logo
GPs cut appointments after computer problems in Nottinghamshire

GPs cut appointments after computer problems in Nottinghamshire

BBC News11 hours ago
Some GPs say surgeries in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire have cut down appointments as they deal with computer problems impacting the delivery of blood test results. Practices have complained of being "bombarded" with duplicate blood test results after new IT systems were introduced at hospital pathology labs in the city and county.The Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) said it had made some progress sorting out the difficulties and was continuing to liaise with doctors. Dr Carter Singh, a GP at the Willowbrook Medical Practice in Sutton-in-Ashfield, said the problems receiving test results had created "extra stress and workload for doctors who are already stretched".
In the first week since the new information technology systems at pathology labs went live, there have been a series of problems reporting blood test results to GP practices.The computer software needed updating because the old software used at the pathology labs based at the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham City Hospital and King's Mill Hospital in Ashfield was no longer supported. This is not the first time there have been issues around information technology used for blood tests. In September 2024, Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS Trust declared a critical incident because of computer problems.
Dr Singh said one of the biggest problems had been working out what results had been sent to GPs electronically from the labs. He said: "Rather than one test result coming through, we have been dealing with duplicated results and others sometimes sent four or five times, [that are] exactly the same results. "It takes a lot of effort and energy to file and navigate and it means less time for patients."
The Nottinghamshire Local Medical Committee (LMC), which represents local GPs, stressed it is continuing to work to resolve problems. Michael Wright, the LMC chief executive, said: "It is frustrating that practices were reassured the new system would work … it is causing so many problems." He understood the testing of the system was made on "dummy patients" - and only when it went live for real patients did problems emerge.He said one GP was starting work early at 4.30am to get on top of the difficulties ahead of seeing patients, a situation Mr Wright concluded is "clearly unsustainable".He added some practices had declared a "black alert" status, meaning they were struggling to maintain their normal levels of service.Mr Wright said he was not aware that patient safety had so far been compromised but concluded "the time needed to deal with these issues has to come from somewhere".He understood some surgeries have been forced to reduce the number of appointments offered as they grapple with computer problems and, if issues persist, that may have to continue.
'Significant progress'
In a statement, Caroline Goulding, director of Primary Care at NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire, said: "We have experienced some issues following the launch of new IT systems in the pathology departments at Nottingham University Hospitals and Sherwood Forest Hospitals on 30 June."This has been impacting the way blood test results are reported to GP practices. Whilst this has not affected the accuracy and quality of the tests, it has, regrettably, led to practices requiring extra time to process and study those results due to the way they have been provided."The ICB and hospital leaders have been working with GP representatives to work through these problems at speed and significant progress has been made."The new IT systems were required to replace an old system which was no longer being supported by the supplier and, as with many projects of this size and complexity, this can sometimes lead to some short-term disruption."We are sorry for the significant impact this has had on our GP practices and are grateful for their continued hard work and support during this."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lampard: Poor Essex mental health care cited in NHS 10-year plan
Lampard: Poor Essex mental health care cited in NHS 10-year plan

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Lampard: Poor Essex mental health care cited in NHS 10-year plan

Mental health services where more than 2,000 in-patients died between 2000 and the end of 2023 have been cited in the government's 10-Year Health Plan as an example of poor practice, a lawyer told a Lampard Inquiry into the care of patients saw counsel Nicolas Griffin reference the government's comments, acknowledging systemic and avoidable harm in mental health services, including in health plan cites issues like toxic culture, incompetent leadership, rampant blame and a lack of fourth public Lampard hearing will focus on evidence from bereaved families over the next two weeks. The majority of mental health services in Essex are now run by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (EPUT). Independent lawyer for the inquiry, Mr Griffin, told the hearing that personal testimonies would guide its investigations into any systemic failings."The Inquiry is aware that many families and friends have through their experiences sadly become experts in various different areas of mental ill-health, care and treatment," said Mr Griffin."It values that knowledge and intends to liaise with families engaging with the Inquiry and their representatives in relation to the investigation of systemic issues where relevant in each case."He said key themes found in relatives' statements included accounts of inadequate care, poor communication, unsafe environments, and a lack of accountability. Mr Griffin said the inquiry had also been monitoring recent deaths and inquests, including the 2021 death of Elise Sebastian under EPUT inquest jury at Essex Coroner's Court concluded that "poorly administered observations" contributed to the 16-year-old's - which runs the unit - and chief executive Paul Scott apologised to Elise's Griffin said further deaths in mental health settings in 2024 and April 2025 "may point to serious and ongoing issues in Essex". He said coroners had - or were expected to - issue Prevention of Future Deaths Reports, highlighting ongoing systemic issues. Mr Griffin told the hearing in London that the inquiry remained committed to establishing accountability - with staff names including those of junior staff generally could apply for their names to be withheld in line with relevant law and the inquiry's protocol on restriction orders, said Mr Griffin. The independent statutory Lampard Inquiry previous hearings were held in September and November 2024 and May 2025. In response to the government's criticisms of its health plan, Mr Scott said: "As the Inquiry progresses there will be many accounts of people who were much loved and missed over the past 24 years and I want to say how sorry I am for their loss."All of us across healthcare have a responsibility to work together to improve care and treatment for all and to build on the improvements that have already been made over the last 24 years." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Doctors against Palantir's NHS software put ‘ideology over patient interest'
Doctors against Palantir's NHS software put ‘ideology over patient interest'

Powys County Times

timean hour ago

  • Powys County Times

Doctors against Palantir's NHS software put ‘ideology over patient interest'

Doctors who oppose the use of software developed by Palantir in the NHS have 'chosen ideology over patient interest', the UK boss of the tech giant has told MPs. Louis Mosley appeared in front of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee on Tuesday as part of its innovation showcase. While there, he also challenged claims that Palantir has a 'reputational difficulty' and said it is 'very proud' of the work it does in Israel. Palantir was co-founded by billionaire tech entrepreneur Peter Thiel, who was an early backer of US President Donald Trump, and has worked with the US government. It was announced in November 2023 that a group led by Palantir had secured a £330 million contract to provide the NHS Federated Data Platform (FDP). The shared software system will aim to make it easier for health and care organisations to work together and provide better services to patients, but Palantir's involvement sparked concerns about how patient data will be used. When asked by MPs about how the company protects patient privacy, and if data would be processed outside of the UK, or be accessible by any foreign government, Mr Mosley said: 'The critical thing to bear in mind about the way our software works and the way it's deployed in the NHS, is that the data controllers – so those organisations that have that legal responsibility, in the NHS those are trusts, typically – they maintain control over their data. 'So each of them gets their own instance of our software, and they control who has access to it, they control what data is integrated into it, and they, in effect, implement and enforce the data protection policies that they deem appropriate.' He also emphasised Palantir does not 'derive any economic benefit from the data, the data belongs to the customer'. Mr Mosley claimed that medics who oppose Palantir's involvement in the FDP as choosing 'ideology over patient interest'. It comes after the British Medical Association (BMA) passed a motion stating the company is an 'unacceptable choice' for the FDP at its annual representative meeting in Liverpool last month. The union's members voted in favour of the BMA lobbying against the introduction of Palantir software in the health service, and called for the Department of Health and Social Care to create an audit of the progress of the uptake of the systems throughout the NHS. When asked about this, Mr Mosley said: 'I was very disappointed to see that. I think the accusation that we lack transparency or this is secretive is wrong. 'I think the BMA has, if I may be frank, chosen ideology over patient interest. 'I think our software is going to make patient lives better; so making their treatment quicker, more effective, and ultimately the healthcare system more efficient. 'And I, as a patient, and a user of the NHS, I want it to be as quick and efficient as possible. 'I'm very sad, frankly, that the ideology seems to have taken precedence over those interests.' The BMA vote comes a little over a year since health workers blockaded the entrance to NHS England's headquarters to call for an end to Palantir's contract. In April 2024, hundreds of NHS workers protested in central London, holding placards which read 'No Palantir in the NHS' and 'Palantir aids apartheid'. Mr Mosley also pushed back against claims about Palantir's reputation. It was put to Mr Mosley that Palantir has a 'reputational difficulty' by Conservative MP Kit Malthouse. 'Everybody's slightly suspicious of what you do,' he said. 'And part of that reputational difficulty has been caused by your software being used in war on Gaza and the targeting of Palestinians with particular characteristics. 'What protections would you put in place for UK programmes to make sure they're not complicit in the commission of war crimes?' Mr Mosley said he would 'push back' on the question around reputation, adding: 'I think much of that concern and suspicion that you mentioned is the result of misunderstandings about the nature of our software, the nature of our business model and the kind of work we support. 'I would emphasise the fact that we have never worked and will never work in countries that are adversarial to the west, like China or Russia or Iran. 'We do work in Israel. We're proud of the work that we do there. We have provided the Israelis with support since October 7, but also our work there predates those events. 'I can't go into operational details of the way in which our software is used, but I can assure you that I think the systems to which you would think, like Lavender, for example, are not ones that we are involved in.'

Sit or squat? Scientist reveals why it's actually WORSE to hover over a public toilet
Sit or squat? Scientist reveals why it's actually WORSE to hover over a public toilet

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Sit or squat? Scientist reveals why it's actually WORSE to hover over a public toilet

When nature calls and a public toilet is the only choice, the hygiene levels can often be pretty grim. But while it might be tempting to try to hover above the dirty seat, scientists say this is a bad idea. Dr Primrose Freestone, a clinical microbiologist from the University of Leicester, says that you should always sit down, no matter how unclean the seat might appear. Writing on The Conversation, Dr Primrose says: 'Squatting may actually cause injury or increase the risk of infection.' While squatting, the muscles in the pelvic floor, glutes, back, abs, and hip rotators are working hard to prevent you from falling down. The resulting tension in these muscles, collectively known as the pelvic girdle, prevents urine from freely releasing. This causes incomplete emptying of the bladder, which leads to increasing frequency and urgency of trips to the bathroom. In extreme cases, Dr Primrose warns that this could even lead to an increased likelihood of bladder infection. The pelvic floor is a layer of muscles that spans the base of the pelvis and supports the organs. When people urinate, the pelvic floor works to support the bladder and ensure that the process doesn't require too much strain. But when you are squatting, the pelvic floor and surrounding muscles are already tense. Brianne Grogan, a women's health physical therapist, says: 'This pelvic girdle tension makes it difficult for urine to flow easily, often requiring you to push or 'bear down' slightly to make the urine come out quickly. 'Frequent pushing or bearing down to urinate can contribute to pelvic organ prolapse.' This can be especially problematic for women who are more susceptible to pelvic floor disorders, particularly following pregnancy and childbirth. That means you should always try to avoid hovering in a half squat while peeing. If you are still worried about the risk of getting sick from sitting on a dirty toilet, the experts say there is no reason to be concerned. Dr Primrose says: 'Developing an infection from your bottom sitting on a toilet seat is very unlikely, as most intestinal diseases involve hand-to-mouth transfer of bacteria as a result of faecal contamination of hands, food and surfaces. 'Human skin is also covered by a layer of bacteria and yeast which functions as a highly effective protective shield.' That means there is no need to squat over the toilet in the first place. The far bigger worry should be touching surfaces in the toilet with your hands. When we flush a toilet, a plume of tiny liquid droplets containing bacteria and faecal matter, invisible to the naked eye, is violently ejected. Studies have shown that this plume of matter can travel up to five feet (1.5 metres), covering everything that it touches. That includes door handles, the toilet lid, toilet paper holders, and even your phone, which can end up coated with a layer of faecal matter and bacteria. Those include E. coli, which can result in nasty diarrhoea and stomach cramps, and Pseudomonas, which causes infections in the blood and lungs. Your phone is a particularly big infection risk for the 75 per cent of people who use their phones in the toilet. You should give your phone a regular clean with a 70 per cent alcohol wipe or a mild soap and water mixture to ensure it doesn't become a bacterial breeding ground. However, the most important thing you can do is to thoroughly wash your hands and try not to touch any surfaces like taps or soap dispensers with your bare hands. Dr Primrose says: 'It is advisable when hand washing is complete, to leave the tap on while you dry your hands - and then to use a clean paper towel to turn off the water.' Aerosol droplets containing urine, faeces and vomit stay in the air for up to 20 seconds Tiny droplets carrying traces of urine, faeces, vomit and viruses float into the air at mouth-level after a toilet is flushed, a 2021 study warned. It showed that tens of thousands of particles are spewed into the air by a flush and can rise several feet above the ground. Droplets were spotted floating around five feet (1.5m) in the air for more than 20 seconds, with researchers pointing out this poses a risk of inhalation. Small droplets and aerosols are so light they can float around in the air on tiny draughts, before settling on a surface. Researchers say that they can also act as vectors for diseases. SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes Covid, for example, has been found alive in human faeces. Therefore, scientists warn that flush-propelled particles from an infected person's faeces could float into the air, be sucked in by a passer-by, and infect them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store