
Solid United States job growth masks loss of labor market momentum
US job growth was unexpectedly solid in June, but nearly half of the increase in nonfarm payrolls came from the government sector, with private industry gains the smallest in eight months as businesses battled rising economic headwinds.
While the Labor Department's closely watched employment report on Thursday also showed the unemployment rate falling to 4.1 percent last month from 4.2 percent in May, that was in part because some people left the labor force.
The average workweek was shorter last month, suggesting businesses were probably reducing hours. Economists say President Donald Trump's focus on what they call anti-growth policies, including sweeping tariffs on imported goods, mass deportations of migrants and sharp government spending cuts, has changed the public's perceptions of the economy.
Business and consumer sentiment surged in the wake of Trump's victory in the presidential election last November in anticipation of tax cuts and a less stringent regulatory environment before slumping about two months later.
The mixed report is, however, unlikely to encourage the Federal Reserve to resume cutting interest rates this month, but raises the prospects of bigger reductions when the US central bank restarts its monetary policy easing cycle.
'Although the overall number of jobs was very strong, the weakness was broad-based across the private sector,' said Eugenio Aleman, chief economist at Raymond James.
'The labor market continued to weaken in June, which is in line with our view and should reignite the conversation regarding the Federal Reserve's interest rate path.' Nonfarm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs last month after an upwardly revised 144,000 advance in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls rising 110,000 following a previously reported 139,000 gain in May.
The report was published a day early because of the Independence Day holiday on
Friday.
Despite the bigger-than-expected rise in payrolls, job growth is slowing and concentrated in a few industries.
Government employment rose by 73,000, boosted by a 40,000 increase in state government education, which economists brushed off as a seasonal quirk related to the end of the school year.
Local government education increased 23,000. A reversal was expected in July. Federal government job losses continued amid efforts by the White House to slash headcount and spending, with 7,000 positions lost in May. Federal government employment is now down 69,000 since January.
Private payrolls increased by 74,000 jobs, the fewest since October 2024, after advancing 137,000 in May. The rise was below the three-month average gain of 115,000. The healthcare sector continued to dominate employment growth, adding 39,000 jobs spread across hospitals and nursing and residential care facilities. Social assistance employment increased by 19,000.
Outside these non-cyclical sectors, weakness prevailed. Reuters Manufacturing shed 7,000 jobs, while wholesale trade lost 6,600 positions, likely because of import duties. Professional and business services payrolls decreased 7,000. Retailers added a paltry 2,400 jobs.
Transportation and warehousing payrolls increased 7,500, while construction payrolls advanced 15,000. A measure of the share of industries reporting job growth decreased to 49.6 from 51.8 in May.
The workweek shortened to 34.2 hours from 34.3 hours in May.
'The private sector was clearly losing momentum in the latter part of the second quarter, which does not augur well for the performance of the economy in the third quarter,' said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College.
The pace of wage growth has also slowed. Average hourly earnings rose 0.2 percent after rising 0.4 percent in May. That lowered the annual increase in wages to 3.7 percent from 3.8 percent in May.
Economists continued to expect that the Fed would not start cutting rates until September or even later. 'For the Fed, the softening in private activity is not so abrupt to lead the FOMC to drop its vigilance toward inflation risks, and we continue to look for the next ease in December,' said Michael Feroli, chief economist at JP Morgan.
The Fed last month left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25 percent-4.50 percent range, where it has been since December.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Tuesday reiterated the central bank's plans to 'wait and learn more' about the impact of tariffs on inflation before lowering borrowing costs again. Stocks on Wall Street traded higher. The dollar advanced against a basket of currencies. US Treasury yields rose.
The decline in the unemployment rate came as 130,000 people dropped out of the labor force. Household employment also increased by 93,000, contributing to pulling the jobless rate down. Discouraged jobseekers jumped 256,000. Economists had expected the unemployment rate to tick up to 4.3 percent.
Still, long-term unemployment is rising, underscoring the sluggish hiring. The number of people out of work for 27 weeks and longer increased 190,000 to 1.647 million.
That aligns with an elevated number of people receiving unemployment checks. The median duration of unemployment rose to 10.1 weeks from 9.5 weeks in May. Surveys show businesses reluctant to add to headcount.
Some respondents in an Institute for Supply Management survey in June said they were 'not hiring new staff if we can backfill the role with current employees' while others reported 'the administration's proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 has put a pause on many pending hiring actions.'
Most economists expect the jobless rate will rise in the second half of this year. Some economists, however, see limited scope as the immigration crackdown shrinks the labor pool.
With the administration having revoked the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants, they argued fewer than 100,000 additional jobs per month would likely be needed to keep the jobless rate stable.
They estimated the economy currently needs to create 100,000-170,000 per month to keep up with growth in the working age population.
The participation rate dropped to 62.3 percent from 62.4 percent in May. There were decreases among both foreign- and native-born populations. 'Some of the decline in participation could reflect changes in immigration policy and could continue,' said Andrew Hollenhorst, chief U.S. economist at Citigroup.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump threatens ‘un-American' BRICS countries with 10 percent tariff
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to hike tariffs against the BRICS economic bloc after the group offered indirect criticism of trade wars and the recent military attacks in Iran. On Monday, Trump took aim at the 10-member bloc, which seeks to strengthen emerging economies, framing its interests as adversarial to the US's. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff,' Trump wrote in a post. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' BRICS is named for its founding members, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. But it has grown to include other countries, such as Indonesia, Egypt, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Over the weekend, the group held its 17th summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The meeting culminated in a declaration angled at promoting peace and global cooperation. But several items in the joint declaration appeared to be aimed at the US and its ally Israel, even though neither was identified by name. Under a section entitled 'Strengthening Multilateralism and Reforming Global Governance', for instance, the BRICS leaders called out the increasing use of tariffs in global trade. This seemed directed at Trump, who has threatened US trading partners with a suite of tariffs to negotiate more favourable trade deals and exact policy concessions. The US president has also called tariffs 'the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary', though many economists warn that the cost of such import taxes is often offset onto consumers. Trump has also championed the use of other protectionist economic policies, under the banner of his 'America First' agenda. But the BRICS leaders warned that these kinds of policies could backfire. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,' the BRICS leaders said in their statement. Such measures, they continued, could 'reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities'. The BRICS leaders also used their declaration to denounce the recent military strikes on one of the bloc's member nations, Iran. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law,' they wrote, adding that 'peaceful nuclear facilities' had been targeted. Israel carried out the first attacks against Iran in the 12-day war on June 13, and on June 22, the US sent seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Iran to strike three nuclear facilities. Both Israel and the US have maintained that these actions were necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, though Iran has denied seeking one. In the wake of Trump's tariff threat, BRICS leaders rushed to assure their US counterparts that they are not seeking confrontation. Others, however, chafed at Trump's remarks. 'I became aware of what President Trump tweeted, and I think there needs to be greater appreciation of the emergence of various centres of power in the world,' said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. 'And this should be seen in a positive light, rather than in a negative light.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took an even blunter approach to Trump's threats. 'I don't think it's very responsible or serious for the president of a country as big as the United States to go around threatening the world through the internet,' Lula said in a question-and-answer session with reporters. 'It's not right. The world has changed. We don't want an emperor.'


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Donald Trump threatens ‘un-American' BRICS countries with 10-percent tariff
United States President Donald Trump has threatened to hike tariffs against the BRICS economic bloc, after the group offered indirect criticism of trade wars and the recent military attacks in Iran. On Monday, Trump took aim at the 10-member bloc, which seeks to strengthen emerging economies, framing its interests as adversarial to the US's. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff,' Trump wrote in a post. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' BRICS is named for its founding members, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. But it has grown to include other countries including Indonesia, Egypt, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Over the weekend, the group held its 17th summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The meeting culminated in a declaration angled at promoting peace and global cooperation. But several items in the joint declaration appeared aimed at the US and its ally Israel, even though neither was identified by name. Under a section entitled 'Strengthening Multilateralism and Reforming Global Governance', for instance, the BRICS leaders called out the increasing use of tariffs in global trade. This seemed directed at Trump, who has threatened US trading partners with a suite of tariffs in order to negotiate more favourable trade deals and exact policy concessions. The US president has also called tariffs 'the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary', though many economists warn the cost of such import taxes is often offset onto consumers. Trump has also championed the use of other protectionist economic policies, under the banner of his 'America First' agenda. But the BRICS leaders warned that these kinds of policies could backfire. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,' the BRICS leaders said in their statement. Such measures, they continued could 'reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities'. The BRICS leaders also used their declaration to denounce the recent military strikes on one of the bloc's member nations, Iran. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law,' they wrote, adding that 'peaceful nuclear facilities' had been targeted. Israel carried out the first attacks against Iran in the 12-day war on June 13, and on June 22, the US sent seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Iran to strike three nuclear facilities. Both Israel and the US have maintained these actions were necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, though Iran has denied seeking one. In the wake of Trump's tariff threat, BRICS leaders rushed to assure their US counterparts that they are not seeking confrontation. Others, however, chafed at Trump's remarks. 'I became aware of what President Trump tweeted, and I think there needs to be greater appreciation of the emergence of various centres of power in the world,' said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. 'And this should be seen in a positive light, rather than in a negative light.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took an even blunter approach to Trump's threats. 'I don't think it's very responsible or serious for the president of a country as big as the United States to go around threatening the world through the internet,' Lula said in a question-and-answer session with reporters. 'It's not right. The world has changed. We don't want an emperor.'


Qatar Tribune
7 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Deals made by Trump since pausing his ‘Liberation Day' tariffs remain sparse
Agencies Just over three months ago, President Donald Trump unveiled his most sweeping volley of tariffs yet — holding up large charts from the White House Rose Garden to outline new import taxes that the U.S. would soon slap on goods from nearly every country in the world. But in line with much of Trump's on-again, off-again trade policy playbook, the bulk of those 'Liberation Day' levies in April were postponed just hours after they took effectin a 90-day suspension that arrived in an apparent effort to quell global market panic and facilitate country-by-country negotiations. At that time, the administration set a lofty goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Now, with the July 9 deadline looming, the U.S. has only announced pacts with the United Kingdom and Vietnam — as well as a 'framework″ agreement with China in a separate trade dispute. News of these deals often trickled through social media posts from the president and, even when countries on both sides of a negotiation table made more official announcements, many key details — including timing — were sparse. The Trump administration has since hinted that some trading partners might get more time for talks. Over the July 4th holiday weekend, Trump said that the U.S. would start sending letters to certain countries warning that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1. Trump took to Truth Social on Monday to share letters he sent to the leaders of Japan and South Korea, declaring that both countries would see 25% tariffs on goods entering the U.S. starting Aug. 1. Even with negotiations ongoing, most countries have still faced a minimum 10% levy on goods entering the U.S. over the past three months, on top of punishing new taxes targeting foreign steel and aluminum as well as auto imports. The 90-day pause pushed back additional steeper rates, which Trump calls 'reciprocal' tariffs, for dozens of nations. Here's what we know about the trade deals announced since April. On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the United States, by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. It wasn't immediately clear when these new rates would go into effect or whether they would come on top of any other previously-imposed levies. Like most other countries, Vietnam has faced Trump's 10% baseline tariff for the last three months. On May 8, Trump agreed to cut tariffs on British autos, steel and aluminum, among other trade pledges — while the U.K. promised to reduce levies on U.S. products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment. The deal was announced in grandiose terms by both countries, but some key details remained unknown for weeks. When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals — and Trump said that rate could also go up on or after Wednesday. The U.K. did not receive a higher 'reciprocal' rate on April 2, but continues to face the 10% baseline its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And last month, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement. On June 11, following talks in London, Trump announced a 'framework' for a deal. And late last month, the U.S. and China both acknowledged that some sort of agreement had been reached. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, without explicitly mentioning U.S. access to rare earths, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that it would 'review and approve eligible export applications for controlled items' and that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China.' More specifics about those measures — and when they would actually go into effect — were not immediately clear. But on Friday, the Ministry of Commerce acknowledged that the U.S. was resuming exports of airplane parts, ethane and other items to China. And when Trump first announced the framework on June 11, the U.S. had said it agreed to stop seeking to revoke the visas of Chinese students on U.S. college campuses.