Swinney calls for more cash to address housing crisis ahead of spending review
At least 12 local housing emergencies have been declared across Scotland, with the first declared by Argyll and Bute Council in June 2023. Edinburgh, Glasgow, Fife and West Dunbartonshire Councils followed suit.
The Scottish Government formally declared a national housing emergency on May 15, 2024.
The number of people in Scotland living in temporary homeless accommodation is at a record high, according to a report from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA).
Pressures have also increased on social housing.
Speaking ahead of his speech at the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations in Glasgow on Tuesday, the First Minister re-emphasised that Scotland 'faces a housing crisis'.
He said the Scottish Government is already investing £768m this year in affordable housing, but he's calling for the UK Government to do more.
'We continue to call on the UK Government to provide multi-year funding for housing to give developers and third sector organisations long-term certainty,' Swinney said.
'The UK Government must also commit to unfreezing Local Housing Allowance rates. These rates set the amount that private renters receive to help with rent. Increasing these rates can be a key lever that can help protect tenants.
'Repegging these rates to the 30th percentile of local rents would mean greater security for many households across Scotland.'
Swinney's comments have come less than 24 hours before UK chancellor Rachel Reeves is set to present a major UK spending review.
The review technically isn't considered a 'fiscal event' – meaning there shouldn't be any detailed tax or spending decisions.
However, the chancellor is expect to plot out her public spending plans for the next three years, department by department.
It will reveal Labour's priorities, and could see some areas of public spending cut to provide more money to others – like the NHS or defence.
It will also chart a course for spending on things like housing.
Reeves will reveal the spending review on Wednesday after Prime Minister's Questions at noon.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Bank of England forecast to cut interest rates amid rising unemployment and Trump tariffs
Bank of England policymakers are widely expected to cut interest rates this week to prevent the economy sliding backwards amid rising unemployment and the hit to global trade from Donald Trump's fresh round of import tariffs. City traders are betting that the Bank's nine-member monetary policy committee (MPC) will reduce the headline rate on Thursday by 0.25 percentage points to 4%, marking the fifth cut since last August and taking interest rates back to where they were in March 2023. Financial markets have put the chance of a reduction at the August meeting at more than 80% and are pencilling in a further quarter-point reduction before the end of the year. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, will welcome the move, which will push down mortgages rates and cut the cost of borrowing for cash-strapped businesses. However, the decision is likely to illustrate the difficult situation confronting the UK as the government struggles to boost growth while trying to limit Whitehall spending before the autumn budget. The economy shrank in May by 0.1% and in April by 0.3%, which many economists blamed on the uncertainty caused by Trump's tariffs and extra business taxes in last October's budget, which came into effect in April. In a sign of weaker growth over the next year, the number of vacancies fell below its pre-pandemic level and the unemployment rate rose to 4.7% in the three months to May, reaching the highest level since June 2021. Trump has signed a trade deal with the UK capping tariffs on most goods to 10%, but on Friday the US president announced extra import tariffs on trading partners of up to 50%, harming global growth. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently said the UK economy would struggle to expand by more than 0.1% in the third and fourth quarters of the year, before a slight increase in the quarterly growth rate to 0.3% next year. The MPC will publish fresh forecasts on Thursday that could prove to be even gloomier, indicating that a period of stagflation is imminent, brought on by a slowdown in growth over the next year while inflation remains high. The consumer prices index (CPI) increased by 3.6% in the year to June, according to the latest official figures, well above the MPC's 2% target. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Matt Swannell, chief economic adviser to the EY Item Club said an increase in vacancies and higher unemployment showed the labour market was weakening while pay growth had cooled more quickly than the Bank of England's May forecast. But he forecast a split in the MPC vote after a jump in food inflation in June. 'Signs of lingering price pressures will mean the committee remains cautious, with two of the hawkish MPC members expected to favour no change,' he said. Inflation has risen by more than the Bank of England expected three months ago after significant increases in the cost of some basic items such as meat and butter. 'The increase in food prices is particularly important to the MPC as it feeds through to households' inflation expectations – one of the committee's key gauges around the risk of inflation persistence,' Swannell added.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Work begins on new council home development in Millerston
Work has begun on the site at Coshneuk Road in Millerton, as part of North Lanarkshire Council's wider plan to deliver 6000 homes by 2035. The properties will include a mix of one and two-bedroom flats, as well as two, three, and four-bedroom houses and a bungalow designed for disabled access. Councillor Michael McPake, housing convener, said: "It's always pleasing to mark the beginning of another new council housing project which will deliver more new homes for our tenants, particularly in an area of high demand. "We're making significant progress in delivering our new supply programme, providing jobs, boosting the local economy, and building homes for our tenants now and for generations to come. "It's all part of our ambition to make North Lanarkshire the place to live, and I look forward to watching the new homes progress." Read more: Plans to build five-bedroom villas revealed - what we know (Image: North Lanarkshire Council) The £4.2 million development is being delivered in partnership with The JR Group and will receive grant funding from the Scottish Government's Affordable Housing Supply Programme. Expected to be completed by spring 2026, the development will feature ground source heat pumps to reduce heating emissions, along with triple-glazed windows, high levels of insulation, and solar panels. The homes are designed to meet Housing for Varying Needs standards, allowing them to adapt to residents' changing requirements, and are built to Secure by Design principles to improve safety and security. Read more: 'Urgent' road closure put in place in busy area - here's where Gary McGregor, managing director of The JR Group, said: "As a business, we are committed to playing our part in delivering much-needed, energy-efficient new homes to communities across Scotland, so it is fantastic to be working alongside North Lanarkshire Council to deliver our first project for them. "Coshneuk Road is a well-considered development and sits in a fantastic, well-established community, close to local amenities. "As a brownfield site, it is great to see it brought back to life and given a new purpose. "The homes we are building here are modern, spacious, and energy efficient, and we look forward to progressing works in the coming months."
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes
The Chancellor has not had much luck with some of her tax rises. Rachel Reeves was expecting to raise up to £3.2bn each year, or around £12.7bn in this parliament, with the scrapping of non-dom status – a policy announced by her Conservative predecessor Jeremy Hunt and then ramped up by Labour. She is heading for disappointment. With the exodus of more than 10,000 millionaires from the UK last year and an expected 16,000 this year, Reeves has been warned that the move may in fact reduce rather than increase tax receipts. Speculation is thus rife that the measures may be further watered down; there has already been some initial tweaking and softening earlier this year. The imposition of VAT on school fees is likewise now widely expected to raise less than the predicted £1.7bn by 2030, due to more than expected numbers of children transferring to the state sector and becoming a burden on education budgets. The spate of independent school closures – not just as a result of the VAT change but also employer National Insurance rises, the loss of business rate relief for schools with charitable status and the gamut of extra regulation affecting all businesses – will inevitably make this worse. But, ironically, Reeves may have been rather more adept at boosting Treasury revenue with some of the tax measures she did not actually implement. Before last year's Halloween Budget there was much speculation that rates of capital gains tax (CGT) would be brought into line with those for income tax. This would have meant that higher-rate taxpayers earning over £50,270 would have had to pay 40pc instead of 24pc on taxable property gains and 20pc on other assets. Additional rate taxpayers, earning over £125,140, even worried they might be faced with a full 45pc levy on any uplift. The fear that these rates would be aligned was an entirely rational one. The great Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson in his 1988 Budget had done just that – although the medicine that year was very much sweetened by the scrapping of all income tax rates over 40pc at the same time. Labour's manifesto, while pledging not to raise the rates of income tax or employee National Insurance, was silent about CGT. And after winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves never tired of talking up a £22bn 'black hole' the Tories had allegedly left them. This would soon need filling – and Reeves did nothing to dampen down speculation that CGT rises and changes to the pension regime would be how she would achieve at least part of this. In the event, the Chancellor took less drastic action. She raised the rate of CGT for non-property gains from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers and 20pc to 24pc for those on the higher and additional rates. In other words, she aligned the rates for different asset classes to the one already levied on property. But the speculation alone did pay dividends for Reeves. In October last year, the month running up to the Budget, CGT receipts on residential property disposals was £408m – more than double that of most other months in the last tax year. Revenue from CGT is notoriously volatile when compared to other taxes. In the 2023-24 tax year, for example, CGT liabilities were 18pc down from the previous year. But the surge in the run-up to the Budget was vast. The best explanation for the Treasury's October windfall is that residential landlords sold up in advance of a clobbering that did not materialise. As Chris Etherington, of accountants RSM, has noted: 'It is clear that anticipation of CGT changes can distort taxpayer behaviour... the Chancellor benefitted from an inadvertent windfall... Reeves does not necessarily need to increase CGT rates to raise revenues. It's potentially possible to maximise CGT receipts by simply saying very little on the subject.' The Chancellor will insist that she cannot speculate about what moves she will be making in future Budgets – due to such information having an impact on the markets. But that argument does not quite wash. She is more than happy to rule out some fiscal moves, such as raising the rate of income tax. So why not others? Is it too cynical to suggest that Reeves has found her own third way? She can benefit from increased inflows without actually raising taxes. But such tactics are far from victimless – the uncertainty and disruption caused comes at a high price. Additionally, it makes it much more difficult for people to plan for the future and may make them take unnecessary decisions that they will live to regret. In other circumstances, allowing speculation to rip may in fact hurt Treasury coffers. Not closing down current Labour Party debates about a wealth tax will surely mean more wealthy people leaving the UK in anticipation of such a move. This will not only hurt our economy but also mean lower tax yields, resulting in less money for public services.
