Commerzbank official tells UniCredit CEO to sell and go home
With UniCredit continuing to face fierce resistance in Germany, Orcel last month sent a flurry of letters to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and others, urging them to come to the table to discuss a deal.
But the latest offensive, which only became public this week, has come up against steadfast resistance from Sascha Uebel, deputy chair of Commerzbank's supervisory board, adding to previous opposition from the German government and the bank's board since UniCredit's initial approach last September.
"His next step should be to sell his shares, take his profits and go home," Uebel told Reuters on Friday.
UniCredit, which last year bought a large stake in the Commerzbank and began to press for a merger, declined to comment.
In his letters, Orcel wrote that a tie-up would be beneficial "economically, socially and politically" and would create a new national banking champion for Germany.
Orcel was also given short shrift by the Verdi labour union, which said its concerns had not been allayed, according to copies of their correspondence seen by Reuters.
"We are continuing to campaign against a merger and are in favour of an independent Commerzbank," Verdi boss Frank Werneke wrote to Orcel in a response dated July 2.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
40 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
'Now is the time to defend food security', says Irish MEP ahead of CAP vote
A key vote on the future direction of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) will take place later today in the European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI). It marks a critical step in setting out the Parliament's political priorities ahead of the European Commission's proposals for the post-2027 CAP later this month. Advertisement The report, led by Spanish EPP MEP Carmen Crespo Diaz, outlines the Parliament's vision for the CAP in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). Fianna Fáil MEP for Midlands North-West, Barry Cowen, served as lead negotiator for the Renew Europe Group. The vote comes amid growing debate in Brussels over the future structure and financing of EU agriculture policy. The report strongly defends a ring-fenced CAP budget and argues that food security must be treated as a pillar of EU strategic autonomy. It stresses that the CAP should remain a standalone EU policy and not be folded into a broader national funding envelope. 'Secure and constant access to food has become a matter of strategic security,' the text notes. Advertisement In terms of content, the report calls for better environmental rewards for farmers, a clearer approach to generational renewal, and urgent simplification to reduce bureaucracy. 'Farmers must be properly rewarded for their environmental contributions,' it states, while urging that eco-schemes be made 'simpler and more flexible". It also proposes the continuation of direct payments, including to part-time and small-scale farmers. Notably, the report repeats the Parliament's call for 'impact assessments that take into account farm-level implications' before introducing new requirements. It urges the Commission to cut red tape and simplify access to support through a 'CAP one-stop-shop' – a key ask from recent farmer protests across Europe. Speaking before the vote, Barry Cowen MEP said: 'This is my first report as a lead negotiator for Renew Europe and I'm pleased to have helped shape a strong, constructive text that reflects the real concerns of farmers across the Midlands North-West, Ireland and Europe Advertisement 'The process – meeting hundreds of stakeholders across Europe before engaging in detailed technical and political negotiations – is one I relished and look forward to repeating many times. 'While not every proposal I put forward in my recent position paper on the future of European agriculture made it into the final version, I'm satisfied that a large number of my key asks are reflected – particularly on food security, stronger environmental rewards for farmers and the simplification agenda. 'This vote, I hope, will send a clear message to the Commission ahead of its upcoming MFF and CAP proposals: agriculture is not a footnote to Europe's security – it's central to it. If we want more from our farmers, we must match that with more meaningful support." Mr Cowen added: 'Too often, farmers have been caught between rising expectations and falling incomes. The next CAP must reset that imbalance with clear schemes, fairer payments and a structure built to last. Advertisement 'Dismantling the CAP's ring-fenced budget would be a historic mistake. Farmers need predictability, not political games. Equally, however, I will not be distracted by debate around the CAP's structure and will not accept stagnant funding even if the current format is retained. 'Without an inflation adjustment, the CAP's real value could shrink by 54 per cent by 2034 - an effective €250 billion shortfall. A secure, increased CAP budget is the only way to secure the future of European agriculture and that message will be sent loud and clear to the Commission today.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Apple hits back against 'unprecedented' €500m EU fine
Apple is appealing against a €500m (£430m; $586m) fine handed down by EU regulators over alleged anti-competitive behaviour on its App European Commission said in April that the tech giant had breached its laws by restricting app developers in their ability to inform customers of alternative offers or marketplaces that could be found outside its own and steer them towards purchases. Apple called the Commission's fine "unprecedented" on Monday, saying the decision and its penalty "go far beyond what the law requires".A Commission spokesperson told the BBC it took note of Apple's filing and would defend its decisions in court. The company objects to the Commission requiring it to make further concessions to app developers, including provision of tiers for services which it says introduce more complexity to its options for users and businesses."As our appeal will show, the [Commission] is mandating how we run our store and forcing business terms which are confusing for developers and bad for users," Apple said in a statement."We implemented this to avoid punitive daily fines and will share the facts with the Court."Paolo Pescatore, technology analyst at PP Foresight, said Apple's appeal was a "widely expected move" that "sets the precedent for others"."It is disappointing that it now has to be settled in a long, drawn public process in the courts," he said, adding the nature of changes required by regulators - and enforcement of them - can be lengthy and complex."We should not underestimate the sheer complexities of having to make fundamental design, operational and commercial changes to well-established services and the time it takes to enforce them," he told the BBC."As always the devil is in the detail, which will inevitably take more time to unravel." EU's big tech scrutiny The Commission's Apple fine was delivered in April alongside a penalty on Facebook owner Meta of €200m (£171m) over choice for users under its "consent or pay" fines were the first imposed under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) - its landmark legislation designed to boost competitive business practice in online law also carries tougher obligations for companies designated dominant "gatekeepers" in certain sectors, and firms face hefty fines of up to 10% of their annual global turnover for rule Virkkunen, the Commission's executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said at the time that both companies had undermined the key principles of the DMA - to enable free business and choice for said it was being "unfairly targeted" and forced to "give away our technology for free".It also accused the regulator of "[moving] the goal posts" during their has now escalated its complaint to the EU's second highest court, the General EU's strict regulation of large US tech firms has also attracted scrutiny from President Donald Trump's said in January that he had "some very big complaints with the EU" regarding its treatment of American tech companies, likening fines upon them to "a form of taxation".Speaking on a podcast in October, he said Apple's boss Tim Cook had also called him to complain about the bloc's fines. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Major retailers including Home Bargains and The Range misleading shoppers about their refund rights – are you due cash?
MAJOR retailers including Home Bargains and The Range are reportedly misleading shoppers about their refund rights. Findings from Martin Lewis's Money Saving Expert found that over 30 shops and cafés' online return policies suggest consumers have fewer rights than what the law entitles them to. Under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, customers always have 14 days after the day of receiving a product to notify the retailer that they wish to make a return. Shoppers then have a further 14 days after that to send the product back. But it is important to note that this does not apply to certain goods such as perishable or personalised items, or sealed audio, video or computer software which has since been opened. These can only be returned if they're faulty, or if the retailer's policy allows it. Retailers must inform customers of their legal return rights before they make a purchase. If shoppers are not informed of their return rights, for example not displaying information on the website, the window for a return is extended to 12 months. These statutory rights overrule a retailer's individual policy. For example, Home Bargains ' return right states: "You can return your order, or part of it, for any reason within the specified period of time after delivery. Via EVRi/Courier: 14 Days. To Store: 28 Day". MSE said this breaches shoppers rights as law states that online shoppers have 14 days to change their mind, and a further 14 days to return the item. Meanwhile, The Range also states that customers only have two weeks to return, when they should have up to 28 days. River Island confirms which 33 stores are shutting as a further 70 at risk in huge shake-up – is your local going? Meanwhile, Selfridges also claimed that customers only have 14 days to return products. Monsoon was also found to have miseled customers, but told The Sun it has since updated the language on its website. They said: 'We read Martin Lewis's comments this morning and have taken immediate steps to update the wording on our website to make it clear that our returns policy complies fully with our customers' statutory rights' All mentioned parties have been approached for comment. Keeping this mind the next time you shop online can ensure you don't miss out on cash you are owed back as part of your return. Martin Lewis, MSE founder told the outlet: "It's important for people to know that as a legal minimum… while you can only return goods bought in-store if they're faulty… buy something online and you have a no-fault right of return, provided it is not perishable or personalised. "You have up to 14 days after delivery in which to tell the retailer you're sending an item back, and 14 days after you tell them to return it." YOUR RETURN RIGHTS EXPLAINED THE SUN'S Head of Consumer, Tara Evans, explains your return rights: YOUR right to return items depends on where you purchased it and why you want to return it. If you bought an item online then you are covered by the Consumer Contracts Regulations, which means you can cancel an item 14 days from when you receive it. You then have a further 14 days to return the item, once you've notified the retailer that you want to return it. If an item is faulty - regardless of how you bought it - you are legally able to return it and get a full refund within 30 days of receiving it. Most retailers have their own returns policies, offering an exchange, refund or credit. Shops don't have to have these policies by law, but if they do have one then they should stick to it.
