Texas abortion ban tied to mental health declines
Texas' abortion ban is linked to increased mental health concerns among women of reproductive age, a new study found.
Why it matters: Texas is the epicenter of the country's battle over abortion rights. Knowing whether abortion restrictions impact mental health can help guide the policy response, per the study in JAMA Network Open, published by the American Medical Association.
By the numbers: Compared with men, women in Texas experienced a nearly 7 percentage point increase in frequent mental distress associated with the state's severe abortion restrictions beginning in 2021, per the study.
Texas women experienced frequent mental distress at an increase of 5.3 percentage points compared to women in other states that had not yet approved abortion restrictions.
The study defined frequent mental distress as 14 or more days of poor mental health during the previous 30 days.
Context: JAMA looked at changes following restrictions that took effect in September 2021 banning abortions at about six weeks, then one of the most restrictive state abortion laws in the nation.
Texas later prohibited most abortions in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
Zoom in: The rate of sepsis and pregnancy-related deaths in Texas rose after 2021, a ProPublica investigation found earlier this year.
"It's already scary to decide to become pregnant … If something medically complex happened, you could lose your life," Dr. Emily Briggs, who practices family medicine in Central Texas, told CBS News last year.
Gov. Greg Abbott last weekend signed into law a bill that seeks to clarify exceptions to the abortion ban, but some critics said it doesn't go far enough to protect women facing pregnancy-related medical emergencies.
How it works: Public health professor Jusung Lee from the University of Texas at San Antonio led the study. It analyzed data from a survey of 15,614 Texas women, 14,500 Texas men and 49,495 women in other states between 2012 and 2022.
Between the lines: Mental distress was higher among younger people who might have fewer resources to access abortion care out-of-state, per the study.
Younger age groups are also more likely to experience an unwanted pregnancy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Telehealth abortions are on the rise since Roe was overturned three years ago. See charts
Three years after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, the total number of abortions continued to increase in 2024, totaling 1.14 million, a recent report found. The Dobbs decision on June 24, 2022, upheld Mississippi's ban on abortion after 15 weeks. Since then, states have enacted a range of laws from near-total abortion bans to shield laws protecting patients from other states who travel to get the procedure. As of this year, 12 states have full bans on abortion. The report was published by #WeCount, a project of the Society of Family Planning. #WeCount is a national reporting effort that tracks abortions in the United States after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Here's how the total number of abortions has changed since the Dobbs ruling: The monthly number of abortions increased in 2024 compared with prior years, according to the #WeCount report. When looking at monthly abortions in 2024, the total was higher than monthly abortions in 2023 and 2022. 'The #WeCount findings make clear that abortion bans haven't stopped people from seeking care,' Alison Norris, #WeCount's co-chair, said in a statement. 'As care shifts across state lines and into telehealth care, what's emerging is a deeply fragmented system where access depends on where you live, how much money you have, and whether you can overcome barriers to care,' Norris said. Telehealth abortions are on the rise At the end of 2024, a quarter of all abortions were delivered through telehealth − a significant increase compared with the second quarter of 2022, when 5% of abortions were provided through telehealth, according to #WeCount. Which states have shield laws for abortion care? Nearly half of all telehealth abortions provided in 2024 were in states with shield laws, the report found. According to the UCLA Center for Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, shield laws provide "legal protections for patients, health care providers, and people assisting in the provision of certain health care in states where that care is legal from the reach of states with civil, criminal, and professional consequences related to that care." At least 22 states and the District of Columbia, have shield laws for reproductive care. California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington protect clinicians no matter where the patient is at the time reproductive care is provided, KFF reported. According to #WeCount, an average of 12,330 abortions a month were provided under shield laws at the end of 2024. Expanded protections for clinicians along with access to medication abortion have allowed patients to receive care outside states with full abortion bans. In 2023, medication abortion made up two-thirds of all abortions, the Guttmacher Institute found. The most common medication abortion regimen in the United States involves two medications: mifepristone and misoprostol. The two-drug regimen can be used up to the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, according to the FDA. Which states outlaw abortion medication? Of the states where abortion is still legal, 12 have at least one restriction that requires one or more visits to the clinic, effectively banning telehealth for medication abortion. Twenty-six states and the District of Columbia have no restrictions around abortion medication and do not require telehealth appointments to be prescribed the pills. CONTRIBUTING Kinsey Crowley
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Planned Parenthood isn't the only loser in Supreme Court case. Women lose, too.
While Democrats have shied away from talking about abortion since the 2024 presidential election, it is still an issue Republicans are rallying around. Almost three years to the day since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the justices have once again made a decision that will limit access to reproductive care. This time, they're explicitly coming after Planned Parenthood. On Thursday, June 26, the Supreme Court ruled in a decision that could allow states to keep Medicaid dollars from the organization. In the 6-3 ruling, the justices determined that individuals could not sue to choose their health care provider after a patient sued South Carolina to receive reproductive care from Planned Parenthood. By making this decision, the courts are potentially shutting Planned Parenthood out of millions of dollars that would go to necessary health care options like birth control, cancer screenings and testing for sexually transmitted infections. It's a ruling that, like Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pointed out in her dissent, is going to harm people who rely on Planned Parenthood for their care. The plan was always to end abortion in every state It's just another instance of conservatives ignoring the realities of women's health care in favor of their beliefs, and a reminder that abortion continues to be a Republican target. It's also a reminder that we'll be living in this dystopian health care nightmare for a very, very long time. While Democrats have shied away from talking about abortion since the 2024 presidential election, it is still an issue Republicans are rallying around. They were never going to be satisfied with simply returning abortion rights back to the states, the plan was always to eradicate the health care procedure nationwide. Opinion: Who would want to have babies under a Trump administration? Not me. In May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the Food and Drug Administration to review mifepristone, an abortion medication, because of a study from a conservative think tank that relies on flawed data. The majority of abortions in 2023 were medication abortions. If mifepristone were suddenly taken off the market, it would have huge ramifications for patients across the country. Planned Parenthood was also already struggling after President Donald Trump froze federal funding to more than 100 clinics earlier this year. It has led clinics across the country to shut down. His One Big Beautiful Bill Act also would block Medicaid patients from seeking care at Planned Parenthood, which could lead to more closures. None of this is happening in a vacuum. All of these Republican attacks amount to a nationwide assault on abortion rights, no matter where one is located in the country. Millions of people could soon lose access to the care they need because of the Republican agenda. Abortion bans aren't working. Defunding Planned Parenthood won't change that. Despite these targeted attacks on abortion, the procedure hasn't become less popular in the years following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision. In 2024, there was actually an increase in abortions, with a quarter of those procedures occurring via telehealth for medication. Public opinion on abortion has remained steady, with Pew Research Center reporting that 63% of Americans supported abortion in all or most cases in 2024. Opinion: Democrats don't need to move to the center. Mamdani proves progressives can win. Clearly, Republican leaders are only listening to a small subset of their constituency when they decide to go after Planned Parenthood. They do not listen to the millions of people who have benefited from the wide range of services that the organization provides. Instead, they would rather spread falsehoods about abortion and how it is funded. They will not be happy until abortions are nearly impossible to obtain, even when someone's life is at risk. The Supreme Court's latest cruel decision shows that we are still living with the long-term repercussions of having Trump nominate three justices to the bench. And this is just the beginning. It's clear nothing is going to stop Republicans from attacking Planned Parenthood until it's unable to function because of a lack of government funding. It's shameful that they continue to put a political agenda ahead of the health care needs of women. It's also not changing anytime soon. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
San Francisco Chronicle
20 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A rundown of recent Trump administration vaccine policy changes
The Trump administration continued to reshape U.S. health policy in recent days with several moves that could change what vaccines people can get to protect themselves from common illnesses. Some of the changes are immediate, others are still being discussed, and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. must still sign off on some. Doctors' groups have expressed alarm at the moves made by Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, and his appointees, who at times have ignored well-established science. Nearly 80 medical groups, including the American Medical Association, issued a statement backing vaccines against common respiratory ailments as 'among the best tools to protect the public.' 'We come together as physicians from every corner of medicine to reaffirm our commitment to these lifesaving vaccines,' the groups wrote. Here's what to know about some of the recent vaccine policy changes: Flu shots and thimerosal On Thursday, a vaccine advisory group handpicked by Kennedy recommended that just about every American get a flu shot this fall. But the group also said people should avoid shots containing thimerosal, a preservative used only in large multi-dose vials that has been proven to be safe. The ingredient isn't used in single-dose flu shots, the type of syringe used for about 95% of U.S. flu shots last season. Status: Kennedy must sign off on the recommendations. Read more AP coverage here. How to get a COVID-19 shot Universal access to updated COVID-19 shots for the fall remains unclear, even after Kennedy's vaccine advisers were shown data showing how well the vaccines are working. Kennedy changed CDC guidance last month, saying the shots are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women — even though doctors groups disagree. And the Food and Drug Administration has moved to limit COVID-19 vaccinations among healthy people under age 65. Expanded warnings on COVID-19 vaccine labels At the request of the FDA, makers of the two leading COVID-19 vaccines on Wednesday expanded existing warnings about a rare heart side effect mainly seen in young men. Prescribing information from both Pfizer and Moderna had already advised doctors about rare cases of myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is usually mild. The FDA had asked the drugmakers to add more detail about the problem and to cover a larger group of patients. Status: Labels are being updated now. Read more AP coverage here. Changes considered for the childhood vaccine schedule On Wednesday, Kennedy's vaccine advisers said they would be evaluating the 'cumulative effect' of the children's vaccine schedule — the list of immunizations given at different times throughout childhood. The announcement reflected vaccine skeptics' messaging: that too many shots may overwhelm kids' immune systems. Scientists say those claims have been repeatedly investigated with no signs of concern. The American Academy of Pediatrics said it would continue publishing its own vaccine schedule for children but now will do so independently of the government advisory panel, calling it 'no longer a credible process.'
