Club World Cup final: A win for Chelsea, FIFA and Trump – DW – 07/13/2025
"The golden era of global club football has started," said FIFA President Gianni Infantino at Trump Tower in New York on Saturday. "We can say definitely this FIFA Club World Cup has been a huge, huge, huge success."
It's the kind of hyperbole favored by the owner of Trump Tower, where FIFA have recently rented an office. Donald Trump and Infantino have grown ever closer this year, ostensibly because of this revamped and expanded tournament and next year's World Cup, to be hosted in the USA, Canada and Mexico — an event many feel will be used by Trump to further push his message.
"He loves the game," Infantino said of the man who sat next to him at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on Sunday. "You cannot organize a competition like this without the full support of the government. Great thanks to President Trump – he has been fantastic."
So too was Chelsea's Cole Palmer. The English attacking midfielder scored twice and made a third goal for Brazilian striker Joao Pedro to put European champions Paris Saint-Germain to the sword before halftime. PSG had no answer in the second half, as Chelsea cruised to victory.
Infantino's main measure of success for the Club World Cup, though, appears to be financial. He reported revenues of over $2 billion (€1.7 billion) and average earnings of $33 million per match for FIFA. Not bad for an organization whose remit is organization and promotion of the sport, rather than pure profit.
FIFA aside, the biggest financial beneficiaries were the two teams that contested the final. Chelsea will get $40 million for the final alone while Paris Saint-Germain gets $30 million for the match, plus both get their share of the overall $1 billion prize pool. It's a sizable chunk, even for a team owned by an American private equity firm who bought it from a sanctioned Russia oligarch and one owned by the oil-rich nation state of Qatar. A $250 million solidarity payment was also promised by FIFA "to club football across the world."
The fact that the final contained European teams who won two of three continental competitions in the season just finished is evidence of the primacy of European football. Three of the four semifinalists were European, as were the majority of the quarterfinalists. It remains to be seen how much a solidarity payment split between the rest of the teams in FIFA's 211 member states will impact the inequalities in the global game.
Though Infantino has been effusive in his praise, many in the game have found failings with the first edition of a revamped competition pushed through by the FIFA boss.
"The Club World Cup is the worst idea ever implemented in football in this regard," German coach Jürgen Klopp, who coached Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund said during the tournament. "People who have never had or do not have anything to do with day-to-day business anymore are coming up with something. There is insane money for participating, but it's also not for every club.
"Last year it was the Copa [America] and the European Championship, this year it's the Club World Cup, and next year the World Cup. That means no real recovery for the players involved, neither physically nor mentally."
The issue of exhaustion, echoed by many players, coaches and fans throughout the tournament, was exacerbated by the extreme temperatures in some of the matches.
"Honestly, the heat is incredible. The other day I had to lie down on the ground because I was really dizzy," said Chelsea midfielder Enzo Fernandez on the eve of the final. "Playing in this temperature is very dangerous, it's very dangerous." Borussia Dortmund coach Niko Kovac, meanwhile, described conditions for his team in Charlotte as being like "a sauna" in the group stage.
While there are mandated cooling breaks, Infantino has now said indoor air-conditioned stadiums will be used as much as possible for daytime kickoffs across the 16 venues that will host 2026 World Cup matches. But only Atlanta, Dallas, Houston and Vancouver (which has the coldest average temperatures of any venue at the relevant time of year) have such facilities in place.
FIFA also made a surprise player welfare announcement on Saturday. An agreement has been made for a mandatory 72-hour minimum gap between games and a three-week period of rest in the off season, with global players' union, FIFPRO, among those who have been pushing hard for similar measures. The amount of long haul trips taken by players will also be considered in future.
All that may well have been some distance from the Chelsea players' minds as, after a brief scuffle on the pitch with PSG players and staff, they celebrated a win that clearly meant something to them.
As he headed from the stands to hand medals to those victorious players, a beaming Infantino was likely reflecting favorably on the beginning of his "golden era". The next stage will be the biggest one of all, the World Cup. Infantino seems well disposed to let Trump bask in some of football's light there too.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
23 minutes ago
- DW
Language rows rage in India as ruling party pushes Hindi – DW – 07/15/2025
People who speak English in India will "soon feel ashamed," according to a senior government minister from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. But the party's efforts to promote Hindi are facing an escalating backlash. India's Home Minister Amit Shah recently said that those who speak English in the South Asian country would "soon feel ashamed." He also urged people to speak their mother tongue with pride. "I believe that the languages of our country are the jewels of our culture. Without our languages, we cease to be truly Indian," he said. He emphasized that India should lead globally through its own languages instead of using English. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has also been increasingly giving precedence to Hindi over English in official work. Legal directives require Hindi in official communication, documentation, courts, and recruitment, especially in Hindi-speaking states, aiming to boost Hindi's role and reduce dependence on English. The push to elevate Hindi, however, has been controversial — particularly in non-Hindi-speaking states. Language is a touchy subject in the world's most populous country, where its 1.4 billion people speak a mosaic of over a hundred languages and thousands of dialects. India does not have a single "national language." Instead, it now has 22 official languages. At the federal level, both Hindi and English are designated as official languages, while individual states have adopted one or more regional languages as their official languages. The nation's internal, state boundaries are also drawn mostly along linguistic lines. Hindi is the country's most-spoken language with more than 43% of the population (more than 528 million people) able to communicate in it, as per the last census held in 2011. It's followed by Bengali, Marathi, Telugu and Tamil. "Unlike Western nation-states that are mostly monolingual, India embraces multiple official languages, reflecting its rich linguistic diversity, from which this tension arises," said Dwaipayan Bhattacharya, a professor at the Center for Political Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Attempts were made in the past to make Hindi the sole official language at the federal level, but they all met stiff resistance in non-Hindi-speaking regions. Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, has long campaigned for the promotion of Hindi. Prafulla Ketkar, editor of Organizer, the mouthpiece of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the BJP's ideological parent, said, "English as a colonial legacy should be replaced by Indian languages. Hindi serves as a communication medium with the Union without undermining other languages, as every Indian language holds national importance." While the BJP insists it wants to promote all native Indian languages — not just Hindi — its attempts to expand the usage of Hindi have been contentious, with critics accusing New Delhi of trying to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking states. Southern states, whose languages don't have much in common with Hindi, have particularly opposed the Hindi push. "Hindi is as foreign for non-Hindi-speaking states as English," said Samuel Asir Raj, a sociologist and formerly a professor at Manonmaniam Sundaranar University in Tirunelveli. In the western state of Maharashtra, which is run by the BJP, the government recently announced that young pupils would be taught Hindi as a third language. But a fierce backlash quickly forced it to scrap the move. In Tamil Nadu, Chief Minister MK Stalin has been engaged in a bitter row with Modi's government over language policy. The dispute centers around India's National Education Policy (NEP), first introduced in 1968 and recently updated by the Modi government in 2020. The original policy envisioned a three-language formula. Hindi-speaking states in northern India had to teach Hindi, English and a third Indian language in school. Non-Hindi-speaking states, meanwhile, would teach the regional language, Hindi and English. When revised in 2020, the NEP retained the three-language formula but offered more flexibility for states to choose the three languages. It, however, mandated that at least two of the languages must be native to India, although Hindi is not mandatory. Tamil Nadu, though, has remained a fierce opponent of the policy and wanted to stick with teaching its school children just two languages — Tamil and English. And it views the three-language plan as an attempt to impose Hindi on the state through the backdoor. Concerns over federalism and cultural identity have also fueled resistance. "South India's opposition to the NEP isn't about Hindi itself, but about the central government using the policy to culturally appropriate their identity," said Raj, the sociologist. Despite the Modi government's push for Hindi, the use of English in India remains widespread, including in education, commerce and courts, even in Hindi-speaking regions. People across the country view learning the language as key to upward economic and social mobility. They increasingly send their children to English-medium schools, in the hope that it would help them gain access to better and higher-paying jobs. Against this backdrop, it's unlikely that Hindi will completely replace English in India anytime soon. But Hindi has been spreading across the country in recent years, thanks to the Hindi film industry, or Bollywood, which has popularized the Hindi language in non-Hindi-speaking areas. Migration from northern, Hindi-speaking regions to southern states has also contributed to the spread. Bhattacharya said the Modi government's "heavy financial support" for Hindi "creates a sense of imposition." He called for a dialogue between New Delhi and state governments to put an end to the language disputes."Unity should not mean uniformity imposed by the state. While this may spark regional opposition, it won't lead to major conflict. Ultimately, dialogue and compromise between the center and states are essential to resolve these tensions."
DW
an hour ago
- DW
India: Language rows erupt as BJP pushes Hindi – DW – 07/15/2025
People who speak English in India would "soon feel ashamed," according to a senior government minister from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. But the party's efforts to promote Hindi are facing escalating backlash. India's Home Minister Amit Shah recently said that those who speak English in the South Asian country would "soon feel ashamed." He also urged people to speak their mother tongue with pride. "I believe that the languages of our country are the jewels of our culture. Without our languages, we cease to be truly Indian," he said. He emphasized that India should lead globally through its own languages instead of using English. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has also been increasingly giving precedence to Hindi over English in official work. Legal directives require Hindi in official communication, documentation, courts, and recruitment, especially in Hindi-speaking states, aiming to boost Hindi's role and reduce dependence on English. The push to elevate Hindi, however, has been controversial — particularly in non-Hindi-speaking states. Language is a touchy subject in the world's most populous country, where its 1.4 billion people speak a mosaic of over a hundred languages and thousands of dialects. India does not have a single "national language." Instead, it now has 22 official languages. At the federal level, both Hindi and English are designated as official languages, while individual states have adopted one or more regional languages as their official languages. The nation's internal, state boundaries are also drawn mostly along linguistic lines. Hindi is the country's most-spoken language with more than 43% of the population (more than 528 million people) able to communicate in it, as per the last census held in 2011. It's followed by Bengali, Marathi, Telugu and Tamil. "Unlike Western nation-states that are mostly monolingual, India embraces multiple official languages, reflecting its rich linguistic diversity, from which this tension arises," said Dwaipayan Bhattacharya, a professor at the Center for Political Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Attempts were made in the past to make Hindi the sole official language at the federal level, but they all met stiff resistance in non-Hindi-speaking regions. Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), however, has long campaigned for the promotion of Hindi. Prafulla Ketkar, editor of Organizer, the mouthpiece of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the BJP's ideological parent, said, "English as a colonial legacy should be replaced by Indian languages. Hindi serves as a communication medium with the Union without undermining other languages, as every Indian language holds national importance." While the BJP insists it wants to promote all native Indian languages — not just Hindi — its attempts to expand the usage of Hindi have been contentious, with critics accusing New Delhi of trying to impose Hindi on non-Hindi-speaking states. Southern states, whose languages don't have much in common with Hindi, have particularly opposed the Hindi push. "Hindi is as foreign for non-Hindi-speaking states as English," said Samuel Asir Raj, a sociologist and formerly a professor at Manonmaniam Sundaranar University in Tirunelveli. In the western state of Maharashtra, which is run by the BJP, the government recently announced that young pupils would be taught Hindi as a third language. But a fierce backlash quickly forced it to scrap the move. In Tamil Nadu, Chief Minister MK Stalin has been engaged in a bitter row with Modi's government over language policy. The dispute centers around India's National Education Policy (NEP), first introduced in 1968 and recently updated by the Modi government in 2020. The original policy envisioned a three-language formula. Hindi-speaking states in northern India had to teach Hindi, English and a third Indian language in school. Non-Hindi-speaking states, meanwhile, would teach the regional language, Hindi and English. When revised in 2020, the NEP retained the three-language formula but offered more flexibility for states to choose the three languages. It, however, mandated that at least two of the languages must be native to India, although Hindi is not mandatory. Tamil Nadu, though, has remained a fierce opponent of the policy and wanted to stick with teaching its school children just two languages — Tamil and English. And it views the three-language plan as an attempt to impose Hindi on the state through the backdoor. Concerns over federalism and cultural identity have also fueled resistance. "South India's opposition to the NEP isn't about Hindi itself, but about the central government using the policy to culturally appropriate their identity," said Raj, the sociologist. Despite the Modi government's push for Hindi, the use of English in India remains widespread, including in education, commerce and courts, even in Hindi-speaking regions. People across the country view learning the language as key to upward economic and social mobility. They increasingly send their children to English-medium schools, in the hope that it would help them gain access to better and higher-paying jobs. Against this backdrop, it's unlikely that Hindi will completely replace English in India anytime soon. But Hindi has been spreading across the country in recent years, thanks to the Hindi film industry, or Bollywood, which has popularized the Hindi language in non-Hindi-speaking areas. Migration from northern, Hindi-speaking regions to southern states has also contributed to the spread. Bhattacharya said the Modi government's "heavy financial support" for Hindi "creates a sense of imposition." He called for a dialogue between New Delhi and state governments to put an end to the language disputes."Unity should not mean uniformity imposed by the state. While this may spark regional opposition, it won't lead to major conflict. Ultimately, dialogue and compromise between the center and states are essential to resolve these tensions."
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Threatens US Planes And Whiskey While Pressing For Deal
Brussels plans to target US goods including planes, cars and whiskey if trade talks with Washington fail, according to a list seen by AFP on Tuesday, as the bloc renewed its push for a deal. Trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic was to talk to US counterpart Jamieson Greer Tuesday, a day after speaking with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The European Commission said that Brussels was still hopeful for a "good outcome" in the tariffs standoff. US President Donald Trump threw a curveball into months of EU-US negotiations at the weekend when he announced he would slap a 30-percent levy on the bloc's goods from August 1 if no deal was made. Until Trump's ultimatum, the EU had been hoping for an accord last week that would stave off higher tariffs and avoid a damaging trade war with its biggest commercial partner. On Monday, Brussels shared with member states a list of US goods worth 72 billion euros ($84 billion) that could be hit by levies if tariff negotiations fail -- with several capitals urging the bloc to toughen its stance. The 202-page document, seen by AFP on Tuesday, lists big-ticket items like US-made aircraft, cars, chemicals and electrical equipment alongside sundry other items, such as live bees, camels, parrots, condoms and opium. Bourbon whiskey, whose targeting faced resistance from France and Italy for fear of reprisals against European wine and spirits, also features. So are nails, snails, and Christmas trees. Commission spokesman Olof Gill declined to provide details of Sefcovic's Monday call with Lutnick, but said a technical team from the commission, in charge of trade policy for the 27-nation EU, was heading to Washington "as we speak". "We are in the most sensitive stage of those negotiations right now, working towards getting an agreement in principle over the line before the deadline," he told reporters. "We wouldn't be engaging in negotiations if we didn't think those negotiations could lead to a good outcome. So clearly, we think that an agreement in principle, as we have said, is within reach." The commission's new list of reprisal targets comes in addition to a first package -- worth 21 billion euros -- which it drew up after Trump slapped tariffs on imports of EU steel and aluminium. That retaliation remains suspended until early next month to allow for more negotiations, and Gill said the EU would not decide on imposing the second round of tariffs before August 1.
