Furious West Lothian home owner ordered to tear down fence protecting her home
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A Livingston woman has vowed to fight on against an order by councillors to tear down a fence she put up to protect her garden.
Dawn Gardner accused West Lothian Council's Development Management Committee of 'bullying' behaviour, and of ignoring a decision by Scottish ministers, which agreed the land belonged to her.
Mrs Gardener partially won an appeal to the Scottish Government last year and had to retrospectively apply for new permission to keep the fence.
She told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that the fence had been put up to stop persistent dog fouling and littering over the area of land beside her home.
The corner site is in her title deeds and she has to maintain it, as did the previous owner of the house in Waverley Crescent.
Before the fence was put up the land was frequently used as a shortcut by some, and the last straw for Mrs Gardner was seeing drunks urinating against a garden wall just feet from her back door.
Mrs Gardner paid thousands of pounds to have the area fenced off to create more privacy around her home. While most of the fence is low enough to be allowed as permitted development one section is just a few inches above the height permitted.
Council planning officers told a meeting of the DMC that, while they did not fully agree with the Scottish Government's Reporter's partial upholding of the appeal, they did recommend retrospective planning permission for the fence along with planning permission to build a double garage within the garden of the house be approved.
Eliburn Community Council complained last year about the enclosure of open space and it reiterated that when Steve Egan appeared before the committee.
He said: 'The community council's objection was to the loss of open space. Why have stated policies and not follow them. The officer's report is wholly silent on this.'
An agent for Mrs Gardner said Mr Egan had an 'unhealthy obsession' with the issue of open space around Mrs Gardner's home, adding she had fenced in land she owned to protect her home against criminal behaviour.
However, councillors did not not like the fence.
Councillor George Paul said 'the quality of finish is very poor. I don't think it's very aesthetic to the area.'
Councillor Pauline Stafford said: 'It appears that the fence is in breach of planning legislation; the height of the fence detracts from the streetscape which most other properties have quite an open aspect.'
Chairing the meeting, Councillor Tony Boyle said the fence was ' really intrusive'.
He added: 'I note there are no objections from neighbouring householders but that's beside the point.'
Having sought clarification from planning and legal officers, the DMC agreed to grant permission for the garage but refused permission for the fence.
After the meeting a furious Mrs Gardner told the LDRS: ' A new appeal goes in tomorrow.'
She added: 'The councillors took no notice of what the Scottish ministers said. They didn't even listen to the planning officer.'
Referring to the councillors she said: 'They were making really personal remarks. Some of the comments were very personal. There's nothing wrong with the fence.
'I thought it was bullying. There was not one decision based on fact; it was all personal opinion they didn't even look at what the ministers said.
Mrs Gardner said she had the support of surrounding neighbours who have told her the fence is better than the unkempt open ground there previously.
As for the objection, 'Eliburn Community council didn't even discuss it, it was never on their agenda,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Feral seagulls 'close to killing a human' as stark warning issued to tourists
A warning has been issued after a child was left with "blood running down her face" in flurry of horrific attacks from the flying gulls with politicians calling for more to be done Feral seagulls are edging closer to killing a human, it's been claimed. n what is seen as the most alarming warning yet over the terrifying flying threats, a summit to deal with them is set to get off the ground. Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who previously called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, told Parliament humans risk being killed over the "growing problem" of kamikaze-diving seagulls. The politician said: 'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate should be all the SNP government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.' Adding fuel to the flames, Tory Rachael Hamilton claimed "aggressive" seagulls had attacked seven children in just one month in Eyemouth last year. She went on to highlight how one girl had gashes to her scalp and "blood running down her face" after a "divebombing attack," the Daily Star reports. The MP added: 'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour. 'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.' The latest flap over gulls comes after the people of Moray in Scotland were dive-bombed by the birds. In one case, an elderly woman broke her leg during a gull swoop. But other ministers are urging Brits to hug a gull. MSP Jim Fairlie said a summit on tackling the scourge of demented seagulls should not 'demonise' the pests. His fellow Nationalist MSP Christine Grahame added: 'Language such as 'mugging' and 'menace' can be applied to us, or our counterparts, but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food. 'What we mustn't have is people versus gulls, or gulls versus people.' Highlands and Islands MSP Mr Ross said he has been 'inundated' with reports about the dangers of gulls from constituents. They included a couple in the village of Hopeman who were 'worried about going out of their home' due to the aggressiveness of the birds. Jeff Thornhill, a Moray pensioner, said he and his wife were 'dive-bombed' by gull on Monday morning while they were out for a stroll. Among the other victims of the birds is terrified Caroline Mackay, who has lived in the coastal town of Nairn for almost 50 years. She said: 'I know they are part of living beside the sea, and I accept that, but they are quite a danger.' Lucy Harding from Nairn Business Improvement District said they had received 85 reports of gull attacks in the last year alone.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Armed police descend on Ayrshire property amid 'disturbance'
Police said they received a report of an injured man at a property on Cross Street, Galston, at about 8.05am on Saturday. He was taken to hospital for treatment. Officers remain at the property where police said there is a 'disturbance' involving a second man. READ MORE: Scottish manufacturing firm announces 90 jobs face redundancy Police described the incident as 'contained', and said armed officers are in attendance as a 'precaution'. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'Around 8.05am on Saturday June 28 2025 we received a report of man having been injured at a property on Cross Street, Galston. 'He was taken to hospital for treatment. 'Officers are in attendance at the property where there is a subsequent disturbance involving a second man. 'This is a contained incident and firearms officers are in attendance as a precaution. 'Inquiries are ongoing. Officers will remain in the area and anyone with concerns can approach them.'
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Classrooms in chaos: Teachers need option of excluding pupils
Surely this was an exaggeration, dramatic licence? people asked. The notion that teachers really have no means of enforcing good behaviour seems absurd to those who are a few decades out of short trousers. But ask current teachers if they recognise the scenes and the response is not reassuring. 'There's so little you can do,' one told me, 'and the kids know it.' Disruptive, abusive and violent behaviour in schools has become a bona fide crisis in Scotland as in England since the pandemic and many teachers feel their hands are tied in dealing with it. Many Scottish schoolchildren feel safe in their schools, thankfully, but not all do and nor do their teachers, against a nationwide increase in disruptive behaviour. Read more Rebecca McQuillan Some teachers describe 'lawless' schools where pupils refuse point blank to do what they are told and square up to staff. Forty four per cent of Scottish teachers in a recent survey by the NASUWT teaching union reported experiencing physical abuse or violence in the previous year. Women report experiencing more physical assaults than men. Staff at one East Dumbartonshire school took industrial action earlier this year over 'a culture of abuse and violence from pupils'. Many teachers are at the end of their tethers. Mike Corbett of the NASUWT describes how in tackling bad behaviour, the use of restorative conversations is the norm, where children are encouraged to take accountability and repair relationships that have been damaged. But he stresses that this type of approach, while useful, just isn't enough to cope with the range of problems school staff face. Teachers need other options – right up to and including exclusion – and that is what has been lacking. Or it was until this week. The Scottish Government has now published long-awaited new guidance on behaviour. But will it help? Teachers have been crying out for a wider range of tools to deal with aggressive behaviour and for schools to have the confidence to use them. The guidance appears to offer that. It stresses the importance of schools having a culture of positive relationships and behaviour, with clear expectations of pupils, well understood consequences and consistent application of the school rules. But teaching unions, who helped design the guidance, stress that the most important part is the appendix, where a list of exemplars of poor behaviour and possible consequences are laid out. The NASUWT welcomes the description there of 'an escalating set of consequences', including things like detention and, where absolutely necessary, exclusion. Teachers need other options – right up to and including exclusion – and that is what has been lacking in recent years (Image: free) No school wants to exclude pupils, for solid reasons. Twenty years ago, ministers sought to drive down exclusions, in response to strong evidence that pupils who were excluded had significantly lower levels of attainment and were much more likely to become offenders. When the use of exclusions fell, it was rightly seen as a positive development. But some head teachers, fearful of being criticised if they excluded children, started regarding the option as prohibited altogether. That left them with limited options for dealing with instances of serious, dangerous behaviour. That has contributed to a sense of helplessness among teachers faced with a rising tide of violence. Exclusion in the new guidance is described as as 'a last resort, where this approach is proportionate and there is no appropriate alternative'. Many teachers will be glad the Scottish Government is explicitly including it in the list of options for teachers but they also know that exclusion was never and will never be the answer on its own. We've come a long way with the focus today in schools on the 'why' of pupil behaviour rather than just the 'what'. Given the profile of children who are traditionally most at risk of exclusion – those with unmet additional support needs (ASN), looked after children and those from deprived backgrounds – meeting those children's needs more effectively is clearly a huge part of the answer. It's easy for politicians to dismiss such approaches as touchy-feely and call for harsher consequences but disruptive behaviour can't be tackled in a lasting way unless its causes are addressed. Tackling the 'why' is better for the child and for the whole school. And that is demanding for any school. It requires close collaboration with educational psychology, social work and underfunded mental health services, and it also means thinking differently about the way some children are educated. Read more Particularly for children with ASN, the difficulty so many mainstream schools have meeting their needs is raising serious questions about the inflexibility of the system. Some schools, though not all, now have 'wellbeing hubs' or 'nurture spaces' where such children can spend time productively in a supportive environment; we'll need a lot more focus on developing these spaces and staffing them properly in future. At the same time, and separately from these issues, teachers report a trend for parents and children to value school less. In a survey last year by the NASUWT, one teacher commented that 'it has become more common for learners to see school as optional'. Pity our head teachers: they now face a whole new challenge in persuading those parents to value their children's education more. Will it work? Will the tide go out on classroom violence and abuse? It could, provided these principles are shared with teachers and embedded in schools, and schools have the staff and resources to better support all children in their care. But the positive headlines may be some time coming. Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on Bluesky at @ and on X at @BecMcQ
