Welsh employment rate remains lowest in Britain as poverty and joblessness rise
WALES continues to have the lowest employment rate in Britain, according to the latest official figures released for May 2025, sparking renewed political criticism over the Welsh Government's economic performance and approach to tackling poverty.
The data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that employment in Wales stands at 72.2%, the lowest in Britain, compared to a UK average of 75.1%. Meanwhile, economic inactivity—people neither in work nor actively seeking work—remains the highest in Britain at 24.2%, above the UK average of 21.3%.
Unemployment in Wales has risen to 4.7%, a year-on-year increase of 1.3 percentage points, and the number of paid employees has dropped by 5,300 in the past month, according to separate figures from Stats Wales.
The figures have prompted concern from opposition parties, who argue that tax and regulatory policies are pushing businesses to halt recruitment or cut jobs.
Welsh Conservative Shadow Economy Secretary Samuel Kurtz MS said: 'Under Labour, our economy is broken, both here in Wales and across the United Kingdom. You cannot tax your way to prosperity.'
He criticised what he called a 'regulatory stranglehold' on enterprise, including business rates, the so-called 'jobs tax,' and the proposed Tourism Tax, which he claims stifles growth.
'We would scrap business rates for small firms, revitalise our high streets and axe the Tourism Tax once and for all,' Kurtz added.
Welsh Liberal Democrat MP David Chadwick went further, saying: 'These figures show the huge damage Labour's misguided jobs tax is already having on the Welsh economy. With Wales more dependent on small businesses than other parts of the UK, the Chancellor must scrap it now.'
The criticism was echoed by the Welsh Conservatives' Shadow Social Justice Secretary Dr Altaf Hussain MS, who cited a recent 'Poverty in Wales' report revealing that 22% of the population—around 700,000 people—are living in poverty.
This includes 200,000 children (31%), 400,000 working-age adults (21%), and 100,000 pensioners (16%).
'After 26 years of Labour in Wales, poverty remains stubbornly high,' Dr Hussain said. 'We would cut taxes for working families and match England's childcare offer, enabling more parents to work and reducing child poverty.'
The Welsh Government has not yet responded to the latest labour market figures or the criticism from opposition parties. Ministers have previously stated they are focused on reducing regional inequality and supporting job creation through skills programmes and targeted investments.
The full employment and poverty statistics can be accessed via Stats Wales and the Office for National Statistics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
3 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Police Scotland sends report to prosecutors after Glasgow councillor charged with fraud
Labour veteran Frank McAveety was arrested and charged earlier this year in connection with fraud offences. Police have sent a report to prosecutors after a former Labour leader of Glasgow City Council was charged with fraud offences. Frank McAveety is a former Labour MSP and Cabinet Minister who also led the council on two occasions. A spokesperson for Police Scotland said in April: 'A 62-year-old man has been arrested and charged in connection with fraud offences in the Glasgow area between 2022 and 2024. 'A report will be submitted to the procurator fiscal in due course.' The force has now told the Record a report has been submitted to the Procurator Fiscal. McAveety represents the Shettleston ward and is currently listed as an independent. He was leader of Glasgow council between 1997 and 1999, and between 2015 and 2017. Here you can get your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. You can also check out our social media channels for live us on Twitter @Record_Politics for the latest news. Or you can catch all the action by following our team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewjquinn97 and @dennynews. We're on Facebook where you can join our Record Politics group for all our stories. We also have a weekly politics podcast, Planet Holyrood, which you can listen to Spotify or Apple music, or watch on the Daily Record YouTube channel.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's prison system was 'on the brink of collapse' on multiple occasions while Rishi Sunak was PM
Britain's prison system was on the brink of collapse on three occasions while Rishi Sunak was prime minister, according to a damning new report. Dame Ann Owers, a former chief inspector of prisons, found the criminal justice system had been 'in crisis' for more than 18 months under the Tory government. In her review, commissioned by Labour 's Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, Dame Ann revealed that senior officials even feared riots if jails ran out of space. She also disclosed that top civil servants 'were so concened' about a breakdown that they kept 'an audit' of all decision-making and documents in case of a future inquiry. Following Labour's general election victory in July 2024, Ms Mahmood implemented a new early release scheme in order to tackle prison overcrowding. This saw her cut the proportion of a sentence that inmates must serve behind bars from 50 per cent to 40 per cent. But prisons in England and Wales are still around 98 per cent full. HM Prison and Probation Service says it cannot run the estate efficiently at over 95 per cent capacity. In her report, published today, Dame Ann described an 18-month 'permacrisis' in the criminal justice system while Mr Sunak was in Downing Street. Dame Ann criticised the previous Tory government for only doing 'just enough to avert breakdown and buy time until the next predictable cliff edge was reached'. She revealed how, in May 2024 following the announcement of the general election, senior officials discussed 'contingency plans in case the criminal justice system collapsed during the election campaign because prisons were unable to take in any more prisoners'. 'This could involve invoking emergency powers under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to release prisoners early, in order to avert the risk of public disorder,' she added. 'The risk was real: at one point there were fewer than 100 places in adult male prisons. 'However, the system had in fact been in crisis for over eighteen months. From 2023 onwards, prisons were running very close to the edge of capacity. 'On three occasions, this was only pulled back at the last minute by the use of early release schemes, gradually decreasing the amount of time many prisoners spent in custody, using powers designed to allow release on compassionate grounds. 'Senior officials were so concerned about a potential breakdown in the criminal justice system that an audit was kept of all decisionmaking and documents, in case there was a public or parliamentary inquiry.' In a further criticism of the previous government's handling of the crisis, Dame Ann continued: 'Although departmental ministers were convinced by mid-2023 that some form of early release was both necessary and urgent, this required Prime Ministerial agreement, which was not forthcoming until the system was within three days of potential collapse, and only in incremental stages.' She also said that, while conducting her review, many of those she spoke to 'expressed frustration and sometimes anger at the reluctance to accept and then act on the well-documented and imminent crisis, or to agree any coherent plan to avert it'. 'Many believed that the default position was to do as little as possible as late as possible, with the consequence that the system repeatedly reached the brink of collapse, rather than accepting the inevitable and getting ahead of the crisis,' Dame Ann added. In October 2023, then justice secretary Alex Chalk announced some 'less serious offenders' could be freed from prison up to 18 days before their automatic release date. This was then increased to 60 days in March 2024 and then to 70 days in May 2024. Ms Mahmood said: 'This report lays bare the disgraceful way the last Conservative government ran our prisons. 'They added less than 500 cells to the prison estate over 14 years, released over 10,000 prisoners early under a veil of secrecy, and brought our jails close to total collapse on countless occasions.' Andrew Neilson, the director of campaigns at the Howard League for Penal Reform, said: 'This review into prison capacity spells out in forensic detail how the Government has found itself facing the prospect of running out of cells. 'It is a crisis, or more accurately a series of crises, that has been brewing over several decades and across successive governments.' A Conservative Party spokesperson said: 'In office, the Conservatives rightly listened to the public demand to see criminals punished with proper sentences, and to tackle the capacity issues we had plans to use prisons abroad. 'Labour scrapped those plans and instead chose to release violent criminals back on our streets. 'Labour aren't serious about tackling these issues. They blocked our deportation bill that would have mandated the deportation of all foreign criminals. 'Whilst Labour and Reform want shorter sentences, the Conservatives will make no apology for ensuring that heinous criminals are kept off our streets and behind bars.'
The National
3 minutes ago
- The National
I have more questions than answers about Jeremy Corbyn's new party
He and I are both admirers of Tony Benn and I share many of his political opinions. At the same time, I respectfully disagree with him on some important issues. And I point out that the 27-year-old Scottish Socialist Party has already announced – and reiterated again at our National Council in Glasgow last weekend – that it is our intention to stand in all eight regions at next year's Holyrood election. One of the most substantial differences we had with Corbyn for a long time was the nature and role of the Labour Party, which I left 40 years ago. For me Labour are not now, nor have ever been, a legitimate or trustworthy vehicle for socialist change. The independent socialist Scotland and modern democratic republic I want to see, for example, is not an ambition Labour share. The reverse in fact is true. It seems Corbyn, having split with Labour, agrees with me on the former issue at least. Keir Starmer's ambivalence toward the ongoing slaughter in Gaza is merely the last straw for many of his erstwhile voters. Others were just as disgusted by his attack on the benefits for people with disabilities and families with more than two children. Then there is the betrayal of the Waspi women and the repugnant decision to divert international aid spending towards armaments. Many questions remain about the Corbyn/Sultana project, however, largely because its advocates have been slow to provide answers. Is it their intention, for example, to create another version of the Labour Party? In other words, an electoral machine that may criticise but ultimately sustains capitalism? Where is the primacy of class in the new party's politics? How will it prevent the broad, and therefore shallow, coalition of disparate opinions collapsing under the pressure of ideological divisions and competing tactical priorities? If I were to guess at the social composition of the 600,000 people who have reportedly signed up for this project, I'd say many were likely to be students, others would be from the pro-Palestinian diaspora. And most would be from Greater London and the biggest English cities. READ MORE: 'One that belongs to you': Jeremy Corbyn reveals temporary name of new party My late father, a lifelong socialist and trade union member, never took to Corbyn as Labour leader. He felt he was just not 'hard enough' to withstand what the Labour right would throw at him. I confess I could see what he meant. Corbyn is a decent man, and it is an outrage that the charge of antisemitism was levelled against him for criticising the actions of the ultra-reactionary Israeli government. And yet he often seems like 'an altar boy at a knife fight', prone, according to Owen Jones's book This Land to disappearing to his allotment for days at a time to avoid confrontation. Just as Starmer has come a cropper for being merely the anti-Tory conduit in last year's election, Corbyn can surely see that offering an opposition to Starmer is not enough for people to sustainably coalesce behind. Another feature of the Corbyn announcement I found interesting was examining who is not joining – John McDonnell, Diane Abbott (below), Ian Lavery and other members of the 'Bennite' group of Labour MPs, nor are the trade unions. Nor are many socialists in the schemes of Scotland. The project, it seems to me, is therefore hamstrung by the contradictions within it. It's another London-centric project whose approach to the national question is at best ambivalent – they say they will not take a position on Scottish independence. I fear this new party is therefore less likely to succeed in Scotland than many believe. If it fails to build roots in working-class communities here, it will not sustain and in due course may perversely act as an accelerant for further advance by forces such as Reform UK. The rise in support for Reform can also be traced to Starmer's door. It has been seven years in the making and while the first five were spent largely trying to usurp the Tory Party, it really took off under the weight of Starmer's failures. They won the Runcorn by-election in May – Labour's fifth-safest seat – and are on course to win the Welsh Assembly election. They have 500 councillors, many in England's poorest counties and their narrative that 'Britain is broken and needs Reform' resonates with millions. Successful strategies demand thorough preparation, immense funding and resolute application. Nigel Farage, I regret to say, seems better prepared and more streetwise than Corbyn. The question I have been examining in this column over recent months is not so much 'is support for Reform increasing in Scotland?' but rather 'why is it on such a sharp incline?' What is driving its support? It's a question that demands an honest and comprehensive answer from an independence movement losing support to arch-Unionists. READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan and SNP chances in 2026 Starmer's failures are undoubtedly the main driver. He promised to redistribute wealth in favour of working people and to fully fund public services such as the NHS, social care and education. He palpably has not. But it is also true that John Swinney must take his share of the blame for Reform's surge here. As First Minister, he has presided over NHS Scotland's worst crisis and betrayed a promise to deliver a national care service. His cut-and-paste independence strategy is no more credible. Claiming only an SNP majority at [[Holyrood]] next year can deliver indyref2 is undermined by a poor record in government over the past 19 years. That referendum also remains in the gift of Westminster and Swinney has never offered a serious route to achieving it. Incapable of thwarting the rise of Reform, he is unable to extricate himself from the view voters have of him as part of the political establishment implicated in the failure to address the grotesque inequalities, privatisations and exploitation people endure here. The Scottish Socialist Party will offer people an alternative to the parties of the 'extreme centre' and Reform UK at next year's election. And in doing so we will highlight our unwavering support for an independent socialist Scotland and a modern democratic republic – and the fact our MSPs would live on the average worker's wage, as I did between 2003-07. We'd replace the hated and unfair Council Tax with an income-based alternative where the poorest are exempt, and point proudly to an unparalleled record, over a quarter of a century, of support for workers and communities in struggle.
