Murray Watt ramps up lobbying efforts in last-minute push to get Murujuga rock art on world heritage list
Unesco advisors recommended in May that the nomination be blocked and referred back to Australia until nearby 'degrading acidic emissions', including those from a Woodside gas plant, were stopped.
But the government has said that recommendation was based on 'factual inaccuracies' and says a major monitoring project shows current emissions at the Western Australian site are not eroding the rock art.
The Murujuga landscape contains more than a million pieces of rock art, some almost 50,000 years old.
Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter
The 21-country committee meets in Paris this week and is expected to make a decision on the nomination late Friday or Saturday, Australian time.
The Australian government has been lobbying Unesco and committee member countries to ask them to ignore the recommendation from Unesco advisors the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS).
Watt, who was due to fly to Paris on Tuesday night to join delegates from the WA government and the Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation (MAC), told the Guardian he had hosted ambassadors from about 15 committee member countries at an afternoon reception in Canberra.
Watt said the government aims to convince at least one member country to move an amendment during the meeting that would see the site given world heritage status.
'We're not at a point where people are giving us firm commitments, but we are encouraged by the reception we have received and by what's been said to me and our ambassadors,' he said.
ICOMOS said in a report evaluating the nomination that while the site clearly met the criteria for world heritage status, the government needed to 'ensure the total removal of degrading acidic emissions, currently impacting upon the petroglyphs' and prevent further industrial development. Until then, the nomination should be referred back to Australia.
The case to list the site rests heavily on a WA government report on the results of two years of monitoring air quality and the condition of the rock art at the site by a team of about 50 scientists.
'That report is the most comprehensive conducted for this landscape,' Watts said. 'It is clear in saying industry can co-exist with the rock art, without damaging it, and the air quality is cleaner than capital cities.
'The crux of our argument is that the world heritage committee should base its decision on the scientific evidence that is available. That's the evidence that should be used to determine the listing.'
Some scientists have contested the way the data from the Murujuga Rock Art Monitoring Project (MRAMP) was presented, suggesting it showed there was ongoing damage to the rock art from current emissions.
Conservationists have also pointed to Watt's provisional approval of an extension to 2070 of Woodside's North West Shelf project that would see the gas plant at Karatha, near the site, continue operation.
Watt said his department was still negotiating with the company around the proposed conditions that relate to emissions from the gas plant.
Prof Ben Mullins, of Curtin University and the lead scientist at MRAMP, is in Paris with the WA government delegation.
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
He told the Guardian: 'We released a large and very dense report. We got the feeling, based on what [ICOMOS] put in its report, that they had not had time to properly digest it.'
The monitoring report did find damage to some rocks, but Mullins said this was most likely down to emissions from a long-closed power plant in the area.
He said: 'We found there's no acid rain rain observed in the last couple of years. To the levels of statistical confidence, we are very confident that it is unlikely there's any ongoing impact, but we still have two more years of science to do.
'Part of the reason we're here is to clarify our findings and refute any other, more erroneous misinformation that's out there.'
A delegation from Save Our Songlines, a group opposed to the industrialisation of the Murujuga area and to the Woodside plant, is also in Paris asking the committee to provisionally approve the nomination, subject to the conditions requested by ICOMOS.
Raelene Cooper, a Mardathoonera woman from the group and a Murujuga traditional custodian, said the government was going to 'extraordinary lengths' to push the committee to 'ditch the recommendation by expert body ICOMOS'.
'[The government] are now trying to have their cake and eat it by pretending that industry and Murujuga's World Heritage can coexist – Unesco have said very clearly it can't, so now the government is pulling out all the stops to fix the vote rather than fixing the problem.
'I'm looking forward to seeing Murray Watt for the first time when he flies in later this week.'
The countries that form the committee are Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, India, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Lebanon, Mexico, Qatar, South Korea, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Türkiye, Ukraine Vietnam and Zambia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Could US-style primaries be the answer to the Liberals' gender imbalance? Party figures are mixed
Senior Liberal party figures reject claims support is growing for US-style primaries for preselections and say the issue is 'distracting' from discussion on quotas, but the NSW Liberal Women's Council president says the idea merits further investigation. In the US, both Democrats and Republicans use primaries. Rules vary across states, and can be open (to any registered voter), closed (requiring party registration) or a mix of both. There can be thousands of participants, leading to high levels of voter engagement. Supporters among the Liberals believe primaries would allow local communities to choose and be better engaged with their candidate, and level the playing field for women who might be disadvantaged by current party structures. Some Liberals, including the shadow attorney general, Julian Leeser, have long backed the proposal. But one NSW Liberal, who asked not to be named in order to speak freely, said they believed opponents of gender quotas were using the 'ridiculous' idea as a distraction. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'The primary problem … is that we have a gender imbalance,' they said. They also said primaries were 'risky', with too many 'structural problems', and that the cost of running primaries would lock some potential candidates out. Neither the Liberals nor Labor, they said, would have the money to implement primaries in the style of the US. Another party figure, who did not want to comment publicly, criticised the idea, calling it 'a classic bait and switch to avert the subject of quotas'. A third NSW Liberal source, who did not wish to take a public stance on local primaries, said they were not aware of the idea being discussed at state branch or leadership meetings. The state Women's Council president, Berenice Walker, said the idea of primaries was worth looking into, but that the council was more focused on quotas. '[The] suggestion of community primaries is worth further investigation,' she told Guardian Australia. '[But] quotas are getting broader support around the party. Members are quite pragmatic about how to increase women's participation and are open to a range of solutions.' In June, Leeser told the ABC that community primaries were an opportunity for candidates to build and demonstrate 'actual community support'. 'I think it completely levels the playing field,' he said. 'Women often don't have the time to put into the years of building up support within a party that men do – because often women are juggling family and other responsibilities, and party structures are less friendly to women.' Former long-serving Liberal MP Karen Andrews has also supported primaries. When Andrews announced her retirement, no women stood up for preselection to replace her in her south-east Queensland seat of McPherson. Andrews said the teal independent movement showed how direct community engagement can increase support across the electorate. '[With] a different style of preselection where the community was engaged, you're more likely to have a greater level of commitment from the community.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The federal Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, has said she is 'agnostic' about what approach the party takes to increase female representation. Her deputy, Ted O'Brien, told the media on Tuesday 'all ideas are welcome'. The shadow minister for women, Melissa McIntosh, said in recent days that any reforms must include deeper cultural change within the party. McIntosh would not say if she supported US-style primaries, but has publicised her support for a 'candidate pool' model, similar to that introduced by former UK leader David Cameron to increase female and multicultural representation in the party. Sally Betts, a former Liberal mayor of Waverley and prominent moderate in Wentworth, said party reforms should focus on members and giving them value. Betts said that in her experience, preselections, which under the current rules are open to all members of a branch, often involved only a fraction of the members. 'We are a member-based organisation. When are we going to look after members and encourage them to participate?' As a result of changes introduced by Tony Abbott, all Liberal branch party members are now entitled to vote in preselections, sometimes referred to as plebiscites. Previously, candidates were chosen by a panel that was a mix of party members and party officials. She said preselection for Vaucluse held relatively early after the new plebiscite rules had attracted about 100 members to participate, out of a possible 600, reflecting a the party's more pressing problem – internal engagement. 'We should perhaps make it easier to register and encourage our members to participate.' Former NSW Liberal party president Jason Falinksi said the floating of possible US-style primaries was 'yet another example of us talking about ourselves' and did not believe the model would improve diverse representation in the party. 'Not a single part of this proposal helps us represent the people who are desperate for representation. We would spend yet more resources talking to ourselves while ignoring the very people who need our help and representation.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australians could cut power bills by 90% if they made their homes more energy efficient, report finds
The debate over where Australia gets its energy from has played out like a 'comic-book death battle between coal and renewables' in recent years, according to Luke Menzel, the chief executive officer of the Energy Efficiency Council. Discussions over coal versus renewables, the role of gas and the speed of infrastructure rollout to bring renewables online had been 'important', Menzel said. 'But there's a whole other conversation we need to be having. And that's about how we are using energy.' Menzel and other energy experts say political noise has often overshadowed the role of energy efficiency in Australian homes and how to cut rising household bills. The latest of several reports to make the case for boosting energy efficiency is from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA). IEEFA found Australian households could cut their power bills by more than 90% by implementing a range of energy efficiency measures. Released on Wednesday, the report calculated potential savings of between 82% and 94% if households installed solar and a home battery and used efficient appliances – such as heat pumps, air-conditioners and electric induction cooktops. The report said with federal and state government policies to incentivise home energy efficiency, a goal of halving household energy bills in a decade is achievable. 'We've seen over the last few years that energy prices and cost of living has become an emerging concern, but the debate has been around one-off rebates or debates on how to generate power,' Jay Gordon, an energy finance analyst at IEEFA, said. 'That's important, but it misses the point when you see these 80% to 90% cost reductions.' Last month, energy experts congratulated the Victorian government for a suite of measures to improve home energy efficiency, including a ban on gas heating and hot water systems in new homes from January 2027. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The Albanese government's new $2.3bn home battery program, which officially kicked off last week, provided discounts of about 30% on batteries. Wednesday's IEEFA report projected that households could make savings of between 82% and 94% if they: Installed an 8kw rooftop solar system and a 10kwh battery Used reverse-cycle air conditioning instead of gas or electric heaters Swapped gas or old electric water heaters for heat pumps Replaced gas cooktops with electric induction The IEEFA modelling did not take into account the further gains that Gordon said can be made by improving the thermal efficiency of homes: how well they can hold heat in the winter or keep heat out in summer. More thermally efficient homes give households the option to use more daytime energy from solar to either pre-heat or pre-cool their homes ahead of the evening peak. Menzel said though technologies such as heat pumps and solar are well established, policies to encourage their take-up are a challenge. 'With electrification and efficiency you're talking about a much broader range of product types and interventions that look different in different parts of the economy,' he said. 'It's a heavier lift, but it's where we need to go.' Australian homes use about a quarter of the country's electricity, and account for more than 10% of greenhouse gas emissions. Cutting gas use in homes could also ease the supply pressures in the east coast, Menzel said. Two reports in 2023 and 2024 from the independent Climateworks Centre, based at Monash University, have made the case for a 'renovation wave' across homes in Australia, especially those built before 2003 when minimum energy efficiency rules were introduced to national building codes. Steps such as upgrading windows, adding insulation to walls, ceilings and floors, and upgrading appliances could save up to $2,200 a year on a household bill, the centre's research has claimed. Dr Gill Armstrong, the centre's buildings program manager, said: 'They're tried and tested. It's low-hanging fruit, but it's also the one area where we can move fast for households to get the benefit of lower bills. 'There's a growing awareness that homes can be improved quite quickly. It's a no-brainer for the federal government.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Richard Marles' chief of staff disclosed long-term relationship with lobbyist from firm with defence clients
The defence minister's chief of staff has disclosed and managed a long-term de facto relationship with a lobbyist who works for a small firm representing several defence clients, including a subsidiary of an Israeli government-owned weapons manufacturer. Confirmation of the relationship comes as the Centre for Public Integrity calls on the federal government to publish monthly disclosures of all interactions between lobbyists and senior staff advising ministers, to improve trust in democracy and increase transparency. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The relationship is the latest example of how ministers and senior staff manage probity when dealing with the politically well-connected lobbying industry, which is based on building influence with decision-makers. Sacha Fenton is one of four registered lobbyists for the Canberra-based firm Precision Public Affairs, which represents defence clients that have secured lucrative contracts with the federal government. Fenton's de facto partner is Lucien Wells, who replaced Jo Tarnawsky as Richard Marles' chief of staff after an internal workplace dispute, which was resolved with a confidential settlement in March. There is no suggestion Fenton or Wells breached any rules or ethical obligations or improperly shared any government information that could have assisted Precision's clients. The Centre for Public Integrity's position paper on lobbying, published on Wednesday, calls for all interactions between senior parliamentary advisers and lobbyists to be publicly disclosed by the attorney general's department. The centre's chair, Anthony Whealy, did not comment on the de-facto relationship, which both the government and lobbying firm stress has been carefully managed, but said regular public disclosures would improve trust in the system and increase accountability. 'Not only does the community demand proper reform of the lobbying structures and rules, we need open public records of who meets whom and the nature of their discussions,' Whealy said. 'Closed doors need to be opened.' While senior ministerial staff do not make procurement decisions for the department, they may have access to information that could assist lobbyists in advocating for their clients. When contacted about the long-term relationship, a federal government spokesperson did not comment on it specifically, but said 'it is a condition of employment that all staff abide by the ministerial staff code of conduct and private interest declarations'. The code of conduct governing ministerial staffers requires they 'disclose and take reasonable steps to avoid any conflicts of interest, real or apparent, in connection with their employment'. It also requires them to 'not make improper use of their position or access to information to gain a benefit or advantage for themself or anyone else'. Guardian Australia was told 'probity mechanisms' are put in place to manage and mitigate any private interests that may give rise to a perception of conflict or compromise. These can include staff removing themselves from email chains, meetings or relevant decisions. Precision's founder and managing director, Sarah Cullens, said the firm was 'committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and operates in full compliance with all relevant requirements, including applicable federal and state lobbying codes of conduct'. Precision declined to state whether Fenton had been precluded from lobbying for defence industry clients, given the de facto relationship. The firm has several other health and not-for-profit clients. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The centre for public integrity's disclosure recommendation, if adopted, would have revealed this information. It is not uncommon for political operatives in Canberra to have relationships with lobbyists, and former advisers often work in lobbying. Shortly after Annika Wells become minister for sport, her husband, Finn McCarthy, was formally precluded from lobbying for SEC Newgate clients in the sport portfolio. McCarthy no longer works at SEC Newgate. One of Precision's clients is Rafael Australia Pty Ltd, an Australian subsidiary that is wholly owned by Rafael Advanced Defence Systems. Precision is listed on the Australian government foreign influence transparency scheme as it provides 'general political lobbying' on behalf of a 'foreign government-related entity'. The Greens and prominent crossbenchers have pushed Labor to toughen regulation of political lobbying, promising to use their balance of power to increase transparency and probity. Leading lobbyists have also urged the federal government to strengthen investigative powers and penalties to crack down on rogue operators, including through new laws that would add corporate interests to a transparency register. Wells and Fenton were approached for comment.
