logo
Labour Government ‘deeply committed' to recognising Palestine, Reynolds says

Labour Government ‘deeply committed' to recognising Palestine, Reynolds says

Yahoo4 days ago
Sir Keir Starmer's Government is 'deeply committed' to recognising a Palestinian state, a member of his Cabinet said.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds stressed that such a move would have to be meaningful and come as part of a 'genuine move towards a two-state solution and a long-term peace settlement' with Israel.
The Prime Minister is under increasing pressure to fulfil Labour's promise to recognise Palestine.
Mr Reynolds told LBC Radio: 'We are deeply committed to the recognition of Palestine as a state, which was part of our manifesto, but obviously we want that to be meaningful.
'Now, at the minute, there is not a Palestinian state there. There is no political agreement between the two principal Palestinian territories in the West Bank and Gaza.
'We have taken other steps in relation to the intolerable situation in Gaza. We've obviously sanctioned two Israeli cabinet ministers. I myself have ended arms exports to Israel that could be used in the conflict in Gaza.
'We've ended our talks with Israel on a more enhanced trade agreement and trade relationship. So we have taken those immediate steps.
'And we do want to see Palestine recognised. I want that to be meaningful. I want that to be working with partners, other countries around the world.'
Labour's London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has piled pressure on Sir Keir to 'immediately recognise Palestinian statehood'.
The UK must immediately recognise Palestinian statehood.
There can be no two state solution if there is no viable state left to call Palestine. pic.twitter.com/7c7YlIUw3P
— Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) July 23, 2025
He said that the UK 'must do far more to pressure the Israeli government to stop this horrific senseless killing', as aid groups have warned of starvation in the Gaza Strip.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called for the Royal Air Force to carry out airdrops of aid into Gaza.
'Aid delivered by the air is no substitute for the reopening of supply routes by land,' he said.
'But the extent of the humanitarian catastrophe we are now witnessing requires us to leave no stone unturned in our efforts to get aid to Gazans.'
More than 100 organisations, including Doctors Without Borders and Save the Children, have put their names to an open letter in which they said they were watching their own colleagues, as well as the Palestinians they serve, 'waste away'.
It comes as the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, labelled the situation in Gaza 'a stain on the conscience of the international community'.
He said: 'With each passing day in Gaza, the violence, starvation and dehumanisation being inflicted on the civilian population by the government of Israel becomes more depraved and unconscionable.'
Hamas-led militants based in Gaza abducted 251 people in the October 7 attack in 2023 that triggered the war and killed around 1,200 people.
Fewer than half of the 50 hostages still in Gaza are believed to be alive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Animal rendering plant responds - as MP calls for it to be shut down over bad smells
Animal rendering plant responds - as MP calls for it to be shut down over bad smells

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Animal rendering plant responds - as MP calls for it to be shut down over bad smells

A BRADFORD business has said it "makes every effort to minimise odours" - after an MP urged the Council to take steps to shut its operations down amid concerns about bad smells. For years, residents and businesses have complained about odours allegedly linked to the P Waddington animal rendering plant, off Hammerton Street. This week, Imran Hussain, Bradford East Labour MP, wrote to Bradford Council demanding that it looks at the legal options it can take against Waddington & Co (1947) Ltd, with a view to closing its operations. Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, leader of the Council, said the 'very offensive smells are hugely frustrating' for the area and 'need to stop'. P Waddington has been based in the city since the 1880s, and is one of just a handful of animal by-product rendering facilities in the UK. Dead animals and animal parts - such as bone, offal and hooves - are transported to the site from across the country and then recycled into energy and biofuels. P Waddington - which is owned by Sheffield-based company J G Pears Group - said it "understands concerns of residents and businesses located close to our facility", adding that its "operations are within the strict requirements of our environmental permit and odour management plan". 'Lives blighted' Mr Hussain told the Telegraph & Argus: "For years I have been campaigning for Waddingtons to take action and deal with the foul odours and long-standing concerns of local residents, whose lives have been seriously blighted. "I've written to Bradford Council demanding that they look at all the legal options available to deal with Waddington & Co, with a view to closing down their operation." He said the Council "must look at legal options to act decisively in the public interest". Bradford East MP Imran Hussain (Image: Parliament) He added: "This is not just unpleasant for residents - it's a serious public health issue. "For years, residents have had their lives made a misery. "I'm informed it's getting worse: more frequent, more intense, and more disruptive. "We need a legal solution to fix this situation. "I'm also calling on Bradford City Council to have an urgent debate on this and consider all legal option available." Cllr Hinchcliffe told the T&A: "The very offensive smells are hugely frustrating for the local community and for the wider district and need to stop. Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, leader of Bradford Council (Image: Newsquest) "We are making so many improvements to the city centre that we now expect everyone to step up, play their part and clean up their act. "As leader, I want to make sure Council officers are doing all they can to hold those responsible to account and I will ask them to look at what more we can do. "We'll be replying to the MP, who has consistently made his views very clear on this matter, more formally in due course." 'We make every effort to minimise odours' Alistair Collins, a director at P Waddington, said: "We would like to highlight that we continue to be open to meeting the MP and community representatives to discuss this matter. "We understand the concerns of residents and businesses located close to our facility. "We also recognise the inherent challenges of a site in such a built-up area; however, the facility is in a designated industrial area, and there are other enterprises nearby handling animal products. "P Waddington make every effort to minimise odours beyond the site boundary. "Our operations are within the strict requirements of our environmental permit and odour management plan. "All of this is done in line with the UK Best Available Techniques (BAT). "BAT ensures that industrial installations use the best available techniques to prevent or minimise emissions and environmental impact. "Our permit was granted because the installation uses modern technology and operating procedures compliant with the current BAT standards. "Other installations handling animal by-products in the UK will be using the same techniques to manage odour and emissions. "The installation is regularly inspected by environmental health officers from Bradford Council. "We work with them constructively to ensure compliant operations at the installation in accordance with our environmental permit. "Animal by-product processing facilities like ours play a vital role in making livestock production sustainable and in preventing animal disease outbreaks. "We take animal material not suitable for food and convert it into safe, reusable resources, such as biofuels. "There are robust regulations governing this sector to ensure the protection of public health."

Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns
Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns

An animal charity has called for stricter regulations on animal rescues importing dogs into the UK, citing concerns about disease risks and behavioural issues Government statistics reveal that in 2023, 320,000 pets were brought into the UK under travel pet schemes and 44,000 entered as commercial imports. RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to 'Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'

AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future
AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

AOC isn't radical enough for the anti-Israel Left. It's a sinister sign of the future

'AOC funds genocide in Gaza', announced a sign posted outside the Bronx campaign office of progressive New York Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. In a particularly chilling gesture, the office's windows were splattered with red paint, including a splotch big enough to blot out an image of her face. An anti-Israel group called the 'Boogie Down Liberation Front' took responsibility for Monday night's act of vandalism in a message to a local journalist, stating 'The Bronx is sick and tired of people like AOC … using us as a stepping stone for their own political careers'. It added that their community 'stands with the people of Palestine and we denounce the hypocrisy of AOC who voted to fund Israel's ongoing genocide and starvation campaign in Gaza.' At immediate issue was Ocasio-Cortez's vote last Friday against an amendment to a military spending bill that would have cut millions in aid to Israel for its air defence systems. The amendment, which only six Congressmen supported, was proposed by Ocasio-Cortez's polar political opposite, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican Congresswoman from Georgia, whose apparent motivation was her belief that Israel no longer requires American taxpayer assistance due to its successful military operations earlier this year. Greene's amendment was also supported by noted anti-Israel Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. Ocasio-Cortez has argued that the amendment would have done 'nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza'. She maintains that she still believes Israel is committing genocide, but that it should not be denied defensive weapons. That was not enough for some increasingly extreme factions on the Left, however, which consider approving any amount of support for Israel to be unacceptable. It should go without saying that nobody should be cheering on the vandalism of any politician's campaign office. Ocasio-Cortez's campaign has also revealed that she has received an increased number of death threats in recent days – a disturbing reminder that political violence is never far from the surface in American politics today. It also says something very concerning about where the American Left is heading that she should become a target of their vitriol. Back in 2018, she had a roaring start on the Left-wing of the Democratic Party. A one-time barmaid who claimed to speak progressive, working class truth to corporate power, regardless of party, she rode the anti-incumbency trend in the midterm elections of Donald Trump's first presidency to become the youngest woman ever to sit in the US Congress. She went on to be one of the very few American politicians so well known that her initials often supersede her name, a distinction usually reserved for presidents of the order of FDR or JFK. In office, AOC emerged as the best known member of the 'Squad', a small group of Left-wing Congresswomen whom many progressives hailed as the future of US politics. Her radical agenda made her a role model for young Democrats who distrust their party's older and more moderate leadership, and a bugbear for flustered Republicans who only made her more popular in constant media attacks. In recent years, however, AOC seems to have lost her progressive lustre, even if her politics haven't really changed. Last year, her stance on Israel caused the Democratic Socialists of America – a national progressive organisation that had backed her since her first standing for office – to withdraw its endorsement, accusing her of 'deep betrayal'. AOC clearly retains substantial popularity among Democrats – at over $15 million, her campaign contributions in 2025 exceed those of all other members of Congress this year as she considers greater ambitions, possibly including a primary challenge to fellow Democrat Chuck Schumer for his New York Senate seat. Some 72 per cent of those funds came from outside her congressional district. But the vandalism at her office – alongside other trends, like the emergence of Zohran Mamdani as the Democrat nominee for mayor of New York City – suggests that the Left is beginning to turn in a far more sinister direction. Paul du Quenoy is a historian and president of the Palm Beach Freedom Institute. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store