logo
How a small wine importer took On Trump's tariffs

How a small wine importer took On Trump's tariffs

Mint30-05-2025
Victor Owen Schwartz is the founder of a family-run wine and spirits importer called VOS Selections.
Victor Owen Schwartz was preparing linguine and clams for dinner Wednesday night when he spotted an email from his lawyers with some good news. 'I wasn't shocked," said Schwartz. 'I thought we were right, but I know that's not always the way the world works."
Schwartz, a small wine importer and distributor, is the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit that was filed in April by the Liberty Justice Center, a libertarian legal group, to challenge President Trump's tariffs. The email told him that a federal court had ruled in his favor and invalidated almost all of Trump's tariffs.
'This is really a win for small business in America and the right of free trade," Schwartz said.
The 66-year-old businessman is the unlikely face of tariff resistance. He is one of five small businesses that agreed to take on the U.S. government. Big corporations, powerful CEOs and trade groups didn't mount legal challenges to the Trump administration's tariffs.
An appeals court Thursday granted a government request to pause the decision while it considers an appeal. Other tariff challenges, including one by a group of states, have been filed, but Schwartz's case is front and center.
An unhappy banker, Schwartz started his business, VOS Selections, 39 years ago after working for five years as a commercial lender. His New York City company imports wines, sakes and spirits from small producers in 16 countries. European wines account for the bulk of sales.
He was introduced to Ilya Somin, a George Mason University constitutional law professor and co-counsel in the case, by a family member who had been a student of Somin's. The professor had written a February post on the blog Volokh Conspiracy calling the tariffs unconstitutional. Lawyers at the Liberty Justice Center had reached out to him to help bring a case.
'We are importers. We are canaries in the coal mine, on the front line of this issue," said Schwartz, who started as a two-person operation and now has about 20 employees. His firm sells to restaurants, small liquor stores and big chains such as Total Wine.
Schwartz said he was nervous about the political repercussions of challenging the Trump administration but decided to go ahead anyway. 'If I didn't do it, who is going to do it?" he said. 'It was not a political decision. It was a business decision."
Schwartz started his wine business 39 years ago after working for five years as a commercial lender.
The Liberty Justice Center, which is based in Texas, has brought more than 135 lawsuits since it launched in 2011. The libertarian, nonprofit public-interest litigation law firm previously was best known for a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 that allowed government employees to opt out of union dues.
The group initially spoke with about a dozen small-business owners about joining the tariffs lawsuit but had little success finding potential plaintiffs. 'A lot of people we contacted were hesitant to challenge the administration," said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center and lead counsel on the tariff lawsuit.
In early April, Somin wrote in a post that he and the Liberty Justice Center were looking for plaintiffs for a lawsuit challenging the tariffs that they would represent on a pro bono basis.
'I think the ideal client would be a privately held company affected by the tariffs that imports materials directly from one of the countries subject to the tariffs," Somin wrote. 'The company doesn't have to be a small business, but since I suspect many small businesses will be disproportionately harmed by the tariffs, that may be an ideal plaintiff."
The post generated a lot of interest. The group spoke with about three dozen businesses before settling on at least 10 they liked. Some decided not to participate.
Somin said being counsel on a case was new for him, as he mostly spends his time writing amicus briefs and doesn't litigate cases. However, the libertarian scholar did represent himself about 30 years ago at a hearing in front of a Massachusetts state board to fight points being added to his auto insurance. 'I was successful in that case," he said.
Along with VOS, four other small businesses joined the case: a fishing tackle retailer in Pennsylvania, a women's cycling apparel brand based in Vermont, a Utah manufacturer of plastic pipe, and MicroKits, a Virginia-based maker of educational electronic kits.
The five plaintiffs, collectively, import goods from more than three dozen countries, Schwab said, and represented a variety of industries. VOS was selected as the lead plaintiff in part because 'wine illustrated why the broad-based tariffs don't make any sense," Schwab said.
David Levi, the owner of MicroKits, which sells do-it-yourself electronics kits for students and hobbyists, gets about 60% of his parts from China. 'Either you can't find them in the U.S., or they are five to 10 times more expensive," he said.
Levi started the business in 2020 and has one part-time employee. When the tariffs hit, he stopped placing parts orders. 'I was petrified," he said. 'The meaning of petrified is you are so scared, you don't take any action."
With fewer parts on hand, he had to slow production and cut his part-time employee to 15 hours a week from 25. He also raised prices. A kit that produces sounds now sells for $49.95, up from $39.95 before the tariffs.
VOS also had to review each of its products to quantify the tariff impacts. Schwartz and his daughter Chloë Syrah Schwartz, who helps run the business, decided to put off purchases of some new items and slower-selling products.
Tariffs are particularly painful, Schwartz said, because they must be paid when the goods arrive in the U.S., not when they are sold. The company has paid about $20,000 in new tariff costs this year.
'The simple word is contraction," said Schwartz. 'We have to buy less. We have to buy more carefully. We can't take the same risks we normally would."
Write to Ruth Simon at Ruth.Simon@wsj.com and James Fanelli at james.fanelli@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump open to China visit if Xi invites; Beijing wants tariff truce extended, no US decision yet
Trump open to China visit if Xi invites; Beijing wants tariff truce extended, no US decision yet

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump open to China visit if Xi invites; Beijing wants tariff truce extended, no US decision yet

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (July 29) clarified that he has no intention of pursuing a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, but said he may visit China if formally invited. 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest!' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump and Xi last spoke by phone in June. Following the call, both leaders reportedly invited each other to visit. If Trump's visit materializes, it would mark their first face-to-face meeting since Trump's return to the presidency in January. Meanwhile, US-China trade negotiations concluded in Stockholm after two days of closed-door meetings. The third round of talks between the two economic giants is seen as a key step toward easing ongoing trade tensions. Speaking at a press conference after the talks, Chinese Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said Beijing wants the existing tariff truce with Washington to continue. The current agreement has capped tariffs at 30% on Chinese goods entering the US. 'We believe the current arrangement has helped maintain stability in bilateral trade. China supports its extension,' Li said, without specifying a timeline. Trump had previously extended the truce by 90 days. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed that the pause in tariff hikes was 'under discussion,' but emphasised that no final decision had been made. Greer told reporters that he and Secretary Bessent will brief President Trump once they return to Washington, but ultimately, it's the president's call. Trump, speaking to journalists at the end of a trip to Scotland, said he was informed the Stockholm meeting had gone well.

Donald Trump says US-India trade deal not finalised yet, hints at 20-25% tariff
Donald Trump says US-India trade deal not finalised yet, hints at 20-25% tariff

India Today

time29 minutes ago

  • India Today

Donald Trump says US-India trade deal not finalised yet, hints at 20-25% tariff

US President Donald Trump on Monday said a trade agreement with India has not yet finished, just two days before the August 1 deadline to impose reciprocal tariffs. Speaking to reporters, Trump said discussions are ongoing and hinted that India could face import duties as high as 25% if talks do not reach agreement."India trade deal not been finalised." When asked about the possibility of tariffs ranging from 20% to 25%, Trump responded, "Yeah, I think so. India is my friend. They ended the war with Pakistan at my request... The deal with India is not finalised. India has been a good friend, but India has charged basically more tariffs than almost any other country."advertisement In recent weeks, the US president has been repeating that both sides were close to striking a trade agreement. INDIA AWAITS VISIT FROM US DELEGATION IN MID-AUGUSTAccording to news agency Reuters, New Delhi is preparing for potential US tariffs on select exports -- expected to range between 20% and 25% -- if a deal is not finalised by the deadline. However, rather than rushing into new concessions, India is planning to restart trade negotiations when a US delegation visits in mid-August."Talks are progressing well, and a delegation is expected in Delhi by mid-August," one Indian official told Reuters. The official added that Trump could still issue a formal tariff notification imposing duties of up to 25% in a "worst-case scenario."He added, "We assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out."Indian officials said that the objective is to work toward a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement by September or October. While discussions have been positive, certain sectors remain contentious, particularly agriculture and remains firm in its position against the import of genetically modified crops like soybean and corn, and it is unwilling to open its dairy EYES GLOBAL TARIFF PUSHOn Monday, Trump hinted at a wider tariff strategy, saying that most countries without bilateral trade deals could soon face US tariffs ranging from 15% to 20%. This would be significantly higher than the 10% baseline tariff he introduced in April. The administration plans to notify around 200 nations of the new "world tariff" to CNBC, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer acknowledged that the talks with India still require further negotiation. "President Trump is more interested in good deals than quick deals," he said. He noted that India has demonstrated "strong interest in opening portions of its market," although its trade policies have traditionally prioritised domestic Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal also struck an optimistic tone, saying last week that progress in the ongoing trade discussions has been "fantastic."Trade between the two countries will reach approximately $129 billion in goods in 2024, with India enjoying a trade surplus of nearly $46 EndsWith inputs from Reuters

Trump's 10-day ultimatum to Russia: Putin's ally Medvedev issues ominous warning - ‘Each new ultimatum is a threat'
Trump's 10-day ultimatum to Russia: Putin's ally Medvedev issues ominous warning - ‘Each new ultimatum is a threat'

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump's 10-day ultimatum to Russia: Putin's ally Medvedev issues ominous warning - ‘Each new ultimatum is a threat'

US President Donald Trump's latest move to shorten the timeline for a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine has drawn sharply contrasting reactions from Kyiv and Moscow. While Ukrainian leaders welcomed the increased pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, top Russian officials issued stern warnings, framing the move as a provocation. The Kremlin offered a cautious initial response. Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters Tuesday that Russia had 'taken note' of Trump's statement, but said the Kremlin would refrain from commenting further. 'I would like to avoid any assessments,' Peskov said. However, Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, responded sharply, accusing Trump of risking escalation. 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10,' Medvedev wrote on X. 'He should remember two things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' Medvedev — a known hardliner in Putin's inner circle — warned against following 'the Sleepy Joe road,' in a reference to President Joe Biden, whom Trump frequently criticizes. 'Clear stance and expressed determination by POTUS — right on time, when a lot can change through strength for real peace,' Zelensky wrote on X. He added, 'I thank President Trump for his focus on saving lives and stopping this horrible war,' reaffirming Ukraine's readiness to work with the US to pursue peace and shared security. Andriy Yermak, Zelensky's chief of staff, also expressed support, posting on Telegram: 'Putin only understands strength — and this has been communicated clearly and loudly.' Speaking during a visit to the UK on Monday (July 28), Trump said he was 'very disappointed' in Putin and saw no signs of progress toward a ceasefire. He announced a new, shortened deadline for action. 'I'm going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today,' Trump said. 'There's no reason in waiting. I want to be generous, but we just don't see any progress being made.' Earlier this month, Trump had set a 50-day deadline for Russia to accept a ceasefire, warning that failure to do so would trigger severe economic retaliation — including secondary sanctions targeting countries still doing business with Moscow. The US and Ukraine continue to push for an immediate ceasefire as a precursor to peace talks. However, Russia insists that negotiations cannot proceed unless Ukraine agrees to sweeping concessions — including demilitarization, withdrawal from contested territories, and abandoning its NATO aspirations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store