Trump's tax bill will gut Medicaid in Indiana
For a state that already ranks near the bottom in public health funding, this is deeply irresponsible.
This bill creates unmistakable winners and losers. Wealthier Americans and large employers benefit from extended tax cuts and fewer insurance requirements. States with conservative leadership gain more control over Medicaid, allowing them to cut spending with less federal oversight. Meanwhile, the losses fall squarely on working families, rural communities and people with chronic illness.
More from Raja Ramaswamy: Nurses are drowning while Braun ignores Indiana's health care crisis
Giving Indiana more control over Medicaid isn't inherently harmful. But in Indiana, where leaders have consistently underfunded public health and pushed for tighter eligibility, that control is likely to mean stricter rules, fewer benefits and more people losing coverage.
Indiana's hospitals will absorb roughly $800 million in unpaid care, leading to higher bills, strained clinics and more Hoosiers forced into medical debt. Patients who rely on comprehensive plans may find themselves stuck with stripped-down policies that exclude mental health, maternity care or treatment for serious illness. The people who need care the most are the ones being asked to sacrifice.
The bill cuts Medicaid by more than $1 trillion nationwide, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In Indiana, 2.3 million people rely on Medicaid, including children, seniors and low-income workers. New work and paperwork requirements are expected to knock tens of thousands of Hoosiers off the rolls.
These are bureaucratic obstacles that force families to choose between treatment and financial stability.
Supporters claim the bill will root out fraud and encourage work. But with Indiana ranked 48th in public health funding, we are in no position to absorb cuts of this scale.
Medicaid is not a handout. It is a lifeline for working families. This bill severs it, leaving thousands vulnerable to financial and health crises. The Center for American Progress estimates the legislation will add $36 billion in uncompensated care costs nationwide, with Indiana's share at roughly $800 million.
Those costs will strain hospitals, raise premiums and burden families already struggling to afford care.
This bill is a failure of health policy. Health care is not optional. It is as essential as public education or clean water. Cutting coverage for thousands of Hoosiers does not save money. It shifts the burden onto families who cannot afford to get sick.
Trump calls it beautiful. In Indiana, it's nothing but brutal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
Paramount agrees to pay $16M to settle Trump lawsuit over '60 Minutes' interview
NEW YORK - CBS parent company Paramount on July 1 settled a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump over an interview broadcast in October, the latest concession by a media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage. Paramount said it would pay $16 million to settle the suit, with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, and not paid to Trump "directly or indirectly." "The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret," the company statement added. Trump filed a $10-billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on its "60 Minutes" news program with then-vice president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to "tip the scales in favor of the Democratic Party" in the election. In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to $20 billion. CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appears to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas. CBS previously said the lawsuit was "completely without merit" and had asked a judge to dismiss the case. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comment. Edward A Paltzik, a lawyer representing Trump in the civil suit, could not be immediately reached for comment. A spokesperson for Paramount Chair Shari Redstone was similarly unavailable for comment. The case entered mediation in April. Trump alleged CBS's editing of the interview violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading, or deceptive acts in commerce. Media advocacy groups said Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could be a way of circumventing legal protections for the press, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false. The settlement comes as Paramount prepares for an $8.4-billion merger with Skydance Media, which will require approval from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. On the campaign trail last year, Trump threatened to revoke CBS's broadcasting license if elected. He has repeatedly lashed out against the news media, often casting unfavorable coverage as "fake news." The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump. As part of that settlement, which was made public on December 14, the network donated $15 million to Trump's presidential library and publicly apologized for comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, who inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for rape. It also follows a second settlement, by Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta Platforms, which on January 29 said it had agreed to pay about $25 million to settle a lawsuit by Trump over the company's suspension of his accounts after the January 6, 2021, attack at the U.S. Capitol. Why Trump sued CBS: What to know about complaint dating back to Kamala Harris interview Trump has vowed to pursue more claims against the media. On December 17, he filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and its former top pollster over its poll published on November 2 that showed Harris leading Trump by three percentage points in Iowa. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an order barring the Des Moines Register from engaging in "ongoing deceptive and misleading acts and practices" related to polling. A Des Moines Register representative said the organization stands by its reporting and that the lawsuit was without merit. On June 30, Trump dropped the federal lawsuit and refiled it in an Iowa state court. (Reporting by Helen Coster and Jack Queen in New York, Kanjyik Ghosh and Surbhi Misra in Bengaluru; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Rod Nickel and Kate Mayberry)

Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Mexico joins multi-state suit over slashed mental health funding. Here's why.
Jul. 1—New Mexico is joining 15 other states in suing the Trump administration over the halted flow of $1 billion in federal mental health grants axed by the Department of Education earlier this year. The grants were introduced in a 2022 bipartisan piece of legislation called the Safer Communities Act, passed on the heels of the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, that claimed the lives of 19 children and two adults. In April, the education department announced it would be terminating those grants. "It is one of our greatest responsibilities to protect the mental health and safety of our children," New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said in a statement on Tuesday. "The Department's decision to abruptly eliminate this funding is not only reckless, but it also defies the law and threatens to dismantle programs that are saving lives." The discontinuation of the grants occurred nearly a month after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in March to dismantle the Department of Education and as the administration worked toward cutting costs through the Department of Government Efficiency. The education department did not respond to a request for comment on why it chose to cut those grants. The cuts could have major effects across the state. For instance, the Central Region Educational Cooperative, or CREC, has been operating off a five-year, $6.5 million federal grant to provide mental health services to seven rural school districts: Belen Consolidated Schools, Estancia Municipal School District, Jemez Valley Public Schools, Magdalena Municipal School District, Mountainair Public Schools, Quemado Independent Schools and Vaughn Municipal Schools. "Removing these services means that students don't get the support ... their mental health is compromised. These are rural school districts, so there's no access to those services," said Velinda Pearson, CREC's school-based mental health program coordinator. "Working parents aren't going to drive their kiddo an hour or two hours away to get the service every week." Pearson added that the team had just reached full staffing in September, but if funding isn't salvaged, she and the rest of her staff could be out of jobs by December. "We are looking at other options. ... We'll try everything we can to continue the services," Pearson said. She said the plan written into the grant was to bill Medicaid for services provided after five years. But on Tuesday, with the passage of the budget reconciliation package by the Senate, sweeping cuts to Medicaid were made, which could alter that plan. Pearson met with the state's Public Education Department in June to discuss possibly filling the funding gap, but said that the department requested additional data. PED did not respond to a request for comment sent Monday, asking if it would help plug funding gaps. "New Mexico is experiencing a significant mental health crisis with one of the highest rates of suicide in the U.S. The defunding of programs like ours is alarming and upsetting," Pearson said. "We need to stop playing politics off the backs and lives of our most vulnerable communities and all come together in this fight to stop people's pain and suffering." The other states that joined the lawsuit are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Wisconsin and Washington.

Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Paramount to Pay $16 Million to Settle Trump Lawsuit Over ‘60 Minutes' Interview
Paramount Global PARA 2.02%increase; green up pointing triangle has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit with President Trump over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris, the company said Tuesday. The settlement, which doesn't include an apology, includes legal fees and payments made to the president's future presidential library. Paramount also agreed that '60 Minutes' will release transcripts of interviews with presidential candidates in the future, according to the company.