logo
Innate Pharma Highlights Durable Responses to Lacutamab in Sezary Syndrome and Mycosis Fungoides

Innate Pharma Highlights Durable Responses to Lacutamab in Sezary Syndrome and Mycosis Fungoides

Business Wire23-05-2025
MARSEILLE, France--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regulatory News:
Innate Pharma SA (Euronext Paris: IPH; Nasdaq: IPHA) (' Innate ' or the ' Company ') today announced the presentation of long-term follow-up data from the Phase 2 TELLOMAK clinical trial evaluating lacutamab, an anti-KIR3DL2 monoclonal antibody, in patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) and mycosis fungoides (MF), two rare and aggressive forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The results will be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025 Annual Meeting, in Chicago, Illinois.
Lacutamab was recently granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Sézary syndrome, underscoring its potential to address critical needs in advanced CTCL.
As of October 17, 2024, data cut-off, lacutamab demonstrated compelling and sustained clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients, with a global ORR of 42.9% for SS and 19.6% for MF. With longer follow-up, we observed improved median duration of response of 25.6 months in SS and 13.8 months in MF, highlighting the durability of responses in these challenging indications 1.
In addition, lacutamab was very well tolerated supporting the strong rationale for further investigations in combination beyond CTCL, especially in combination with other anti-lymphoma agents in peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL).
' Patients with advanced mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome often face a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after multiple prior lines of therapy,' said Prof. Pierluigi Porcu, Director, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia and principal investigator of the TELLOMAK trial. ' The durability and depth of responses observed with lacutamab in this study are highly promising and represent a significant advancement for this patient population.'
' The long-term follow-up data from the TELLOMAK clinical study confirms lacutamab's meaningful clinical benefit in Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides and were the basis of the FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation. We are encouraged by these results and are actively preparing a Phase 3 trial in collaboration with health authorities to bring this promising therapy to patients as swiftly as possible,' added Dr Sonia Quaratino, Chief Medical Officer of Innate Pharma.
1 Compared to results previously presented at ASH 2023 and ASCO 2024.
Efficacy results in SS patients (Data cut-off: OCT 17, 2024)
Efficacy results in MF patients (Data cut-off: OCT 17, 2024)
Best Response
All MF
N=107
KIR3DL2 ≥1%
N=48
KIR3DL2 <1%
N=59
CR (complete response), N (%)
3 (2.8)
3 (6.3)
0 (0.0)
PR (partial response), N (%)
18 (16.8)
7 (14.6)
11 (18.6)
SD (stable disease), N (%)
71 (66.4)
30 (62.5)
41 (69.5)
PD (progressive disease), N (%)
13 (12.1)
6 (12.5)
7 (11.9)
ORR (Objective Response Rate), % [95%CI] Olsen 2011
19.6 [13.2, 28.1]
20.8 [11.7, 34.3]
18.6 [10.7, 30.4]
ORR, % [95%CI] Olsen 2022
24.3 [17.2, 33.2]
29.2 [18.2, 43.2]
20.3 [12.0, 32.3]
Time to response, months, median (range)
2.8 (1-37)
1.0 (1-5)
2.8 (1-37)
DoR, months, median [95% CI]
13.8 [7.4, NE]
13.8 [4.6, NE]
15.7 [5.1, NE]
PFS, months, median [95% CI]
10.2 [8.0, 15.4]
11.8 [5.6, 16.8]
9.5 [6.5, 16.6]
Expand
Abstract details:
Abstract: 2522
Abstract Title: Lacutamab in patients with relapsed and refractory Sézary syndrome: Long term follow-up from the TELLOMAK phase 2 trial
Session Type: Poster Session
Session Title: Developmental Therapeutics—Immunotherapy
Session Date and Time: Monday June 2, 2025 – 1:30 – 4:30 PM CDT
Abstract: 2523
Abstract Title: Lacutamab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory mycosis fungoides: Long-term follow-up and translational data from the TELLOMAK phase 2 trial
Session Type: Poster Session
Session Title: Developmental Therapeutics—Immunotherapy
Session Date and Time: Monday June 2, 2025 – 1:30 – 4:30 PM CDT
About Lacutamab
Lacutamab is a first-in-class anti-KIR3DL2 humanized cytotoxicity-inducing antibody that is currently in clinical trials for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), an orphan disease, and peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Rare cutaneous lymphoma of T lymphocytes have a poor prognosis with few efficacious and safe therapeutic options at advanced stages.
KIR3DL2 is an inhibitory receptor of the KIR family, expressed by approximately 65% of patients across all CTCL subtypes and expressed by up to 90% of patients with certain aggressive CTCL subtypes, in particular, Sézary syndrome. KIR3DL2 is expressed in up to 50% of patients with mycosis fungoides and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). It has a restricted expression on normal tissues.
Lacutamab has been granted European Medicines Agency (EMA) PRIME designation, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Fast Track designation for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory Sézary syndrome who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Lacutamab is granted orphan drug status in the European Union and the United States for the treatment of CTCL. Lacutamab has received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA.
About TELLOMAK
TELLOMAK (NCT03902184) is a global, open-label, multi-cohort Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides (MF) in the United States and Europe. Specifically:
Cohort 1: lacutamab being evaluated as a single agent in approximately 60 patients with Sézary syndrome who have received at least two prior systemic therapies, including mogamulizumab. The Sézary syndrome cohort of the study could enable the registration of lacutamab in this indication.
Cohort 2: lacutamab being evaluated as a single agent in patients with MF that express KIR3DL2, as determined at baseline with a Simon 2-stage design.
Cohort 3: lacutamab being evaluated as a single agent in patients with MF that do not express KIR3DL2, as determined at baseline, with a Simon-2 stage design.
All comers: lacutamab being evaluated as a single agent in patients with both KIR3DL2 expressing and non-expressing MF to explore the correlation between the level of KIR3DL2 expression and treatment outcomes utilizing a formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) assay under development as a companion diagnostic.
The trial is fully enrolled. The primary endpoint of the trial is objective global response rate. Key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, quality of life, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity and adverse events.
About Innate Pharma
Innate Pharma S.A. is a global, clinical-stage biotechnology company developing immunotherapies for cancer patients. Its innovative approach aims to harness the innate immune system through three therapeutic approaches: multi-specific NK Cell Engagers via its ANKET ® (Antibody-based NK cell Engager Therapeutics) proprietary platform and Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADC) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
Innate's portfolio includes several ANKET ® drug candidates to address multiple tumor types as well as IPH4502, a differentiated ADC in development in solid tumors. In addition, anti-KIR3DL2 mAb lacutamab is developed in advanced form of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and peripheral T cell lymphomas, and anti-NKG2A mAb monalizumab is developed with AstraZeneca in non-small cell lung cancer.
Innate Pharma is a trusted partner to biopharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi and AstraZeneca, as well as leading research institutions, to accelerate innovation, research and development for the benefit of patients.
Headquartered in Marseille, France with a US office in Rockville, MD, Innate Pharma is listed on Euronext Paris and Nasdaq in the US.
Learn more about Innate Pharma at www.innate-pharma.com. Follow us on LinkedIn and X.
Information about Innate Pharma shares
Disclaimer on forward-looking information and risk factors
This press release contains certain forward-looking statements, including those within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The use of certain words, including 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'can,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'may,' 'might,' 'potential,' 'should,' 'will,' or the negative of these and similar expressions, is intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, the uncertainties inherent in research and development, including related to safety, progression of and results from its ongoing and planned clinical trials and preclinical studies, review and approvals by regulatory authorities of its product candidates, the Company's reliance on third parties to manufacture its product candidates, the Company's commercialization efforts and the Company's continued ability to raise capital to fund its development. For an additional discussion of risks and uncertainties, which could cause the Company's actual results, financial condition, performance or achievements to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the Risk Factors ('Facteurs de Risque") section of the Universal Registration Document filed with the French Financial Markets Authority ('AMF'), which is available on the AMF website http://www.amf-france.org or on Innate Pharma's website, and public filings and reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC'), including the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2024, and subsequent filings and reports filed with the AMF or SEC, or otherwise made public by the Company. References to the Company's website and the AMF website are included for information only and the content contained therein, or that can be accessed through them, are not incorporated by reference into, and do not constitute a part of, this press release.
In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by the Company or any other person that the Company will achieve its objectives and plans in any specified time frame or at all. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
This press release and the information contained herein do not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe to shares in Innate Pharma in any country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

You Have $1,000 to Invest. Should You Buy GOOG or GOOGL?
You Have $1,000 to Invest. Should You Buy GOOG or GOOGL?

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

You Have $1,000 to Invest. Should You Buy GOOG or GOOGL?

Key Points Alphabet offers investors exposure to powerful tech megatrends like artificial intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, and autonomous transportation -- all under one roof. Alphabet trades under two ticker symbols, but they both represent the same underlying business. Unless voting rights are important to you, either ticker is a great way to invest in this "Magnificent Seven" stock. 10 stocks we like better than Alphabet › The "Magnificent Seven" is a popular tag for the most dominant, high-performing tech companies on the planet. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL), (NASDAQ: GOOG), Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla have delivered market-crushing returns over the past decade, in large part because their businesses are on the forefront of the most disruptive technology macrotrends in modern history. While all seven companies are juggernauts in their own right, one Magnificent Seven stock stands out due to its dominant core business, exposure to multiple megatrends, and attractive valuation relative to its cohorts. That stock is Alphabet. An unconventional company There's something else that makes Alphabet different. Unlike the other members of the Magnificent Seven, Alphabet trades under two tickers: GOOG and GOOGL. Why would Alphabet do that? A little history will provide some helpful context. Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded Google (Alphabet's predecessor) in 1998. When Google filed its IPO paperwork in 2004, Page declared in a letter to prospective shareholders: "Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one." In that same letter, Page fretted that becoming a public company could undermine the independence and creative spirit that had been critical to Google's success. He also made it clear that the company would not "shy away from high-risk, high-reward projects" just to hit some arbitrary quarterly financial target. To ensure that Page, Brin, and the rest of the executive team would retain "control over the company's decisions and fate," Google implemented a dual-class stock structure. It's all about insider control Common stock represents partial ownership in a company, and it usually comes with the right to vote on issues such as executive compensation, board members, and mergers and acquisitions. When Google debuted as a publicly traded company in August 2004, it used the dual class structure to concentrate 99% of the voting power in the hands of its founders, executives, and board members. Here's how: Each share of Class A common stock (available to regular investors) came with one vote. Each share of Class B common stock (held by founders and insiders) came with 10 votes. At the time, Page acknowledged that this was an unconventional move for a tech company, although it wasn't uncommon for other types of businesses. Perhaps the most well-known example is Berkshire Hathaway. However, in the years since Google's 2004 IPO, a number of tech companies have adopted dual class structures to maintain insider control, including Meta Platforms, Palantir, and Roblox. . This is where it gets a little confusing In April 2014, Google added another layer of complexity to its share structure by way of a 2-for-1 stock split. On April 2, 2014, Google's shareholders received one share of newly issued Class C stock for every share of Class A stock that they already owned. Starting on April 3, 2014, two classes of Google stock were available to the public: Class A shares (GOOGL): One vote per share Class C shares (GOOG): No voting power The important thing to note is the Class C shares don't come with voting rights. That was the whole point of the 2014 stock split. By issuing nonvoting Class C shares, Google could fund acquisitions and offer stock-based compensation and incentives without diluting executives' voting power. To recap, this is the share structure that exists today: Class A shares (GOOGL): One vote per share Class B shares (held by insiders): 10 votes per share Class C shares (GOOG): No voting power Should you buy GOOG or GOOGL? Today, Google the search engine is just one piece of Alphabet, the umbrella company formed in 2015. What makes Alphabet such a compelling investment is that it's not just a search-engine provider. Owning Alphabet is a bit like owning an ETF with exposure to some of the biggest themes in tech -- from cloud computing and AI to autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity, and streaming. And as I alluded to earlier, Alphabet trades at a discount to its Magnificent Seven cohorts based on its forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio: But there's still one question left to answer: Is GOOG or GOOGL the better investment? Because GOOGL comes with voting rights, you'd think it would trade at a premium to its Class C sibling, GOOG. But interestingly enough, GOOG has outperformed GOOGL since April 3, 2014, ever-so-slightly: As of July 16, GOOG was priced at $183.77, just a hair above GOOGL at $182.97. So based on the recent price action, you could look at it this way: GOOGL gives you the same exposure to Alphabet's basket of businesses, but at a slightly lower price, with the added benefit of voting power. In reality, most regular investors can't purchase enough shares to have any meaningful impact on the company's strategic direction through their votes. And because both tickers represent the same underlying security, there likely will never be any wide variation in price between the two. So unless you care deeply about voting rights, either ticker is a great way to invest in this Magnificent Seven standout. Should you buy stock in Alphabet right now? Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Josh Cable has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Palantir Technologies, Roblox, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. You Have $1,000 to Invest. Should You Buy GOOG or GOOGL? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Could Hit a $2 Trillion Valuation by July 31
Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Could Hit a $2 Trillion Valuation by July 31

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Could Hit a $2 Trillion Valuation by July 31

Key Points Meta Platforms' recent rally has brought its market cap close to the $2 trillion mark. The digital advertising giant's upcoming earnings report could help it hit this milestone. Meta's ability to deliver strong returns to advertisers with the help of AI tools could help it grow at a faster pace than the end market in the long run, paving the way for more upside. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) stock has been rallying impressively of late, gaining more than 32% in the past three months amid the broader rally in technology stocks. As a result, Meta's market cap has jumped to $1.8 trillion as of this writing on July 14, making it the sixth-largest company in the world. Meta is slated to release its second-quarter results after the market closes on July 31. The company has been able to grow at a faster pace than the digital ad market thanks to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into its offerings, which could enable it to deliver another solid set of results later this month. Given that Meta stock is just 11% away from entering the $2 trillion market cap club as I write this, there is a good chance it could achieve that milestone in July, driven by the tech stock rally and a healthy quarterly report. Let's look at the reasons why Meta stock is primed for more upside this month and in the long run. Meta Platforms can exceed expectations once again It is worth noting that Meta's earnings have been better than consensus expectations in each of the last four quarters. One reason is the increase in spending across its family of applications by advertisers. In the first quarter, for instance, Meta reported an impressive increase of 10% year over year in the average price per ad. Ad impressions also increased by 5% from the year-ago period, which means the company is delivering more ads. This combination of higher pricing per ad and an increase in impressions delivered enabled Meta to report a 37% year-over-year increase in its earnings to $6.43 per share in Q1. However, investors should also note that the company has been aggressively increasing its capital expenditures (capex) to bolster its AI infrastructure. It expects to spend $68 billion on capex in 2025, at the midpoint of its guidance range. That would be a massive increase over its 2024 capex of $39 billion. This explains why analysts are expecting Meta's earnings to increase at a slower year-over-year pace of 13% for the second quarter to $5.84 per share. While the increased investment in AI-focused data center infrastructure is undoubtedly likely to weigh on Meta's bottom line in the short run, the higher returns its AI investments are generating on the advertising front could help it beat the market's bottom-line expectations. And beating expectations often sends a stock up, as investors react with excitement and optimism. Meta management points out that users are now spending more time on its applications thanks to AI-recommended content. In the six months that ended March 31, Meta saw the time spent on Facebook and Instagram increase by 7% and 6%, respectively. The increase in user engagement tells us why it has been able to serve more ads. Moreover, the gains advertisers have seen on the dollars they are spending on Meta's applications are also quite solid. A couple of months ago, Meta said it "assessed the impact of [its] new AI-driven advertising tools and found that they drive a 22% improvement in return on ad spend for advertisers. This means that for every dollar U.S. advertisers spend with Meta, they see a $4.52 return when they use [its] new AI-driven advertising tools." Unsurprisingly, Meta saw a 30% increase in the number of advertisers using its AI tools to create campaigns in the first quarter. So, there is indeed a solid possibility that Meta will clock healthy growth in ads delivered and the average price per ad in Q2, which could pave the way for a better-than-expected jump in its bottom line and help the company cross the $2 trillion milestone. I expect it to hit that market cap before Aug. 1. The long-term picture is bright as well Looking ahead, Meta expects that it will allow advertisers to completely automate the creation and execution of ad campaigns by the end of next year. As such, there is a good chance that Meta's earnings growth could accelerate from 2026, following this year's projected increase of 7%. Estimates are shown in the chart below. However, there is a strong possibility that Meta's earnings growth will outpace market expectations, thanks to AI. That's why it won't be surprising to see its market cap jumping to higher levels in the long run, as the digital ad market is expected to clock a robust annual growth rate of 15% through 2030, and Meta has the ability to keep growing at a faster pace than the end market. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $447,134!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,090!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $652,133!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of July 14, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Harsh Chauhan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock Could Hit a $2 Trillion Valuation by July 31 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Eating foods in this order could help with weight loss and blood sugar, experts say
Eating foods in this order could help with weight loss and blood sugar, experts say

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Eating foods in this order could help with weight loss and blood sugar, experts say

The order in which you eat foods during meals may affect your health, according to some nutrition experts. The concept — known as "meal sequencing" — involves first eating fiber-rich, non-starchy vegetables, followed by protein and then fats, before eating the carbohydrates on your plate. This orderly way of eating may help prevent blood sugar spikes, increase feelings of fullness and help with weight loss, according to nutrition experts who spoke to Fox News Digital. Popular 'Fibermaxxing' Diet Trend Not Right For Everyone, Nutritionist Says "Starting with vegetables, protein and healthy fats — before eating starches or sugary foods — may help blunt post-meal glucose spikes," Caroline Susie, a registered dietitian based in Dallas, Texas, told Fox News Digital. "This effect is particularly beneficial for people with insulin resistance, prediabetes or type 2 diabetes," said Susie, who is also a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Read On The Fox News App The expert noted, however, that people with diabetes should receive personalized guidance from a medical expert. Elevated blood sugar levels (known as hyperglycemia) after meals can increase an individual's risk for type 2 diabetes, according to a UCLA report. Controlling blood sugar levels can help benefit the treatment of diabetes and obesity. Experts Reveal 5-Step Approach To A Healthier Gut And Stronger Immunity Previous research published in the journal Nutrients found that patients who followed the meal sequencing method — eating vegetables before refined carbohydrates — showed a significant improvement in glycemic control and blood sugar after a five-year period, while the group that did not follow the approach did not show improvement. "What causes the sugar spikes is eating too many carbs," Sandra J. Arevalo, a New York-based registered dietitian and spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, told Fox News Digital. "Eating them alone makes it even worse," she cautioned. "When eating them together with protein and fiber, we are cushioning their effect by slowing their absorption." In addition to lowering blood sugar levels, meal sequencing may also assist with weight loss. Studies have shown that eating protein before refined carbs promotes the secretion of the hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) from the gut, which delays gastric emptying and suppresses appetite. "When you eat other foods first — mainly fiber-rich foods — and then you drink water, the fiber from the foods helps you feel satisfied, thus decreasing your appetite," Arevalo told Fox News Digital. "And let's not forget that fiber also helps to reduce the absorption of sugar in the blood, helping to cushion your sugar levels." Complex carbohydrates — such as most vegetables, beans and legumes — are rich in fiber and slow to digest, which causes a gradual rise in blood sugar levels, according to the UCLA report. Refined carbohydrates — such as sugar, white rice and white flour — have higher glycemic levels, which are easier to break down and contribute to faster blood sugar spikes. As nutrition experts pointed out, eating fiber before refined carbohydrates can help slow the carbs' absorption, which helps blood sugar levels stay lower during digestion. To assist with healthier food choices and to monitor blood sugar levels after a meal, experts recommend using a food rating system called the glycemic index. This rating scale determines how quickly certain foods can cause blood sugars to rise and fall, according to the UCLA report. For those interested in trying meal sequencing, Susie laid out the following steps. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter Start with eating non-starchy vegetables first, as the fiber slows digestion. Eat protein and healthy fats. This will promote feelings of fullness and slow glucose absorption. Eat the carbohydrates last, as this may lead to "lower glucose excursions," Susie said. For more Health articles, visit Everyone reacts differently to different meal plans, Arevelo noted. Both dietitians emphasized the importance of working with a licensed registered dietitian nutritionist who can help with planning balanced meals and monitoring blood sugar article source: Eating foods in this order could help with weight loss and blood sugar, experts say Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store