Google seeks licensing talks with news groups, following AI rivals
The company plans to launch a pilot project initially with about 20 national news outlets, according to one of the people, who works at a media outlet that was contacted and asked not to be identified discussing private talks.
'We've said that we're exploring and experimenting with new types of partnerships and product experiences, but we aren't sharing details about specific plans or conversations at this time,' a Google spokesperson said in a statement.
Getting Alphabet Inc.'s Google to pay for content for AI projects could be a big win for struggling media companies, which have lost readers and advertisers to digital outlets for years and view artificial intelligence as a new, potentially existential threat. With the exception of a partnership with the Associated Press earlier this year and a 2024 pact with Reddit, Google has mostly sat on the sidelines while AI rivals strike deals with publishers.
Startups Perplexity AI Inc. and OpenAI have both started paying publishers to use their content in their chatbots, giving the media companies a much-needed infusion of revenue.
Google's licensing project is tailored to specific products, according to another person familiar with the plan. They didn't share additional details of the program, such as possible terms.
Google cites articles and online outlets in its AI Overviews, which are short, AI-generated responses that top many search results. While publishers believe those summaries have cut traffic to their websites, they have been hesitant to shield their content from Google's AI tools for fear of hurting their visibility in the company's search results.
Silicon Valley and the media industry have been at odds over tech companies' use of news content to build AI programs, with publishers worried it will further erode their relationship with readers. In late 2023, the New York Times sued OpenAI, alleging that the startup and its largest investor, Microsoft Corp., relied on copyrighted articles to train the popular ChatGPT chatbot and other artificial intelligence features.
Yet as the media industry increasingly speaks out about the need for compensation, technology companies seem to be recognizing they must come to terms with news outlets, said David Gehring, chief executive officer of Distributed Media Lab, a company that works with publishers and advertisers. Gehring said he had no knowledge of Google's latest talks with publishers.
'Google and the other platforms realize that — if not by virtue of public policy then by virtue of technology — the platforms' access to unlimited web data is about to end,' said Gehring, who previously worked on news partnerships at Google and the UK newspaper the Guardian. 'And so they need to have licensing relationships in place, or there won't be any blood to put in the veins of the AI monster.'
In July, Cloudflare Inc., a web infrastructure and security company, announced a 'pay per crawl' program that lets creators bill AI services for access to their content.
'Google still thinks they're special and that they don't have to play by the same rules that the rest of the industry does,' Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said in an interview. 'Eventually, Google will get in line with what the large AI companies have been saying for a long time, which is that ultimately content providers need to be paid for their content.'
Google has long engaged in a delicate dance with news outlets. Many publishers depend on the search engine for traffic when news breaks. Yet industry leaders have cried foul about the tech giant's use of their content in products such as Google News, which displays headlines and short snippets of articles.
In the past, Google has offered programs such as Google News Showcase to compensate publishers without undermining its core argument that the copyright doctrine of fair use permits use of their material. The company has also been more open to striking deals with wire services such as the AP, which are in the business of licensing content.
Earlier this year, Google announced a partnership with the AP to provide news for its Gemini chatbot, its first deal of that nature. The tech giant has also explored an audio AI news product under its Gemini brand that leverages the content it's licensing from the AP, according to a person familiar with the matter.
For the long-term health of the news business, Danielle Coffey, president of the News/Media Alliance trade group, said she is focused on ensuring the industry has 'a legally sustainable right to compensation and protections that will provide a fair market exchange for our valuable content across the board.'
Love and Miller write for Bloomberg.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
a minute ago
- Tom's Guide
I used Alexa+ vs ChatGPT to generate 5 AI images — and the results surprised me
You probably know Alexa as the voice that sets timers, dims the lights and plays music, but after testing Alexa+ for a few weeks, I'm discovering new features nearly every I discovered that upgraded Alexa has a creative side and can now generate realistic images on the fly. In my testing, I was impressed by the speed and ease of generating the images, that I couldn't help but do a side-by-side image generation comparison with ChatGPT. Whether you ask for a watercolor of a cozy cabin, a photorealistic puppy or a design mockup, Alexa+ responds in seconds, then texts the image directly to your phone. It's surprisingly intuitive, shockingly fast and potentially a game-changer for everyday what happened when I tested Alexa+ versus ChatGPT and the images each bot generated. Prompt: 'A friendly robot mom, dad and two robot kids sitting at a kitchen table eating spaghetti, surrounded by retro 1950s-style decor, with warm lighting and a dog robot under the table.'ChatGPT automatically went with a cartoonish image of a robot family. It nailed almost everything except for the robot dog and opted for a realistic-looking dog presented a modern-looking image of a robot family also with a 'real' dog. It missed aspects of the prompt such as 'two robot kids' and the style of the ChatGPT wins for accurately following the prompt. Prompt: 'People browsing colorful fruit and vegetable stands at an outdoor farmers market. A woman holds a bouquet of sunflowers, a man samples cheese, and kids eat popsicles. Background includes food trucks and string lights.'ChatGPT once again hit every detail of the prompt, even if it's hard to tell the man is sampling offered a more diverse and more realistic look at a farmer's market, though it's not completely obvious if the man in the image is sampling Alexa+ wins for an image that better captures the energy and diversity of a farmer's market. Prompt: 'Cars lined up outside an elementary school on a gray rainy morning. Parents holding umbrellas hustle their kids to the entrance. Backpacks, rain boots, and puddles all around. View from a car window with raindrops.'ChatGPT created an image that is storybook and highlights the mood of a rainy school day. The backpacks in the puddles is a glaringly unrealistic delivered a photorealistic image that also captures the mood, but looks less like it is a view from a car and doesn't capture the hustle that the prompt asks for. Winner: ChatGPT wins for following the prompt and better storytelling with this image. Prompt: "A golden retriever sitting next to a toddler on a cozy living room rug. The toddler is offering a cracker, and the dog gently takes it. Toys and a sippy cup are scattered around. Natural window light, soft and heartwarming." ChatGPT used soft, warm lighting in an image that evokes a heartwarming, almost storybook-like feel, which best fits in line with the prompt request 'soft and heartwarming' made a great photo that looks very natural and realistic, but it's missing details such as the sippy cup and the dog is not taking the cracker. While it may arguably be a better image, it loses because of missed aspects of the prompt. Winner: ChatGPT wins for the best composition match, setting and details. Prompt: "A diverse group of people crossing a city street in the early morning — a woman in heels with a coffee, a jogger with headphones, a dad pushing a stroller, and a teen on a scooter. Background includes traffic lights, brick buildings, and steam rising from a manhole. Overcast sky, everyday realism."ChatGPT captured all of the details within the prompt but delivered a messy and cluttered image that does not look real and one I wouldn't use for delivered a polished image that highlights the prompt, but misses several Draw. ChatGPT hit every detail of the prompt, but at the cost of an unrealistic crosswalk situation. Alexa+ made an image that better captures the vibe of a busy city but misses out on key details of the prompt. After five rounds of head-to-head testing, one thing is clear: ChatGPT might take a more whimsical or storybook approach, but it consistently nails the specifics. However, I was pleasantly surprised by Alexa+. It generated refined images that often looked more realistic than ChatGPT that are instantly shareable. And it was faster than ChatGPT, too. But in most cases, Alexa+ fell short when it came to following the actual prompt. Whether it's missing a sippy cup, skipping key characters, or glossing over a specific setting, the details matter, especially when you're generating visuals with a purpose. So, while Alexa+ has potential and impressive speed, it still loses out to ChatGPT when prompt accuracy counts. My suggestion to users is to use Alexa+ for speed and realism, but be ready to tweak any resulting image with follow up prompts.
Wall Street Journal
2 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
U.S. Stock Futures Rise But Asia, European Markets Fall on Rate Cut Uncertainty
U.S. stock futures rose after Nasdaq closed at another new record Thursday following Google-parent Alphabet's earnings and despite continued trade tensions and weaker-than-expected housing data. European stocks fell in line with Asia on uncertainty over Fed rate cuts. —U.S. futures for the S&P 500 were up 0.1% and futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 0.1%. The S&P 500 added less than 0.1% Thursday for its fourth consecutive record, the longest such streak since December while the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained 0.2% to hit its 12th record of July.
Tom's Guide
31 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I swapped my Apple Watch Series 10 for a Google Pixel Watch 3 — here's what I liked and disliked
If you own an iPhone and you're fully locked into the Apple ecosystem, then it's hard to look past choosing the Apple Watch as your smartwatch. Whether it's our top smartwatch pick or the number one smartwatch choice for women, it's a tough one to beat. There are other great smartwatches outside of the Apple Watch, including the Google Pixel Watch 3. It's our favourite Android smartwatch and is proof that great Wear OS smartwatches exist. So what would happen if you swapped Apple Watch for Google Pixel Watch to dish out those phone notifications, let you make payments from the wrist, or let the music play sans smartphone? That's exactly what we did to find out if Google's best is a good enough alternative to the Apple Watch Series 10. Here's what we liked and disliked as we did smartwatch swapsies. If there's one area in general I think Wear OS smartwatches struggle in comparison to the Apple Watch, it's with the native fitness and health tracking support. It's generally good in parts, but lacks as a package. That's where the Pixel Watch 3 differs, and that's mainly down to the strong Fitbit integration, which essentially takes care of monitoring daily step counts, motivating you to keep moving during the day, and offers the kind of metrics and insights that are both glanceable and actually useful to pay attention to. A few features stand out particularly on the Pixel Watch. One is sleep tracking, which Fitbit has had quite a head start on Apple, both with tracking and with the level of metrics it can offer. Apple's sleep tracking support is pretty solid, but in contrast to what you get on the Pixel Watch, the presentation of data on and off the watch is a bit slicker. Readiness scores are another feature that's a win for Google over Apple. It's a good example of a metric that's powered by reliable tracking of heart rate and sleep. Once calibrated, these scores can offer a simple heads-up of whether you should work out or take a rest day. Currently, Apple doesn't offer a similar readiness-type score that is a great feature for fitness newbies and more experienced fitness lovers. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The Google Pixel Watch 3 is hardly a battery powerhouse, especially compared to other Wear OS smartwatches like the OnePlus Watch 3 and many of Mobvoi's dual-display-toting TicWatches. It does manage to squeeze out a little bit more battery than the Apple Watch Series 10, based on my testing time. The raw numbers state the Pixel Watch 3 can last up to 24 hours with the screen set to always-on, or you can switch to the Battery Saver mode to get up to 36 hours. The Apple Watch Series 10 lasts 18 hours, and really will if you keep the screen on at all times. Granted, it's a pretty rapid charger, but it doesn't negate that you definitely do end up having to think about the battery. Especially if you're taking it to bed to track your sleep. While the Pixel Watch 3 isn't immune to similar concerns, it's definitely slightly less of one compared to Apple's smartwatch. Like Apple, it does try to remedy that with some pretty rapid charging support. Apple's smartwatch has remained square since the original Watch and seems unlikely to shift from that angular look. While there's no shortage of round smartwatches, I'd say that the Pixel Watch 3's round look stands out for the right reasons. For starters, it comes in two different sizes, which is great news whether you like a smartwatch to dominate on the wrist or you prefer something that lives a little smaller, letting you strap on additional wristwear alongside it. You're getting a fully circular case design in either a polished or matte aluminium finish, an elegant watch crown, and a bright AMOLED display, and it has those deep black levels you associate with a high-quality colour screen. Combine all of that and you get something that's sleek and really does set it apart from other smartwatches. You certainly can't accuse the Google Pixel Watch 3 of aping the look of the Apple Watch Series 10 or other Apple Watches, and while Apple also gets plenty of things right with its design, so does Google with its own. Apple beats Google when it comes to tracking your exercise. Quite simply, if you want a smartwatch that can closely match the performance of a dedicated sports watch, it's not the Pixel Watch 3 you'll want on your wrist. Take GPS performance, or the fact that it doesn't offer the latest dual-band GPS technology that now appears on a whole host of smartwatches, some of which cost less than the Pixel Watch 3. If you look at the supported sports tracking profiles, there's simply more on offer with Apple's smartwatch. Take swimming as an example, where the Pixel Watch 3 only supports tracking pool swims, while Apple's will track your movements in the open water and do a really good job of it. If you're heading outside to track workouts, Apple gives you maps to view. Some of that mapping is available out of the box, with a host of apps in the App Store that are capable of extending that to other sports. That extensive third-party training and fitness app support gives Apple the upper hand to enhance its sports tracking capabilities. It also has the advantage of letting you pair external fitness accessories like a heart rate monitor, which you cannot do on the Pixel Watch 3. Yes, there's certainly enough on the Pixel Watch to track workouts and offer a satisfactory level of performance as well as a good array of metrics. The Apple Watch Series 10 is a much better performer across most, if not all, fronts. Having Fitbit take care of most of the Pixel Watch 3's fitness and health tracking was a smart move, but you will need to shell out more money, either on a monthly or annual basis, to get the most complete Fitbit experience. Thankfully, features like daily readiness scores, core activity tracking, and health metrics are available in the free version of the Fitbit App. The biggest features you're going to miss out on by not paying up for Premium are the extra analysis offered for sleep and stress data. You also miss out on Fitbit's workout videos and audio-based training sessions, but I'd say that richer sleep and stress insights are the things that most users will most appreciate having access to. Yes, I did like the fact that the Pixel Watch 3 (the larger 45mm version) has a better battery than the Apple Watch Series 10, but it's not by a huge amount. This is still a smartwatch where you have to think about the battery pretty much every day, whether the screen is on at all times, or when using the raise-to-wake gesture support. Having spent time with other Wear OS smartwatches that can go for almost a week without charging, it's frustrating that Google didn't seize the opportunity to make the Pixel Watch 3 go much longer than Apple's Watches, or at least seek parity with the best WearOS battery performers. Now, this is exactly the same criticism that can be levelled at the Apple Watch and its inability to play nice with Android. This dislikable element of using a Pixel Watch is unlikely to change anytime soon. The lack of compatibility across the two biggest smartphone platforms instantly makes using the Google Pixel Watch 3 a restrictive experience for many. If you don't have the luxury to switch between Android phones and iPhones, then that's going to be a pretty major reason to dislike the Pixel Watch 3. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
