Bernie Sanders torches Senate Democrat Elissa Slotkin: Americans aren't ‘dumb' and know what ‘oligarchy' means
His remarks on Sunday came after Michigan's newly elected Democratic senator Elissa Slotkin told Politico that she thinks her party should stop using the term.
'The American people are not as dumb as Ms. Slotkin thinks they are,' an unusually pointed Sanders told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday.
'I think they understand very well, when the top 1 per cent owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent, when big money interests are able to control both political parties, they are living in an oligarchy.'
Slotkin, who spoke with Politico last week, urged her fellow party members to stop using the term 'oligarch' — a word she herself has used to describe Russian billionaire allies of Vladimir Putin on X.
The independent senator from Vermont told NBC's Kristen Welker that the tens of thousands of Americans coming out to his rallies across the United States are proof that Slotkin is out of step with Americans across the country.
'We had 36,000 people out in Los Angeles, 34,000 people in Colorado. We had 30,000 people in Folsom, California,' Sanders said.
'These are precisely the issues that have got to be talked about. Are you living in a democracy when [Elon Musk] can spend $270 million to elect Trump and then becomes the most important person in government?' he added. 'Or where AIPAC and other super PACs have enormous power over Democratic candidates?'
Joining Sanders on his appropriately-named 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour is New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the party's youngest stars in Congress and a favorite to seek higher office in the coming cycles. The two have turned out crowds larger than Kamala Harris and Donald Trump as they rally angry Democrats and independents in response to the rapid, sweeping changes to the federal government under Trump's second presidency.
Another Democrat taking the party's message directly to voters at a time when the national Democratic brand is badly tarnished is Conor Lamb, a former congressman from Pennsylvania, who continues to make appearances at town hall-style events across his home state, including in Republican districts.
Lamb, who lost a Senate primary to incumbent Senator John Fetterman after progressives broke in Fetterman's favor, mended fences with Ocasio-Cortez in a social media thread that also revealed where he fell on the use of the term 'oligarch.'
He, like Ocasio-Cortez, is widely believed to have ambitions of further political service.
'[C]learly we have been on the same side of the oligarchy question (against) and protecting social security and Medicare (for),' Lamb wrote to Ocasio-Cortez on X last month. '[L]ets make that team as big as possible. Good luck on the road.'
Sanders, like many progressives, faulted Democrats for abandoning key parts of the party's electoral base — working class voters and minorities — after the 2024 election ended disastrously for Harris, who lost every major battleground state to Trump and won millions fewer votes than her old running mate, Joe Biden, did four years prior.
During the campaign, Harris eschewed public support for policy items supported by many on the left, including raising the minimum wage or ending U.S. military support for the Israeli siege of Gaza, and instead campaigned with former Republican Rep. Liz Cheney and vowed that her presidency would be a continuation of Biden's first term.
Sanders was an avid supporter of many provisions in Biden's 'Build Back Better' agenda, which died in Congress after the party suffered defections from two centrist Democrats who later gave up their seats rather than face reelection challenges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump tax cuts needed to be extended - but not like this
While it was necessary to extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, the Senate has passed a completely irresponsible budget that endangers America's fiscal health. The Trump tax cuts needed to be extended, but not like this This entire piece of legislation is oriented around extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, which is good policy. In fact, it's just about the only good part of the bill. If not extended, the expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would have been devastating to Americans. If allowed to expire, 62% of Americans would see a tax increase, according to the Tax Foundation. Extending the TCJA would result in a gross domestic product growth of 1.1% in the long run. The issue is that the extension of these tax cuts will result in a revenue loss of $4.5 trillion for the federal government. The economic growth spurred by the act will cover just $710 billion of that shortfall, leaving nearly $3.8 trillion that needs to be paid for somehow. The tax cuts themselves aren't the only significant source of spending in the bill. A sticking point for swing district Republicans has been the state and local tax (the SALT deduction), or the amount of state tax burden taxpayers can deduct from their federal income tax. Certain House Republicans have demanded that the annual limit of $10,000 be raised to $40,000, and the Senate has begrudgingly given them their increase for the next five years. Opinion: Supreme Court's birthright citizenship opinion reveals rising hostility, tension I've written elsewhere about why the SALT deduction is bad policy, but combined with other changes to the alternative minimum tax would result in a $325 billion revenue loss on net. The Senate's version is even more generous on these policies than the House's version was. Additionally, the big ugly mess includes no tax on tips, social security and overtime pay. Neither Trump nor Republicans more generally have made a case for why these types of income are deserving of exempt status, and they amount to nothing more than a populist bribe of voters. These policies add hundreds of billions more to the revenue decreases from the tax cut extension. Other defense and immigration enforcement provisions bring the grand cost of the legislation up to $4 trillion once the long-term economic growth is accounted for. Work requirements for Medicaid benefits and food stamps are the chief sources of new funding to offset these costs, as well as the elimination of certain clean energy tax credits. The House should hold the line against Senate's fiscally irresponsible bill As written, the Senate version of the bill adds even more to the budget deficit than the version the House put together. The House version was a fiscally irresponsible mess, which was estimated to add about $1.7 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, even after considering the economic growth that the bill is projected to create. The Senate version is estimated to add $2.9 trillion under the same metrics. Previously: Trump's 'big beautiful bill' is an ugly fiscal mess created by Republicans | Opinion Some House Republicans have already expressed frustrations with the Senate version of the bill, which House Speaker Mike Johnson wants to pass before Friday, Independence Day. The budget hawks in the House must hold the line against the careless spending the Senate has engaged in. The House bill that passed in the first go-around was a mess, and the Senate made it even worse. The Senate version also exaggerates its benefits and underestimates its costs by making many of its programs temporary. This allows them to gloss over this fact when discussing the benefits while claiming a lower cost. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. All of these games are played in order to avoid tough political conversations about slashing entitlements, the chief cause of our escalating budget crisis. I have little faith in the House's ability to stop this mess of a bill. Our legislators (with one notable exception) are so terrified of the prospect of a Trump primary challenge that they will vote for just about anything to avoid being the one to hold up the president's desired budget. America's takeaway from this should be to laugh hysterically the next time Republicans claim to be the party of responsible spending. For all the talk of slashing government spending, the GOP has put together one of the most counterproductive efforts in modern history. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Zohran Mamdani wins Democratic NYC mayoral primary instant runoff
Under the city's ranked choice voting system, with voters allowed to rank up to five candidates in their preferred order, the New York City Board of Elections released calculations showing Mamdani, 33, picked up more votes than Cuomo from those who had ranked one of the other nine candidates first. The Associated Press called the race for Mamdani on July 1 shortly after those results were announced. The nomination will become official on July 14 after affidavit ballots, which are not going to change the outcome, have been counted. Mamdani's victory, which the former governor conceded on election night, marked a shocking upset in Democratic politics. The latest results gave Mamdani an even more decisive win as votes from the nine candidates who received fewer first-place votes were transferred to whoever they ranked higher, Mamdani or Cuomo. More than 1 million New Yorkers voted in the election, with large increases among younger voters. "This is just the beginning of our expanding coalition to make New York City affordable," Mamdani tweeted. "And we will do it together." Mamdani, a democratic socialist, drew national attention for beating Cuomo, the 67-year-old Democrat and the initial frontrunner. The victory now makes Mamdani, once the leftist long shot in the primary, the leader in the crowded race for mayor in the Nov. 4 general election, which also includes incumbent Mayor Eric Adams. Adams, a centrist Democrat, avoided the primary and is running as an independent after being mired in scandals. In the days since his victory, Mamdani has faced attacks from Republicans and conservatives for his faith as a Muslim, been falsely labeled a communist, and received a tepid welcome from many mainstream Democrats. President Donald Trump, a New York City native, has launched attacks against the Democratic nominee, including calling for his arrest and falsely suggesting he is in the United States illegally. Mamdani, born in Uganda, is a naturalized citizen. Endorsed by fellow democratic socialists Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, Mamdani campaigned heavily on a message of addressing affordability in the notoriously expensive city. His policy proposals include freezing rents on rent-stabilized apartments, free city buses and expanding child care. Critics have questioned how the mayor could enact such policies without the ability to levy taxes absent the state government's permission. Mamdani's campaign drew large numbers of new voters, while making gains in Asian American, Latino and progressive white communities. He and a slate of candidates began to cross-endorse each other under the city's ranked choice system to block what was seen as an inevitable Cuomo mayoralty. Mamdani formed a key alliance with city Comptroller Brad Lander, who stood by Mamdani's side on election night. Lander, an experienced, progressive politician who is Jewish, could help Mamdani in the days ahead to help secure support among many Jewish New Yorkers in the city with the largest Jewish community outside of Israel. Results showed Mamdani expanded his coalition among many Jewish communities. Mamdani faced criticism for his opposition to Israel as a Jewish state while refusing to condemn controversial phrases such as "globalize the intifada." Although Mamdani doesn't use the phrase, he has critiqued Israel's treatment of Palestinians and said Israel has a right to exist with equal rights for all. Cuomo, a three-term governor who resigned in 2021 amid accusations of sexual harassment and abuse of power, received substantial support among outer-borough Black, Latino and Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods, as well as ultra-wealthy enclaves like Manhattan's Upper East Side. However, Cuomo did little outreach to voters or other candidates to expand his support. Cuomo's name will remain on the ballot in the November election. Cuomo hasn't decided whether he will fully campaign as a third-party candidate against Mamdani and a slate of other independent and Republican candidates. In a statement, Cuomo said young voters and others who had never voted before that changed the overall electorate. He didn't commit to staying in the race to November, though he pointed to receiving more votes than Adams, who won the primary in 2021, the first time the city used ranked choice voting. That election had lower turnout. "We'll be continuing conversations with people from all across the city while determining next steps," Cuomo said. Adams, the scandal-plagued moderate incumbent, remains deeply unpopular after corruption probes ensnared his administration. Federal prosecutors also indicted Adams in a corruption case, before he was accused of negotiating with the Trump administration to drop the criminal charges. Adams denies any wrongdoing. Trump spoke highly of Adams as "a very good person," in his July 1 press conference. "I helped him out a little bit," the president said of Adams, referring to the mayor's legal trouble. Adams hopes to rebuild the working-class coalition of Black, Latino and Orthodox Jewish New Yorkers that narrowly won him the Democratic primary. In the race to November, Adams also hopes to draw in Republicans opposed to Mamdani, though Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, the GOP nominee, has said he won't drop out. As Adams, Cuomo and Sliwa jockey for moderate or conservative lanes, the Democratic nominee - in this case, Mamdani - is usually the prohibitive favorite in the heavily Democratic city. Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Reach him by email at emcuevas1@ or on Signal at emcuevas.01.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's next for Trump's tax bill? Quarreling House Republicans
House Republicans are already slamming the changes made to the bill in the Senate, from moderate members concerned about cuts to Medicaid and fiscal conservatives who are concerned about the bill's massive price tag. It will add a projected $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. "The United States is $37 TRILLION in the red. This is unsustainable," wrote Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, on X. "I support President Trump and his tax cuts, but we cannot saddle our children and grandchildren with TRILLIONS upon TRILLIONS in new debt." However, House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated in a statement that he plans to push his conference to accept the bill in order to meet the president's self-imposed deadline of July 4. "The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July. The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay," he said in a statement. "This bill is President Trump's agenda, and we are making it law." A key House committee plans to meet in the afternoon to begin the process of advancing the Senate's bill in the chamber. Trump indicated that he may be willing to budge on the July 4 deadline given the complications of passing it in the House. "I'd love to do July 4th, but I think it's very hard to do July 4th," Trump told reporters. "It can go longer, but we'd like to get it done by that time if possible."
