Scoop: Israel seeks U.S. help on deals to move Palestinians out of Gaza
The spy chief, David Barnea, told White House envoy Steve Witkoff that Israel has been speaking in particular with Ethiopia, Indonesia and Libya.
Why it matters: The Israeli government's goal of removing much of Gaza's population is hugely controversial. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government claims such a "relocation" would be "voluntary," U.S. and Israeli legal experts have labeled it a war crime.
Behind the scenes: In their meeting earlier this week, Barnea told Witkoff that Ethiopia, Indonesia and Libya had expressed openness to receiving large numbers of Palestinians from Gaza, the two source say.
Barnea suggested that the U.S. offer incentives to those countries and help Israel convince them.
Witkoff was non-committal, and it's not clear if the U.S. will actively weigh in on this issue, one source said.
The White House, the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, and the foreign ministries of Ethiopia, Indonesia and Libya did not respond to requests for comment prior to publication.
Flashback: In February, President Trump proposed the removal of all two million Palestinians from Gaza to rebuild the enclave.
But the White House cooled on the idea after getting significant pushback from Arab countries, U.S. officials say, and it hasn't gone anywhere.
Israeli officials say the Trump administration told them that if Netanyahu wants to pursue this idea, Israel needs to find countries that are willing to take Palestinians from Gaza.
Netanyahu tasked Israel's Mossad foreign intelligence agency with finding countries that would agree to receive large numbers of Palestinians displaced from the Gaza Strip.
The big picture: Nearly every Palestinian in Gaza has been displaced during the war, often multiple times. Most buildings in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed.
Israel has been developing a plan for moving all two million residents of the enclave to a small "humanitarian zone" near the border with Egypt.
That plan has sparked concerns in Egypt and many Western countries that Israel is preparing for the mass displacement of Palestinians out of Gaza, something Netanyahu's ultranationalist coalition partners and many inside his own party have been pushing for years.
While the government insists any displacement would be "voluntary," that description has little meaning under these circumstances.
What they are saying: When Netanyahu visited the White House last week, Trump was asked about this issue and deferred to the Israeli Prime Minister.
Netanyahu said Israel is working with the U.S. "very closely" to find countries that will agree to take Palestinians from Gaza and stressed that "we are getting close to finding several countries."
"I think President Trump had a brilliant vision. It's called free choice. You know, if people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn't be a prison," Netanyahu said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
27 minutes ago
- American Military News
Trump admin blocked from ending Temporary Protected Status for Afghan nationals
A federal appeals court temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's Department of Homeland Security on Monday from terminating Temporary Protected Status for roughly 75,000 Afghan nationals who were resettled in the United States following former President Joe Biden's disastrous military withdrawal from Afghanistan. In a Monday order, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote, 'The Court GRANTS the requested administrative stay of agency action regarding the termination of Temporary Protected Status for Afghanistan until Monday, July 21, at 11:59 p.m.' Fox 17 reported that the decision by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to temporarily block the Trump administration's termination of Temporary Protected Status for Afghan nationals gives the court additional time to consider the case. According to Fox 17, the Biden administration granted Afghanistan Temporary Protected Status in 2022 following the U.S. military's disastrous withdrawal from the country after the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan. Under the administration's Temporary Protected Status program, tens of thousands of Afghan nationals have been protected against deportation to Afghanistan due to humanitarian concerns in the country. READ MORE: Supreme Court hands Trump 'Giant Win' in birthright citizenship case In May, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced, 'This administration is returning TPS to its original temporary intent. We've reviewed the conditions in Afghanistan with our interagency partners, and they do not meet the requirements for a TPS designation. Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country.' At the time, Noem explained that the termination of the Temporary Protected Status program for Afghan nationals 'furthers the national interest as DHS records indicate that there are recipients who have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security.' The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that the Trump administration is required to provide a response to the court's emergency motion by Wednesday and that CASA, Inc., the organization that filed the lawsuit against the Trump administration, must provide a response by Thursday.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Demoting the Education Department's watchdog is a spark in a five-alarm fire
Another day, another chilling development in the fight against waste, fraud and abuse. President Trump, who removed 17 inspectors general (including me) at the beginning of his term, continued his attack earlier this month by demoting the acting inspector general of the Department of Education — simply because she was doing her job. That job is especially important right now, in light of the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Trump administration can proceed with dismantling the Education Department. When agencies engage in major muscle movements like the expected shuttering of the Department of Education, inspectors general can add real value through fair, objective and independent oversight. Therefore, changing the acting inspector general under the circumstances is a major issue. Here's the backstory. In March, the secretary of Education announced that the Department of Education would be reducing its workforce by 50 percent, and the president issued an executive order weeks later directing the secretary to begin the process of shuttering the agency entirely. In April, the Department of Education's acting inspector general announced that her office was initiating a series of reviews to examine the effect of the Trump administration's overhaul of the department on its programs. She described the goal of the reviews as 'identify[ing] the cumulative effect of staffing reductions in relation to the department's statutory responsibilities, along with any actions it should consider, to help ensure productive and efficient operations following its workforce changes.' The Office of Inspector General is the internal watchdog in federal agencies, empowered to examine the effectiveness of their agency's programs. So, this review is squarely within the office's jurisdiction; it is exactly the entity that should conduct such an assessment. Over the ensuing few weeks, however, the department apparently pushed back on the Office of the Inspector General, using standard agency tactics to sabotage oversight — namely, dragging its feet and improperly denying access to information and witnesses. After weeks of this pushback, the acting inspector general notified Congress of the Education Department's delay tactics and unfounded refusals to provide critical information. On June 5, President Trump told Congress of his plans to demote the acting inspector general and install a new one. Earlier this month, he did just that. This should worry every American. When a president changes or removes inspectors general for asking difficult questions and conducting oversight that might lead to uncomfortable findings, they no longer are taxpayers' watchdogs. They transform into presidential lapdogs. Inspectors general must be independent to provide fair and objective analysis of their agency's operations. They are the taxpayers' representatives inside federal agencies, providing crucial transparency and information to the administration, Congress and ultimately, the American people about how the agency is doing. That necessarily includes reviewing controversial issues, like in this case, the shuttering of the Department of Education. It also includes occasionally ruffling feathers with agency leadership, many of whom bristle at independent oversight assessing their office's performance. Inspectors general are a unique and very positive feature of the American federal system. As the chair of the Council of Inspectors General, I hosted delegations from numerous foreign countries to discuss the system and how it adds value for the American people. These delegations marveled at America's inspector general system and passionately inquired how they could implement such a robust accountability mechanism in their countries. A perfect example of inspector general effectiveness is 'Operation Gold Rush,' the largest health care fraud bust in U.S. history led by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. After a two-year investigation, 19 people were charged with multiple crimes related to an alleged $10.6 billion Medicare fraud scheme. The demotion of an acting Department of Education inspector general under these circumstances eviscerates the entire inspector general construct. It is wholly inappropriate for her position to be changed for doing her job as required under the Inspector General Act and as Americans have come to expect. This has nothing to do with how someone views the specific issues of the Department of Education and whether it should be closed. As an inspector general appointed by President Trump who dedicated my career to fighting waste, fraud and abuse and protecting taxpayers' dollars, I can certainly appreciate the impulse to cut government bloat and inefficiency. The Department of Education is not immune to such problems. To the contrary, the problem with this removal is that it is clearly retaliation for conducting legitimate oversight. It will not only impact the oversight at the Department of Education; it will likely undermine the entire inspector general community. Could you blame an inspector general for thinking twice about initiating a sensitive evaluation or investigation when they know the president could fire them simply for doing their jobs? Could you blame them for hesitating to investigate a senior Trump appointee when they have the proverbial sword of Damocles hanging over their heads? This chilling effect should be a cause for concern nationwide. Regardless of whether someone agrees or disagrees with President Trump, all of us should want oversight that is without fear or favor — namely, fair, objective and independent oversight that helps the federal government perform better. Inspectors general must be allowed to do their jobs, including asking hard questions, examining sensitive initiatives and pushing back on agencies' obfuscations. Anything less should raise major alarm bells for the American people. Mark Lee Greenblatt is a former inspector general of the U.S. Department of the Interior and chair of the Council of Inspectors General, as well as the author of ' Valor: Unsung Heroes from Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Home Front.'
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bacon praises Trump ‘pivot' on Russia: ‘We owe Melania some thanks here'
Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), a moderate Republican, suggested in a Sunday interview that first lady Melania Trump deserves some credit for President Trump's apparent pivot against Russia in its war against Ukraine. 'Well, I'm glad that the President has pivoted on Ukraine,' Bacon said in an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday.' 'I think we owe Melania some thanks here. Even the president said that his wife reminds him every day that Russia is bombing Ukrainian cities every night,' he continued. The president announced on Monday a deal with NATO to provide weapons to Ukraine, and he also warned Russia that he is prepared to levy 100 percent secondary economic sanctions in 50 days, which would target other nations that do business with Russia. Trump has in recent weeks expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin as Moscow continues to fire missiles into Ukraine despite the White House's push for a ceasefire. He described his frustration in Monday's White House meeting. 'I go home and tell the first lady, 'I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She says, 'Oh really? Another [Ukrainian] city was just hit,'' Trump said on Monday. 'We're very, very unhappy with them and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days,' he said. 'Tariffs at about 100 percent.' The White House later clarified that Trump meant 'secondary sanctions' and not tariffs. Bacon, one of three Republicans elected in districts that voted for Vice President Harris in 2024, praised Trump's announcement on Monday but said he wants to see more from the president. Bacon recently announced he would retire after his term. 'I think we should have total moral clarity here. Russia is the invader. They're bombing the cities. And what will happen if Russia prevails in Ukraine? And we should have this clarity. We know Moldova will likely follow immediately. Georgia and Azerbaijan are very vulnerable,' he said. 'If we fail in Ukraine, it's going to cost us a lot more in the future. And Ukraine, how do we get here? They wanted to be aligned with the West. They want to be democracy. They want free markets. They'd like to be in the EU. And Russia couldn't tolerate that,' Bacon added. 'And so I hope the president does more than just sell weapons to NATO, for NATO to give to Ukraine. I hope that he does that, plus more,' he continued. On the secondary sanctions, Bacon added: 'I wish it wasn't 50 days. I wish it was like 20 days or 30 days, but we do need to punish China, Iran, North Korea, for basically propping up Russia's war effort against Ukraine.'
