logo
Ngāti Oneone calls for unused land return in Gisborne protest

Ngāti Oneone calls for unused land return in Gisborne protest

Scoop06-05-2025
Protesters in Gisborne demand the return of land taken from Ngāti Oneone nearly a century ago
Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson emphasised the need for fairness and honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi
The council and Trust Tairāwhiti acknowledge the grievance
Protesters carrying placards reading "We are the whenua" and "Public works, Private grief" marched through Gisborne on Monday, calling for the return of land taken from Ngāti Oneone nearly a century ago.
The hīkoi began at the Gisborne District Council administration building and visited Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port before ending at the group's occupation site, Te Pa Eketū Shed, on Hirini Street.
There, a pou was erected and a fire lit - actions the group say will continue until their concerns are addressed.
"We will keep that fire burning until all of this is resolved," Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told the crowd. "It's going to be a long haul, but we're up for it."
She told Local Democracy Reporting the group intended to remain at the site "as long as it takes".
This year marks 95 years since the hapū was displaced from its ancestral land under the Public Works Act. Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae, originally established on Hirini Street in 1852, was removed to make way for the development of the Gisborne Harbour.
Gibson said a tipping point came when the hapū realised the Eastland Port shed on Hirini Street was no longer being used for port-related operations.
"It sort of broke the back...we lost that whenua for you to store boats," she said.
Gibson said that returning the land was not about legalities, rather fairness, partnership and honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
"We want all the lands back that you are not using for your core business," she said.
"If you look at the whole of Hirini Street, which was our marae, they've all been sold on."
Gibson said if further port developments were to proceed and the land was sold again, the hapū could lose any chance of reclaiming it.
"We would lose the opportunity in my lifetime."
Previous attempts to get the land back were made by her grandfather and father, Gibson said. The aim now was to avoid passing the burden on to future generations.
"We don't want it to fall on the next generation."
They want the land returned without it being the problem of the hapū to work out how that return happened.
"It always falls on us to 'make the case'," she said.
Ngāti Oneone is calling on the council, Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port to return land not essential to their core operations.
Trust Tairāwhiti is the region's economic development and tourism agency and the sole shareholder of Eastland Port.
In separate statements, the council and Trust Tairāwhiti acknowledged the historical grievance and the right to a peaceful protest.
The council said it began exploring how land could potentially be returned following formal requests from Ngāti Oneone in 2024.
"This includes looking into the relevant legal processes, policy settings and the interests of other Treaty partners," council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said.
"The council recognises its part in past decisions that contributed to the loss of land and the lasting impacts of those actions."
Trust Tairāwhiti chair David Battin said the trust valued its relationship with Ngāti Oneone and had sought independent legal and cultural advice to understand the complexities of the request.
"Ultimately, we advised that the trust could not approve those requests and that the Crown is best placed to address their historical grievance," he said.
Battin said that because the trust was not a Crown entity, it did not have the authority or mechanisms to address historic Treaty breaches.
"Our commitment to Te Tiriti is about working in partnership with mana whenua to support hapū and marae development now and into the future.
"We are focused on solutions and remain open to constructive engagement with Ngāti Oneone."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Seymour Lashes Officials After LINZ Becomes Latest Agency Raising Concerns About His Regulatory Standards Bill
David Seymour Lashes Officials After LINZ Becomes Latest Agency Raising Concerns About His Regulatory Standards Bill

Scoop

time17-07-2025

  • Scoop

David Seymour Lashes Officials After LINZ Becomes Latest Agency Raising Concerns About His Regulatory Standards Bill

Another government agency is warning the costs to comply with the Regulatory Standards Bill could be "significant", and hinder the government's ability to acquire land for infrastructure projects and public works. Documents show Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) officials issued the warning to the Ministry of Regulation in March after it asked for feedback. Regulation Minister David Seymour has hit back at the criticisms, blasting officials for not prioritising New Zealanders' rights, saying it's proof the bill is needed. Earlier, RNZ revealed Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment officials raised fears the bill could be much more expensive than previous estimates, and could lead to business uncertainty, slowing economic growth. LINZ, which has a key role in managing Crown land, land title systems and regulatory frameworks that govern land use and access, said the "overly rigid emphasis" on property interests could affect the government's ability to acquire land for infrastructure or public good projects. It also worried it would create "legal barriers for returning land to iwi" under Treaty of Waitangi settlements, according to feedback obtained by environmental activist group Greenpeace under the Official Information Act. "While strong property rights are important, an overly rigid emphasis on property rights may conflict with broader regulatory objectives, including the Government's ability to acquire land for infrastructure or public good projects," officials wrote. "The potential cost and resource implications to comply with the new requirements could be significant, depending on the guidance issued by the Minister," it told the ministry. LINZ also warned the bill could limit the ability to respond quickly to emergencies, such as natural or climate-related disasters. The agency declined to be interviewed or answer further questions about the concerns it raised. It did not give any details about the extra costs it might face. Officials 'see rights as an inconvenience' - Seymour Regulation Minister David Seymour said LINZ's comments were "worrying." "LINZ do important work, including administering the Public Works Act, which they well know already requires compensation for taking people's land. That makes their comments surprising, and worrying," Seymour said in a statement to RNZ. "At their heart, they see New Zealanders' rights as an inconvenience, when they are supposed to be public servants. "The comments they have made further prove the need for the Regulatory Standards Bill. Public Servants should not see respecting people's rights as an inconvenience, it is one of their duties." Seymour said ministers could "ignore the bill" in a crisis or emergency situation, while Treaty Settlement Bills were also exempt from consideration under the bill. Officials criticisms of the bill were proof it was needed, he said. "One thing that is becoming clear from some government departments' criticisms of the bill is that they don't take New Zealanders' rights seriously, seeming to see them as a nuisance that stops them making rules and going home early. Public servant attitudes to our basic rights, as shown in some of their comments, are another good reason why we need the Regulatory Standards Bill." 'Stark warning' about a 'dangerous bill' Greenpeace said LINZ's comments were a "stark warning", especially as flood-hit Tasman faces a huge clean up after three storm events in recent weeks. Infrastructure was urgently needed to prepare for, and recover from climate disasters, said spokesperson Gen Toop. "Things like flood protection, transport and communication links, and renewable energy," she said. "The Regulatory Standards Bill is dangerous. It would tie the Government's hands at the very moment when urgent climate action and disaster preparation are needed most. "This new warning is yet another nail in the coffin for this doomed bill. It has attracted blistering criticism from the United Nations, legal experts, health professionals, Māori leaders, environmental groups, and the public service itself," said Toop. Several government agencies have sounded warnings about the bill, including the Treasury which predicted the it could "adversely impact the cost and speed of government infrastructure projects and public works in the future." According to the Ministry for Regulation, the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill (RSB) seeks to "establish a benchmark for good legislation" by introducing a set of principles of "responsible regulation". Essentially, the bill creates a set of rules that all lawmakers must consider in regulation design. The law would also set up a Regulatory Standards Board, which would respond to concerns raised around the consistency of regulation. Appointed by the Regulation Minister, the board would be able to make non-binding recommendations, much like the Waitangi Tribunal. The bill is currently with the finance and expenditure committee, which is expected to report back in November. If it passed into law, it would likely take effect at the start of next year.

Te Waka McLeod Facing Peter Moeahu For New Plymouth Māori Ward
Te Waka McLeod Facing Peter Moeahu For New Plymouth Māori Ward

Scoop

time06-07-2025

  • Scoop

Te Waka McLeod Facing Peter Moeahu For New Plymouth Māori Ward

In what might be the last election for New Plymouth's Māori ward, voters will choose between a young māmā ushering in the next generation and an experienced campaigner wanting land returned. Three years ago Te Waka McLeod won Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa ward and on Friday confirmed she would stand again. She faces one opponent so far: kaumātua Peter Moeahu, who has been active in council chambers for decades. More may stand before the four week cut-off but candidates are competing for an uncertain prize. Like almost all Māori wards, New Plymouth District Council's newest seat might be pulled from under the victor after three years, via a government-ordered referendum at October's election. McLeod said the threat steeled her determination that the coming generation will know they belong in local government. "Māori faces at the table are vital so rangatahi can imagine themselves sitting there." "If Māori wards are voted down I worry people might forget how deeply we care about how our communities are run, how all our people and places are cared for." During her first term "quiet conversations and gentle educating" had brought progress, as had Taranaki's iwi liaison committees, other committees with tangata whenua representatives, and Māori staff. "Everybody in the room sees how useful it is." "Non-Māori councillors, staff and voters no longer have to guess what we're trying to achieve together with them." McLeod had a baby in office and wanted to show young parents - especially mums - they could be involved. "I don't need to be the loudest voice in the room. I work on kaupapa aligned with my values and my people and that's how change happens." Peter Moeahu often has had the loudest voice in the room. Across the reigns of five New Plymouth mayors he has stood up for mana whenua in Taranaki's council chambers. He sits on Taranaki Regional Council's Policy and Planning Committee and South Taranaki District Council's Te Kāhui Matauraura. Moeahu said several New Plymouth councillors who had become experienced with iwi and hapū aspirations are stepping down, leaving him worried about candidates from right-wing ratepayer groups and the Act Party. "That's why I'm throwing my hat in the ring," he said. "If this is the last term for the Māori ward I want to be there and face up to whoever they chuck at us." Moeahu wants a specific win: the return of land taken from Puketapu hapū in 1968, with no record of compensation. His grandfather Pehimana Tamati helped established a trust for Mangati E Māori Reserve. "Three years later, the county council just took the land. Just took it under the Public Works Act." Earmarked for sewerage works, nothing happened beyond the digging of two oxidation ponds Moeahu believes were never used. New Plymouth District Council inherited control and Mangati E is part of Bell Block's Hickford Park and the coastal walkway. In 2022 Moeahu asked for Puketapu's land back, but councillors halted progress to investigate how to deal with the range of Māori land it governs. "There are Māori reserves all around New Plymouth that were set aside for us to live on, for us to prosper on - and they're no longer in our hands," Moeahu said. He wants Mangati back as a priority and precedent. "I want to see the finalisation of this piece of land, Mangati E, in my lifetime so we don't leave the situation for the next generation." National's coalition deals with NZ First and Act promise referendums for wards elected by voters on the Māori roll. No other type of ward can be voted down. If voters ditch Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa it cannot be resurrected for six years.

Mounting Legal Threats And Property Deal Patterns Spark Fresh Call For National Inquiry
Mounting Legal Threats And Property Deal Patterns Spark Fresh Call For National Inquiry

Scoop

time03-07-2025

  • Scoop

Mounting Legal Threats And Property Deal Patterns Spark Fresh Call For National Inquiry

Tauranga, NZ – Civic watchdog and advocacy group Lobby for Good is renewing its call for an independent investigation and a full Auditor-General inquiry after its legal advisor, Kirsten Murfitt (Principal at KM Law), uncovered another high-risk land transaction involving Tauranga City Council. The deal saw land at 57 Pitau Road, sold to a developer for $6.65 million, then bought back within seconds the same day for $13.59 million. No open tender. No clear explanation. Even more concerning, the land appears to have been subject to the Public Works Act, which legally requires it to be offered back to the original owner. That offer-back isn't recorded on the title, and Council's justification relies on a vague reference to a 'successor.' 'This isn't just about one deal,' says Erika Harvey, Director of Public Affairs at Lobby for Good. 'It's about a pattern, deals that quietly transfer public value to private hands, often without oversight or genuine public input.' Harvey says that in investigating other developments across Tauranga, Lobby for Good and her legal advisor Kirsten Murfitt have already encountered legal threats aimed at stifling scrutiny and public questioning. 'These legal threats didn't arise from the Pitau Road development, but based on the behaviour we've seen elsewhere, we are concerned that the same approach could be used to silence public concern here too,' Harvey says. Lobby for Good, in partnership with its external legal advisors at KM Law, have now documented at least seven concerning property or governance decisions made under Tauranga's unelected commissioners, including the undervalued sale of the Marine Precinct, hidden influence over candidate selection, heavily redacted information requests, and clauses in elder housing contracts requiring Council to repurchase land before on-selling it. 'This is soft corruption,' Harvey says. 'Legal-looking deals that quietly shift public value into private hands. And now, instead of transparency, we are seeing patterns of legal intimidation being used to discourage public scrutiny.' Lobby for Good reports that residents from the Pitau Road community have contacted them, feeling helpless, angry, and voiceless. They're deeply concerned that this high-rise development will overshadow their homes, devalue their properties, destroy the neighbourhood's character, increase traffic and stormwater problems, and set a dangerous precedent for suburban intensification without proper consultation. Residents say they've been shut out of the process from day one, with decisions made behind closed doors under fast-track consenting rules that silenced the community's voice. 'We hear you,' says Harvey. 'This is your neighbourhood, your skyline, your home. You deserve to be heard.' Lobby for Good is calling on residents affected by the Pitau Road development to visit and register their interest to attend a community meeting about the Pitau development. If there is sufficient interest, Lobby for Good will support residents in bringing their voices into the mainstream, connecting them with wider networks, and working together to prevent this from happening to other everyday Kiwis in communities across New Zealand. 'In a healthy democracy, journalists and advocates shouldn't need legal defence just to ask questions,' says Harvey. 'That's why we're again calling on the Office of the Auditor-General and the Department of Internal Affairs to investigate the full scope of governance failures, and whether legal intimidation is being used to suppress public participation in Tauranga.' Lobby for Good is calling for: A public-facing, independent investigation into all land and asset sales approved under Tauranga's unelected commissioners. A formal inquiry by the Office of the Auditor-General into Council financial decisions, consultation failures, and conflicts of interest. An immediate review of the use of legal threats to suppress scrutiny of public decisions. 'If nothing improper occurred, there should be no need for threats, only answers,' says Harvey. 'And if this is happening in Tauranga, what else is happening behind closed doors across New Zealand?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store