Bride 'Blew Her Entire Savings.' Now, She Expects Her Sister to Help Pay for Her 'Lavish' Wedding
A woman is questioning whether she's wrong to refuse to help her sister pay for her "dream wedding," after she lost money in a multilevel marketing scheme
In a post on Reddit's "Wedding Shaming" forum, the woman shared that her sister has asked to use her savings to fund her wedding
"She knows I have a decent chunk of change saved and she's been dropping not-so-subtle hints about how I'm 'so responsible with my money' and 'don't have a mortgage yet' so surely I can spare some cash for her big day," the Reddit user wroteA woman wonders whether she's wrong to refuse to help her sister pay for her "dream wedding."
In a post on Reddit's "Wedding Shaming" forum, the 30-year-old woman opened up about her sister's "serious main character energy when it comes to her wedding."
"The kicker — she expects me to foot a significant chunk of the bill after she blew her entire savings — $25k — on a ridiculous MLM [multilevel marketing] scheme," she explained.
According to the OP (original poster), her sister, a 32-year-old named Chloe, has a history of being "terrible with money."
"Think impulsive buys loans for trips, the whole nine yards," the OP wrote. "Meanwhile, I've been diligently saving every penny for a down payment on a house. Our financial approaches are polar opposites."
"About a year and a half ago, Chloe got completely sucked into one of those 'boss babe' wellness drink MLMs," she continued, referring to the business model where participants earn money from both selling products or services and recruiting others into the network. According to the Federal Trade Commission, many MLM companies are illegal pyramid schemes.
"I tried to warn her gently at first, then more forcefully as she sank more and more cash into inventory and training. She was convinced she'd be a millionaire. Spoiler alert: she's not," the OP added. "She flushed her entire $25k savings down the drain and is now financially back at square one."
According to the Redditor, Chloe is engaged and has plans for a "massive, fairytale wedding — the kind that easily costs $50k+" — and she's asked her sister for help paying for the lavish event.
"She knows I have a decent chunk of change saved and she's been dropping not-so-subtle hints about how I'm 'so responsible with my money' and 'don't have a mortgage yet' so surely I can spare some cash for her big day," the OP wrote.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Eventually, the sister "straight-up asked" for the money, and the OP was taken aback by her justifications for the bold request.
" 'You know,' she said, 'if you even threw in like 10 grand it would make such a huge difference. You don't really need all that house money right this second and this is my one shot at the wedding I've always pictured,' " the OP wrote, recounting the conversation.
The OP said she absolutely "lost it" after this request and promptly shut it down.
"I told her, 'Chloe there is NO WAY I'm paying for your wedding. You literally flushed your savings down the drain on a scam, even though everyone told you not to and now you expect me to bankroll your fantasy. My savings are for MY future, not to bail you out of your past mistakes,' " she said.
Her sister got upset, calling the OP "selfish" and "unsupportive." The sisters' mom also took Chloe's side, telling her other daughter: "Family helps family."
"Honestly, I feel a little bad for making her cry and I do love my sister," the OP admitted. "But I also feel like I'm being put in an impossible position. She made her bed and now she expects me to pay for the luxury sheets."
In the comments section, readers were quick to take the OP's side, agreeing that she shouldn't have to fork over her hard-earned savings just because she isn't getting married or buying a home right now.
"Any time she brings it up, just remind her that 'no' is your final answer," one person advised. "If she wants a $50k wedding, then she and her fiancé had better start saving that."
"I find it extremely audacious that you are being asked to give up or push back your dream because of your sister's poor financial decisions," another commenter said. "She needs to learn to live within her means. And right now, those means do not extend to a $50k wedding."
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
34 minutes ago
- Fast Company
The rise of AI in CEO communications—and the credibility threat it poses
CEOs have become more than just corporate leaders—they're among the most valuable assets on the balance sheet. Great leadership can drive billions in market cap by shaping narratives and galvanizing stakeholders. But what happens when the communication tools they use to build credibility start to erode it? We're entering a new era in CEO communications, one where human messages increasingly filter through the lens of AI. Analysts and investors have long leaned on AI-powered language models and sentiment analysis to dissect earnings calls, parsing executive tone, word choice, and delivery for signals on strategy, risk, or future performance. Now, CEOs and their teams are flipping the script—crafting messages with the help of generative AI to appeal to the very same systems analyzing them. It's a feedback loop of machines talking to machines. And while the tech arms race might make earnings calls look polished and sentiment scores spike, it also risks creating a sentiment gap. In the end, credibility is still the most valuable currency in leadership—and AI can't replace that. The CEO Premium Meets the AI Arms Race Corporate valuation has always been about more than just numbers. Investors have baked intangibles like brand equity, leadership narratives, and cultural impact into their models. As NYU finance professor Aswath Damodaran puts it, valuation is as much about a company's story as it is about spreadsheets. The CEO's job is to integrate those stories with their strategies. Jensen Huang didn't make Nvidia a trillion-dollar company because of flawless financial execution—he did it by selling a vision of AI as the engine of the future, powering everything from healthcare to climate solutions. That's the CEO premium in action: the ability to turn a strategic story into market-moving value. But here's what no one's saying out loud: when that story is over-engineered with AI, something critical is lost. Consider this: Bank of America's S&P 500 corporate sentiment tracker, based on an analysis of thousands of earnings transcripts, hit an all-time high earlier this year, even as analysts lowered growth expectations for 2025. The disconnect is stark. While executives are optimizing their tone and language to look and sound bullish, it's masking underlying realities. We're looking at a sentiment bubble, where polished communications are designed to impress algorithms but are creating distance from actual performance. The result? A risk to long-term stakeholder confidence and broader market integrity. The Credibility Gap is Real–and Risky AI-powered communications is an incredible asset. It can help executives sharpen their messages, anticipate audience reactions, and streamline delivery. But when it starts to obscure reality—or worse, is used as a veil—it risks blowing up the most important thing any CEO has: credibility. Markets thrive on credibility. Investors place a premium on CEOs who communicate clearly and consistently, and are transparent about their strengths and challenges. When communication becomes engineered for algorithms rather than stakeholders, it creates a hollow effect—polished on the surface, but leaving questions below. This is more than theoretical. A recent study published in Harvard Business Review found that employees rated CEO messages as less helpful if they thought the message was AI-generated—even when it wasn't. Perception alone was enough to damage trust. That finding underscores the growing credibility risk CEOs face when misusing or leaning too heavily on AI. What CEOs Need to Do Now So where does this leave us? The CEOs who win in this new reality won't be the ones with the most AI-polished messaging—they'll be the ones who balance technology with authenticity. Here's how: Speak to Stakeholders, Not Just Algorithms: Say what you mean. Own the hard truths. AI should enhance a message, not sanitize it. AI-generated communications might score well with language models, but stakeholders—investors, employees, customers—aren't grading on polish. They're looking for clarity. Anchor Narratives in Performance: Narratives drive valuation, but they're meaningless without numbers. If the results are strong, show your math. If they're weak, explain why. Don't let AI overinflate optimism. Instead, use it to sharpen transparency. Ensure AI Augments, Not Replaces: AI is great for refining delivery and identifying blind spots, but it can't replace human judgment or instinct. Companies that over-rely on AI-driven clones or sentiment engineering risk losing the real connection that drives stakeholder engagement. Anticipate the Credibility Pivot: As sentiment inflation continues, markets will inevitably adjust. Investors will begin looking for the next differentiator, pivoting from polished delivery to deeper signals of authenticity. CEOs who lean into direct, unvarnished communication will stand out. Get Ahead of What's Coming: The tools analyzing your every word are only getting more advanced. The only sustainable strategy? Consistency. Authenticity. Messages that hold up under scrutiny—algorithmic or human. If your leadership story can't survive deep analysis, it was never leadership to begin with. The Way Forward: Still a Human Game AI is reshaping the rules of executive communications, but the most successful leaders will recognize that technology is a supporting act—not the star of the show. At the end of the day, the algorithms don't close deals, inspire employees, or build relationships with customers—CEOs do. In this next chapter of leadership, The CEOs who win won't be the ones scoring highest on sentiment trackers. They'll be the ones who use AI responsibly, stay grounded in performance, and lead with clarity and authenticity. Because when machines talk past each other, the whole system breaks down.
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Survey Says…Parents Matter In College Admission And They Feel It Is Rigged
Parents' Three-Word Descriptions of College Admission Even if you are not a follower of the long-running game show, Family Feud, you have no doubt heard their 'survey says' tagline. In the game, families compete by guessing the answers to survey questions on a range of topics, and it gets rowdy! College admission often feels like a similar face-off between families, leaving them confused, concerned, and conjecturing. It is not an solitary process where applicants must find their way without support. Experience has shown the critical role of parents in postsecondary planning. After all, we love our kids and want a future for them that is full of success. We also don't want them living in our basement for eternity! Recent surveys reveal, however, just how nuanced and complex this planning process is for parents to navigate. While high school counselors are the most qualified to offer students guidance on college admission and career pathways, they have a herculean job. They often have caseloads drastically exceeding the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) recommended student-to-counselor ratio of 250:1. Counselors are balancing the physical, intellectual, and social-emotional well-being of the students with whom they work, and despite the best intentions, their time and resources are limited. Sadly there are systemic failures. A recent survey from the Niche college search platform found that 1 in 5 juniors never meet with their school counselors, with 17% saying they received no guidance on the college search process. This is consistent with the findings of a 2019 Education Trust report. The reality is that even those of us (I am a high school counselor) who are fortunate to have smaller caseloads are not available 24/7. I am not at the kitchen table on Sunday morning or in the car with families on a summer night when they are often discussing college admission. Who is? Parents, but they often feel left out of the equation. A survey conducted by the American Student Assistance (ASA) found that parents have the greatest influence on their child's post-secondary path. Ninety-one percent of student respondents reported that they discussed their post-high school plans with their parents. Research by the enrollment management firm EAB confirms the ASA findings–the majority of students identify family as the greatest influence on which pathway they plan to pursue. But parents are not getting the information they want and need. A 2024 EAB study found that 73% of parents want direct communications from colleges. It also discovered that students who are not responding to outreach campaigns from colleges have a 47% greater likelihood of applying when a college has their parent contact information. Michael Koppenheffer, vice president of Enroll360 Marketing at EAB says, 'In an era of intensive parenting, it's not surprising that most parents expect direct and transparent communication from colleges. Concerns about cost, value, and campus safety are top of mind for today's parents, and our research shows that many parents now look for open, ongoing dialogue with institutions throughout the college search process. Colleges that engage families early across multiple channels build trust, ultimately influencing where students choose to enroll.' A May survey conducted by College Guidance Network (with whom I work) revealed not just a lack of communication, but also a significant trust deficit. Sixty-five percent of parents report that the system feels rigged against them and they are pleading for transparency, fairness, and insight into how to play the admissions game. While hoping for fairness may be a fool's errand (the process is simply not built for this), transparency and insight are reasonable expectations. Survey respondents volunteer words like "stressful," "confusing," 'tedious,' and "expensive" to describe college admission, and negative associations outnumber positive terms six to one. These attitudes are consistent across income level, school type (private/public/charter), and first‑generation status. Only 11% of parents report feeling 'very confident' guiding their student through the admission process and 63% say they are struggling, missing details, or need extensive guidance. The top concern of parents is that their teen is 'not competing on a level playing field,' followed closely by fear of making costly financial mistakes. As chief product officer at College Guidance Network (CGN), Michael Kolowich designed and conducted the survey of a national sample of 602 parents. He observes that 'college admissions has evolved over time from a straight sprint to a kind of escape room: the clues are scattered everywhere, but parents don't have a master key to solve the puzzle." CGN's research revealed four distinct parent mindsets that can help colleges better understand their concerns and needs: Anxious Planners, Confident Navigators, Skeptical Realists, and Hands-Off Hopefuls. Every one of them is hunting for a different kind of key to solve the puzzle. Here's more on the four segments the survey identified: Parent engagement strategies in high schools and colleges should incorporate the unique needs and concerns that characterize each of these styles. By doing so they will not only provide important guidance to those who are often the primary financial stakeholder, but as the EAB research found, colleges will also increase the likelihood that students in their inquiry funnel will apply. Parents are not just hungry for information about traditional four-year colleges. Judy Goldstein is the senior vice president of communications for American Student Assistance (ASA). She says, 'Nearly 90% of parents are interested in learning more about non-degree pathways for their children, and two in five want schools to start advising students about their post-secondary options as early as middle school,' Goldstein adds, 'Overall, there is a need for widespread access to the information, resources, and experiences focused on diverse post-secondary education and career pathways earlier in students' educational journeys. Doing so will ensure that young people–and their families–are equipped to make informed, confident decisions about the path after high school that meets their needs and aspirations.' The take-home message from all of these surveys is that we need to better support parents who often feel like they are flying without instruments. K-12 schools need to start earlier and be adequately funded to provide the resources necessary, not just for students but for parents as well. Colleges and universities must better understand the needs of parents and others who support applicants and find more effective ways to connect and communicate with them early and often. If not, families will continue to feud and make uninformed guesses as they navigate the escape room of college admission.
Associated Press
34 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Order.co Names Larry Robinett to Lead Partnerships and Drive Adoption of Its Workday Built Procurement Integration
NEW YORK, June 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- the world's leading B2B Ecommerce Platform, welcomes Larry Robinett as Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances. Robinett joins the company to expand strategic partnerships and scale adoption of exclusive Workday Built integration. Robinett brings more than two decades of experience in enterprise software and strategic alliances, with a long-standing focus on the Workday ecosystem. Most notably, he served as Vice President of Sales and Partner Alliances at Ascend Software. Here, he successfully spearheaded the company's strategic partnership with Workday to help customers streamline accounts payable operations. As a result of the partnership, customers experienced significant efficiency gains and cost savings through AP automation, allowing them to scale operations without adding headcount – all while maximizing their investment in Workday Financial Management. Now, as the Head of Workday Accounts & Alliances at Robinett will lead efforts to expand enterprise adoption of the company's innovative Workday integration. With the integration at customers' fingertips, they can unlock greater control, efficiency, and savings with a modern procurement experience from requisition to reconciliation. 'I'm thrilled to join at such an exciting stage of growth,' Robinett said. 'As someone who has worked extensively in the Workday ecosystem, I'm especially proud to join a company with a Workday Built integration, an achievement that reflects close collaboration with Workday's product teams to deliver meaningful value to joint customers. I look forward to building strong partnerships and helping Workday Financial Management customers simplify and modernize their procurement experience in Workday.' As a Workday Select Partner, worked closely with Workday to co-develop an embedded B2B Ecommerce experience directly within the Workday platform. Using exclusive 'Integrated Search', customers can purchase all the items they need from the best-fit suppliers without leaving the Workday portal. Teams can search for any item and browse pre-approved products within their custom catalog, complete with contracted pricing or cost-effective alternatives. Submitting an order automatically generates a pre-populated requisition, eliminating the need for manual, error-prone data entry. Once approved, handles vendor fulfillment, and pre-coded invoices load seamlessly into Workday. Some of the benefits of leveraging Integrated Search include: customers have raved about the integration, with Kyle Ingerman, Finance Transformations Senior Manager at WeWork, saying, 'I cannot tell you how much time, effort, and money [the integration] has saved us.' To learn more about Workday-built integration, visit About simplifies business buying by combining the ease of online shopping with the sophistication of world-class purchase order and AP automation. The result? Businesses cut costs and complexity with every order. Hundreds of companies, like WeWork and Hugo Boss, leverage to centralize purchase-to-pay workflows, scale operations, and gain total control over spending – saving an average of 5% on products. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in New York City, has raised $70M in funding from industry-leading investors like MIT, Stage 2 Capital, Rally Ventures, 645 Ventures, and more. To learn more, visit About Workday Workday is the AI platform for managing people, money, and agents. The Workday platform is built with AI at the core to help customers elevate people, supercharge work, and move their business forever forward. Workday is used by more than 11,000 organizations around the world and across industries – from medium-sized businesses to more than 60% of the Fortune 500. For more information about Workday, visit Media Contact Allison Reich Senior Manager of Brand, Content & Enablement [email protected]
