
Divide, distract, dominate is the oldest political trick in the book
READ MORE: Calls for removal of migrant effigies in boat on loyalist bonfire
There's a pattern here. Infringements of human rights provoke resistance from those with lived memory or historical understanding of injustice. When that resistance is ignored – or worse, criminalised – it becomes troubling to those invested in the status quo. At that point, bigotry is no longer covert, it erupts into entitled performance. We're closer to square one than should ever have been allowed.
This isn't just a Northern Irish issue, nor is it confined to sectarianism. It is mirrored in how Westminster handles Scottish democratic expression. Repeated refusals to permit a second independence referendum have stalled not just political process but political imagination. Yet instead of scrutinising Westminster's intransigence, much of the media, and therefore the population, blames the SNP government for not having 'delivered' independence – as if permission wasn't withheld in the first place. This is precisely the kind of misreading and misattribution the UK Government depends on to suppress dissent.
Ironically, the Scottish Government has achieved a great deal despite these constitutional constraints. Standards in public services have been maintained above what should have been possible without mitigation under Westminster's fiscal tightening. Meanwhile, many English councils – Labour-led ones among them – are buckling under austerity. English voters and commentators routinely spout the lie that they're subsidising Scotland, instead of recognising their own shared victimhood under the same system of centralised indifference.
READ MORE: Scottish depot trying to bring back Tesco pallets from loyalist bonfire
Just as the bonfires burn symbols of international solidarity, so too Westminster pits nation against nation, and citizen against migrant. Divide, distract, and dominate: it's the oldest political trick in the book. Whether it's asylum seekers turned into effigies, or Holyrood turned into a scapegoat, the effects are the same: dehumanisation, delegitimisation, deflection, and denial.
And this is not unique to the UK. Globally, we see the same game playing out. Refusal to address historical or structural injustice leads to protest reframed as provocation, then those in power manipulate grievance to embolden reactionary forces. The rise of religious nationalism in India, Israel's settler-state exceptionalism fuelling genocide in Palestine, and racial retrenchment in parts of the US all follow this well-worn pattern.
We are not trapped in this cycle because it is inevitable. We are trapped because those with the power to break it choose instead to preserve it. They conflate silence with peace, and protest with peril. That's why symbolic violence like these bonfires is tolerated, and even encouraged in some circles. It's why legitimate calls for democratic self-determination in Scotland are rebranded as political failure.
Until this cycle is broken by those in the middle ground recognising that complacency is complicity, we will keep returning to these same flames of hatred, denial, and distraction.
The real danger is not just that we forget history or fail to celebrate sociocultural traditions, but that we keep choosing to relive history's worst moments and immolate the progress those traditions should represent.
Ron Lumiere
via email

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
19 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
French action ‘has prevented nearly 500 small boat crossings this year'
Yvette Cooper told MPs nearly 500 crossings had been 'prevented' by the French police, with 385 reaching British shores. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Cooper told MPs the Government had five tactics to address small boat crossings, including strengthening the border and clamping down on illegal working. Her statement came days after the Government secured a new agreement with France over returning migrants who had arrived on small boats. She said: 'French actions have prevented 496 boat crossings this year, but 385 boats have crossed. 'And criminal gangs are operating new tactics, increasing the overcrowding of boats so that more people arrive, and loading them in shallow waters, exploiting the French rules that means their authorities have not been able to intervene in the water.' It is unclear whether the figure refers to small boat crossings being stopped before or during attempts to leave the coastline, or by other means such as seizing boats from warehouses. The Home Secretary referred to 'appalling scenes' of people clambering onto crowded boats in shallow waters, and said French police had faced 'disgraceful violence' from gang members behind the crossings. She continued: 'We cannot stand for this. That is why the new action agreed with France includes establishing a new French Compagnie de Marche of specialist enforcement officers, with stronger public order powers to address increases in violence on French beaches and prevent boat launches before they reach the water.' Some 22,492 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel, according to latest Home Office figures. This is up 57% on this point last year (14,291) and 71% higher than at this stage in 2023 (13,144), according to PA news agency analysis. Last week's agreement saw a deal struck for a one in, one out system that would see a small boat migrant exchange for a legal asylum seeker. No details have been given about how many people will be covered by the scheme, but reports from France have indicated it could initially be limited to around 50 a week – a small fraction of the weekly average this year of 782. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. The accord came at the end of a state visit by French President Emmanuel Macron to the UK. Ms Cooper said: 'The new agreement reached at the summit last week means stronger partnership working with source and transit countries to prevent illegal migration.' Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp rubbished the idea that progress had been made on the issue, and said statistics showed small boat crossings had risen under Labour. Mr Philp said the 12 months since Labour's election last July had seen a 40% rise year-on-year in terms of crossings. He said: 'The Home Secretary comes here today sounding rather pleased with herself. I'm afraid she has no reason to. 'A year ago, she promised to smash the gangs, she said again and again that was her plan, indeed it was her only plan. Yet today, there is no mention of what was once her favourite catchphrase. 'That's because her claim to smash the gangs has become a joke, an embarrassment to her and to the Government.' He added that rather than closing asylum hotels, there were 3,000 more people in them than last year. 'She is setting records, just all the wrong ones,' he said. Ms Cooper replied: 'This crisis, the small boats chaos, went on for 340 weeks under the Tories, a period in which when he was immigration minister, overall migration near trebled and small boat crossings increased tenfold when he was the immigration minister in charge.' She later said the Government's plan would involve greater co-operation with other governments, rather than 'standing at the shoreline shouting at the sea'. Ms Cooper said: 'We will best strengthen our border security by working with countries on the other side of those borders who face exactly the same challenges far better than just standing at the shoreline shouting at the sea.' Conservative former minister Andrew Murrison asked the Home Secretary to respond to the idea that the UK was 'perceived as being attractive to illegal migrants'. She replied: 'I do think frankly it has been too easy to work illegally in this country for too long, and we know that one of the things that the criminal gangs say to people is, 'it will be easy to get a job'. 'They will even give people discounts if they can come and work for those same criminal gangs operating in the UK.'


Daily Mirror
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Rachel Reeves makes promise on tax rises - as she vows not to repeat last Budget
Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a battle to fill the black hole in her spending plans after U-turns on winter fuel and disability benefit cuts wiped out most of her headroom Rachel Reeves has insisted ordinary workers won't be clobbered by higher taxes - and she has no plans for another mega tax-raising Budget. The Chancellor faces a battle to fill the black hole in her spending plans after U-turns on winter fuel and disability benefit cuts wiped out most of her £10billion headroom. And speculation is mounting that she will be forced to put up taxes to balance the books. Senior Labour figures including ex-leader Neil Kinnock have floated the idea of a wealth tax on the mega-rich. Ms Reeves has refused to rule out the idea, saying she would not be drawn into speculation months ahead of the next Budget. But speaking to the Mirror today that she would keep her manifesto pledge to protect the payslips of working people. Asked who was covered by the definition of 'working people', the Chancellor said: "You can see what we mean by the manifesto commitments we made, and we said, no increases in income tax, national insurance or VAT on working people, and we stuck to that in the Budget last year. "It was a tough budget last year, we raised £40billion worth of tax, but we did that by asking the wealthiest and businesses to pay more to sort out the problems with our public finances that we inherited from the Tories, but also to put £29billion extra a year into the National Health Service. We did that without increasing any of those taxes, those key taxes that working people pay." She added: "I don't think we need to define more than that, really. We made a commitment in our manifesto to not increase those taxes. We didn't last year. It remains our commitment for this Parliament." Ms Reeves said previously she had no intention of doing another Budget on that scale again. Asked if the commitment remains, she said: "Yes. Last year, I had to deal with the inheritance that I faced, which included a £22billion black hole in the public finances." She said the cash from the Budget was vital to put public services on a firmer footing after years of Tory neglect, including work to begin driving down NHS waiting lists. She said: "Everyone can see that in the last year, the world has changed, conflicts in the Middle East, worries about security in Europe, disruptions to trade." But she added: "We're a strong economy. We can weather those storms." Ms Reeves visited Westleigh Methodist Primary School, in Leigh, on Monday, as she unveiled a £500million Better Futures Fund to help get cash to schemes for at-risk children. It comes as the Government faces pressure from its own backbenchers to do more to tackle child poverty. The Tory two child benefit limit is shaping up to be another flashpoint between MPs and the Government, which would cost around £3.5billion a year to scrap. Asked if axing it was still on the table after the disability cuts U-turn, she said: 'I'm not wedded to any particular policy. I absolutely share the desire to lift kids out of poverty and you can see in the budget and the spending review that we've already done, my commitment to that." Ms Reeves said driving down poverty was personal to many members of Keir Starmer's Cabinet, as a number of top ministers grew up in difficult circumstances. Pointing to the Better Futures Fund, she said she saw this as part of a "down payment" made to help struggling kids, including the recent expansion of free school meals provision. She said: "[Reducing] child poverty is about putting more money in the pockets of families. This is about expanding the opportunities, the horizons, the ambitions of young people. It's about improving school attendance and school attainment. "It's about putting kids in touch with different opportunities in the local community... to give children opportunities to do things that they might not otherwise get the chance to do. "Today, I was in a learning through play session with children, and some of these kids have not got toys at home. Certainly, they don't have the opportunities that my children or that any of us would want our children to have." She added: "We know there's loads of children who turn up at school when they're four or five for reception and they're not ready for school, not potty trained, can't sit in a chair, can't eat with a knife and fork, don't recognize letters, don't recognize numbers. "All of this is about not just ensuring that parents have more money in their pockets, but that is really important to me... it's also about expanding the opportunities, and that means working individually with children and families to extend and expand their opportunities and life chances." She added: "I got involved in politics in the first place because I wanted more children from ordinary backgrounds and from some of the poorer backgrounds as well, to get a good start in life. Where you start shouldn't be your destiny."


Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ukraine's Zelenskiy taps deputy PM Svyrydenko for prime minister
KYIV, July 14 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy asked First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko on Monday to lead a new government, setting the stage for a political reshuffle as prospects for an end to Ukraine's war with Russia grow dim. The nomination, which requires parliamentary approval, comes as diplomatic efforts to end the war, now in its fourth year, have stalled and as Ukraine seeks to revive its cash-strapped economy and build up a domestic arms industry. "We ... discussed concrete measures to boost Ukraine's economic potential, expand support programs for Ukrainians, and scale up our domestic weapons production," Zelenskiy wrote on X. "In pursuit of this goal, we are initiating a transformation of the executive branch in Ukraine," he said, adding that he had proposed that Svyrydenko lead the government and "significantly renew its work". Svyrydenko, 39, is an economist by training and has served as first deputy prime minister since 2021. She played a key role in recent negotiations for a minerals deal with the United States. Ukraine relies on financial aid from its Western allies to finance social and humanitarian spending as the bulk of state revenues go to fund the army and domestic weapons production. Ukrainian officials have also urged Kyiv's partners to help finance the country's arms industry, including through joint defence projects. Writing on X, Svyrydenko said she would pursue deregulation, cut back bureaucracy, protect business and reduce non-critical expenditure to achieve the "full concentration of state resources" for defence and post-war recovery. "The state apparatus has no right to waste the resources and potential of our country," she said. "Ukraine deserves to be among the strongest economies in Europe." Ukraine's current prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, has held the post since March 2020, making him the longest-serving head of government since the country gained its independence from Moscow in 1991 amid the collapse of the Soviet Union.