Negative FCA for KE consumers: KATI concerned over delay in implementation
KARACHI: Junaid Naqi, President of the Korangi Association of Trade and Industry (KATI) has voiced strong concerns over reported efforts by the Ministry of Energy (Power Division) to delay the implementation of the negative Fuel Cost Adjustment (FCA) for April 2025 for K-Electric consumers.
He warned that these attempts, which lack legal and procedural basis, could sabotage the Prime Minister's reform initiatives.
'The FCA must be determined and implemented in accordance with NEPRA's formula-based regulatory framework,' said Naqi. 'Blocking its application solely for Karachi raises serious questions about regulatory independence and sets a troubling precedent of administrative overreach.'
Naqi pointed out that in the past, when FCA charges were higher, the people and industries of Karachi paid the additional costs without delay. 'Now, when the relief is finally due, obstacles are being placed. This selective treatment is unjust and erodes public trust in the government's reforms,' he added.
He further clarified that unless a uniform FCA policy is formally approved by the federal cabinet and directed to NEPRA, no intervention holds legal validity. Even if approved, such a policy can only be applied prospectively, not retroactively.
President KATI called for the transparent, fair, and timely implementation of all regulatory decisions and urged the government to allow NEPRA to function independently. Junaid Naqi stressed the need for equal treatment of all consumers including those in Karachi and reaffirmed the importance of upholding the rule of law.
He welcomed Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's recent move to reduce electricity tariffs for industrial consumers, calling it a timely and commendable step.
Junaid Naqi said the decision reflects the government's commitment to supporting Pakistan's export sectors and driving industrial growth during a time of economic uncertainty.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
The cost of irrational energy levies
The federal government's decision to impose a petroleum levy of Rs 77 per litre on furnace oil (HFO), supplemented by a carbon tax of Rs 2.50 per litre, adds Rs 84,742 per ton in taxes to a fuel that otherwise costs approximately Rs 130,000 per ton. For export-oriented textile manufacturers, many of whom depend on HFO-based captive power for uninterrupted production, this will severely undermine their viability. Under current market conditions, HFO-fired captive generation costs roughly Rs 33 per kWh, broadly equivalent to prevailing grid tariffs. Once the new levies are applied, generation costs surge to nearly Rs 51 per kWh, by over 50%. At this level, HFO-based power generation ceases to be economically viable, forcing textile firms into an untenable dilemma: continue operating at a severe loss or switch to an unreliable and, ultimately, more expensive grid supply. For most mills, switching to grid-supplied power is not a viable alternative, as HFO-fired captive generation is principally used by units lacking reliable DISCO connections. Across Pakistan—and particularly in urban industrial hubs such as Lahore and Karachi—DISCOs routinely decline new industrial hookups due to constrained infrastructure and transformer capacity. Where connections are technically offered, firms are presented with demand notices running into the tens of billions of rupees merely to secure a feeder line, with no guarantee of timely service: lead times for actual energization often extend to two or three years. Under these conditions, pursuing a formal grid connection is neither commercially nor operationally feasible, aside from enduring the frequent voltage sags and load-shedding that characterize grid supply. This punitive taxation of HFO follows the so-called 'grid transition levy' on gas consumption by captive-power users—a tax that the government itself concedes is incorrectly calculated yet refuses to rectify. Officially, the transition levy is intended to align the cost of captive power with grid tariffs. In practice, however, the levy calculation is based on peak-hour grid rates that apply for only four hours each day, it relies on an eight-year-old Nepra determination of captive O&M costs, a figure that has since doubled or tripled due to inflation and currency depreciation, and incorporates a series of arbitrary errors that artificially inflate the final rate, coercing efficient captive generators onto an unprepared grid. Over the past month alone, two major textile production units served by HESCO reported repeated outages, voltage fluctuations, and sudden trippings. These disturbances burned out feeders and control panels, inflicted heavy machinery damage, and disrupted tightly scheduled production lines. Similar incidents are occurring across multiple DISCOs, underscoring that Pakistan's electricity grid lacks both the capacity and reliability to absorb additional industrial loads. Rather than addressing these structural weaknesses through targeted grid investments, modernization of aging infrastructure, and expansion of generation capacity, the government has opted for a shortcut: tax all alternative energy sources until the grid becomes the sole available option. First gas, now HFO and even solar panels. On one hand, political rhetoric extols market-driven strategy and competitive pricing; on the other, regressive taxes are being wielded to coerce industrial users onto a system that is demonstrably incapable of meeting their needs. The economic repercussions extend far beyond individual factory bills. Pakistan's textile industry accounts for over 50% of export revenues, sustains millions of direct and indirect jobs, and underpins rural livelihoods through cotton cultivation. A unilateral surge in energy costs will erode global competitiveness, and potentially trigger plant closures or relocation of production to more stable energy markets. Already, the poorly designed levy on gas-fired captive generation has slashed captive gas demand by 90%, creating a 400 MMCFD RLNG surplus that the government cannot absorb and which worsens circular debt. The same error is now being applied to furnace oil—despite domestic oversupply, demand will collapse once the levy is imposed, forcing HFO to be exported at under Rs 100,000 per ton rather than sold locally at Rs 130,000. As a result, industry will rely on a grid powered largely by imported coal and RLNG, while domestic HFO is sold abroad at a loss. With demand destroyed, the levy will generate no revenue, import costs will rise, and domestic value addition in exports—through the use of local fuels—will decline. To reverse this trajectory, the government must take three immediate steps. First, suspend the new petroleum and carbon levies on HFO until a comprehensive impact assessment is completed, involving industry stakeholders, DISCO representatives, and energy experts. Such an assessment should quantify the cost differential between captive and grid power under current conditions, and model the long-term effects on export revenue, employment, and foreign exchange earnings. And even then, any levy should be imposed gradually to allow sufficient time for consumers to adjust. Second, the calculation of the grid transition levy must be corrected to reflect actual grid power tariffs and captive generation costs and eliminate arbitrary inflation. Finally, commit to a multi-year grid-modernization plan that addresses transmission bottlenecks, reduces line losses, and provides reliable power at a regionally competitive rate of 9 cents per kWh or below. Without these corrective actions, the government risks imposing a de facto production tax on Pakistan's most vital export sector—one that it can ill afford. Coercive levies may fill the treasury in the short term, but they undermine industrial resilience, drive up unemployment, and weaken foreign-exchange reserves through the hollowing-out of export capacity. In effect, policy is being used not to bolster markets, but to strangle them—and in the process, torpedo the very growth narrative that it purports to champion. A reversal of these levies, accompanied by a clear roadmap for grid improvement, will restore confidence among exporters, stabilize power costs, and ensure that Pakistan's textile sector remains a global competitor rather than a declining casualty of misguided energy policy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Ministries oppose gas price increase
ISLAMABAD: The gas price increase has been opposed in its current form by several line ministries, citing concerns that it will disproportionately impact the industrial sector, lead to higher electricity prices, and result in cross-subsidization of the fertiliser industry at the expense of other industries. The concerns raised by ministries representing various sectors have also been made part of the summary which came under consideration of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet. The Power Division stated that the proposed hike in gas rates for the power sector—from Rs 1,050/mmBtu to Rs 1,313/mmBtu—will increase electricity generation costs for thermal plants using domestic gas by approximately Rs 10 billion in FY 2025–26. This increase is expected to result in higher Fuel Cost Adjustments (FCA), ultimately passed on to consumers, raising electricity tariffs by around Rs 0.10 per unit. Pakistan now gas-surplus amid demand collapse, says Motiwala The Power Division further noted that rising generation costs could make electricity less affordable for all consumer categories. This may reduce the overall sales of Discos, with a knock-on effect on capacity payments in the power sector. Additionally, the price hike would reduce the merit order ranking of gas-based power plants, pushing them below imported fuel plants such as those using coal. This shift could result in an estimated foreign exchange exposure of around $140 million due to increased coal imports. The Division cautioned that such a change in the energy mix must be carefully considered due to its implications for energy affordability, the balance of payments, and broader macroeconomic stability. In a scenario where imported fuel-based plants replace gas plants, the Sui gas companies could face estimated revenue losses of Rs 39 billion, depending on global fuel price trends. The Power Division also addressed a reported Rs 41 billion revenue shortfall claimed by SNGPL, attributed to RLNG diversion. However, it emphasized that the cost of RLNG diversion is already covered under Gas Supply Agreements (GSAs) with government power plants and reimbursed through CPPA-G via NPD payments. Therefore, it recommended that only genuinely unrecovered amounts, if any, be allowed in SNGPL's accounts. The Ministry of Industries and Production (MoI&P) expressed concern that increasing gas prices for the general industry—from Rs 2,150 to Rs 2,350/mmBtu—will escalate the cost of doing business, hinder industrial growth, and damage export competitiveness. The Ministry warned this would further disadvantage Pakistani industries compared to regional competitors. MoI&P highlighted that the new National Tariff Policy 2025–30 aims to reduce Customs duties on finished goods and decrease input costs for locally manufactured products. These objectives would be undermined if the cost of industrial inputs like gas continues to rise. The Ministry recommended that the Petroleum Division reconsider its decision and refrain from increasing gas prices for the general industry. The Finance Ministry also raised objections, noting that while gas prices for the fertiliser sector have been kept unchanged, the process industry will face a Rs 200/mmBtu increase. It argued this effectively results in the process industry cross-subsidising the fertiliser sector. The Petroleum Division was urged to consider full cost recovery from the fertiliser sector to alleviate the subsidy burden on the rest of the industry. Furthermore, the Finance Ministry criticized the current practice of recovering Unaccounted-for Gas (UFG) losses through consumer pricing, which it said discourages utilities from improving operational efficiency. It recommended that the Petroleum Division brief the ECC on planned UFG reduction measures and their financial implications. The ministry also requested the Petroleum Division to inform the ECC whether lifting the moratorium on new gas connections could help address surplus RLNG issues and the curtailment of indigenous gas production. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
K-P CM warns Centre of tit-for-tat response
Listen to article Rawalpindi Central Jail authorities on Thursday once again refused to allow key PTI leaders including Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and veteran politician Makhdoom Javed Hashmi to meet PTI founder Imran Khan, who is detained at the prison facility. Talking to the media later, Gandapur expressed his anger at the "unjustified restrictions" imposed on the executive head of a province and vowed to pay the PML-N led federal government in the same coin. Hashmi, who also remained a part of the PTI from 2012 to 2014, also condemned the move. The K-P chief minister stated that they had to meet the former prime minister in order to brief him on the K-P budget but the authorities did not allow this to happen. "The K-P budget approval process has not yet been completed and the budget session is ongoing," he added. Cracks in the former ruling party became more pronounced after the K-P Assembly on Tuesday approved the provincial budget. Some PTI leaders expressed amazement at the provincial government's "haste" with Imran's sisters claiming that the PTI founder was not consulted ahead of the approval. Gandapur said he could respond to refusal by authorities to let them meet their incarcerated leader by imposing restrictions on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during his visit to the K-P. The PTI has been in power in the K-P since 2013. He said Imran, the PTI patron-in-chief, was to give his input before the budget was passed but he, the K-P chief minister, was prevented from meeting him. He said law or the Constitution are being violated; institutions are not functioning and even the judiciary is not independent. "We were told by jail authorities that we could not meet Imran as a precautionary measure, as if we are terrorists. A meeting with the party founder will eventually happen, but the current method is wrong," he said. He said the party has filed a civil miscellaneous application (CMA) in the Supreme Court as well and asked as to what action has been taken on the letters that Imran Khan wrote to the chief justice of Pakistan, Gandapur also asked Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz as to how much authority does the Punjab Home Department actually have in allowing and disallowing a meeting between Imran Khan and his party leaders. He said as a chief minister, it is his right to visit any jail and meet with any prisoner. Makhdoom Javed Hashmi also spoke on the occasion, stating that no one could implement "the minus-Imran formula". He said he had come to Adiala Jail to express solidarity with the PTI founder. Hashmi said he had distanced himself from Imran when he had got closer to the establishment. "Imran does not want freedom, he only demands rule of law," he added.
