: Over 200 MW of wind farms + 43 MW waste-heat recovery — lower electricity costs.
Distribution Network: 9,400+ dealers, 23,500+ sub-dealers — gets cement to tens of thousands of customers in villages, towns, and cities.
Industry consolidation and competition
After a slowdown in 2018-19, the Indian cement industry has seen consolidation. Giants like UltraTech and Ambuja have snapped up smaller players, especially in South India. In FY24 and FY25, Ramco had to keep plants running at high capacity to spread fixed costs, even when demand was weak. Meanwhile, pricing was lacklustre, i.e., supply outpaced demand. From FY21 through early FY2024, South Indian cement prices languished near multi-year lows.
Ramco's response has been to expand in other regions, cut costs, and bank on its brand. They boosted green power use from 22% of total energy in FY22-23 to a planned 34% in FY2023-24. They built rail sidings to ditch diesel trucks. They also sold off non-core real estate to pay down debt.
Demand outlook: Signs of a turnaround
After years of weak pricing, South Indian cement prices finally began to stabilise in early FY25-26. Drivers included a combination of modest demand recovery (government infrastructure projects, rural housing) and relatively slower capacity additions in that region.
South India cement prices had seen an uptick in April 2024, compared to April 2023, however, the price hikes did not sustain through the rest of the year.
According to Nuvama Research, 'In May 2025, cement prices saw an increase across all regions, with the southern region leading the trend, followed by the eastern, central, and western markets. This price hike was mainly driven by an improvement in demand.'
Given that the South Indian cement market is significantly consolidated compared to a year ago, the expectation is that these hikes will sustain themselves. And because South accounts for ~75% of Ramco's volumes, that would directly lift revenue and profitability.
That's why, despite a grim FY25, FY26 could be much better. With most expansion behind them (no massive capex outlays planned beyond maintenance), Ramco can use existing capacity to serve recovering demand, so each incremental tonne sold adds right to the bottom line.
A significant cost pressure has emerged with the introduction of a new Mineral Bearing Land Tax of Rs 160 per tonne of limestone in Tamil Nadu, effective from April 4, 2025. This rate is reported as the highest in India (e.g., Jharkhand levies Rs 40 per tonne). This tax is expected to increase the cost of cement production in the state by approximately Rs 200 per tonne. Given Ramco Cements' strong footprint in South India, this tax poses a direct and substantial threat to production costs and profitability.
The cement industry has appealed to the Tamil Nadu government for relief. The outcome of this request will be critical — an unfavorable decision could result in a structural cost hike for Ramco.
Valuation: Is Ramco a good buy now?
At Rs 988 per share, Ramco's trailing P/E is roughly 85x earnings. That may sound high, but cement stocks often trade at high P/Es because profits are low. For comparison:
UltraTech Cement: 54 P/E
Ambuja Cements: 33 P/E
Shree Cement: 94X P/E
Ramco: 85X P/E
Ramco's P/E at 85X reflects a cyclical trough in earnings (not a premium growth multiple). Thus P/E is usually not a great valuation metric for 'cyclical stocks'.
P/B comparison: Cheaper on book value
P/B is a better metric for comparing valuations for cement companies. Let's take a look :
UltraTech and Shree trade at 4.5x and above
Ambuja Cement trades at 2.5x book value
Ramco trades at ~3.1× book value
That tells us that Ramco's assets (plants, land, mines) are valued more cheaply relative to some of the larger peers.
Based on its 10-year historical media value of 3.5x, Ramco trades at a reasonable discount.
The bottom line: Betting on a cycle turn
Ramco is a cyclical bet. You're wagering that the Indian cement cycle is on the upswing—volumes rising, prices firming, costs stabilizing. If that plays out, the stock today is a 'value' (relative to peers) at mid-teens EV/EBITDA and 2.7x P/B.
But if your horizon is a few quarters, wait for clearer signals of demand and pricing. If you can hold for more than 12-18 months, Ramco's cyclical upswing could lead to far better performance by the company.
Note: We have relied on data from http://www.Screener.in and http://www.tijorifinance.com throughout this article. Only in cases where the data was not available, have we used an alternate, but widely used and accepted source of information.
Rahul Rao has helped conduct financial literacy programmes for over 1,50,000 investors. He has also worked at an AIF, focusing on small and mid-cap opportunities.
Disclosure: The writer or his dependents do not hold shares in the securities/stocks/bonds discussed in the article.
The website managers, its employee(s), and contributors/writers/authors of articles have or may have an outstanding buy or sell position or holding in the securities, options on securities or other related investments of issuers and/or companies discussed therein. The content of the articles and the interpretation of data are solely the personal views of the contributors/ writers/authors. Investors must make their own investment decisions based on their specific objectives, resources and only after consulting such independent advisors as may be necessary.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
Rs 44000000000! But Mukesh Ambani wants to separate this business from Reliance because…, it is…
Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries is all set to take out its FMCG (Fast-Moving Consumer Goods) business into a separate entity and a move expected to be completed within this year depends on regulatory approvals. Currently, this business operates under Reliance Retail, but soon it will function as an independent unit within the broader Reliance Industries umbrella. During the Q1 FY2025 earnings conference call, it was confirmed that the FMCG vertical of Reliance Retail will be demerged and launched as a standalone company. Reliance Retail Growth Dinesh Taluja, CFO and Head of Corporate Development at Reliance Retail, said the company witnessed 11% year-on-year growth in Q1. Both the grocery and fashion segments performed strongly, while consumer electronics saw some slowdown due to an early monsoon. He stated that Reliance has a well-diversified portfolio in multiple categories which gives stable performance. During this quarter, Reliance opened 388 new stores, taking the total store count to over 19,600. Additionally, the company recorded a 16% YoY rise in customer transactions. The FMCG division saw big momentum, with Q1 revenue reaching Rs 4,400 crore, nearly double compared to the same period last year. Reliance Retail Sales Reliance noted that nearly 70% of its FMCG sales come from general trade, i.e., small neighborhood stores. While Reliance operates its own retail outlets (both B2C and B2B), it has also developed a nationwide distribution network to ensure product availability across regions. During this year's IPL, Reliance launched an ad campaign for its Campa Cola brand which gave good results. The company thinks this will also give stronger future sales for Campa and other products. Reliance is also setting up new factories and R&D labs across India. These facilities will incorporate automation and advanced technologies to ensure high-quality products at affordable prices. The goal is to make consumer products that are both appealing and economical. Reliance Retail New FMCG Brand The company stated that while its FMCG and retail businesses currently function distinctly, the demerger will formalize this separation. Both businesses will operate separately with professional independence. The new FMCG company will soon operate under the name 'Reliance Consumer Products Limited (RCPL),' housing brands like Campa Cola.


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bengaluru Hebbal–Silk Board tunnel road may add to traffic snarls, add 22 gridlock situations: Detailed Project Report
The Detailed Project Report (DPR) for Bengaluru's ambitious Hebbal–Silk Board underground tunnel has indicated that fewer vehicles are expected to use the corridor in a no-toll scenario than in one where tolls are levied, both towards the city and the airport, suggesting more traffic congestion with tolls. This anomaly, revealed through a review of the traffic projections for the proposed 16.75 km tunnel, has raised eyebrows about the integrity of the demand modelling used to justify the project's viability. Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar had earlier emphasised that 'without toll, the tunnel road project will not work.' The numbers defy logic, say mobility experts, who argue that tolling infrastructure generally reduces traffic volumes, as price-sensitive daily commuters, especially those heading into the city, tend to avoid toll roads. According to the final DPR prepared by Rodic Consultants for the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), the number of vehicles (measured in Passenger Car Units or PCUs) projected during the morning peak hour in 2031 is 34,796 in a no-toll scenario. However, if toll is charged, the number drops to 33,057 PCUs (Scenario 2), and even further to 32,304 PCUs in Scenario 3 (alternative alignment with toll). DPR forecasts higher or similar volumes in toll scenarios, especially airport-bound trips in 2041, where Scenario 2 surprisingly shows more traffic than the no-toll scenario. In the morning peak hour projections for 2031, DPR estimates that 19,932 PCUs will travel towards the city and 14,864 PCUs towards the airport in a no-toll scenario, adding to 34,796 PCUs. However, in the toll-based Scenario 2, these numbers drop to 18,731 PCUs towards the city and 14,326 towards the airport at 33,057 PCUs. Scenario 3, another toll-aligned option, shows an even lower 18,405 PCUs city-bound and 13,899 PCUs towards the airport, totalling 32,304 PCUs. The pattern remains similar in 2041, with the no-toll scenario projecting 26,215 PCUs towards the city and 19,489 towards the airport (at 45,704 PCUs), compared to Scenario 2's 24,949 city-bound and 19,994 airport-bound PCUs (total: 44,943), and Scenario 3's 24,809 city-bound and 19,664 airport-bound PCUs (total: 44,473). DPR also proposes a toll of Rs 330 (one-way) for a distance of 16 km. The report also highlights that tolls for subsequent years are calculated based on a 5 per cent annual increase in the wholesale price index, with a 40 per cent restriction. Additionally, DPR also warns of at least 22 gridlock situations at entry and exit ramps if ramp capacities are not adequately designed or if traffic management is not strengthened. Some of the potential gridlock locations include the Chalukya Circle, Race Course Road junction, Minerva Circle, Cauvery Junction, Lalbagh West Gate, and other areas. The report recommends the need for additional slip lanes and turning lanes, signal optimisation and real-time monitoring systems. Satya Arikutharam, an urban mobility expert, said, 'BBMP's Tunnel Road proposal upends economic theory. Its traffic analysis outputs suggest that more cars will use the Tunnel Road facility when tolled. The entire transport modelling work is flawed, and the all-important modal share is just arbitrarily lifted from the old Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP). The DPR is flawed and unreliable, and I do not expect any credible bids for the tender.' Rajkumar Dugar, convenor, Citizens4Citizens forum, said, 'The tunnel road project is likely to do the exact opposite of what it promises. Any minor gain from commuting at an average speed of 50 kmph inside the tunnel will be almost entirely wiped out at the entry and exit points. Worse, it will create traffic chaos for those who aren't even using the tunnel. If the goal is truly to free up the roads, what's needed is a serious push for public transport — buses, metro, suburban rail and more.' Sanath Prasad is a senior sub-editor and reporter with the Bengaluru bureau of Indian Express. He covers education, transport, infrastructure and trends and issues integral to Bengaluru. He holds more than two years of reporting experience in Karnataka. His major works include the impact of Hijab ban on Muslim girls in Karnataka, tracing the lives of the victims of Kerala cannibalism, exploring the trends in dairy market of Karnataka in the aftermath of Amul-Nandini controversy, and Karnataka State Elections among others. If he is not writing, he keeps himself engaged with badminton, swimming, and loves exploring. ... Read More


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After month at Kerala airport, British Royal Navy's F-35B fighter jet set to fly out, parking fee bill being prepared
The British Royal Navy's F-35B fighter jet, which has been stranded at the international airport in Kerala after an emergency landing on June 14, is ready to fly back on Tuesday. Sources at the airport said the repair of the fighter jet at the Air India hangar is complete. 'The jet is now being taken back to the bay from the hangar, where it has been undergoing repair and assessment since July 6 after an engineering team from the UK arrived in Thiruvananthapuram. The 14-member engineering team, which has been here for safety checks and repairs, will return to the UK by Airbus A400M Atlas aircraft, which will land here on Tuesday. The fighter jet will also fly back on Tuesday,'' sources said. Airport sources said the parking fee for the jet fight is being calculated as per the existing norms. 'It would range between Rs 15,000 and Rs 20,000 a day. Besides, there would be a fee for land for the fighter jet and the Airbus. It is calculated between Rs 1 lakh and Rs 2 lakh. Air India will fix the fee for using their Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) facility at the airport,' said the official. The F-35B from the Royal Navy's aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales made the landing in Thiruvananthapuram on June 14 when it was undertaking a routine flight outside the Indian air defence identification zone, which is a designated area of airspace extending beyond a country's sovereign territory. Thiruvananthapuram was designated as the emergency recovery airfield, a location where aircraft can land in the event of an in-flight emergency. Subsequently, the integrated air command and control system, a central command and control system that enables the Indian Air Force to monitor and manage air operations, detected the British fighter jet and authorised the aircraft to land after it had been diverted due to an emergency. Three weeks later, the UK engineering team arrived after their government accepted the offer of a space in the MRO facility. The UK High commission has earlier stated that the UK remains grateful for the support and collaboration of the Indian authorities and airport teams.