logo
Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?

Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?

Hindustan Times4 days ago
Editor's note (August 1st 2025): This article has been updated. Container ships are seen at the container terminal at Lianyungang port, in China's eastern Jiangsu province in the early morning on July 24,
In the bygone age that was 2024, America charged levies averaging just 2% on its imports of goods. In the new era of trade wars, it now has an 'effective' tariff of over 16%, the highest since the 1930s (see chart 1). Rates look set to go even higher. On July 31st President Donald Trump signed an executive order that significantly raises tariffs on most of America's trading partners, with the increases due to go into effect on August 7th. Duties on most products from the European Union and South Korea, which recently struck deals with America, will rise to 15%. India faces a tariff of 25%; South Africa, 30%; Canada, 35%. As we published this, Mr Trump seemed inclined to extend America's tariff truce with China. But that still leaves the world's second-largest economy facing levies of around 40% on sales to the world's largest.
Chart 1
Who pays for these tariffs, in all their infinite variety? Most economists reckon that ordinary Americans will lose out, as prices in shops rise. Mr Trump and his coterie, by contrast, blithely insist that the rest of the world will shoulder the load by cutting their selling prices. So far, the evidence is giving the know-nothings a glimmer of hope.
Mr Trump's critics in the economics profession have history and research on their side. Studies show that when a country imposes duties on its imports, its foreign suppliers often keep their prices roughly the same. The tariff is layered on top. So it was during the first Trump administration, which slapped tariffs on China and others. A study from 2019 found 'complete pass-through of the tariffs into domestic prices of imported goods'.
Some foreign firms are taking a similar stance in response to Mr Trump's new levies. In April Ferrari added up to 10% to the price of its cars. Britain's Ineos said it would charge more for its Grenadier off-roader. Canon, a camera-maker, has warned dealers to brace for price increases.
But the broader pattern is more benign. There is, for example, surprisingly little evidence so far of tariff 'pass-through' into inflation. In June America's 'core' consumer prices (ie, excluding food and energy) rose by 0.2% on the previous month, below the consensus estimate of 0.3%. Economists have found some evidence of tariff-induced price rises—in car parts, for instance—but they have had to look harder for it than they had expected.
What explains these surprising results? American firms, not consumers, may be paying for the trade war by accepting lower profits, suggests research by Deutsche Bank. Some firms also boosted inventories before the tariffs were implemented, allowing them to avoid raising their prices for now.
America's foreign suppliers may also be sharing more of the load than they did in Mr Trump's first term. Nintendo, a Japanese electronics firm, is keeping the American price of the Switch 2 games console at $449.99. Many Chinese manufacturers seem prepared to follow Nintendo and absorb duties: Fuling, a supplier of cutlery, says its clients expect it to shoulder 'part of the increased tariff costs'. TIRTIR, a South Korean beauty brand popular with American Gen Zers, has signalled that it can absorb most of the tariffs. Games Workshop, a British manufacturer of war games, also seems resigned to taking the hit, warning investors that tariffs could reduce annual profits by £12m ($16m).
'We found tentative evidence that Korean auto exporters are shouldering the cost of higher US tariffs, at least for now,' wrote Kim Jin-Wook of Citigroup, a bank, in a recent note. The Bank of Japan tracks the prices of the country's car exports to America. In yen terms, they have fallen by 26% in the past year. Some of that decline may reflect exchange-rate movements. An unchanged dollar price brings in fewer yen when the American currency is weak. But that only raises another question: why are Japan's carmakers not raising their dollar prices more vigorously in response?
More comprehensive data point in a similar direction. The Economist assembled a series on export prices from a number of America's largest trading partners, including Canada, Germany and South Korea. In the past exporters in these countries have been perfectly willing to raise prices: during the inflationary surge of 2021-22, they increased them by more than 15% over a 12-month span (see chart 2). Yet in the past year the average local-currency price of their exports has fallen by 3.6%. Nothing of the sort happened during Mr Trump's first trade war.
Who-s-feeling-the-pain-of-Trump-s-tariffs-
Some economists have noted a disconnect between what foreigners report and what American importers say they are paying. For instance, it is hard to find much evidence of plunging prices for Japanese car imports. Economists at Citi speculate that the time it takes to ship a foreign product to an American port may explain the puzzle. It 'implies a lag between falling export prices and when US import-price data would capture the decline', they say.
Why might foreign suppliers be so forgiving? Some bosses worry more than before about the American consumer. With high inflation a recent memory, people already think that everything is too expensive. They have little tolerance for paying even higher prices. The opposite may be true of the foreign companies themselves. They are in a good financial position to withstand the tariffs. Aggregate margins of listed companies in emerging markets have become fatter over the past decade, increasing by over two percentage points. European firms have enjoyed similar gains. These companies can afford to take a small hit to profits, at least for now.
Before long America's economy is likely to feel the pain of the trade war more acutely. Although some Chinese firms may have lowered their prices, these cuts are not nearly deep enough to offset the huge rise in tariffs they now face, points out Deutsche Bank's research. In addition, foreign companies that have borne the costs until now may not be able to bear them for ever—especially if tariff rates keep ratcheting up. The president loves defying his adversaries, in the economics profession and beyond. But he is always his own worst enemy.
For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in economics,finance and markets, sign up to Money Talks, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelensky, Trump Discuss Ceasefire, Sanctions, and Major Drone Deal
Zelensky, Trump Discuss Ceasefire, Sanctions, and Major Drone Deal

India Today

time24 minutes ago

  • India Today

Zelensky, Trump Discuss Ceasefire, Sanctions, and Major Drone Deal

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday (local time) that he had had a "productive" conversation with his US counterpart, Donald Trump on ending the war, sanctions on Russia and the finalisation of a US - Ukraine drone deal."President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities," Zelensky wrote on X, referring to intensifying drone and missile who has signalled frustration with Vladimir Putin in recent weeks, has given the Russian president until August 8 to make peace in Ukraine or face tougher sanctions. A source in Washington said US envoy Steve Witkoff would be meeting the Russian leadership in Moscow on in his nightly video address, Zelensky said Trump "knows the situation along the front line," which extends for 1,000 km (620 miles) through eastern and southern he said, had long supported US proposals for an immediate ceasefire and had proposed a number of formats to implement a halt to the fighting."We have spoken with and proposed to Russia quiet in the skies, no missile and drone attacks and specifically no attacks on civilian infrastructure or on the energy sector," he said."All of this has been violated by the Russians and in a very cynical fashion."Trump has threatened to hit Russia with new sanctions and impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy its oil, although sources close to the Kremlin have told Reuters that Putin is unlikely to bow to the said Ukraine was also ready to conclude a deal with the U.S. on the purchase of Ukrainian drones that would amount to "one of the strongest agreements". He had earlier said the deal was worth around $30 is increasingly seeking financing and investment from its foreign partners to bolster its burgeoning domestic arms said Kyiv's European partners had so far pledged to buy more than $1 billion in US weapons for Ukraine as part of a new scheme.- EndsTune InMust Watch

World War 3 Near? Russia ends nuclear limits as Putin signals Cold War-style arms race with West
World War 3 Near? Russia ends nuclear limits as Putin signals Cold War-style arms race with West

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

World War 3 Near? Russia ends nuclear limits as Putin signals Cold War-style arms race with West

Russia has declared it will no longer limit its nuclear missile deployment. This comes after the US planned to station new missiles in Germany. President Vladimir Putin and top officials warned of retaliatory steps, raising fears of a new Cold War-era arms race with advanced weapons and reduced response times. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Russia Responds to US Missile Plans Kremlin Declares End to Nuclear Restraint Putin Prepares New Oreshnik Missile Deployment Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Missile's Impact Could Blur War Lines Trump's Role and Medvedev's Reaction Return of Cold War Missile Tensions Risks of Escalation Increase FAQs This announcement follows the United States' plans to deploy new intermediate-range weapons in Europe. The move marks a shift in global nuclear strategy and has raised concerns about a renewed Cold War-style arms Russian Foreign Ministry accused the United States and its NATO allies of creating a direct threat to its national security. The trigger is the planned deployment of US-made Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting in 2026. These intermediate-range weapons have been a point of contention since the collapse of the INF Treaty in spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia no longer considers itself bound by any previous arms control limits. He said Russia has the right to take appropriate steps if needed. According to Russian officials, the deployment of US missiles in Europe has broken the remaining stability between nuclear is preparing to deploy the Oreshnik missile, which can travel at Mach 10 and carry either nuclear or conventional warheads. This missile was first used in Ukraine in November. It is now being readied for deployment in Belarus. President Vladimir Putin has claimed that even conventional strikes using this missile could cause destruction comparable to nuclear Oreshnik missile's use suggests a new gray zone in warfare. While it may not carry nuclear warheads, its destructive potential could resemble that of a nuclear weapon. This tactic could lead to confusion about whether a nuclear strike has occurred, further complicating international Russian declaration comes shortly after Donald Trump repositioned two US nuclear submarines in response to nuclear threats from Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's Security Council deputy chairman. Trump has demanded a peace deal on Ukraine or warned of new sanctions. Medvedev responded that each new ultimatum was a step toward war. He also posted that Russia's end of its missile moratorium is a direct answer to NATO's missiles, banned under the 1987 INF Treaty, are now being considered again by both sides. The United States claimed Russia violated the treaty first. In contrast, Russia said its actions are in response to US missile placements in warn that intermediate-range missiles reduce decision-making time to just a few minutes. This increases the risk of mistakes, as world leaders may misinterpret incoming threats and respond without full information. The breakdown of arms control increases global said it will no longer follow past nuclear limits and may deploy its own missiles in reaction to US weapons moving into Oreshnik is a fast missile that can carry nuclear or conventional warheads. It is being prepared for deployment in Belarus.

AMD Gives Solid Forecast, Showing Strength of Demand for AI
AMD Gives Solid Forecast, Showing Strength of Demand for AI

Mint

time24 minutes ago

  • Mint

AMD Gives Solid Forecast, Showing Strength of Demand for AI

(Bloomberg) -- Advanced Micro Devices Inc., the second-largest maker of AI accelerator chips, gave a strong forecast for the current period, signaling that it's making inroads in an industry dominated by Nvidia Corp. Third-quarter sales will be about $8.7 billion, the company said in a statement Tuesday. That compares with an average analyst estimate of $8.37 billion. The forecast doesn't include sales of AI chips to China, where US export controls were recently eased. The outlook pleased investors, who have been looking for more growth from AI accelerators, the highly prized chips that help develop and run artificial intelligence models. The market has become the hottest part of AMD's business, even though the company remains far behind Nvidia. But the China market remains a question mark: Though AMD is expected to begin resuming sales of AI chips there — after the easing of restrictions by the Trump administration — it's unclear how soon that will happen. Investors have poured money into AMD's shares this year, making it the best-performing semiconductor stock in 2025. The run-up has put pressure on its management to match lofty expectations for growth. Three months ago, AMD said it was taking $800 million in charges for inventory and reserves due to export controls in the second quarter and that those restrictions would cost it $1.5 billion in revenue this year. The US move to ease those restrictions on China are expected to eventually change its outlook. AMD's stock, the top stock in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index this year, rose about 1% in extended trading following the announcement. It had gained 44% in 2025. AMD's second-quarter sales rose 32% to $7.7 billion, compared with a $7.43 billion average estimate. Profit was 48 cents a share, minus certain items. Analysts projected 49 cents. Data center sales gained 14% to $3.2 billion in the period. On average, analysts had predicted $3.25 billion. Personal computer-related sales climbed 67% to $2.5 billion. The average prediction was $2.56 billion In the decade since Chief Executive Officer Lisa Su took the top job at AMD, the company has become a key provider of technology across the computing industry. The ability to deliver competitive products — at a time when longtime nemesis Intel Corp. has stumbled — has brought a reversal of fortunes. AMD's market capitalization is now roughly $200 billion higher than Intel's. Still, neither company has matched the runaway success of Nvidia, whose dominance of AI accelerators has made it the world's most valuable business. AMD is the second-biggest provider of graphics chips, which form the basis for the AI accelerators that run in data centers. Its microprocessors, meanwhile, go head to head with Intel products in the markets for PCs and servers. More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store