logo
Chuck Schumer, 74, Rushed to D.C. Hospital amid Heatwave After Getting 'Lightheaded' at Senate Gym

Chuck Schumer, 74, Rushed to D.C. Hospital amid Heatwave After Getting 'Lightheaded' at Senate Gym

Yahoo6 days ago

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was rushed to a Washington, D.C., hospital on Wednesday, June 25, but later returned to work.
The 74-year-old senior senator from New York, who has led the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017, was exercising at the Senate gym when he began to feel "lightheaded," according to a statement from his office.
"Out of an abundance of caution, he went to the hospital to be treated for dehydration and is now back at work in the Capitol," the statement continued. "He wants to remind everyone to drink some water and stay out of the heat."
Like much of the eastern United States, D.C. is experiencing a major heat wave this week. Temperatures in the nation's capital were expected to reach around 100 degrees on Wednesday.
Schumer is a New York City native who launched a career in politics as soon as he earned his law degree from Harvard University in 1974.
He joined the Senate in 1999, after 18 years in the House of Representatives and five years in the New York State Assembly, and succeeded Nevada Sen. Harry Reid as the top Senate Democrat in 2017.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Schumer is up for reelection in 2028, and would be 78 at the start of his next term if he opts to seek reelection.
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump suggests DOGE take ‘good, hard, look' at Musk companies
Trump suggests DOGE take ‘good, hard, look' at Musk companies

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump suggests DOGE take ‘good, hard, look' at Musk companies

President Trump suggested the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — the commission once spearheaded by Elon Musk — could take a 'good, hard, look' at the tech billionaire's companies and the extent to which they've benefited from environmental tax credits. Trump issued the warning early Tuesday, after his longtime ally-turned-foe took to social media to attack the massive tax and spending bill, which phases out many of the tax credits for renewable energy and is making its way toward a vote in the Senate. 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a post shortly after midnight Tuesday. 'It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one.' 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' he continued. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE.' The president added, 'Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Musk responded directly to Trump in a post on his social platform X: 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' The Tesla CEO's close relationship with Trump quickly devolved into a public clash last month over the fate of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which he has blasted as 'utterly insane' and 'political suicide' for the GOP. Musk, this week, has renewed his sharp criticism of the bill and the party behind it, as the 'big, beautiful bill,' full of Trump's legislative priorities, faces hiccups in the upper chamber of Congress. He has also threatened to primary any Republican who supports the bill and, on Monday, renewed his calls for a new political party. 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!! Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,' Musk wrote on X, which he owns. The Senate's version of the bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion between 2025 and 2034, roughly $1 trillion more than the House-passed version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Amendment targeting Medicaid expansion won't get a Senate vote
Amendment targeting Medicaid expansion won't get a Senate vote

Politico

time23 minutes ago

  • Politico

Amendment targeting Medicaid expansion won't get a Senate vote

Senate conservatives are dropping their push for a vote on scaling back a key Medicaid funding mechanism, according to three people granted anonymity to discuss private deliberations. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and allies were expected to get a vote on an amendment to scale back the federal share of Medicaid costs for those enrolled under the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid starting in 2031. Senate leadership backed the proposal and were expected to help build support for it as part of a deal cut earlier this week to start debate on President Donald Trump's domestic policy bill. But Republicans were wary of enacting such a deep cut despite other provisions in megabill that would decrease Medicaid funding by nearly $800 billion. Several GOP senators warned Monday they did not support making changes to the federal march for Medicaid enrollees. A spokesperson for Scott did not immediately respond to a request for comment. While the amendment is being withdrawn, Scott's fight highlights how far Republicans have been willing to go to curb the Medicaid expansion, a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act. Republicans argue the expansion enables able-bodied adults to get coverage at the expense of beneficiaries with disabilities and the elderly. The federal government traditionally covers half of all Medicaid costs and the state picks up the rest. But the federal government covers 90 percent of costs for expansion enrollees. Under Scott's proposal, that extra funding would shrink down to 50 percent after 2030. Anyone who was enrolled prior to that date would be grandfathered at the 90 percent payment rate. While Trump himself has said he does not want to cut Medicaid benefits, an estimated 11.8 million people are expected to lose coverage if the megabill becomes law by 2034, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The number would likely balloon if Scott's amendment passed.

Vance arrives at Capitol as GOP short votes to pass Trump megabill
Vance arrives at Capitol as GOP short votes to pass Trump megabill

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Vance arrives at Capitol as GOP short votes to pass Trump megabill

Vice President JD Vance arrived at the Capitol early Tuesday as Senate Republican leaders had still not locked down the 50 votes needed to pass President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' after more than 21 hours of voting. The deadlock in the Senate GOP conference is raising serious questions about whether Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) will have to pull the bill from the floor, something that would be an embarrassing setback for Republicans. Senators say that the final text of the legislation, which has been undergoing changes throughout the night, has yet to be circulated, leaving them in a state of limbo that stretched for hours into the night and then past dawn. Vance played a key role in helping to muster enough votes to pass a motion to proceed to the bill on Saturday and he has had success throughout the first several months of Trump's second term persuading GOP senators to take tough votes, such as on the confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The GOP leadership's lobbying efforts have focused on Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R), who has held out for hours over concerns that deep cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) will hit her home state hard. A remarkable scene played out on the Senate floor shortly after 5 a.m., when Thune, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) huddled around Murkowski along the back wall of the chamber, having an animated conversation about her concerns over the bill. GOP leaders suffered a serious setback when Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough rejected two provisions aimed at softening the impact of Medicaid and SNAP cuts on Alaska. GOP negotiators worked past midnight Tuesday to rewrite those provisions to meet the parliamentarian's approval but with limited success. A source familiar with the parliamentary discussions said MacDonough has accepted a reworked version of the language to delay the implementation of SNAP cuts to Alaska as long as the state shows it is making progress in reducing its error rate in delivering food assistance benefits. But an effort to rewrite language to deliver an enhanced federal Medicaid funding match — also known as an enhanced Federal Medical Assistance Percentage — for Alaska had not yet received the parliamentarian's approval as of 6 a.m. Tuesday. Thune desperately needs Murkowski's vote because there are already three likely Republican 'no' votes on the legislation. Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) say they are hard 'no's' on the legislation as it's now written and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who faces a tough reelection race next year, said she's leaning against voting for the bill. Collins offered an amendment to the bill to double the size of the rural hospital relief fund in the bill from $25 billion to $50 billion, but it was voted down, 22 to 78. GOP leaders have had a tough time locking down Murkowski's vote, despite hours of entreaties Monday night and Tuesday morning. Thune met with her in his office shortly before 4 a.m. and were spotted walking in the hall together. Thune said they were 'just chatting.' When asked, Thune rejected the prospect of having to pull the bill off the floor, telling a reporter for the Associated Press that it was an option he didn't want to worry about. That prompted Thune to have a conversation early Tuesday with Paul, who says he would support the bill if the language to raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion is stripped out. Paul is instead proposing that the bill increase the debt-ceiling by only $500 billion, which he hopes could force Republicans to advance another reconciliation package with deeper spending cuts tied to another debt-limit increase later in the year. One Democratic senator, who requested anonymity, expressed exasperation over the deadlock on the Senate floor and the failure to produce final legislative text, even more than 21 hours into voting. 'There's still no text, as of today there is still no text,' the senator said. 'I think they don't have the votes. 'Have you seen what's going on, on the floor, I've never seen anything like that,' the lawmaker said, referring to efforts to lobby Murkowski to vote for the legislation after hours and hours of voting on amendments. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) accused Republicans of slow-walking the bill to buy more time to scrounge up Republican support. 'They're slowing things down because right now, they're one big mess. They've made a lot of promises, contradictory promises to different parts of their caucus,' he told MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store