Maryland Gov. Wes Moore avoids taking stance on Trump's school choice plan
'The Governor is committed to ensuring that every student in Maryland has the best education possible,' Moore's spokesperson Carter Elliott said in a statement. 'The Trump Administration's approach on this issue has never been tried before. We are evaluating all of the options to ensure Maryland students have the best opportunities to succeed.'
The federal school choice plan was passed as part of President Donald Trump's expansive tax bill earlier this month. If Maryland opts in, taxpayers could choose to donate up to $1,700 toward private education grants in the state and receive the same amount back as a tax credit.
A spokeswoman for Maryland Congressman Andy Harris, a Republican, wrote in an email that he strongly supports federal school choice and that '[e]very child — regardless of zip code, income, or background — deserves access to a quality education that fits their needs, not a one-size-fits-all system.'
Maryland's U.S. Sens. Angela Alsobrooks and Chris Van Hollen, both Democrats, also didn't say whether they would support Maryland opting in.
'I am committed to making sure all of Maryland's students get the education they deserve,' Alsobrooks said in an emailed statement on Monday. 'Meanwhile, this Administration is taking the opposite approach — working to dismantle the Department of Education and undermine the promise of an education for all Marylanders, by further eroding the resources districts, teachers, and students desperately need to succeed.'
Van Hollen said in an emailed statement, 'Instead of working to achieve the goal of ensuring that every child receives a quality education, Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress are attacking public schools and the federal resources they depend on to support students while pumping more dollars into private education.'
School choice advocates argue that opting in would be a win for Maryland families who are dissatisfied with public school options, while opponents contend that the program would remove students from public schools, depriving them of funding and resources.
School choice is complicated to implement and it's been a 'sticky issue' in the past, said Roger Hartley, dean of the College of Public Affairs at the University of Baltimore. He added that with another election season on the horizon, politicians may avoid taking sides on the issue without first 'having done their homework.'
Maryland has a small private school voucher program at the state level — Broadening Options and Opportunities for Students Today (BOOST). It provides around $9 million in the form of vouchers to help families send their kids to private and religious schools. Moore has proposed cuts to the program in the past, which began under his Republican predecessor, Larry Hogan, though BOOST has continued so far during Moore's administration.
Funding debate
Advocates for the new federal program note that it would be funded at no cost to Maryland.
'It doesn't cost the state a dime,' said Jeff Trimbath, president of the Maryland Family Institute, noting that the state faced significant deficits that it had to adjust for during the past legislative session.
But Liz Zogby, co-chair of the Maryland Down Syndrome Advocacy Coalition, noted that even though the program doesn't cost state dollars, it will take money out of public schools if they lose enrollees. This can be especially harmful for students with disabilities, who need public school resources and may not be able to attend a private school, she said.
'Let's say you have a student who is not being well-served in a private school, not making progress, acting out, having challenging behaviors because they're not being well-supported — that school can just expel them,' Zogby said.
But in public schools, she said, an Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting would be convened to figure out how to help the child. 'So they don't just kick kids out,' she said.
Whom does school choice benefit?
There's also a debate over which students would benefit from the program.
Kalman Hettleman, a former member of the Baltimore City school board and the Maryland Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education, said school choice funds 'go mainly to people of means,' since scholarships may not cover the full cost of a student's private school tuition.
'In many cases, the education savings accounts and vouchers will be able to go to people who have already left the public schools [and] are paying the whole private schools' bill already,' Hettleman said.
Trimbath noted most schools offer other scholarships that could supplement a school choice scholarship, and that most schools 'means-test' their support, offering more money to lower-income students.
Garrett O'Day, deputy director of the Maryland Catholic Conference, urged Moore and state education leaders to opt into the program and said that even if Maryland doesn't participate, Maryland taxpayers can still choose to donate to scholarship organizations in other states.
'In other words, if the state doesn't opt in, Maryland dollars will go out of state to the detriment of Maryland kids who need it, taking away money available for education for both public and private school students,' he wrote in an email.
'Unpredictable federal funding cuts'
Paul Lemle, president of the Maryland State Education Association, advocated against the opt-in for Maryland.
'We strongly oppose giving away public funds to private schools as Maryland public schools — which serve 90% of Maryland students — continue to face chaotic, drastic, and unpredictable federal funding cuts to schools that will hurt students and the supports they depend on,' he said in a statement.
Harris' spokeswoman wrote in his statement that school choice is 'not about taking money away — it's about giving parents control.'
'The federal plan is designed to empower families, not bureaucracies,' she said in an email to The Sun. 'When parents can choose the best education for their child, all schools — public and private — must compete to improve. That's a win for every student, including those with disabilities, who will benefit from increased options tailored to their needs.'
A spokesperson for the Maryland State Department of Education did not respond to a request for comment.
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas governor threatens to remove Democrats who left state over Trump-backed redistricting
Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says he will begin trying to remove Democratic lawmakers from office Monday if they don't return after dozens of them left the state in a last-resort attempt to block redrawn U.S. House maps that President Donald Trump wants before the 2026 midterm elections. The revolt by the state House Democrats, many of whom went to Illinois or New York on Sunday, and Abbott giving them less than 24 hours to come home ratcheted up a widening fight over congressional maps that began in Texas but has drawn in Democratic governors who have floated the possibility of rushing to redraw their own state's maps in retaliation. Their options, however, are limited. At the center of the escalating impasse is Trump's pursuit of adding five more GOP-leaning congressional seats in Texas before next year that would bolster his party's chances of preserving its slim U.S. House majority. The new congressional maps drawn by Texas Republicans would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. A vote on the proposed maps had been set for Monday in the Texas House of Representatives, but it cannot proceed if the majority of Democratic members deny a quorum by not showing up. After one group of Democrats landed in Chicago on Sunday, they were welcomed by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, but declined to say how long they were prepared to stay out of Texas. 'We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know,' said state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader. But legislative walkouts often only delay passage of a bill, including in 2021 when many of the same Texas House Democrats left the state for 38 days in protest of new voting restrictions. Once they returned, Republicans still wound up passing that measure. Four years later, Abbott is taking a far more aggressive stance and swiftly warning Democrats that he will seek to remove them from office if they are not back when the House reconvenes Monday afternoon. He cited a non-binding 2021 legal opinion issued by Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, which suggested a court could determine that a legislator had forfeited their office. He also suggested the lawmakers may have committed felonies by raising money to help pay for fines they'd face. 'This truancy ends now,' Abbott said. In response, House Democrats issued a four-word statement: 'Come and take it.' The state of the vote Lawmakers can't pass bills in the 150-member Texas House without at least two-thirds of them present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber and at least 51 left the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned on Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table. . .,' he posted on X. Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, said on X that Democrats who 'try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' Fines for not showing up A refusal by Texas lawmakers to show up is a civil violation of legislative rules. The Texas Supreme Court held in 2021 that House leaders had the authority to 'physically compel the attendance' of missing members, but no Democrats were forcibly brought back to the state after warrants were served that year. Two years later, Republicans pushed through new rules that allow daily fines of $500 for lawmakers who don't show up for work as punishment. The quorum break will also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas that killed at least 136 people. Democrats had called for votes on the flooding response before taking up redistricting and have criticized Republicans for not doing so. Illinois hosts Texas lawmakers Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender who has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term, had been in quiet talks with Texas Democrats for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Last week, the governor hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. 'This is not just rigging the system in Texas, it's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come,' Pritzker said Sunday night. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states. ___ Associated Press writer Nadia Lathan in Austin contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats leave the state to prevent vote on GOP-drawn congressional map
Texas House Democrats left the state Sunday in a desperate bid to block an aggressively partisan redrawing of the state's congressional map orchestrated by Republicans with the support of President Donald Trump. The last-ditch attempt adds kerosene to an already smoldering political battle in the Lone Star State that has significant repercussions in Washington, where House Republicans enter a challenging midterm landscape with a razor-thin majority. In a hostile response, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott threatened late Sunday to remove lawmakers who don't show up when the state House convenes Monday afternoon, equating the absence to an 'abandonment or forfeiture of an elected state office.' The latest escalation in Texas could preview more bitter fights ahead as GOP states face intensifying pressure from Trump to redraw more maps to their advantage where possible. Democrats have vowed retribution in states where they control district boundaries. The proposal put forward last week by Texas Republicans could potentially eliminate five Democratic US House seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. With solid majorities in both state legislative chambers, Republicans have a glide path to delivering on Trump's wishes. States typically redraw congressional district boundaries once every 10 years following the release of updated population data from the United States census. A mid-decade revision of the map would be an extraordinary move — one that Democrats contend is a nakedly partisan effort aimed at bolstering Republicans' prospects of retaining control of the House. Texas Democrats played one of their few remaining cards: leaving the state to block a quorum. The Texas Constitution requires two-thirds of the state House present to conduct legislative business. With 62 Democrats in the House, the minority party can block action as long as 51 remain out of state. 'We will not be complicit in the destruction of our own communities,' Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said shortly after landing in Chicago. Dozens of Democrats joined Wu on Sunday night in Chicago, where they were greeted by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. Others flew to Boston and some to Albany, New York, where they will hold an event Monday with Gov. Kathy Hochul. A handful with family and medical issues stayed in Texas but will not appear in Austin on Monday, Wu said. He declined to share details on how many lawmakers are in each location and where they intend to go from here. In a statement from Chicago, the Texas House Democratic Caucus responded to Abbott's threat to remove lawmakers from office: 'Come and take it.' 'It is the right of legislators to deny quorum, ' said Democratic State Rep. Chris Turner, whose district includes Arlington, around 30 miles west of Dallas. 'As Governor Abbott should know, we also have separation of powers in this country. The executive doesn't get to remove lawmakers just because he doesn't like how we choose to represent those who elected us.' It remains to be seen whether the gambit will successfully block Republicans from eventually passing their map. Lawmakers are meeting under a special session that can last for only 30 days, and the current session will end August 19. But there's little stopping Abbott from calling them back to the state Capitol as many times as it takes. It's also unclear whether Texas Democrats will stick together. A similar play by Democrats there in 2021 fizzled out after 38 days when a handful secretly broke ranks and returned to Texas, allowing Republicans to move ahead on a bill imposing new voting restrictions. After that unsuccessful effort, new rules were put in place to fine lawmakers $500 a day if a member is absent, including 'for the purpose of impeding the action of the House.' Lu would not say how long Democrats were prepared to stay outside the state, only that they would do 'whatever it takes.' 'What that looks like we don't know,' he said. Already, Texas Democrats are facing threats from back home. In his statement late Sunday warning Democrats they could lose House membership, Abbott also accused them of raising money to cover their fines, which he suggested may be a felony. Ken Paxton, Texas' attorney general and a candidate for US Senate, said Sunday evening that 'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.' 'We should use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law,' he continued in a post on X, though he did not specify which tools could be used. Texas Republicans argue the redistricting is necessary over concerns that the current maps are unconstitutional and racially gerrymandered. Democrats have said it would suppress the votes of people of color. Democrats nationwide have threatened to respond to the GOP's efforts at redistricting in Texas with the same tactics in Democratic-controlled states like California and New York. National Democratic Redistricting Committee Chairman Eric Holder, a longtime critic of partisan gerrymandering, says it may be time for Democrats to change their approach. 'We have to understand that the nature of the threat that has been put upon the country through what they're trying to do in Texas has really increased the danger to our democracy. And as a result of that, we've got to do things that perhaps in the past, I would not have supported,' he said on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday. The political climate sets the stage for a year of chaos leading up to the midterm elections, with the congressional maps in flux and lawsuits likely. But Trump and national Republicans have made clear they will take exceptional measures to retain Congress for the final two years of his presidency. And Democrats have promised their supporters they intend to fight. Republicans have argued that blue states have already tilted congressional maps in Democrats' favor. They point to states like Illinois, where Democrats have 14 legislative seats to Republicans' three. Pritzker, who CNN reported Sunday first began planning this move with Texas Democrats in June, rejected that argument, arguing his map passed constitutional muster and was approved on a traditional timetable. He urged Democrats to fight back if Texas Republicans move ahead with their mid-decade power grab. 'All bets are off when the cult leader and would-be dictator of the United States tells Texas to midstream change the game when they know that they're going to lose in 2026,' Pritzker said. 'All bets are off. Everything's got to be on the table.' This story has been updated with additional developments. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Shameless': Trump's Big Golf Boast Backfires Amid Renewed Cheating Claims
The White House over the weekend bragged that President Donald Trump won yet another golf tournament just as a new video emerged that some say shows him cheating. 'Winning on and off the course,' the White House wrote on X, along with an image of a scorecard showing Trump shot a 69 ― 67 after adjusting for his handicap ― to win the men's senior championship at his Bedminster club. But the claim comes as Trump faces renewed accusations of cheating at the game, with many critics pointing to a video of him in Scotland last week in which the caddie casually dropped the ball for him. The day before Trump's latest tournament, sportswriter Rick Reilly ― who has golfed with Trump and authored an entire book detailing how he cheats at the game ― wondered aloud if the president would dare to declare himself the winner. 'Tomorrow is the Senior Champ at Bedminster,' he wrote on X. 'Are you shameless enough to pretend you won it? Even after the whole planet saw you cheat in Scotland? Is your ego that sick?' After Trump won, he wrote in a follow-up: 'Guess we got our answer. What a child.' After another new video surfaced showing a caddie dropping the ball for Trump ― this time in Bedminster, possibly from the day of the tournament ― Reilly added: Reilly has previously pointed out that Trump only wins on the courses he owns as more evidence he cheats. 'He's played in Pebble Beach, he's played in the Tahoe one, where there are rules and judges and cameras. And in those, he's never finished in the top half,' he said on MSNBC last year. Others who've played with the president have also accused him of cheating, including boxer Oscar De La Hoya, who once explained in detail some of Trump's tricks. Rock icon/golf enthusiast Alice Cooper didn't quite come out and call Trump a cheater. But he came close. 'The worst celebrity golf cheat? I wish I could tell you that,' he told Q magazine in 2012. 'It would be a shocker. I played golf with Donald Trump one time. That's all I'm going to say.' Given that history ― and the recent videos ― Trump's critics weren't about to grant him a gimme on his latest championship claim:
