
Building A Smarter Shield: How Quantum Tech Will Fortify America's Missile Defense
When President Reagan proposed a 'Star Wars' missile defense system in 1983, as a science-obsessed high school student, I was enthralled at the idea of space-based lasers and particle weapons. Reagan's vision, while clearly technically infeasible at the time, galvanized an entire generation of young minds to pursue careers at the intersection of science, technology and national security.
Today, with rising threats from stealthy cruise missiles and maneuverable hypersonic glide vehicles, missile defense has taken on a new national urgency. The White House recently launched the 'Golden Dome for America,' an ambitious effort to build a next-generation defense shield for the U.S. homeland. This program sets a bold goal: a layered, high-tech missile defense shield capable of detecting and defeating a wide array of threats before they reach U.S. soil.
Yet as modern threats evolve, so must the tools we use to counter them. Quantum technologies, which until quite recently were confined to the laboratory, are now playing a pivotal role in that transformation.
Today's missile threats are faster, stealthier and more evasive than ever. They're designed to fly under radar coverage, jam traditional tracking systems, and confuse defense systems and decision-makers through their speed and complexity. The Golden Dome responds to this through a multilayered shield: integrating satellites, radars, interceptors and command centers across space, land, sea and air. But simply stitching these systems together isn't enough. The real breakthrough lies in fusing them into a cohesive, intelligent network that can anticipate, adapt and respond in real time.
That's where I expect quantum technologies to make a profound impact.
Missile defense depends on precise timing synchronization across hundreds of systems—from satellites to radar to interceptors. However, GPS-based timing is vulnerable to jamming, and even slight timing errors can translate into missed intercepts. Optical atomic clocks deliver timing accuracy at the picosecond level and operate independently of GPS, allowing the defense network to stay precisely in sync, even in congested or contested environments. These clocks are already being tested and deployed in defense settings, recognized for their ability to keep communication, sensing and targeting aligned under pressure. They will also enable advanced radar systems that rely on precisely synchronized nodes to detect fast-moving or stealthy threats.
Next-generation missiles typically emit only faint or camouflaged radio signals, making them challenging to detect using conventional receivers—especially in noisy or jammed environments. Quantum radiofrequency sensors use clouds of atoms to detect radio waves with extraordinary sensitivity, capturing signals that traditional antennas miss, including low-power telemetry, stealthy communications or the electronic whispers of a missile in flight. They also enable passive detection—listening without transmitting—providing a stealthy, jam-resistant approach to monitoring adversarial activity. Deployed on satellites, drones or ground stations, these sensors can offer unprecedented spectrum awareness for missile defense.
A layered defense system generates immense volumes of data, including infrared and optical imagery, radar feeds, and intercepted communication signals. Making sense of this data in real time is a substantial challenge, especially during an active attack. Quantum-inspired AI is helping to address this. This new class of machine learning models makes use of quantum principles to process time-sensitive, multisource data more efficiently and effectively than traditional AI, resulting in faster, smarter, more reliable decision-making.
Such AI systems can correlate radar and infrared inputs, discriminate real threats from decoys and direct optimal interceptor responses in fractions of a second. They're capable of running on edge-deployed GPU hardware, making them ideal for space or mobile deployments where every millisecond counts.
Much of the Golden Dome's infrastructure will be in orbit, where resilience is critical. Space-based sensors and systems must thus operate reliably in harsh, maintenance-free conditions. Quantum sensors have already flown aboard the International Space Station and are being prepared for a range of upcoming U.S. satellite missions. These deployments demonstrate that quantum technology can already be ruggedized, miniaturized and adapted for real-world missions far beyond the lab. Autonomous space-based quantum systems—providing precise timing or detecting faint emissions—add a critical source of advantage to a missile defense system that must remain functional even when under electronic or kinetic attack.
The strategic implications of quantum-enhanced defense are far-reaching. If the U.S. can reliably detect, track and intercept even the most advanced missiles, the incentive for adversaries to launch such weapons drops dramatically. This 'deterrence by denial' is a cornerstone of modern defense strategy.
A quantum-enabled missile shield would be smarter, more adaptive and harder to fool or disable. It could detect threats sooner, track them more precisely and respond more decisively. And by reducing reliance on vulnerable systems like GPS, it would ensure critical national security systems remain online and functional even in the fog of war.
Missile defense is at a crossroads. Traditional technologies won't be sufficient to meet the Golden Dome's needs, but quantum technologies, once seen as futuristic, are now proving their worth in the fast-evolving national security landscape. Optical atomic clocks, quantum RF sensors and AI inspired by the rules of quantum physics are no longer on the horizon. They're here, tested and ready to be deployed as part of the Golden Dome and beyond.
Just as Reagan's bold vision sparked my fascination with the intersection of science and defense, today's quantum breakthroughs rekindle that same sense of possibility. The dream that once seemed like science fiction is now becoming a national security fact—and this time, we actually have the tools to make it real.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Safe Spaces Are Coming Back to Brown University—All Thanks to Trump
Brown University has settled with the Trump administration, which is currently waging war on elite institutions of higher education. Under the guise of combating antisemitism on campuses—an important problem, though not one the federal government is well-suited to address—President Donald Trump's Education Department has gone after Columbia University, Harvard University, and also Brown. Brown's deal with the federal government has been described as more favorable to the university than Columbia's; Harvard has yet to reach an agreement at all, but is reportedly willing to spend up to $500 million to settle the matter. Large sums of money are at stake for all three universities, as the federal government is responsible for doling out billions of dollars in research grants. Brown is the recipient of $510 million in public funding. So it's not surprising that Brown wanted to make a deal. It's unfortunate, of course, that the Trump administration is using the threat of a funding reduction to dictate terms to what is ultimately a private institution. This is obviously a version of jawboning, in which political figures use non-legislative means to achieve some sort of policy end. When the Biden administration threatened social media companies and browbeat them into making different moderation decisions, it was swiftly recognized as a free speech issue by many conservatives, libertarians, and even some on the left. It's similarly vexing when the Trump administration—which has pledged to restore free speech and end federally driven censorship—does this. It's true that institutions of higher education are not entitled to federal funding, which, after all, is paid by taxpayers. The Trump administration, or any administration, could decide, in a moment of unusual frugality, that the U.S. is too indebted to continue sending billions of dollars to wealthy private organizations that have their own massive endowments. But the government shouldn't use the threat of a funding cut as a form of coercion. That's no different from how the Obama administration handled Title IX enforcement: Obama's Education Department instructed campuses to adopt policies that were hostile to free speech and due process, and they implied that federal research dollars would evaporate in the event of noncompliance. Indeed, the extent to which the Obama higher ed coercion blueprint has been adopted by Trump is under-acknowledged. All that said, the details of the Brown settlement are disturbing in their own right. It's true that Brown avoided some of the harsher penalties that Columbia got stuck with, and it's good that the settlement recognizes that the government has no "authority to dictate Brown's curriculum or the content of academic speech." Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California at Irvine, complains that the settlement includes "no barrier to government interference in faculty hiring," but the only thing it really says about hiring is that it must be race neutral. The Supreme Court has already held that race-based hiring and admissions policies are almost always impermissible, so this is hardly some unreasonable, out-of-nowhere demand. But Dubal is also concerned about a provision of the settlement that permits the feds to collect and read Brown faculty course evaluations, and that's legitimately concerning. In fact, it speaks to the most troubling aspect of the settlement: It lends itself toward the creation of a campus antisemitism police that will be laser-focused on identifying, cataloguing, and eliminating uncomfortable and offensive speech that is nevertheless clearly protected by the First Amendment. In other words, the Trump administration is directly encouraging the formation of campus safe spaces. The settlement instructs Brown to survey students on their feelings of emotional safety. The survey questions are really something, and include: "whether they feel welcome at Brown; whether they feel safe reporting anti-Semitism at Brown; whether they have experienced harassment on social media." These are vague questions that will prompt subjective answers. Social media harassment is a particularly fraught topic; what constitutes harassment? If one student is being unkind to another student on Instagram or TikTok, is it really the university's job to intervene? Brown should act to counter identity-based harassment in cases where it's egregious, criminal, or abjectly violates the code of conduct. If students are drawing swastikas on Jewish people's doors, the university should certainly intervene. But the language in the settlement is too non-specific, and almost requires university administrators to overreach. No one should be naive about this, because it's obvious what's going to happen: An anti-Israel student will go after a pro-Israel student on social media, the pro-Israel student will say they are being harassed, and Brown will feel obligated to respond. No student should be made actually unsafe—i.e., be a victim of violence—because they are Jewish, or for any other reason. But it should be self-apparent to everyone who criticized the liberal safe space trend of the 2010s that re-orienting the campus speech police around the protection of Jewish students' subjective feelings of discomfort is not a positive development. This will produce the same sort of histrionics that existed when campus authorities were dedicated to policing speech that was perceived to be anti-black, anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-trans, etc. There will be an uptick in bias incident reports as students discover that they can weaponize the process against perceived enemies, as students absorb the idea that the administration is responsible for making them feel emotionally well at all times. I really thought the idea was to undermine the ideological foundations of the safe space mentality, not expand its identity-based reach. The Trump administration is erecting an edifice that would have been much to the liking of all those Play-Doh-loving, coloring-book-needing, puppy-hugging, safe-space liberals circa 2015. I'm joined by Amber Duke to discuss South Park's jokes about Trump, the latest Epstein Files news, Sydney Sweeney, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D–Texas), and more. It has begun: My Nintendo Switch 2 arrived last night. I bought the system, one extra set of Joy-Cons, the Pro Controller, and three games: Donkey Kong Bananza, Mario Kart World, and Super Mario Party Jamboree. (The grand total was in the $800 range.) I spent most of the night transferring my data from the old Switch to the new one, and I've only had time to play about 20 minutes of Donkey Kong, so the full report will have to wait until next week. The post Safe Spaces Are Coming Back to Brown University—All Thanks to Trump appeared first on
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft valuation surges above $4 trillion as AI lifts stocks
Shares of Microsoft spiked Thursday following blowout quarterly results, lifting the tech giant into the previously unprecedented $4 trillion club along with Nvidia, another artificial intelligence standout. The landmark valuation is the latest sign of growing bullishness about an AI investment boom that market watchers believe is still in the early stages -- even as companies like Microsoft plan $100 billion or more in annual capital spending to add new capacity. Microsoft reported profit of $27.2 billion on revenue of $76.4 billion in its fiscal fourth quarter, capping another year of growth amid massive customer interest in the company's cutting-edge AI capacity. Shortly after midday, Microsoft shares were up 4.3 percent, giving it a market capitalization slightly under $4 trillion after earlier eclipsing the benchmark. "Cloud and AI is the driving force of business transformation across every industry and sector," said Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. "We're innovating across the tech stack to help customers adapt and grow in this new era." The results drew plaudits from Wall Street analysts on an earnings conference call at which Nadella boasted that the company had opened new data centers across six continents in the last year and touted major contracts for global companies like Nestle and Barclays. Microsoft was one of the first tech giants to double down on artificial intelligence when the launch of ChatGPT in 2022 rocked the tech industry. Microsoft has had a strategic partnership with ChatGPT maker OpenAI since 2019, holding rights to its intellectual property. At the heart of the results was a stunning 39 percent surge in Azure, the company's legacy cloud computing platform, which is getting "supercharged" with AI, said Angelo Zino, technology analyst at CFRA Research. Zino attributed "just about all of" Microsoft's recent surge in valuation to AI. - Legacy businesses - While Nvidia is part of a wave of tech companies that have risen to prominence with the AI boom of the last few years, Microsoft has long been among America's corporate elite, joining the prestigious Dow index in 1999, more than a decade after introducing the once-revolutionary Windows program. The company's revenue base includes such workplace mainstays as the Outlook email platform and the LinkedIn career website. Microsoft also has a significant gaming division with the Xbox console. All of these businesses are set to benefit from Microsoft's AI advantages. "We view (Microsoft) as kind of the enterprise king," said Zino. "What AI does is it provides new growth opportunities for this company." For all of fiscal 2025, Microsoft reported revenues of $281.7 billion, up 15 percent from the prior year. Microsoft's revenues have more than doubled from 2018, when they were $110.4 billion. Zino thinks Microsoft is poised for a comparable run over the next six or seven years when it could see annual revenue growth of 10 percent as greater use of AI creates even more opportunity. The biggest risk to this outlook -- and to the AI boom generally -- would be "if we get to the point where supply for AI exceeds demand," Zino said. "That could put pressure on pricing for cloud computing and space." jmb/jgc
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pressure is on for Amazon to deliver strong Q2 earnings results following big beats by Google, Microsoft
Amazon (AMZN) will announce its second quarter earnings after the bell on Thursday, and the pressure is on to show that its AI investments are paying off. The company's report follows Google's (GOOG, GOOGL) and Microsoft's (MSFT) own blowout announcements, highlighting growth across their respective cloud businesses on the back of increased customer spending on AI. Microsoft reported that its Azure business brought $75 billion in its fiscal 2025, helping to push its market capitalization past the $4 trillion mark in early trading Thursday. Microsoft is only the second company to reach the milestone behind Nvidia (NVDA). Google parent Alphabet offered up its own strong results, noting cloud revenue climbed 32% and backlog, or purchase commitments from customers not yet realized, rose 38%. Search also performed better than expected during the quarter, with sales increasing 12% year over year. Now it's Amazon's turn to show that its AI buildout is driving revenue gains for AWS. The company's stock price is up more than 6% year to date and more than 25% over the last 12 months. Alphabet is up 1.8% year to date and 12% over the last 12 months. Microsoft is up 27% and 28%, respectively. For the quarter, Amazon is expected to report earnings per share (EPS) of $1.32 on revenue of $162.1 billion, according to Bloomberg consensus estimates. The company saw EPS of $1.26 and revenue of $147.9 in the same quarter last year. AWS revenue is expected to top $30.7 billion, up 17% versus the $26.2 billion it brought in last year. But like Microsoft, Amazon says it's contending with supply constraints as demand for AI outstrips the company's ability to stand up data centers. During the company's Q1 earnings call, CEO Andy Jassy said Amazon's AI business is a multibillion-dollar annual run rate business and that it's growing triple-digit percentages year-over-year. BofA Global Research analyst Justin Post wrote in an investor note that supply growth should support revenue trends in the second half of the year, which could accelerate AWS revenue. Outside of AWS, Amazon is expected to post online store revenue of $59.1 billion, up 6%, while advertising revenue is anticipated to hit $14.9 billion, a 17% jump. 'The consumer was far more resilient than expected in 2Q, with CEO Andy Jassy saying in May that "we have not seen any attenuation of demand at this point,' Wedbush analyst Scott Devitt wrote in a note to investors ahead of earnings. '[Foreign exchange] should also have a favorable impact to International Retail sales, with the dollar weakening on a [year-over-year] basis versus most European currencies,' he added. Investors will also be on the lookout for any potential tariff impact in retail sales in the quarter and beyond, as President Trump continues to threaten higher levies on countries that don't agree to new trade deals including, most recently, India. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio