Over half a million people impacted by major data breach — full names, SSNs, financial data and more exposed
As reported by BleepingComputer, the benefits administration and payroll provider Kelly & Associates Insurance Group, also known as Kelly Benefits, has revealed that the impact of the security incident it experienced between December 12-17 of last year is much worse than originally thought.
Back in April, the company originally said that 32,234 individuals were affected after hackers gained access to its IT systems and stole sensitive files. However, over the course of the past three months, Kelly Benefits has revised this figure multiple times. Now though, it has revealed that 553,660 individuals are at risk as a result of this breach.
Here's everything you need to know about this major data breach including some tips and tricks to help you to stay safe from hackers if your personal information was compromised.
Even if you've never heard of Kelly Benefits before, chances are that a company you do business with relies on its services which include benefits consulting, enrollment technology, payroll administration, carrier management and more.
In fact, in a public data breach notice recently published on its site, the firm explained that a total of 46 companies are impacted as a result of the breach. Here are some of the most popular and well-known ones but you can check the page linked above for the full list:
In addition to that notice, Kelly Benefits also sent out personalized ones (example here) to impacted individuals explaining the specific data types that were compromised. This is because the exposed personal, financial and health info varies per person.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Surprisingly though, as BleepingComputer points out, in its public data breach notice, Kelly Benefits says that the compromised data may include the full names, Social Security numbers, tax ID numbers, dates of birth, medical and health insurance info and financial account info of those caught up in this breach.
With all of that information in hand, the hackers responsible for this data breach could launch targeting phishing attacks, all sorts of different scams or worse, they could try to commit identity theft.
Due to U.S. laws, when a company is hit by a data breach, they have to inform you regarding what type of data was stolen. However, just like when dealing with the IRS, data breach notification letters typically arrive via traditional mail as opposed to in an email, text message or phone call.
If a company you're a customer of does business with Kelly Benefits, then you're going to want to keep a close eye on your mailbox over the next few days/weeks. The reason being is that your personalized data breach notification letter will let you know exactly what types of your personal, financial or medical data were compromised.
At the same time, Kelly Benefits is offering free access to one of the best identity theft protection services from IDX for affected individuals for a full year. The letter will likely contain an enrollment code that you can use to redeem this offer if you want to take the company up on it. And you should, since identity theft protection services can help you regain your identity after an incident like this one but they can also help you recover any funds lost to fraud as a result of this data breach.
From there, you're going to want to monitor all of your financial accounts for signs of fraud or abuse. Another step that may be worth taking is to freeze your credit with the three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. This way, cybercriminals with access to this stolen data won't be able to take out loans in your name.
Even if you try your hardest to avoid falling victim to a data breach, as you see here, you can easily get wrapped up in one as a result of a company you do business with relying on another firm's services. This is why you need to take action immediately when you learn that your personal or financial information was exposed as the result of a data breach.
Now that cyberattacks and data breaches becoming a much more common occurrence though, you should always carefully monitor your personal and financial accounts for anything amiss since early detection can save you a whole lot of hassle later on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why living trusts are a good option, most of the time
Dear Liz: My goal is to avoid probate and allow simplified access for my heir, who is also my executor. I have no family. I have chosen payable-on-death and transfer-on-death accounts instead of putting all financial assets in my trust, against the wishes of the attorney who drew up the trust for my condo. I am 79, with about a million in financial assets, with no debt or mortgage, and I am self-insured for long-term healthcare. Is the decision to use these accounts appropriate for me? Answer: Please take the advice you paid for. The trust you have is probably a living trust, a flexible estate-planning device that avoids probate. Living trusts generally allow a smoother, more organized settlement of the estate than other probate-avoidance options. The person who settles your estate is called your successor trustee and will perform much the same duties as an executor. But typically your successor trustee also can handle financial and other matters should you become incapacitated. As covered in previous columns, payable-on-death and transfer-on-death accounts can be appropriate solutions for people with few assets who can't afford to pay for a living trust. For more complex estates like yours, however, a living trust is the more appropriate option. Dear Liz: I am under full retirement age, collecting Social Security and working part-time. I just received a letter from Social Security telling me I earned over the $22,320 limit and now have to pay back some of my Social Security. I was aware of the limit, so the letter was not unexpected. What I'm curious about though is what is the rationale behind the earnings limit? Once you're eligible for Social Security, why do they care how much you earn? Are they trying to discourage applying before full retirement age? Also, and more importantly, I think I read that somewhere down the line, I will get back what I had to pay back. Can you clarify that for me? Answer: Social Security was designed as insurance for those who could no longer work, and a retirement earnings test has been a part of the system from its creation in 1935. Back then, the test was all-or-nothing: Any earned income would preclude your getting a benefit. Over time, the test was modified so that people could earn some income without losing all their benefits. The age at which the earnings test no longer applies has changed as well. In the 1950s, it was set at 75. In the 1960s, the age was lowered to 65. In the 1980s, it was adjusted so that the current 'full retirement age,' when the test no longer applies, is 67. The current test withholds $1 for every $2 earned over a certain limit, which in 2025 is $23,400. Once you reach full retirement age, the withheld amounts will be added back into your benefit. What you won't get back, however, is the larger benefit you could have earned by delaying your initial application. Most people are better off waiting at least until full retirement age to collect Social Security, if they possibly can. Dear Liz: You recently wrote that it's easier to have one bank than many, but I worry about FDIC insurance limits because I have more than $250,000 in savings. Answer: You may be able to get more coverage at one bank than you think. FDIC insurance is per depositor, per ownership category, per bank. Ownership categories include single accounts, joint accounts, certain retirement accounts such as IRAs and trust accounts, among others. If you're married, for example, a joint account would be covered up to $500,000, or $250,000 for each owner. If each of you had single accounts, your total coverage for the three accounts would be $1 million ($500,000 for the joint account, plus $250,000 for each individual account). If you each had an IRA as well, you could have up to $1.5 million in coverage at a single institution. Adding beneficiaries to your accounts turns either joint or single accounts into trust accounts, for FDIC insurance purposes. Each owner of a trust account is covered up to $250,000 per beneficiary, to a maximum of $1.25 million for five or more beneficiaries. Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at
Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Legendary fund manager has blunt message on ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
It's official. The Big Beautiful Bill is law. President Donald Trump successfully arm-wrestled support in the House and Senate to get his signature tax cut and spending bill across the legislative finish line on July 4. It wasn't easy. The House only passed the bill initially after blue-state Congressmen successfully increased the State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction substantially, providing much-hoped-for relief to homeowners in high-tax communities. The Senate was even more contentious. Some senators recoiled at the bill's size, forcing steep cuts to energy tax credits and Medicaid. Still, even with those offsets, the bill carries a staggering price tag. Ultimately, the bill squeaked through, with Vice President Vance's vote resulting in a 51-50 final vote tally. Related: Goldman Sachs revamps Fed interest rate cut forecast for 2025 That cost captured the attention of longtime Wall Street icon Ray Dalio. Dalio founded Bridgewater Associates, a hedge fund now managing more than $112 billion of assets. He's featured in the popular "Market Wizards" series of books, and his prescient economic and stock market predictions have made him a billionaire worth $16 billion, good enough to rank him 156th on Bloomberg's Billionaires Index. Over his 50-year investment career, Dalio has navigated his share of good and bad economic times, and many consider him among the most successful in predicting what could happen next to markets. Lately, he's focused on the U.S. debt level as a major crisis looms. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that's led to him offering a pretty blunt take on the Big Beautiful Bill Act. Image source:One of the biggest features of the law is that it extends tax cuts provided in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was passed in 2017 during President Trump's first term in office. That's not all it does, though. Related: Veteran analyst sets eye-popping S&P 500 target On the campaign trail, President Trump made a series of promises, including more tax breaks for Americans and rolling back much of former President Biden's green energy initiatives. The over 900-page One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes good on promises to reduce taxes on Social Security and tips. However, it falls short of entirely removing taxes on them. For example, rather than eliminating income taxes on Social Security, the act provides a Social Security bonus deduction by increasing the deduction to $6,000 from $2,000 previously. Tips are also excluded from Federal income taxes; however, there is a $25,000 deduction limit. The act also eliminates tax credits for electric vehicles, energy-efficient heating and cooling, and other green energy breaks on solar and wind power. To reduce the cost of income tax cuts, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes steep cuts to Medicaid, including expanding work requirements. It also shifts the cost of SNAP benefits to states with an error rate above 6%. Those moves have proven highly controversial. The CBO estimates that changes to Medicaid will result in 11.8 million people losing health insurance over the next decade. Dalio has focused much of his time researching the rise and fall of economies. This research has led him to a worrisome prediction for America. Specifically, Dalio believes that our substantial and growing debt pile has us on a collision course with an economic Armageddon. He predicts that as our spending increases, people and governments will balk at buying our debt, causing a spiral that could result in either Treasury debt defaults or restructuring. Unfortunately, Dalio sees little political will in Washington, D.C., to cut the spending cord, as evidenced by Congress passing the One Big Beautiful Bill. "After spending time in Washington, D.C., discussing the budget deficit with senior people on both sides of the aisle, it's clear to me that we are unlikely to change the debt trajectory we're on and avoid the painful consequences," wrote Dalio on X. The toll taken by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill is a stiff one. The CBO estimates that the bill adds a whopping $7 trillion a year in spending and only generates about $5 trillion in revenue. As a result, debt relative to GDP will surge, adding more pressure to the economy. "The debt, which is now about 6x of the money taken in, 100 percent of GDP, and about $230,000 per American family, will rise over 10 years to about 7.5x the money taken in, 130 percent of GDP, and $425,000 per family," noted Dalio. "That will increase interest and principal payments on the debt from about $10 trillion ($1 trillion in interest, $9 trillion in principal) to about $18 trillion (of which $2 trillion is interest payments)." That's a lot of money. And Dalio thinks it will require some pretty uncomfortable fixes down the road. "[It] will lead to either a big squeezing out (and cutting off) of spending and/or unimaginable tax increases, or a lot of printing and devaluing of money and pushing interest rates to unattractively low levels. This printing and devaluing is not good for those holding bonds as a storehold of wealth, and what's bad for bonds and U.S. credit markets is bad for everyone," said Dalio. "Unless this path is soon rectified to bring the budget deficit from roughly 7% of GDP to about 3% by making adjustments to spending, taxes, and interest rates, big, painful disruptions will likely occur." The challenge, however, will remain business as usual in D.C. Politicians eager to continue to win elections will continue to make big promises, and cash-strapped Americans can't be faulted for wanting relief. However, kicking the can down the road on our debt may create a bigger problem that will be harder to fix. "While virtually everyone agrees on the need to address our debt problem in a balanced way that includes tax increases and cuts to benefits, they also agree that they cannot speak up because politics have become absolutist," wrote Dalio. "We must find a solution around absolutist pledges like, 'I will not raise taxes,' or 'I will not reduce benefits,' when they are desperately needed." Related: Legendary fund manager issues stock market prediction as S&P 500 tests all-time highs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Makes Glaring Error as He Touts His Megabill in Victory Speech
President Donald Trump got a little too excited in his victory lap over the passage of his Big, Beautiful megabill. During a Thursday speech in Iowa that kicked off yearlong festivities for America's 250th birthday, Trump declared that he fulfilled his campaign promise of eliminating taxes on Social Security. 'Just as I promised, we're making the Trump tax cuts permanent and delivering no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security for our great seniors,' he said in a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. Trump and the White House have repeatedly claimed that the so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which the House sent to the president's desk after a tight vote, will eliminate taxes on Social Security. But what the measure actually does is provide a temporary tax deduction for certain groups. The White House, citing an analysis from the Council of Economic Advisers, said '88 percent of all seniors who receive Social Security—will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits.' 'The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers historic tax relief to seniors, with a new tax deduction that, combined with other deductions, ensures the average Social Security beneficiary will pay zero taxes on Social Security,' it said in a June statement. Under the megabill, seniors get an additional deduction of $6,000 off their taxes ($12,000 for couples). But that deduction begins phasing out for those who earn more than $75,000 ($150,000 for couples) and disappears entirely for those earning more than $175,000 ($250,000 for couples). The tax break also expires at the end of Trump's term in 2028. Many seniors with low income would not benefit from the additional deduction, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center, which also raised concerns about 'intergenerational fairness, since it would provide a tax benefit to those over the age of 65 that is not available to younger taxpayers with identical incomes.' A similar analysis by the Tax Foundation found that the additional deduction would mostly benefit those with higher incomes. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation, told the Associated Press. Trump also touted several other tax breaks during his speech, but one in particular caused a storm on social media over his eyebrow-raising word choice. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going through the banks and borrowing from—in some cases, a fine banker—and in some cases, shylocks and bad people,' he said, using an antisemitic slur that originated from a Shakespeare play featuring a greedy Jewish money lender. Former President Joe Biden apologized for using the term 'shylock' in 2014. But Trump appeared oblivious to the slur as he continued to take aim at his political enemies. 'Not one Democrat voted for us,' he said of the bill. 'They wouldn't vote only because they hate Trump, but I hate them too. You know that? I really do—I hate them. I cannot stand them, because I really believe they hate our country.' The president also continued the victory lap that he began earlier in the day on Truth Social. 'America is on a winning streak like, frankly, nobody's ever seen before in the history of the presidency,' he said. 'They said, 'You know, sir, you're going to go down as one of the greatest presidents ever.' I said, 'Really? Better than Washington? Better than Honest Abe Lincoln?' They said, 'Yes, sir.''
