Trump's Tariffs Hit European Luxury Industry, Shares Tank
Europe's luxury industry, producing handbags, shoes, fashion items and champagne among other prized goods, is highly exposed to the US market, which was seen as the sector's best hope for growth this year as Chinese demand lags.
Shares in LVMH and Hermes, France's largest listed companies by market capitalisation, fell by around 3 percent and 4 percent respectively after Trump's announcement, in line with sector peers including Kering, Prada and Burberry.
The sector's largest groups sell roughly a quarter of their products to US consumers, while exposure among smaller brands varies, from 14 percent at outerwear company Moncler to 46 percent at sandals-maker Birkenstock.
S&P analysts cited the luxury sector in a recent note as one of those most exposed to US tariffs, as companies have only limited ability to move production to the United States.
'If you want to create a factory in the US to overcome the problem of the tariffs, it's just impossible right now. ... You don't have the people, the know-how,' Bain partner Claudia D'Arpizio said at an industry event on Thursday.
LVMH's Louis Vuitton is the only European luxury brand producing locally in the United States, though it has been grappling with problems at one of its sites in country, Reuters has found.
'We therefore believe that pricing will likely be the luxury goods industry's main way of mitigating tariffs,' S&P analysts said in a recent note.
European luxury goods makers including Birkin bag maker Hermes have said they could use their pricing power to offset the cost of any tariffs, but analysts say some brands may have limited room to hike prices.
France's luxury industry — the world's largest — employs over 600,000 people, data from the economy ministry shows.
Italy, producing most of the world's high-end leather goods, is also highly exposed to international trade. According to a report by state-controlled bank Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, the fashion industry accounts for over 5 percent of the country's gross domestic product.
The two countries are the largest exporters of most luxury products to the United States.
In 2024, France shipped sparkling wine including champagne worth €890 million ($1 billion) as well as grape brandy, mostly cognac, worth €1.27 billion to the US, United Nations data shows. Italy meanwhile exported €770 million worth of leather handbags.
By Elisa Anzolin, Tassilo Hummel, Mimosa Spencer and Leigh Thomas; Writing by Tassilo Hummel; Editing by Catherine Evans
Learn more:
Trump Tariffs Prompt Slump in Shipments to US Ports
The number of vessels scheduled to arrive at the Port of Los Angeles next week is down by almost a third, year on year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business of Fashion
20 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Big Tech and Fashion Think They've Finally Figured Out Smart Glasses
Technofuturists have touted smart glasses as the next big device off and on for more than a decade. They were wrong, often embarrassingly so, because wearables makers were either laser-focused on the underlying technology at the expense of style — epitomised by the dorky Google Glass, which even a cameo in a Diane Von Furstenberg runway show couldn't make cool — or simply bolted half-baked features on existing products. In the last few months, we've seen mounting evidence that tech and fashion are finally rowing in the same direction. This week, Meta bought a minority stake in the eyewear maker EssilorLuxottica for $3.5 billion, doubling down on the unexpected success of the two companies' smart glasses collaboration, which began with Ray-Ban and now includes Oakley. Meta is also reportedly planning an eyewear line with Prada, whose eyewear EssilorLuxottica holds a 10-year license to produce. In May, Google — already back in the smart glasses game via a deal with Samsung — announced partnerships with Warby Parker, Gentle Monster and Kering Eyewear, which makes glasses for Kering brands including Gucci and Bottega Veneta, as well as other labels such as Cartier, Alaïa and Puma. The deal with Warby Parker included an investment of $150 million by Google, while its tie up with Gentle Monster reportedly involved a $100 million investment, though neither company has confirmed the news. Apple, which knows a thing or two about making wearables fashionable with its Apple Watch, is gearing up to release its own smart glasses in 2026, according to Bloomberg, while Chinese tech giant Xiaomi recently unveiled its version of the technology. These are major investments, and the market is brimming with optimism. Warby Parker's stock is up by more than one-quarter since the Google investment was announced. But after so many prominent failures, why do tech giants, fashion executives and investors believe this time will be any different? The clearest reason is the surprise success of the second generation of Ray-Ban Meta glasses, which debuted in late 2023 and as of February had sold more than 2 million pairs. The company plans to scale production to 10 million units annually by the end of next year. Those results have created confidence that consumers will actually buy smart glasses if they're done right. The Ray-Ban Meta glasses offer a number of functionalities, from capturing photos and videos to live streaming on Instagram, while being able to maintain the classic look of Ray-Ban styles like the Wayfarer. Meta has also augmented the glasses with AI features, such as live translation of a few languages, the ability to identify landmarks or get directions and general informational searches. Those capabilities point to another cause for the rash of activity: 'It's a bit of a race to leverage the AI models,' said TD Cowen analyst Oliver Chen. The expectation appears to be that, as AI advances, AI-powered smart glasses will be able to add new abilities to make them more useful — and therefore more desirable to consumers who will get all sorts of features in a package that finally just looks like a regular pair of sunglasses. The latest smart glasses boom could fizzle out just like last time, and the time before. After all, it's still a novelty to see someone wearing Meta Ray-Bans in public. But unlike the Google Glass, you don't feel secondhand embarrassment for the wearer. THE NEWS IN BRIEF FASHION, BUSINESS AND THE ECONOMY () Trump announced 25 percent tariffs on Japan and South Korea in August. The duties, which are set to begin on Aug. 1, are largely in line with the rates Trump had initially imposed. The announcement was the first of an expected wave of trade deals this month. Amazon Prime Day sales plunged 41 percent on the first day of its four-day event. Preliminary results indicated the e-commerce giant's gamble on doubling the duration of its summer sales event didn't pan out. The poor results have become a sign of cautious consumer sentiment as President Trump's trade war pans out. Italy's Cucinelli posted a 10.7 percent increase in first half revenues. The sales, which totalled €684 million, slightly beat analyst expectations by and rose 10 percent in the Americas and 13 percent in Asia, bolstered by double-digit growth in China. Levi foresaw robust revenue growth mostly offsetting tariff impact. Revenue for the quarter ending June 1 rose 6 percent to $1.4 billion, beating analyst expectations. The denim maker raised its revenue outlook between 1 and 2 percent for the current fiscal year. S&P cut Saks' credit rating over its new financing package. The department store operator's credit rating has fallen 10 rungs below investment grade to CC, a downgrade that the agency said is in line with its view that Saks' $600 million financing package is 'tantamount to a default.' Shein filed for a Hong Kong IPO to save its London listing. With the filing, the fast-fashion giant hopes to increase pressure on British regulators to approve its planned London debut, according to the Financial Times. If the UK Financial Conduct Authority accepts the Shein IPO, London would reportedly still be Shein's preferred exchange. Canada Goose's private equity backer weighed a stake sale. Controlling shareholder Bain Capital is working with advisers as it contemplates selling part or all of its holding in the luxury parka maker. Ralph Lauren's CEO sees 'resilient' demand amid tariff uncertainty. Patrice Louvet said demand for the American luxury brand's core products including cable-knit sweaters remains strong enough to offset cautious consumer spending. The UK's Mulberry raised $27 million from top investors as revenue dropped. The brand reported a 21 percent drop in annual revenue on Thursday, but raised capital with the support of its two largest shareholders, Chalice and Frasers. Frasers executive James France also joined Mulberry's board. Uniqlo owner's profit missed estimates on weak China sales. Fast Retailing Co. reported third-quarter operating profit of 146.7 billion yen ($1 billion) in the three months ending in May, trailing analyst estimates of 150 billion yen. Revenue in China declined by 5 percent off weaker consumer sentiment. The UK arrested four people linked to M&S and Harrods cyberattacks. The British National Crime Agency arrested three teenage males and one 20-year-old female in the West Midlands and London on suspicion of several offences, including violations of the Computer Misuse Act. Jane Birkin's original Hermès Birkin sold for $10 million. The sale at Sotheby's in Paris to a private collector in Japan broke the global record for most valuable handbag ever sold at auction, previously set in 2021 by a $513,000 Christie's sale of the Hermès Himalaya Kelly. Claire's considers bankruptcy for US operations. The tween retailer has been working with Houlihan Lokey Inc. to strengthen its finances while weighing a sale of all or part of its operations. Amina Muaddi opened its first store. The new location for the seven-year-old women's footwear and accessories brand is at 6 Avenue Montaigne in Paris, where customers can also purchase a capsule collection launched by the brand to commemorate the opening. Birkenstock cracked down on fakes in India. After the German brand filed an infringement lawsuit in the Delhi High Court in May against footwear traders, four factories and two unnamed individuals, Indian court-appointed legal representatives inspected small-scale factories in recent weeks to seize counterfeit Birkenstock footwear. Heron Preston bought back his brand from New Guards Group. The designer has reacquired full, exclusive rights over his namesake label, which launched in 2017, from the Farfetch-owned holding company. Financial terms were not disclosed. Victoria & Albert Museum will stage a Schiaparelli exhibition in London. 'Schiaparelli: Fashion Becomes Art' will open on March 21 next year and include over 200 items, including Elsa Schiaparelli's surrealist dresses made in collaboration with Salvador Dalí. Current creative director Daniel Roseberry's works will also be shown. THE BUSINESS OF BEAUTY (Courtesy) Ulta Beauty acquired Space NK. Ulta announced Thursday that it has purchased the British beauty retailer from its previous owner Manzanita Capital for an undisclosed sum, though previous reports have valued the company at upwards of $300 million. The deal will give the American beauty conglomerate access into the UK market. Trump said pharmaceutical tariffs could reach 200 percent. The US president added that he would give drugmakers roughly a year to negotiate. The Trump administration has posited that heavy reliance on foreign production of medicine is a national security threat, but drugmakers are concerned duties could increase the chance of medication shortage. PEOPLE (Courtesy) Michael Burke was tapped to lead LVMH Americas. The former Louis Vuitton chief executive and LVMH veteran will move to New York to begin his role as chairman and CEO of LVMH Americas, tasked with 'representing and promoting the best interests of the group in North and South America,' the company said. Nike replaced Converse's CEO in a bid to reverse its sales slump. Nike VP and general manager Aaron Cain, a 21-year veteran, will take the reins at Converse to help revive its sales. He succeeds Jared Carver, who is exiting after two years as CEO. Compiled by Jessica Kwon.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The S&P 500 Just Made a Bullish Crossover. Here's Why That Might Not Necessarily Mean a Big Rally Is Coming.
The S&P 500 recently made a very bullish "crossover," which has been known to precede to a strong rally. The last time a similar crossover took place was back in 2023, a year when the index rose by 24%. Investors, however, should consider the full context when analyzing chart trends. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has been doing fairly well this year, and has recovered after the early Trump tariff news spooked investors back in April. It's back up around record levels, and recently made a very bullish crossover -- one that it hasn't made in two years. When there's a big "crossover" in stock prices' moving averages for different time frames, that can be a very bullish sign to buy, according to technical analysts who rely on chart patterns. But that doesn't mean an investment or asset is guaranteed to rise in value after such a crossover. It's always important to consider context. Here's why you shouldn't get too excited about what might normally be a very positive indicator for the S&P 500. A "golden cross" occurs when a shorter-term moving average crosses above a longer-term moving average. On the flip side, when the opposite happens, that's referred to as a "death cross," and technical analysts consider it a very bad indicator. Recently, the S&P 500's 50-day moving average crossed above its 200-day moving average, making a golden cross. A death cross did occur earlier this year when "reciprocal tariffs" were announced, but as you can see from the chart above, the S&P 500 has recovered in a relatively short fashion. The last time that a golden cross took place was back in early 2023, a year when the S&P 500 would go on to rally by more than 24%. Investing based on charts alone can be a dangerous strategy because they don't tell you the whole story, and it's important to understand what's going on in the markets, along with the relevant risks. Back in early 2023, when the last golden cross took place, the S&P 500 was coming off a brutal year in 2022 when it plunged by more than 19%. A golden cross then was a good sign that the market was recovering. This time around, however, things are a bit different. If not for the "reciprocal tariffs" that were announced back in April, a death cross probably wouldn't have happened, and neither would this recent golden cross. This is where context is important in analyzing any chart trends. It's not as simple as assuming that because a golden cross has taken place, stocks are destined to go higher. Instead, it looks like the S&P 500 has effectively gotten back to where it was before the threat of tariffs derailed its progress. I definitely wouldn't interpret this as a sign that stocks are likely to go on to major gains, not with the S&P 500 at record levels and with the threat and uncertainty around tariffs still hovering over the markets. The S&P 500 has historically risen in value over the long term, and that's the only real trend you need to worry about with the index. In fact, the death cross that took place earlier this year highlights a significant weakness in relying on technical analysis and charts alone. By simply looking at the earlier chart back in April, you may not have expected a bearish crossover to suddenly take place. If, however, you were following market-related news and were aware that wide-scale tariffs were about to be put in place, you may have anticipated a significant pullback in the markets due to worsening investor sentiment. Charts can be useful tools in assessing how a stock or asset is doing, but you shouldn't base your investing decision on what a trend may suggest is happening. The good news, however, is that with a simple buy-and-hold strategy, you can ignore chart trends and just hang on for the long haul. This is where tracking the S&P 500 through exchange-traded funds can be an easy, no-nonsense way to grow your portfolio over the long term without having to worry about what's happening in the markets on a day-to-day basis. Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The S&P 500 Just Made a Bullish Crossover. Here's Why That Might Not Necessarily Mean a Big Rally Is Coming. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Republicans stooped to Democrats' level using Trump's tax bill to buy votes
Now that President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act has been signed into law, we can get into analyzing what is actually in the legislation. There are a few things that are clear to me as a conservative who hoped Republicans would push sound fiscal policies. Primarily, this is a flawed conservative policy. While it is a good thing that the 2017 Trump tax cuts were extended, there remain a ton of problems with the bill. Many of the tax break provisions have less to do with economics and more to do with pandering to the American people. Congressional Republicans seemingly made little attempt to justify their poor fiscal ideas, choosing instead to pass Trump's agenda by any means necessary. More: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? | Opinion However, the law goes further, creating new tax exemptions for Social Security, tips and overtime pay. These policies, in addition to the poor policy of an increased cap on state and local taxes, are little more than bribes to the American people. Opinion: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him I'm all for new tax cuts, provided we are reducing spending at the same time. But there is no economic rationale for exempting any of these forms of income from taxation. These incomes are not unique in their impact on the economy and should not be treated as such. The only reason for not taxing tips or overtime in favor of other forms of income is that MAGA lawmakers think they can buy votes. It's a tactic often employed by congressional Democrats, who promise either student loan forgiveness or taxing the ultrawealthy in order to buy middle-class and youth votes. Conservatives should not be proud of our leaders for stooping so low. Not only are these cuts not coherent in theory, they aren't even fiscally sound conservative policies. The issue with this law is that it overlooks the increasingly massive deficit that will be incurred to fund it, as well as the aforementioned new tax breaks. While it attempts to bridge this gap with good policies, such as work requirements for Medicaid and food stamp benefits, it isn't enough. Even after accounting for the economic growth the tax cuts are anticipated to generate, the bill is estimated to add $3.8 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Tax cuts paid for through deficit spending aren't really tax cuts. The cuts still need to be paid for, and both options for doing so would be an additional burden on the American people. The first option is through borrowing money, which not only further increases the national debt but also increases the revenue required later to repay that debt. Second, this is achieved through printing more money, which is inflationary and places further costs on Americans. There is no magic third way that allows the government to cut taxes and keep spending without, at some point, hurting Americans. The only way to truly create tax cuts is by commensurately cutting spending at the same time. However, responsible budgets are not the goal of the current GOP. The main goal is to deliver on Trump's populist attempts to bribe voters, even if, ultimately, this will hurt those voters.
