logo
Rugby-Irish core to strong Lions team for ACT Brumbies clash

Rugby-Irish core to strong Lions team for ACT Brumbies clash

The Stara day ago
Rugby Union - British & Irish Lions v Argentina - Aviva Stadium, Dublin, Ireland - June 20, 2025 British & Irish Lions' Maro Itoje during the warm up before the match REUTERS/Clodagh Kilcoyne
SYDNEY (Reuters) -British & Irish Lions coach Andy Farrell has named eight Irishmen in his starting side to face the ACT Brumbies on Wednesday, the tour match for which he was expected to select a line-up close to his first-choice team for the test series.
Lock Maro Itoje returns as skipper after being rested for the unconvincing 21-10 victory over the New South Wales Waratahs at the weekend, as does Scottish flyhalf Finn Russell.
Russell's compatriot Blair Kinghorn survives from the side that played the Waratahs but will switch from the wing to his more familiar fullback role at Canberra Stadium.
The rest of the backline has a distinctive Irish flavour with Garry Ringrose and Bundee Aki in the centres, Jamison Gibson-Park at scrumhalf and James Lowe on the left wing.
Specialist number eight Jack Conan will be in the back row with English flankers Tom Curry and Ollie Chessum, while Joe McCarthy will play in the second row with Itoje, and Tadhg Furlong and Dan Sheehan fill out two-thirds of the front row.
Young English loose forward Henry Pollock, who was a late withdrawal from the Waratahs game with a calf issue, was named in the replacements as back row cover with Ireland's Josh van der Flier.
Australian-born winger Mack Hansen is another of the four Ireland players on the bench and he gets a chance to play against his former club in his home town.
Farrell said on Saturday that his playmaker son Owen, who was called up last week as an injury replacement for Elliot Daly, would not be considered for the Brumbies match.
"In 2013 the Brumbies beat the British & Irish Lions in Canberra and this year they were the leading Australian team in Super Rugby," Farrell, who is on sabbatical from his job as Ireland coach for the tour, said in a team statement.
"We are fully aware of the challenge in front of us."
Team: 15–Blair Kinghorn, 14–Tommy Freeman, 13–Garry Ringrose, 12–Bundee Aki, 11–James Lowe, 10–Finn Russell, 9–Jamison Gibson-Park, 8–Jack Conan, 7–Tom Curry, 6–Ollie Chessum, 5–Joe McCarthy, 4–Maro Itoje (captain), 3–Tadhg Furlong, 2–Dan Sheehan, 1–Ellis Genge.
Replacements: 16–Ronan Kelleher, 17–Andrew Porter, 18–Will Stuart, 19–Josh van der Flier, 20–Henry Pollock, 21–Alex Mitchell, 22–Marcus Smith, 23–Mack Hansen.
(Reporting by Nick Mulvenney, editing by Peter Rutherford)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Respect for Lara stops Mulder short of world Test record
Respect for Lara stops Mulder short of world Test record

New Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Respect for Lara stops Mulder short of world Test record

ZIMBABWE: South African captain Wiaan Mulder said respect for Brian Lara convinced him to declare 33 runs short of the former West Indies star's world Test record, against Zimbabwe at Queens Sports Club yesterday (July 7). Mulder hammered an unbeaten 367 — a South African record and the fifth highest score in Test cricket — before declaring at lunch on the second day of the second Test. South Africa's total of 626 for five proved way beyond Zimbabwe's reach. They were bowled out for 170 and were 51 for one in their second innings after being forced to follow on. "Brian Lara is a legend. He got 401 or whatever it was (it was 400) against England. For someone of that stature to keep the record is pretty special," Mulder said at the close. "I think if I get the chance again I would do the same again." Mulder spoke to South African coach Shukri Conrad who agreed with his decision. "He said to me as well, let the legend keep the record. I never know what my fate will be but letting Brian Lara keep the record is the way it should be." Mulder took two wickets and held a catch at slip as Zimbabwe crumbled in reply. Sean Williams, who was only allowed to bat after five wickets had fallen because of time spent off the field because of illness, slammed 83 not out off 55 balls in Zimbabwe's only innings of substance. Resuming on 264 not out, Mulder became the second South African triple centurion, reaching the mark off 297 balls — the second-fastest behind India's Virender Sehwag, who took 278 deliveries against South Africa in Chennai in 2007/08. Mulder went past the previous highest South African individual score of 311 not out by Hashim Amla against England at The Oval in London in 2012 with successive boundaries off fast bowler Blessing Muzarabani. Mulder faced 334 balls and hit 49 fours and four sixes off an increasingly dispirited and largely toothless Zimbabwe bowling attack. "I've never even dreamed of getting a double hundred, let alone a triple hundred," said Mulder. "When I started playing for South Africa I was nowhere near good enough but it gave me the opportunity to learn from great players." Mulder said playing English county cricket for Leicestershire as well as batting in domestic cricket on the notoriously tricky Wanderers pitch in Johannesburg had helped him hone his game. "Going to England gave me a chance to understand what kind of batter I wanted to be and to figure out some technical things." He also said current Zimbabwe coach Justin Sammons had played a big role while he was coaching in South Africa, particularly in playing the short ball. Like former England captain Mike Brearley, Mulder said he sung to himself between balls, "keeping myself natural, keeping myself present." Whereas Brearley hummed classical music, Mulder said Afrikaans music helped him reach his first Test century in Bangladesh last year, while in Bulawayo he opted for Zombie by the Cranberries. Zombie was sung by Irish rugby supporters at the 2023 Rugby World Cup and adapted by South African rugby fans after the Springboks won the World Cup in a homage to coach Rassie Erasmus and was used for Conrad at the World Test Championship final won by South Africa against Australia last month. "It was sung at Lord's to Shuks," said Mulder. — AFP

Djokovic advances to Wimbledon quarter-finals after tough battle
Djokovic advances to Wimbledon quarter-finals after tough battle

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

Djokovic advances to Wimbledon quarter-finals after tough battle

LONDON: Novak Djokovic fought back from a shaky start to defeat Alex de Minaur and secure his place in the Wimbledon quarter-finals. The seven-time champion recovered from a first-set stumble to win 1-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 in a gruelling three-hour, 18-minute match. Djokovic admitted he struggled early, committing 16 unforced errors in the first set alone. 'It wasn't a great start for me, it was a great start for him obviously,' he said. However, the Serb found his rhythm, breaking De Minaur at crucial moments to turn the match around. The victory keeps Djokovic on course for a record 25th Grand Slam title. A win on Sunday would also tie Roger Federer's record of eight Wimbledon men's singles titles. Federer, watching from the royal box, saw his long-time rival overcome a stern challenge. 'It's probably the first time he's watching me and I've won the match,' Djokovic joked. 'The last couple I lost, so good to break the curse.' De Minaur started strongly, racing through the first set with aggressive play. But Djokovic responded, breaking early in the second set and battling through a marathon 19-minute game. The Australian fought hard but faltered in key moments, allowing Djokovic to seize control. The third set proved decisive as Djokovic broke in the ninth game. De Minaur briefly rallied in the fourth, leading 4-1, but collapsed under pressure as Djokovic reeled off five straight games to seal victory. Djokovic now holds the second-most Wimbledon quarter-final appearances (16) in men's tennis, trailing only Federer's 18. His next opponent will be determined as he continues his quest for history. - AFP

Wimbledon blames human error for a mistake by the tech that replaced officials. Here's what happened
Wimbledon blames human error for a mistake by the tech that replaced officials. Here's what happened

The Star

time5 hours ago

  • The Star

Wimbledon blames human error for a mistake by the tech that replaced officials. Here's what happened

LONDON: The All England Club, somewhat ironically, is blaming "human error' for a glaring mistake by the electronic system that replaced human line judges this year at Wimbledon. The CEO of the club, Sally Bolton, said Monday that the technology was "inadvertently deactivated" by someone for three points at Centre Court during Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's three-set victory over Sonay Kartal a day earlier in the fourth round. On one point, a shot by Kartal clearly landed past the baseline but wasn't called out by the automated setup – called Hawk-Eye – because it had been shut off. Hours after Bolton spoke with reporters, the club issued a statement to announce that it "removed the ability for Hawk-Eye operators to manually deactivate the ball tracking,' meaning "this error cannot now be repeated due to the system changes we have made.' Bolton declined to say who made the mistake on Sunday or how, exactly, it occurred or whether that person would face any consequences or be re-trained. She did note that there were other people at fault: the chair umpire, Nico Helwerth, and two who should have let him know the system was temporarily down – the review official and the Hawk-Eye official. "We didn't need to put line judges back on the court again,' Bolton said. "We needed the system to be active.' Is Wimbledon using AI for line calls this year? No. But like most big tennis tournaments nowadays – the French Open is one notable exception – Wimbledon has replaced its line judges with cameras that are supposed to follow the balls on every shot to determine whether they land in or out. There are those, particularly in the British media, who keep referring to this as part of the ever-increasing creep of artificial intelligence into day-to-day life, but Bolton objected to the use of that term in this case. "The point I would want to emphasize – and perhaps contrary to some of the reporting we've seen – is it's not an artificial intelligence system. And it is electronic in the sense that the camera-tracking technology is set up to call the lines automatically, but it requires a human element to ensure that the system is functional,' Bolton said. "So it is not AI. There are some humans involved. And in this instance, it was a human error.' What happened on the missed call at Wimbledon? Russia's Pavlyuchenkova was one point from winning a game for a 5-4 lead in the first set against Britain's Kartal on Sunday when a shot by Kartal landed long. But there was no ruling from Hawk-Eye. After a delay, Helwerth decided the point should be replayed, which Pavlyuchenkova thought showed bias toward an opponent competing in her home country. With Hawk-Eye back up and running after a delay, Kartal won that game, but Pavlyuchenkova took that set and the match. The All England Club looked into what happened and found that the line-calling system actually was off for three points before anyone noticed. The system itself worked "optimally,' Bolton said repeatedly. "In this instance, sadly,' she said, "it was the human part of the operation that made a mistake.' Why was the Hawk-Eye system accidentally turned off during a match? Bolton said the system is shut down between matches – "and the humans are the people that need to do the activating and deactivating" – and someone accidentally did so during Pavlyuchenkova vs. Kartal. Asked why, Bolton responded: "Well, I don't know. It was a mistake, obviously.... I wasn't sat there, so I don't know what happened." She said Helwerth could have made a ruling himself on the controversial non-call, the way he did on the prior pair of points, but instead just decided to pause the match. "I'm assuming,' Bolton said, "he felt he had not seen it properly.' Pavlyuchenkova said after the match the official told her he thought the ball was out. What do players think about the use of technology at Wimbledon? Players are divided on whether there even should be electronic rulings during matches – unless it is fool-proof – or whether there should be a return to Wimbledon's old way of doing things. Since 2007 through last year, there was a combination of the human touch and technology: There were line judges on court to make calls, but players were allowed to challenge and ask for a video replay of a point if they thought there was a mistake. "It's such a big match, big event,' Pavlyuchenkova said. "Since we have already automatic line-calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' – AP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store