Cash-strapped Government trying to flog half-built warships amid claims it can't afford to finish them
SHIP SHOW Cash-strapped Government trying to flog half-built warships amid claims it can't afford to finish them
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE Government is trying to flog half-built warships amid claims it can-not afford to finish them.
Military top brass invited Norway to buy £1billion frigates HMS Belfast and Birmingham, which are midway through construction.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Selling half-built warships would give Defence Secretary John Healey and the Treasury breathing space to find the time to pay for them, a source said
Credit: Alamy
Selling them would give Defence Secretary John Healey and the Treasury breathing space to find the time to pay for them, a source said.
But they added that the Navy would have to wait years to get its promised eight vessels if Norway jumped the queue.
They said: "The Royal Navy only has eight frigates, the smallest number in its history.
'It desperately needs these new Type 26 frigates as soon as possible.
'But the MoD budget is under so much pressure that selling the half-built hulls to Norway would give the Treasury breathing space to find the time to pay for them.'
It comes after the Strategic Defence Review warned the Navy needed a 'cheaper, simpler fleet'.
The MoD said Norway was 'one of the UK's most important allies'.
A Norwegian source said: 'The government of Norway is in the final phases of making a decision, but no date has been set.'
Proud Scots workers watch latest Royal Navy frigate roll out at Babcock Rosyth shipyard
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US hits Iranian shipping network with major new sanctions
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury Department announced fresh sanctions on Wednesday on over 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and vessels, in a sign the Trump administration is doubling down on its "maximum pressure" campaign after bombing Tehran's key nuclear sites in June. The sanctions broadly target the shipping interests of Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, who is himself an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The U.S. Treasury described the move as the most significant Iran-related sanctions action since 2018, during President Donald Trump's first administration. According to Treasury, Shamkhani controls a vast network of container ships and tankers through a complex web of intermediaries that sell Iranian and Russian oil and other goods throughout the world. Treasury accused Shamkhani of using personal connections and corruption in Tehran to generate tens of billions of dollars in profits, much of which is used to prop up the Iranian regime. Overall, the new sanctions target 15 shipping firms, 52 vessels, 12 individuals and 53 entities involved in sanctions evasion in 17 countries, ranging from Panama to Italy to Hong Kong. A U.S. official said the new move would make it "much more difficult" for Iran to sell its oil, but added that the administration did not anticipate any sustained disruption to global oil markets . The official said that Iran's oil exports had already declined to around 1.2 million barrels per day, from 1.8 million bpd at the start of the year, after the administration imposed several smaller rounds of sanctions targeting Iran's oil business. "We're still engaging further action to bring that number down even more," the official said, noting that sanctions pressure during Trump's first term had cut Iran oil flows to a few hundred thousand bpd. Iran's UN mission did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China is the top buyer of Iran's oil. The European Union sanctioned Shamkhani earlier in July, citing his role in the Russian oil trade. A U.S. official said that Wednesday's action would impact both Russia and Iran, but the action was focused on Iran. "From our perspective, given where this individual fits, given his connection to the Supreme Leader and his father's previous sanctions activities, given the Iran-related authorities, it's critically important to emphasize that this is an Iran action that is meaningful and very impactful," the official said. Ali Shamkhani, Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani's father, was sanctioned by the United States in 2020. The latest sanctions announcement came as prospects for renewed U.S.-Iran diplomacy remained dim in the aftermath of the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites last month. Trump warned on Monday that he would order fresh U.S. attacks should Tehran try to restart the nuclear sites the U.S. had already struck. He also told reporters Iran has been sending out "nasty signals" and that any effort to restart its nuclear program would be immediately quashed. The United States held five rounds of talks with Iran prior to its airstrikes in June, which Trump said had "obliterated" a program that Washington and its ally Israel say is aimed at developing a nuclear bomb. Some experts have questioned the extent of the damage. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon. A senior White House official said last week that Washington was open to talking directly to Iran. But European and Iranian diplomats have said there is little prospect of Iran re-engaging with the U.S. at the negotiating table for now.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Veterans face eviction from council housing
A dozen veterans fear they will be made homeless after they were threatened with eviction from their homes. The former military and Navy personnel, who have conditions including PTSD, have been told they will have to leave their one-bedroom flats in Bolton after the council decided to stop paying the landlord. The veterans living in Constellation House said they felt they would be treated better if they were asylum seekers, after they were issued with eviction notices from the supported accommodation earlier this month. The proposed evictions were triggered after Bolton council decided to stop paying housing benefit to Qualitas Housing because it concluded the supported accommodation did not meet requirements. The eviction of the veterans, including former members of the Royal Signals, the tank regiment and the Navy, prompted speculation locally that the accommodation was being cleared to house asylum seekers. While the housing association denied it was moving in migrants, saying it was effectively forced to make evictions because of the council, veterans claimed asylum seekers were prioritised over them. The row comes amid concerns from veterans that Afghans given asylum as a result of the worst data leak in British history could be prioritised for housing at the expense of former soldiers. Scott Berry, 55, who served for six years in the Royal Signals, said: 'You have migrants who we don't have a clue about being given everything they need. We are veterans and they don't give a damn. We could be made homeless, we still don't know.' 'You never know what they plan to do, and the council and Qualitas are passing the buck,' he added. 'Have a bit of grace.' The tenants have now said they fear being made homeless and are not getting answers from either the council or the landlord, which they said previously received up to £350 a week per person. Mr Berry said that the housing provider must be serious about evictions to send out notices. 'They said the reason was because the council have held back the housing benefits payments,' he said. 'But you don't issue letters if you don't mean anything. 'They could have just rang the council and discussed it. It doesn't make sense.' 'Sorry state of affairs' Mr Berry said that although the owner was different, nothing had changed with the accommodation and it was putting unnecessary stress on veterans with PTSD. 'We've got PTSD, we do have problems. We don't need things like this happening. It's a sorry state of affairs when you are giving people letters. It's not very nice.' While claims that the building was going to be used to house asylum seekers are false, he said many people believed asylum seekers being housed in hotels were treated better than veterans. The housing system was already at breaking point, with local authority waiting lists at record levels across the country, before it was revealed that Britain was secretly relocating nearly 24,000 Afghan soldiers and their families to the UK after their identities were published online. Local authority tenants include the disabled, victims of domestic violence, people leaving care and benefits claimants, as well as veterans. Under the Armed Forces Covenant, the Government and local authorities are committed to helping military families, including former personnel, to access housing, healthcare and education. But veterans have voiced fears that an influx of Afghans is making it more difficult for them to secure accommodation. The Government will spend £7bn bringing Afghans affected by the leak to Britain over five years, with 18,500 already flown in. According to court documents, Afghans have been sent to Bracknell in Berkshire, Preston in Lancashire, Aberdeen in Scotland, and Cardiff in Wales. Others were sent to West Sussex and Yorkshire, while plans were afoot for hotels to be opened up to them in the North East, East Anglia and the East Midlands. Some of the Afghans sent to Bracknell under the scheme were housed in a four-star hotel, given free English lessons and received medical treatment from the NHS. The block in Bolton was previously managed by another provider and was taken over by Qualitas in February, triggering new applications for the enhanced support rate of housing benefit. After what it described as 'a lengthy period of due diligence and evidence gathering', the council said it did not meet the required standards. Veterans were then issued with eviction notices by Qualitas earlier this month and have been told they have until mid-September to leave their one-bedroom flats. The housing association and the council have now blamed each other for the row, with Qualitas arguing it had to issue the notices because of the withdrawal of housing benefits, while the local authority insisted the accommodation was not suitable. The veterans are being supported by Trevor Jones, the local Reform Party chairman, who has questioned why the housing association would 'throw them out'. He said: 'They wanted to throw 12 servicemen on the street. I have told them not to go anywhere, they are staying put. 'If we can't protect them, then who can we? That doesn't add up. It looks like a plan to get it empty.' Most of those staying in the property were first referred to Constellation House by charities or other local authorities. Exempt accommodation providers receive housing benefits payments directly in exchange for providing support services to vulnerable tenants. Housing benefits paid to exempt accommodation providers are not subject to the same caps as regular housing benefits and the council decided it did not qualify. It is understood the council has to decide eligibility to pay the enhanced support rate of housing benefits based on national legislation that is audited each year to ensure compliance. Ignoring any evidence that accommodation is not fit for purpose could leave the council liable for paying thousands of pounds a month for substandard accommodation and could leave holes in the housing support budget. Bolton council said the decision to issue eviction notices was taken entirely by Qualitas Housing as an independent housing provider and it became aware of the situation only after notices were issued. A spokesman said: 'We share the concerns that have been raised after Qualitas Housing issued section 21 notices to Armed Forces veterans living at Constellation House in Farnworth. 'We are in discussions with the housing provider to resolve this matter. 'The council is also in the process of contacting the tenants to offer the full support of our housing options and advice team. 'Qualitas Housing have confirmed they have not spoken to Serco and do not have any plans to house asylum seekers in the property.' He added: 'Exempt accommodation providers receive uncapped housing benefits directly, in exchange for providing support services to vulnerable tenants. 'In order to qualify, providers must meet specific criteria to ensure appropriate services and facilities are in place. 'While the council previously concluded that Constellation House did not meet the required standards, this decision has now been appealed and we are reviewing the case in line with the legislation.' A spokesman for Qualitas Housing said: 'Qualitas Housing is aware of recent claims suggesting that Armed Forces veterans are being evicted from Constellation House to accommodate asylum seekers. These claims are entirely false. 'The difficult decision to issue section 21 notices followed the local authority's refusal to reinstate housing benefit for the tenants. We are actively supporting the tenants in appealing this decision and are working closely with both them and the council to ensure that no individual is left without suitable accommodation.'
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
US yields advance as Fed's Powell says not sure about September cut
NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury yields rose on Wednesday after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said it's too soon to say whether the central bank will cut its interest rate target in September. "We have made no decisions about September, we don' that in advance," Powell said at a press conference after the Fed held interest rates steady at the end of a two-day policy meeting, as widely expected. He said going forward, "we'll be taking that information" about the economy in the run-up to the next central bank gathering. In standing pat for a fifth straight policy meeting, the Fed cited low unemployment and solid labor market conditions. But it noted that economic growth "moderated in the first half of the year," boosting the case to lower rates at a future meeting should that trend continue. The Fed kept its benchmark overnight interest rate tethered in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Wednesday's Fed decision, however saw two dissenting votes by governors, the most in more than three decades. In afternoon trading, the benchmark U.S. 10-year yields were last up 4.4 basis points (bps) at 4.372% , while the two-year yield, which reflects interest rate expectations, was up 5.7 bps at 3.932% . "There's enough evidence to suggest that the Fed should be cutting right do think that beneath the surface economic activity has slowed down and that's true whether you're looking at consumption or it's true whether you're looking at labor," said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist, at asset manager PGIM in Newark. "In many ways the Fed is haunted by the ghost of transitory past. That gives them an element of pause...I think because of the transitory mistake, it slows down their reaction function," he said, referring to the Fed's slow response to inflation during the pandemic years on views it would be short-lived. Both Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Powell when his term expires next May, were appointed to the board by Trump and "preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting," the Fed's policy statement said. Treasury yields briefly ticked lower after the disclosure of the two dissenting votes. Federal funds futures, which are tied to the U.S. central bank's monetary policy, are implying lower odds of a rate cut in September with a 50% probability, according to LSEG calculations. That was 65% before the Fed statement. U.S. rate futures also reduced the expected pace of easing this year to just 39 bps. That was 44 bps before the Fed decision.
