PM Anwar pays courtesy call on Melaka Governor
The meeting served as a meaningful platform to discuss Melaka's development agenda and efforts to enhance the wellbeing of its people.
'This meeting provides a strong space for us to exchange views, particularly on the state's development and our collective efforts to uplift the people's wellbeing and the prosperity of Melaka.
'The MADANI Government's commitment is clear - we want every inch of this nation to enjoy the fruits of progress and development in a fair, equitable and dignified manner,' he posted on Facebook.
Anwar also stressed the importance of close cooperation between the federal and state governments, saying such collaboration is essential for building a more inclusive and brighter future for all.
The Prime Minister arrived in Melaka earlier today to officiate the 2025 National Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) Day celebration at Melaka International Trade Centre (MITC) in Ayer Keroh.
The three-day celebration, which began yesterday, offers about 5,000 job opportunities across various fields from over 60 companies and employers from within and outside Melaka.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Zahid says Anwar addressed judicial appointment issues with BN MPs
KUALA LUMPUR, July 13 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has clarified issues related to judicial appointments during a meeting with Barisan Nasional MPs, BN chairman Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said. According to Free Malaysia Today, Zahid said the matter was among the issues raised during the one-hour meeting on Friday. 'The king would take into account the personality and background of the prospective appointee when deciding on the matter and we should respect the decision,' he told reporters after opening the Selayang Umno divisional meeting in Sungai Buloh. Zahid said BN held the view that the appointment of the chief justice should not be politicised. He also said BN believed that any royal commission of inquiry into judicial appointments would contradict the government's stance, as stated by law and institutional reform minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. Azalina previously said the government would study the best practices of other countries in appointing judges, with preliminary comparative research to be conducted involving the systems in the UK, India, Australia and Singapore. Delays in filling top positions in the judiciary have prompted calls for a public inquiry and a parliamentary hearing. The chief justice and the president of the Court of Appeal have both recently retired. Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Hashim is now serving as acting chief justice, while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Yusof is the acting Court of Appeal president.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
9,408 students to benefit from first phase of Madani tuition project
KUALA TERENGGANU: Terengganu will become the first state to implement the Madani Tuition Programme, which is set to benefit 9,408 students. With an allocation of RM5.27mil and the support of 614 schoolteachers, the programme is part of the government's broader poverty eradication and educational empowerment initiative. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said Terengganu was selected to pilot the programme in recognition of its students' outstanding performances in public examinations. 'I value Terengganu's excellent results. (Therefore) I would like to announce a special initiative for Terengganu as an early form of assistance for school students. 'This initiative will be carried out in collaboration with schoolteachers. This is the first programme in Malaysia,' he said during the closing ceremony of the Madani Rakyat Programme 2025 (PMR 2025) at Pasar Kedai Payang here yesterday. Also present were Terengganu Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar, Works Minister Datuk Seri Alexander Nanta Linggi and Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek, Bernama reported. Anwar said the Madani Tuition Programme complements the RM100 aid previously channelled for the purchase of books and learning materials for students and teachers. The programme will be supervised by the relevant ministers and the ministry secretary-general, with plans already in place to expand the initiative to Kelantan. In a further boost to education in the state, Anwar also announced that the government had approved the construction of a new matriculation college in Marang and land acquisition for the Kuala Terengganu Polytechnic campus. At the ceremony, 10 excellent Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) 2024 students also received Madani Permai devices. Separately, Anwar announced that Terengganu had received RM30mil under the SejaTi Madani Programme – a unity government initiative aimed at boosting community economic activities. 'Each village is allocated funds and can decide what economic activities to pursue, based on their needs. 'For example, in Parit Buntar, Perak, villagers purchased two drones for fertiliser spraying. They now earn a net profit of RM30,000 monthly. If we empower and manage our communities well, such projects can outperform conventional development efforts,' he said. The SejaTi Madani Programme focuses on five core sectors: agriculture and food, tailoring and handicrafts, herbs and health, tourism and hospitality, and green activities such as recycling. The Terengganu edition of the PMR 2025 recorded an overwhelming public response, with 82,182 visitors as of noon yesterday – far exceeding the initial three-day target of 25,000. PMR 2025 is organised by the Prime Minister's Office through the Performance Acceleration and Coordination Unit, in strategic collaboration with the Works Ministry and the Implementation Coordination Unit under the Prime Minister's Department.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Youth Pulse: Hear the voice, not the din
MY FIRST foray into activism was buoyed by the excitement of the lowering of the voting age back in 2019. Even then, I had heard my share of how youths carried an irreplaceable, insatiable and often unrealistic desire for change. I have come to believe this opinion stems from a comparison to older frontrunners who may have already secured their positions or wealth within a country's system, becoming more desensitised or resigned to systemic issues. Unlike them, we youths are seen to carry fewer vested interests. For that reason, they are often more willing to question social problems and systemic injustice with boldness and idealism. This boldness neither means the youth are always right nor does it imply that older people lack conscience. But because young people are more willing to take risks for their ideals, to speak out against injustice, they remind society that maintaining 'stability' must not come at the cost of neglecting justice. Recently, a student activist group in Kota Kinabalu organised a protest branded Gempur Rasuah Sabah 2.0. Towards the end of the rally, it was reported that the students burned a caricature of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, expressing their frustration with his apparent indifference to the issue of corruption in the Sabah government. It is worth noting that after the burning, the protesters also cleaned up the site. It was hardly surprising that a wave of criticism followed once the news broke. Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) issued a statement condemning the act as crude and immature. The PKR Youth Wing rushed to the prime minister's defence, calling the protestors disrespectful and excessive. Other parties and groups also criticised the act as reckless, violent and extreme. One cannot help but ask: why is there such a strong reaction to the students' action, yet near-complete silence on the corruption issues and demands raised by the protestors? Who, really, deserves greater criticism: those who protest, or those being protested? What the students did is undoubtedly a provocative act, symbolising deep disillusionment and anger towards the current administration. Some may argue that this anger is misplaced, noting that Anwar has consistently emphasised the importance of allowing due legal process to take its course in the Sabah graft cases. It is also disingenuous to cite that the PM has turned his back on his activism roots, as he had called for UMS to not expel the students involved. But should the protesters' motivations and demands be dismissed simply because their method of protest was deemed 'too intense'? Truthfully speaking, this administration faces numerous legitimate public questions that remain unanswered, along with decisions that appear to contradict the reformist platform it once championed. It would be almost understandable for young people to feel that he has not fulfilled his reform promises. Their hope has gradually turned to disappointment and now to anger. Their act is an outcry against a broken system. In fact, the protest's core demands, recently echoed by civil society groups like the Center to Combat Corruption and Cronyism, are anything but extreme. The students called for legal action against the Sabah State Water Department over campus shortages, greater institutional independence for the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, stronger anti-corruption laws and the rejection of Tun Musa Aman's appointment as the 11th Yang Dipertua Negeri of Sabah. Instead of engaging these demands, the response from authorities has centred on the protest's form, not its content. A police investigation is now underway, citing nine offences under laws such as the Peaceful Assembly Act and the Sedition Act. Meanwhile, student activists are being lectured about using 'proper channels', a familiar refrain used frequently to quell dissatisfaction. This incident raises two ideas worth exploring: first, what truly constitutes a 'proper' protest in Malaysia; and second, how society's response to protest reflects the state of democratic space in the country. The implicit belief long-held by our society is that protests must be polite and procedural to be legitimate. Yet, this view ignores the very function of protest in a democratic society which is to challenge power and force engagement with uncomfortable truths. Malaysia's own history tells this story. From the university student demonstrations in the early 1970s against rural poverty to Reformasi rallies and the Bersih electoral reform marches, protests have rarely been tidy or fully sanctioned. This is not to suggest that all forms of protest should be celebrated without scrutiny, but it does compel us to reconsider how we judge them. The current response shows that we risk mistaking offence for injustice and symbols for substance. In a functioning democracy, the legitimacy of protest must be assessed not solely by its form, but by the validity of the message it carries. The second point concerns how we, as a society, respond when dissent takes on an uncomfortable tone. The language used such as calling students 'rude,' 'immature,' or 'disrespectful' mirrors a paternalism that has long characterised state-society relations in Malaysia. But this approach fails to reckon with the shifting expectations of a younger, more politically conscious generation. Rather than viewing protest as a disruption to be contained, we ought to recognise it as a reflection of civic energy and a sign that people still care enough to speak up even when disillusioned. While we can consider if protesters stayed within the bounds of respectability, we must not lose sight of holding those in power accountable for the promises and principles that earned them public trust. That said, I firmly believe that protests are not the antidote to all our country's problems. Change also requires constant education of the broader public and proactive engagement with institutions. Moving further, I hope to see the students who protested engage in other methods and demonstrate commitment to the anti-corruption cause, be it through roundtable dialogues, social media advocacy, or other creative means. Ultimately, the question we should be asking is not, 'Was burning the Prime Minister's caricature too disrespectful?' but rather, 'What has led to such deep public frustration, especially among the young?' A deep breach of public trust occurs when those in power remain deaf to the people's grievances and that deserves far more scrutiny. Student Jonathan Lee traces his writing roots to The Star's BRATs programme. He is now a Malaysian youth advocate. The views expressed here are solely the writer's own.
