Glamorous Pan Am back from the dead, and it's coming to Australia
As of the 'inaugural' flight last week, however, he has changed his tune. Having announced a partnership with AVi8 Air Capital – a merchant bank and consultancy firm which specialises in the aviation industry – Carter is now talking of timetabled services and distant horizons.
'Pan Am remains a cherished name in aviation,' he comments. 'Through this collaboration, we aim to assess a sustainable, forward-thinking approach to reintroducing scheduled commercial service under the Pan Am name; one that not only honours [the airline's] legacy – but also makes the Pan Am experience more accessible.'
If Carter is able to accomplish this not inconsiderable feat, he will have succeeded where several others have failed. Because this month's re-emergence of the 'blue meatball' logo is not the first attempt to restore Pan Am to the present tense. It is actually the fifth rekindling of the airline's embers since the original fire burned out in 1991.
There was the low-cost carrier which flew from the US to the Caribbean between 1996 and 1998. There was a short-haul operator, based at Portsmouth in New Hampshire, which offered flights in the American north-east between 1998 and 2004, and a sister company which had another go at repolishing the holy grail, from the same base, between 2004 and 2008. All of them had the Pan Am name. As did Pan Am American Airways Incorporated, which picked up the baton in 2010, running cargo planes out of Brownsville in Texas, with the promise of passenger services to come. It collapsed in 2012, in a haze of scandal.
While each of these failed projects had their issues, they all, ultimately, struggled to compete with the weight and the mystique of a beloved brand. Because, for more than half a century, Pan Am was the biggest – and most shimmering – fish in the global pond.
The airline first emerged in Florida in 1927, as the brainchild of Henry Arnold, Carl Spaatz and John Jouett – three US Army Air Corps officers who began offering flights between Key West and Havana. But it began to bloom in the 1930s, under the astute leadership of Juan Trippe, an American entrepreneur who understood that the future of travel had wings.
Loading
That decade saw Pan Am lead the way with its Clipper planes – doughty flying boats that, come 1931, were whistling their way down to South America. Within eight years, Europe was in focus. On March 30, 1939, Harold Gray piloted the first ever transatlantic flight with passengers; a Pan Am service aboard the Yankee Clipper which made the oceanic crossing from Baltimore to Lisbon – via a refuelling pause at Horta, on the island of Faial in the Azores – in a total flying time of 24 hours, 39 minutes.
By the dawn of the Jet Age in the early 1950s, Pan Am was the US flag-carrier in all but name, flinging itself into the new arena of international travel with flair, finesse and a reputation for luxury. Its state-of-the-art hub, trademarked as 'Worldport', was inaugurated as JFK's Terminal 3 in 1960, its futuristic 'flying-saucer' design suggesting trips to space as much as to Paris.
Ten years later, it was playing host to the jumbo jet. Pan Am was a key player in the advent of the Boeing 747. Its desire for bigger, better, faster and more – and, specifically, its placing an order for 25 of these revolutionary giants in April 1966 – kickstarted the production line in Seattle. The first commercial flight of a 747 was a Pan Am endeavour – from JFK to Heathrow, on January 22, 1970.
It was all so fabulous that you might wonder how so feted an airline could have ceased to exist. But behind the roar of engines and the clink of champagne glasses, Pan Am was starting to flounder. It had risen via its protected status – granted an effective monopoly as America's international airline by the US government. The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 pulled down that ring-fencing, leaving Pan Am blinking uncertainly at issues it had never had to face.
Suddenly, it had American rivals in foreign skies, but no domestic network to help keep it competitive. The acquisition of Florida-based National Airlines in 1980, for an eye-watering $US437 million (about $US1.5 billion [$A2.3 billion] today), was a bid to redress this imbalance – but only loaded the company with a debt that would prove to be its undoing.
In the end, there were two fatal blows. The Gulf War of August 1990 to February 1991 would stamp on a suffocating Pan Am's throat, sending oil prices soaring just as demand for air travel fell sharply with a nervous public; the airline would file for bankruptcy on January 8, 1991, seven weeks before the guns fell silent in Operation Desert Storm.
In truth, though, Pan Am had not recovered from the Lockerbie Disaster. The bombing of Flight 103 on December 21, 1988 sent 270 people to their graves, tragedy crashing down onto the shocked Scottish town in the week before Christmas. The image of Clipper Maid of the Seas, its broken cockpit disembodied on Tundergarth Hill, would become as inerasably linked to the airline as any sepia photograph of first-class fizz and 1960s style.
Loading
Maybe, just maybe, this latest comeback will be for good. In the meantime, Pan Am's newest reincarnation will offer another sophisticated adventure next year – a grand jaunt out of San Francisco, slated for take-off in April 2026, with landings in Japan, Cambodia, Singapore, Australia (in Sydney), New Zealand and Fiji. The cost – a mooted $US94,495 – will not be to everyone's tastes, or pockets. But perhaps you cannot put a price on history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
14 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Coalition demands answers after Albanese government lifts biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports
The Albanese government is being urged to explain its backflip on a US beef ban after the Prime Minister previously insisted Labor would not 'compromise' on biosecurity. The Australian Financial Review revealed on Thursday that Australian officials had notified their US counterparts that restrictions on the importation of US beef will be lifted following a scientific review of the biosecurity risks. Responding to the reports on Thursday, Nationals Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie said the decision could pose a risk to our beef industry. 'We need to make sure our $11 billion beef export industry is protected. Our concerns would be any watering down of those science-based protocols would lead the risk of disease, entering this country, and our farmers, being subjected to unnecessary risk,' Ms McKenzie said. Shadow finance minister James Paterson said the government needed to explain its backflip. 'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns," Mr Paterson told Sky News. "So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so they should stand up and explain that, not anonymously leak it to a newspaper. 'Full credit to the AFR for getting the story, but a major story like this affecting a major export industry of about $11 billion a year and about an $82 billion domestic industry, when you include red meat more broadly, deserves more answers than this.' The restrictions had been cited by President Donald Trump as a justification for his decision to impose a 10 per cent across the board tariff on Australian imports – as well as much larger tariffs on steel and aluminium – in violation of the existing Australia-US free trade agreement. 'Australia bans – and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything – but they ban American beef,' President Trump said in April In response to the comments, Prime Minister Albanese emphatically declared his government 'will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity, full stop, exclamation mark, it's simply not worth it. So it's that simple.' A blanket ban on US beef imports - imposed following a mad cow disease in 2003 - was repealed in 2019. However biosecurity rules have remained in place due to the risk of beef from countries such as Mexico and Canada being imported through the US, and no American beef has been imported under the new scheme. But a government source told the AFR on Thursday that the US Beef Imports Review had undertaken a 'rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade' and the bans would be lifted. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins confirmed the report, saying in a statement that her department was "satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks.' However Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans said he was sure the decision would not have been made unless scientific experts had the 'utmost confidence' it would not impose a risk to Australia's cattle industry. 'Context is important here. We export more than $4 billion of beef a year to the US, and this has been a multi-year assessment process undertaken by the Department of Agriculture - they're the competent authority in this, and they're required to assess this under a rules based trading system. 'What they've done is they've completed a technical scientific assessment, and they've said, look, there are the right processes in place in these countries to be able to manage these risks, and they've determined that they're going to grant access after making this assessment over many years. 'Now, the cattle industry is a $75 billion industry in Australia. I'm sure they wouldn't have made this decision unless they had the utmost confidence that the science was correct.'

9 News
44 minutes ago
- 9 News
Australia lifts ban on US beef imports
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Australia has lifted remaining bans on beef imports from the US as the ongoing battle to secure an exemption from Donald Trump's tariff regime continues. Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth confirmed on Today that a decade-long review into the imports of US beef had been completed. "That review has been undertaken and the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry believe that there are the right controls in place in the US to lift that ban," she said. Imports of beef from the US will be permitted after a government review. (Getty) "My understanding is that will be lifted as a result of a decade-long review." That source emphasised that Australia's biosecurity would remain uncompromised by the change, a stance Rishworth also took. Donald Trump announces his global tariffs in April. (Nine) "We are not we are not compromising on biosecurity. I need to make that very clear," she said. "We believe in free and fair trade. And our farmers very much benefit from being able to export their products right around the world." The revelation comes ahead of US President Donald Trump's proclaimed August 1 deadline for increased blanket tariffs on imports to the US. There are fears for Australia's biosecurity. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Australia is currently subjected to a baseline 10 per cent tariff on all US exports, including beef, with a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium. Trump has also threatened to increase the tariff on imported pharmaceuticals to 200 per cent. The baseline tariff could as much as double to 20 per cent on the August 1 deadline, Trump warned in recent weeks. In April, when rolling out his "Liberation Day" tariff plan, Trump singled out Australian beef. "Australia bans – and they're wonderful people, and wonderful everything – but they ban American beef," he said then. "Yet we imported $US3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. "They won't take any of our beef. "They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers and you know, I don't blame them but we're doing the same thing right now starting at midnight tonight, I would say." A ban on beef imports from the US was put in place more than 20 years ago after an outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or mad cow disease, which can lead to fatal brain disease in humans. The blanket ban was lifted in 2019 for cattle raised and slaughtered in the US, but remained for cattle that had been raised in Canda and Mexico, but slaughtered in and exported from the US. It's those latter bans which have now been lifted, after the review reportedly found the US had improved its tracking protocols. Trade tariffs agriculture Australia national USA World CONTACT US


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Lift that ban': Albo's huge move on tariffs
Australia is lifting a ban on US beef from cattle originating in third countries, a senior minister has confirmed. American beef imports have emerged as a key negotiating item in the Albanese government's efforts to secure a tariff carve out. The Trump administration has been pushing for Australia to loosen import rules to include beef from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. The Prime Minister confirmed last month biosecurity officials were reviewing the request but vowed his government would not 'compromise' Australia's strict bio laws amid outrage from the Nationals and cattle farmers. Confirming reporting overnight that the ban had been lifted, Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth denied the Albanese government had not been transparent in its handling of the US demand. The Albanese government is lifting a ban on US beef from cattle originating in third countries, a senior minister has confirmed. Nikki Short / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'Obviously, for national security reasons, at times, governments of all persuasions haven't put everything into the public domain,' she told Nine's Today. 'But when it comes to what's known as the beef review … that review has been underway for a decade or over a decade, looking at how we can make sure that our biosecurity is safe. 'We will not compromise on biosecurity. 'That review has been undertaken and the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry believe that there are the right controls in place in the US to lift that ban.' More to come.