London's no-go neighbourhoods: Pockets of the capital with highest knife crime offences revealed - as reports hit a another consecutive record high
In response to the spiralling figures, campaigners slammed mayor Sir Sadiq Khan as 'not fit for purpose' and accused him of 'undermining the Met Police at any opportunity'.
Former Met cop and knife crime campaigner Norman Brennan, who was 25 when he was stabbed in the chest and nearly murdered by a burglar while on duty, told MailOnline: 'Under Sadiq Khan, London has no-go areas and the streets have become unsafe.'
Home Office data shows more than 16,800 knife crimes were recorded by the Metropolitan and City of London police forces last year, a 16 per cent rise on the previous record of over 14,500 a year earlier.
The highest number of knife crimes occurred in several central London neighbourhoods, focused around the high-end areas of Mayfair, Fitzrovia, Soho, St James and the Strand.
The most up-to-date figures are from 2023 as the Met stopped publishing data which breaks down weapons offences to this granular level of geographic detail early last year. MailOnline has asked if the force intends to start publishing this breakdown again.
The number one area for crime was the neighbourhood – technically a 'lower layer super output area' (LSOA) named Westminster 013G – which features Regent Street, New Bond Street and a small section of Oxford Street.
This Westminster suburb saw saw 141 reported knife crimes in 2023, according to Met Police data. A near-600 per cent rise on 2012, where 21 knife-related offences were recorded.
You can see how impacted the areas of the capital you frequent are impacted by the rising epidemic with MailOnline's interactive map.
Outside of central London, other hotspots include Shoreditch, Hackney, Stratford International Station and Westfield shopping centre and the centre of Croydon.
Mr Brennan, who is campaigning for mandatory five-year sentences for knife possession, said the figures show 'the streets have become lawless'.
He added: 'Many people think they can carry a knife and face no consequences.
'The courts offer derisory sentences. For carrying a knife you get the same sentence as a parking fine.
'That's how weak our criminal justice system is and all our criminal justice system does is make excuses.'
Referencing the fatal stabbing of father-of-two Blue Stevens, 26, outside the £1,650-a-night 5-star Park Tower Hotel and Casino, he said that his family and loved ones will now see 'time freeze forever'.
Police are still continuing their manhunt, and have been pursuing multiple lines of enquiry, including whether the murder was a botched Rolex watch robbery.
Mr Stevens, who is the grandson of a champion boxer, had just been for a romantic dinner with his partner when the masked assailant struck.
The murder came hours after the mayor promised a police blitz on crime in the capital, including tackling knife crime and robberies.
Mr Brennan blames the rise in knife crime in the massive reduction of the stop and search powers in the last decade-and-a-half.
PCs in London stopped four times fewer people in 2023 as they did in 2009 – from nearly 790,000 to 180,000 – in the same period, knife crime has risen around 40 per cent.
However, Patrick Green, CEO of The Ben Kinsella Trust, said that while stop and search was an 'important police tactic and tool the police need to do their job effectively', it is 'not silver bullet often portrayed to be'.
'If stop and search was the answer we'd have solved the problem a long time ago,' he added.
Mr Green said: 'It's very disappointing to see that knife crime is going in the wrong direction in the capital.'
The trust he heads is named after Ben Kinsella, who was stabbed to death in a brutal attack in Islington in 2008.
On the way home from a night out with his friends to celebrate their GCSEs, Ben was chased and murdered by a group of older teenagers, entirely unprovoked.
Ben was the seventeenth teenager to be murdered that year. He was 16 years old.
Mr Green added: 'Seventeen years after Ben's murder it's disappointing to see we've failed to address many of the key drivers that influence knife crime.'
He blamed the availability of blades to youngsters, saying: 'It's never been easier for someone under the age of 18 to buy a knife, particularly online.'
The campaigner added that knife crime has been 'glamourised and normalised', and that young people have become 'desensitised' to it because of social media.
But he said that youngsters are 'terrified' of knives, with a recent survey showing 60 per cent were worried or anxious about the violent epidemic, and one-quarter think that carrying a knife is the best way to protect yourself.
He also laid the blame at the gutting of police numbers by 20,000 under the coalition, as well as more than a billion pounds in youth service cuts since 2010, which allow criminals to fill the gaps left by a lack of positive role models.
A knife-wielding attacker was caught on camera threatening a young girl in Gladstone park, north-west London at the end of June.
The hooded perpetrator was filmed running up to the girl and lunging the large kitchen knife just inches away from her face.
Last week, the Met told MailOnline: 'On Monday, 30 June at 22:03hrs police attended Gladstone Park, Brent, having been made aware of a video on social media of a woman with a knife.
'Officers saw no one who matched the description of the woman in the video. No one was injured, no weapons were found and no arrests were made.'
A spokesman for the Mayor of London told MailOnline: 'Making London safer is the Mayor's top priority. The latest ONS statistics show that the rate of violent crime with injury in London is lower than in the rest of the country. Gun crime, burglary and knife crime with injury for under 25s have all fallen since Sadiq become Mayor. The number of homicides recorded in London last year was half the number recorded in 2003, and we had the lowest number of teenage homicides in the capital since 2012. Knife crime overall has also been falling over recent months.
'But there's clearly still much more to do to tackle crime. One death is one too many and the Mayor is determined to continue being both tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime.
'The previous government took a wrecking ball to policing budgets and youth clubs in London, which has had serious consequences. In contrast, the Mayor has doubled investment in policing from City Hall and created 500,000 positive opportunities to divert vulnerable young Londoners away from criminal gangs and crime and towards training and employment.'
A Met Police spokesman told MailOnline: 'Tackling knife crime is at the heart of our determination to protect Londoners.
'Through stop-and-search and data-led policing, we are seeing results, with knife crime down this year compared to last. We have also seen an 18 per cent reduction in the number of victims injured by knives and sharp objects, and a 10 per cent reduction in personal robberies, including phone robbery, which makes up the largest proportion of knife crime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
33 minutes ago
- Times
Veterans minister may quit if Troubles-era troops lose immunity
The veterans minister is expected to resign over government plans to repeal the law that granted Troubles-era servicemen immunity from prosecution. Alistair Carns, a former Royal Marines commando, is said to have told ministers that he cannot support any proposal that would leave veterans vulnerable to criminal proceedings. Government sources said that Carns had made his position clear at a drop-in session for Labour MPs hosted by Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland secretary, on Monday last week. Benn had invited colleagues to be briefed on the Northern Ireland Office's plans to replace the Legacy and Reconciliation Act, the 2023 law that ended dozens of civil cases and inquests examining killings during the Troubles. At its heart is a conditional amnesty for all suspects in historic cases related to violence during the conflict. Conservative MPs had long pushed for the legislation to protect former soldiers from prosecution but the act's provisions also apply to republican and loyalist paramilitaries, provided they co-operate with a new information recovery body. Labour's election manifesto pledged to repeal the law and Benn said last year that it was 'completely wrong' that it had barred victims' families from pursuing new inquests or civil action in the courts. He has promised to abolish immunity for suspects, including veterans. Carns, who was appointed to the government within days of his election to the Commons last July, is understood to have told Benn that he could not endorse new legislation, due to be published within weeks, that reopened the possibility of veterans being prosecuted. 'There is a huge row brewing,' a government source said, adding: 'Everyone has been left with the impression that this is a resignation matter.' The minister was not present when MPs debated a petition signed by 176,485 people opposed to Benn's proposals in Westminster Hall on Monday evening. Suggestions that he is hostile to any change in policy on Troubles prosecutions risk embarrassing No 10, which made much of the fact that Carns, who won a Military Cross and is among the most decorated soldiers to have sat in the Commons, joined Labour last year. Senior figures in Downing Street are increasingly nervous of the backlash to the legislation. While Carns has yet to clarify his position publicly, the government's veterans commissioners for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales signalled their opposition to any legislative change in a joint statement on Monday night. 'We stand united in our firm support of the motion to be debated in Westminster today. We are deeply concerned by the prospect of retrospective legal action being taken against veterans who were carrying out their lawful duties, often under immense pressure and threat. 'We urge the government to resist any changes to legislation that would reopen legal uncertainty for veterans of Operation Banner,' David Johnstone, James Phillips and Susie Hamilton said. 'Any proposed changes must be measured, fair and informed by the voices of veterans themselves — many of whom have already endured decades of scrutiny and hardship. 'This is not a call for immunity from the law, but for fairness under it. Veterans deserve clarity, finality and respect for their service.' They added: 'There can be no moral equivalence between those who served in uniform to uphold peace and the rule of law, and those who sought to destroy it through acts of terrorism.' During the debate, hundreds of soldiers who served during the Troubles descended on Parliament Square to protest against the plans. They warned that modern soldiers would hesitate to pull the trigger in combat if the government were to remove legal protections for troops who served in Northern Ireland. • Trauma of veteran who faced jail over SAS shooting of IRA members The former servicemen massed on motorbikes and blasted their horns while circling Parliament Square during a 'rolling thunder' demonstration. The riders have been campaigning on the subject since 2019, but said that Labour's reignition of the debate made this their most important event to date. Veterans from all three services said that the move had 'reopened old wounds' and was fuelling a recruitment crisis. They said that the move could also be dangerous for serving soldiers whose fear of being dragged through the courts later in life may prevent them from fighting. 'No one will want to the pull the trigger,' said Geoff York, 71, a former lance corporal in The Blues and Royals cavalry regiment, who served for six years in Northern Ireland. 'If they're doing this to us, they'll be doing it to those who served in Afghanistan, Iraq … In 30 or 40 years' time, when these young soldiers are our age, they'll be getting the same thing. It is already reflecting on recruitment. Recruitment is on the floor across the three services.' York said that during the Troubles, British soldiers carried a 'yellow card' detailing the rules of engagement, which instructed troops to give a person three warnings before opening fire. Any soldier involved in a shooting would be investigated by the Royal Military Police and the Royal Ulster Constabulary. 'They would say 'you were in your rights to open fire' but many years later it's come to bite us on the rear,' he said. Special forces soldiers have also criticised Labour's pledge to reopen investigations. In a joint statement shared with The Times, seven commanders of The 22nd Special Air Service Regiment, who served in the elite unit during the Troubles, said: 'We have already processed our grief within our units and with the families of our fallen comrades. 'There's nothing healthy about perpetually reopening these wounds through endless legal proceedings. The harsh reality is that these new hearings are an exercise in futility. The terrorists responsible for killing our colleagues have already been granted 'letters of comfort' — effectively immunity from prosecution. 'So while these investigations might reopen painful chapters for veterans' families, they cannot deliver any meaningful justice. The terrorists walk free while we debate the merits of investigating decades-old cases. 'Our fallen comrades would not want their deaths to be used as political leverage to keep their families and the families of their comrades who are now being hounded, trapped in an endless cycle of hearings and investigations.' Carns and the Ministry of Defence were contacted for comment.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Residents ‘badly shaken' as PSNI probes arson attack
Residents were left 'badly shaken' after a reported arson attack outside a property in Portadown, Co Armagh, police have said. Detectives in Lurgan are appealing for information and witnesses following the report of arson in the early hours of Monday. Advertisement At approximately 1.15am, it was reported that two fires had been started outside a property in the Garvaghy Park area, causing significant damage. While no injuries were reported, the PSNI said: 'Residents were left badly shaken by the incident.' Three people were seen making off from the scene in the direction of the Garvaghy Road. The report is being treated as arson with intent to endanger life. Advertisement A PSNI spokesperson said: 'Anyone who may have witnessed anyone suspicious or anyone with CCTV or other footage that could assist with inquires are asked to contact police on 101 quoting reference number 124 14/07/25. 'A report can also be made online using the non-emergency reporting form via 'You can also contact Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111 or online at
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Omagh bombing inquiry seeks secret 15-year-old transcript from archive
The British parliament's rules watchdog has three-and-a-half months to decide whether to release a secret transcript, amid efforts to establish whether the 1998 Omagh bombing could have been prevented. Omagh Bombing Inquiry solicitor Tim Suter has asked for information about an allegation 'that police investigators into previous attacks in Moira, Portadown, Banbridge and Lisburn did not have access to intelligence materials which may have reasonably enabled them to disrupt the activities of dissident republican terrorists' in the Co Tyrone town. Advertisement The allegation is thought to have been made during a private session of the Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee almost 16 years ago, on November 11th, 2009. Conservative MP Simon Hoare warned there was 'no wriggle room' in the UK parliament's rules to hand over the information to the inquiry without MPs' say-so, because it previously went 'unreported'. Commons committees can refrain from reporting evidence in certain circumstances, for example, if it contains information which is prejudicial to the public interest. British MPs tasked the Commons Privileges Committee with looking at the 2009 transcript. Advertisement This seven-member group has until October 30th to decide whether to report and publish the evidence, which was originally given to the House by former senior police officer Norman Baxter. 'It is very hard for the House to decide whether or not to release evidence it has not seen and cannot see before the decision is made,' Mr Hoare warned. 'It is particularly difficult in this case, as that evidence may contain sensitive information.' The North Dorset MP added that the Privileges Committee 'might simply decide to publish it'. Advertisement Chairman of the Omagh Bombing Inquiry Lord Turnbull (PA) But the agreed motion will give the committee power to make an alternative recommendation 'on the desirability or otherwise of the release of the evidence to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry'. Privileges Committee chairman Alberto Costa, the Conservative MP for South Leicestershire, told MPs that his organisation 'stands ready to deal with this matter'. Ireland UK government has 'plain duty' to assist Omagh inq... Read More The independent inquiry chaired by Lord Turnbull will consider whether the Omagh bombing 'could reasonably have been prevented by UK state authorities'. The dissident republican bomb exploded in the Co Tyrone town on August 15th, 1998, killing 29 people, including a woman pregnant with twins. Advertisement Mr Hoare agreed with DUP MP for Strangford Jim Shannon, who was born in Omagh, after he told the Commons that 'justice' should be at the 'forefront of all right honourable and honourable members' minds during this process'.
