&w=3840&q=100)
Israel warns Iran's Supreme leader will end up like Saddam Hussein: How did the Iraqi dictator die?
Israel has warned Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'of a fate similar to Saddam Hussein' — the late Iraqi dictator. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz made the remarks on Tuesday (June 17) during a meeting with Israeli military and security service commanders.
'I warn the Iranian dictator against continuing to commit war crimes and launch missiles toward Israeli civilians,' he said, as per a statement from his office. 'He should remember what happened to the dictator in the neighbouring country to Iran who took the same path against Israel.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Katz's comments come amid mounting tensions between Israel and Iran . The West Asian countries have launched strikes and counterstrikes against each other for six days now.
But who was Saddam Hussein and what fate did he meet? We will explain.
Who was Saddam Hussein?
Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq for nearly 30 years. Born into a poor family in the al-Awja village outside Tikrit, 150 km north of Baghdad, in 1937, he went on to join an uprising against pro-British royalist rulers at the age of 19.
As a member of the Baath Party, Saddam participated in a botched assassination attempt against Iraq's military ruler, General Abd al-Karim Qasim, in October 1959.
Saddam, who was wounded in the attempt, fled – first to Syria and then to Egypt.
He returned to Baghdad after the Baath Party returned to power in a military coup in February 1963.
However, nine months later, the party was ousted and Saddam was imprisoned. He was made the deputy secretary-general of the Baath party while in jail.
In July 1968, the party toppled the rule of President Abdul-Rahman Aref in a coup. Saddam helped install his cousin, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, as Iraq's president.
After serving as his cousin's vice president, Saddam replaced al-Bakr to become Iraq's president in 1979.
He ruled the country with an iron fist, suppressing anyone who opposed him. While most of the public lived in poverty, Saddam had a taste for luxury and built over 20 lavish palaces throughout Iraq.
To win public support, he provided universal healthcare, free university education, and equal rights for women, as per PBS.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Saddam Hussein rose through the ranks to become the leader of the Baath party. File Photo/AFP
Saddam launched a war against Iran in September 1980. However, it evolved into a war of attrition that lasted eight years. The two countries agreed to a ceasefire in 1988, ending the fighting.
In March 1988, Iraqi forces carried out a chemical attack on the Iraqi Kurdish town of Halabja, killing about 5,000 people.
Under Saddam's leadership, Iraq invaded neighbouring Kuwait on August 2, 1990. His occupation of Iraq led to a global trade embargo against Iraq.
In January 1991, the United States-led forces launched the Gulf War, targeting Iraq and occupied Kuwait with air strikes. Iraq fired missiles at Israel during the conflict, which ended six weeks later. The US forced Iraqi forces out of Kuwait.
Saddam was elected unopposed as Iraq's president in October 1995. Eight years later, the US launched a war against Iraq to collapse the dictator's government.
How Saddam Hussein met his end
In March 2003, the US forces invaded Iraq to destroy the 'Iraqi weapons of mass destruction' and end Saddam Hussein's rule, claiming the Iraqi dictator had links with al-Qaeda.
The US-led forces swept into Baghdad in April. As Saddam's rule crumbled, Iraqi civilians and US soldiers pulled down a statue of the Iraqi president in the capital's Firdos Square.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On July 22, the US troops killed Saddam's two sons – Uday and Qusay – in a gun battle in the northern city of Mosul. However, Saddam continued to remain in hiding.
After nine months on the run, the former Iraqi dictator was captured on December 13, 2003. The US soldiers found him hiding in a six-to-eight-foot deep hole, or 'spider hole,' at a farmhouse nearly 15 km outside his hometown of Tikrit.
The pictures of his capture showed the once 'dapper' man with an unkempt, bushy beard and dishevelled hair. Despite being armed, Saddam did not resist his arrest by the US forces.
Saddam Hussein is filmed after his capture in this footage released December 14, 2003. File Photo/Reuters
In October 2005, the former Iraqi dictator's trial began. Saddam was charged with crimes against humanity for the killing of about 150 people in the Shiite Muslim town of Dujail, Iraq, in 1982. He pleaded not guilty.
Another trial on charges of war crimes against Saddam in the 1988 'Anfal' campaign against Iraqi Kurds began in August 2006. The campaign had led to the killing of 100,000 Kurds. The Iraqi High Criminal Court charged the former president with genocide.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In November, Saddam was sentenced to death by hanging for the 1982 Dujail massacre. An appellate chamber of the Iraqi High Tribunal upheld his death sentence.
On December 30, 2006, Saddam, clutching a Quran, was hanged.
In 2023, former Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi claimed that Saddam's body was 'disposed of' in an area between his home and that of Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi PM at the time of the former dictator's death, in Baghdad's fortified Green Zone.
As per Al Jazeera, al-Kadhimi said in an interview with Arabic daily Asharq Al-Awsat, 'I disapproved of the act [of disposing his body next to his home], but I saw a group of guards, and I asked them to stay away from the body out of respect for the dead.'
'Yes, it [Saddam's body] was brought [outside al-Maliki's house],' said al-Kadhimi. 'Al-Maliki ordered its handover to one of the sheikhs of al-Nada tribe, Saddam Hussein's tribe, and so it was collected from the Green Zone.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He added, '[Saddam] was buried in Tikrit. After 2012, when [the area] came under the control of ISIS (ISIL), the body was dug up and moved to a secret location no one knows to this day. The graves of his children were also tampered with.'
Despite the US' claims, weapons of mass destruction were never found in Iraq.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
PM Modi To Visit UK, Maldives From July 23-26
New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi will pay a four-day visit to the United Kingdom and the Maldives from Wednesday to shore up overall bilateral ties and formalise the landmark India-UK free trade deal that is set to pave the way for doubling two-way trade by 2030 from current USD 60 billion. PM Modi will first travel to the UK on a two-day trip and then will visit the Maldives primarily to grace the island nation's Independence Day celebrations as "guest of honour", according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). The prime minister's visit to the Maldives from July 25 to 26 is seen as important as it marks a significant reset of bilateral ties that had come under severe strain after Mohamed Muizzu, known for his pro-China leanings, became president in November 2023. In the first leg of his trip, PM Modi will visit the UK from July 23 to 24 to hold wide-ranging talks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the MEA said on Sunday. India and the UK are expected to formally sign the free trade deal during PM Modi's visit to London, people familiar with the matter said, adding the British side has completed the administrative process for inking of the pact. In May, India and the UK sealed the free trade agreement (FTA) that is expected to benefit 99 per cent Indian exports from tariff and will make it easier for British firms to export whisky, cars and other products to India besides boosting the overall trade basket. Along with the FTA -- the biggest the UK has done since leaving the European Union -- the two sides also sealed a double contribution convention. It provides for exemption for employers of Indian workers from paying social security contributions in the UK. The trade deal, firmed up after three years of negotiations, is expected to ensure comprehensive market access for Indian goods across all sectors and India will gain from tariff elimination on about 99 per cent of tariff lines (product categories) covering almost 100 per cent of the trade values, according to officials. A British readout had said Indian tariffs will be slashed, locking in reductions on 90 per cent of tariff lines, with 85 per cent of these becoming fully tariff-free within a decade. The FTA is set to double bilateral trade by 2030 from the current level of USD 60 billion, the officials said. PM Modi will hold wide ranging discussions with PM Starmer on the entire gamut of India-UK bilateral relations besides exchanging views on issues of regional and global importance, the MEA said, announcing the two-nation trip. It will be PM Modi's fourth visit to the UK. The MEA said he is also expected to call on King Charles III. "During the visit, the two sides will also review the progress of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) with a specific focus on trade and economy, technology and innovation, defence and security, climate, health, education and people-to-people ties," the MEA said in a statement. From London, Modi will travel to the Maldives primarily to grace the island nation's 60th anniversary of its Independence on July 26. It will be Modi's third visit to the Maldives, and the first visit by an Indian head of state or government since Muizzu assumed office in November 2023. PM Modi and President Muizzu will hold discussions on issues of mutual interest and take stock of the progress in the implementation of the India-Maldives joint vision for a 'Comprehensive Economic and Maritime Security Partnership'. The joint vision was adopted during Muizzu's visit to India in October last year. "The visit reflects the importance India attaches to its maritime neighbour, Maldives, which continues to hold a special place in India's 'Neighbourhood First' policy and Vision MAHASAGAR (Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions)," the MEA said. It said the visit will provide an opportunity for both sides to further deepen and strengthen the close bilateral relationship. PTI MPB KVK KVK
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mehdi Hasan shuts down 20 Donald Trump fans in explosive jubilee debate – viewers call him a ‘National Treasure'
Mehdi Hasan is a British-American journalist who recently made a splash in progressive politics after departing from the MSNBC network to found his own independent media platform, known as Zeteo. Since then, Mehdi has spearheaded numerous investigative journalism and advocacy efforts, most notably concerning the ongoing war in Gaza, which he has termed a 'genocide'. Mehdi is also a staunch critic of the current Donald Trump administration, and has built up a reputation as a formidable debater. On July 20, he showcased his passion for debating once more by appearing on Jubilee's Surrounded. Surrounded is a YouTube series where a public debater deliberately disadvantages themselves by pitting themselves against 20 people of opposing viewpoints, with Mehdi facing off against hardline Donald Trump supporters who were staunchly anti-immigrant and openly supported many of the president's most controversial policies. Mehdi would later post a highlight reel of the over 90-minute debate on his X account, which got a lot of reactions, with James Allan calling Mehdi a "National Treasure". You're a National Treasure Mehdi. Netizens rally around Mehdi after his Jubilee debate Mehdi's highlight reel prompted a lot of responses on his X timeline, with many praising Mehdi's debating skills and commending him on facing off against America's radicalized right-wingers head on. User doomer_world called Mehdi an American hero, which he looked all too happy to hear. 🙏🏽 User Nick Warren said that the others brought a pencil sharpener to a gatling gun fight. They bought a pencil sharpener to a gatling gun fight... User jocamp thanked Mehdi for everything. 🙏🏽 User Rickey Williams commended Mehdi for taking 'hate and fascism' full on, and said there was no barometer to gauge the amount of 'crazy' among the 20 right-wingers. Words cannot express how much I appreciate you Mehdi, you took hate and fascism full on, there's no barometer to gauge the amount of crazy amongst those 20. User whereisjarule_ stated that Mehdi was the best debater he'd ever seen. Happy it's mehdi Hasan of all people going against them. He is the best debater I've ever seen! User thelefttake condemned the people Mehdi debated against, saying they should be 'put on a watchlist'. There are multiple people in this video who should be placed on a watchlist. It's actually scary knowing they walk among us. Not all responses to Mehdi's debate were positive, however, with seasters jones saying that Mehdi shouldn't have given the 'fascists' a platform. Had you never watched previous episodes? Just fascists getting crushed and acting like they won likely because they got to advertise/platform their hate. User Grounded Spaceman accused Mehdi of just talking over everyone. lol…this isn't the own you think it is. I'd wager that you can win a debate fair and square over the normal this is just you talking over ppl. Fast and loud doesn't win a debate dude User Landon Best said that Mehdi shouldn't call what he did a 'debate' because none of the 20 reactionaries he talked to had any ideas worth seriously considering. Your #1 issue is calling this a debate when it's not. Debate implies these ideas are in any way meant to be taken seriously. There is nothing serious about any of the 20 reactionaries you talked to. However, Landon was met with pushback by ValorieThomas, who pointed out that everyone in the video knew what they signed up for, and genuinely considered themselves debaters. It's important to note that every person in that room knew what they were signed up for. Every person in there knew who would be sitting across the table. Everyone in that room thinks they are debaters with relevant, cogent ideas & arguments. Mehdi Hasan has had a storied journalism career Before establishing his own media company, Mehdi Hasan spent a long time building his credentials as a journalist and activist. After doing a few stints on British networks such as ITV and BBC One, Mehdi rose to prominence as an anchor for Al Jazeera, following which he transitioned to MSNBC and hosted The Mehdi Hasan Show from 2020 to 2024. Aside from his work on Zeteo, Mehdi is also a regular columnist for The Guardian. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral follow Indiatimes Trending.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Temples of social justice
Recently, a political controversy erupted in Tamil Nadu on the issue of diverting temple funds for building colleges. Beyond the political debates, the issue throws light on a unique social justice model around the regulation of secular practices associated with religion. This model, predominantly developed in the erstwhile Madras Presidency, draws strength from a 200-year-old legislative framework which continues till date. It has gained more acceptance in south India. As elections approach in Kerala and Tamil Nadu, clarity on the issue will help diffuse attempts to polarise voters around it. Religious endowments law Through the Religious Endowment and Escheats Regulation 1817, the East India Company set up the earliest legislative architecture around regulation of religious endowments. When the British Crown assumed direct control over Indian territories in 1858, Queen Victoria issued a proclamation stating that the sovereign would restrict interference in religious affairs. This was necessary as there was concern about losing face from the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, which was triggered by religious issues. However, the withdrawal of the British government from religious affairs was not complete. In fact, in the Madras Presidency, various British officials argued for continued oversight of religious endowments. Finally, the British government settled for a balanced approach: the sovereign would not interfere with practices that were essentially religious, such as rituals, but would exercise control over the lands and secular aspects of the religious endowments. The idea of the government supervising religious institutions came to be crystallised when the Justice Party was elected in 1920. One of the earliest legislative interventions by the Justicites was Bill No. 12 of 1922: Hindu Religious Endowments Act. When it was introduced in the Madras Legislative Council, it faced opposition, mainly due to the provision in the law that allowed surplus temple funds to be diverted for other purposes. The nub of the issue was whether funds provided to a temple could be used for secular purposes. The matter was debated and settled in 1925, when the law was enacted. Since then, every revised version of the plenary law, including the current law — The Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 — has retained the provision of surplus funds. Also read | Activist alleges 'criminal misappropriation' of temple funds by T.N. HR&CE Dept, Madras High Court calls for response Section 36 of the 1959 Act permits the trustees of religious institutions to appropriate any surplus funds for any purposes listed under the law, with the prior sanction of the Commissioner. 'Surplus' means any amount remaining after adequate provisions have been made for the maintenance of the temple and training of its officials. The Act also empowers the Joint Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner to appropriate funds in cases where the original purpose has become impossible to fulfil. Endowments to temples have a long and rich history. Temples received lavish donations from the sovereign rulers from as far back as in 970 AD, when the Chola empire was at its peak. Historian Anirudh Kanisetti writes that Sembiyan Mahadevi, a Chola queen, made strategic donations of land and kind to temples. The practice continued during the Vijayanagara kingdom. Temples were not just places of worship; they were socio-cultural hubs and were also used for educational purposes. This is confirmed by the inscriptions on temple walls and the spacious mandapams (pillared halls) which were used to hold educational or cultural events. So the original intent argument would also support the theory of utilising temple resources for educational purposes. The 1959 Act has been tested and upheld by constitutional courts. Among the permissible uses of surplus funds under the 1959 Act is the establishment and maintenance of universities or colleges (Section 66). These educational institutions are also required to make available the study of the Hindu religion or Hindu temple architecture. Seen within this framework, building colleges from temple funds is not only legal, but a logical extension of these provisions. Social justice legacy The controversy around the use of temple funds cannot be restricted to discussing legal propositions, however; it also carries ideological and sociopolitical significance. In the pre-colonial era, the motivation for the rulers to support large-scale endowments was that the temples acted as channels through which State resources could be allotted for important welfare projects. Through colonial rule, the British East India Company and the Crown viewed sovereign involvement in the management of temple affairs as necessary for reasons of revenue and maintenance of local control. Over the last century, the Self-Respect Movement, which emerged from the Madras Presidency, viewed the regulation of temples and oversight of their resources as a critical feature of anti-caste reforms. Without this, there would have been no temple entry legislation in 1936 and 1947. Today, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are among the few States where governments have appointed priests from backward classes after a prolonged legal struggle. Ultimately, any argument against government control of temple affairs would be striking at the root of social justice. The role of the government in ensuring that surplus funds are appropriated in a lawful manner is settled. Any reversal of this would only result in a set back of the long legacy of social justice and religious reforms that south India has pioneered.
