Unite suspends Rayner over Birmingham bin strikes
Trade unionists voted 'overwhelmingly' at Unite's conference in Brighton today to suspend Rayner, accusing the former Unison union rep of backing a council that had 'peddled lies'. Rayner isn't the only public figure Unite has gone after. John Cotton, the leader of Birmingham council, has had his membership suspended by Unite, alongside some Labour councillors. The conference also backed a vote to 'discuss our relationship with Labour' – sparking fears there could be a formal split between the organisations which would spell financial trouble for the Labour lot.
The industrial action has dragged on for more than 100 days, after pay talks between bin workers and the city council broke down in March. Union bosses were not impressed when Rayner urged workers to accept the latest pay deal. Unite chiefs have claimed that changes to how rubbish is collected will mean that 170 workers will face an annual pay cut of £8,000 – figures that Birmingham City Council disputes. As the strike action continues, costs are creeping up too. As Mr S revealed last month, a whopping £90,767.20 was splurged on pest control services in Birmingham this March, while over the Easter weekend alone there were 376 complaints of rats.
Unite's general secretary Sharon Graham remarked:
Unite is crystal clear it will call out bad employers regardless of the colour of their rosette. Angela Rayner has had every opportunity to intervene and resolve this dispute but has instead backed a rogue council that has peddled lies and smeared its workers fighting huge pay cuts. The disgraceful actions of the government and a so-called Labour council, is essentially fire and rehire and makes a joke of the Employment Relations Act promises. People up and down the country are asking whose side is the Labour government on and coming up with the answer not workers.
Shots fired!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Spectator
Votes at 16 won't necessarily benefit Labour
Gerrymandering is as old as the hills, and neither of what have been Britain's two main political parties for the past century has a clean nose. Why did the Conservatives extend the franchise to long-term expats who are not even paying taxes in Britain? And why has the present government just announced that 16- and 17-year-olds will be granted the vote in UK general elections for the first time? Forget any high-mindedness about fairness, encouraging responsibility and so on – these are raw attempts to swing the political arithmetic in the governing party's favour. The only trouble is: has Labour made a fatal miscalculation in assuming that 16- and 17-year-olds will vote for the party? It is received wisdom that the young are more idealistic and left-wing than older people – as per the adage often attributed to Winston Churchill (possibly because of his own political transformation): if you are not liberal at 20 you have no heart, and if you are not a conservative at 40 you have no head. Moreover, it is certainly true that in recent elections age has been a very strong determinant of how people vote: the younger a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Labour; the older a voter, the more likely they are to have voted Conservative. But will that relationship still hold for 16- and 17-year-olds? There have not been many polls asking for the opinions of this age group, but those held over the past year or so ought to fire a strong warning shot over Labour's bows. They appear to confirm a reluctance to vote Tory among young voters, but also suggest that Reform is remarkably popular among this cohort. A JL Partners poll from July last year suggested that 39 per cent would vote Labour, 23 per cent Reform, 18 per cent Green, 9 per cent Liberal Democrat and just 5 per cent Conservative. That, however, was in the week of the last general election, before Starmer and his government had had a chance to become unpopular. Another poll was conducted by Find Out Now in February this year. It ought to be emphasised that it didn't ask 16- and 17-year-olds directly for their voting intentions but instead asked their parents how they thought their children would vote – so it is not necessarily the most reliable of polls. It is also worth adding that today's announcement will have no effect on current 16- and 17-year-olds, as they will all be over 18 by the next election anyway; it is today's 13- and 14-year-olds for whom this will make a difference. Putting that aside, the Find Out Now poll suggested support for Reform at 30 per cent, level with Labour. The Greens were on 17 per cent, the Lib Dems 9 per cent and the Conservatives 7 per cent. The poll also suggested that just over half of 16- and 17-year-olds think immigration is too high – which may help explain their favourability toward Nigel Farage's party. Overall, both polls suggest that received ideas about how 16- and 17-year-olds will vote may be biased towards the views of middle-class students. We think of young people as being woke and left-wing because we hear an awful lot about the antics of student activists. Yet half the population do not go to university and may well be less motivated by woke ideas than by the fear that migrants are taking some of their potential job opportunities. The expansion of the franchise to 16- and 17-year-olds could end up being a very big problem for Labour if it means losing the votes of the working-class young. It is also worth noting the strong attraction of the Greens to young voters; that, too, could detract from Labour's vote. The big losers from votes for 16- and 17-year-olds look like being the Conservatives and also the Lib Dems. In times past, the latter used to cultivate young votes through conference votes to legalise dope and the like. But they no longer seem to be cutting through; they have become a party of the middle-aged and middle-class. As to who the winners will turn out to be, that is harder to answer. But it is certainly not guaranteed to be Labour; on the contrary, it could conceivably help Reform into power.
Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Spectator
Confessions of a new intake Labour MP: ‘We're not here to make friends'
Keir Starmer has struck again. Compounding his reputation as a ruthless operator – like Michael Corleone – he is settling all family business by removing the whip from a number of troublemaking MPs, including Neil Duncan Jordan, Chris Hinchcliff, Brian Leishman and Rachel Maskell. This comes after each led respective revolts on winter fuel, planning reform, Grangemouth and the welfare changes. Rosena Allin-Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammed Yasin have all lost their trade envoy roles too. Many of the MPs who have been cast adrift are from the new intake, and so today we are joined on the podcast by Mike Tapp, MP for Dover and Deal, to give his reflections on a year in office. On the podcast: he offers James Heale his advice on stopping the boats; details how Labour can start to deliver tangible change for people in constituencies much like his own; explains why Keir was right to suspend his fellow MPs; and gives us an insight into the future Labour stars from the new intake. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.
Western Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Commons Leader rolls out Oasis puns to describe year since Labour's election
Little by Little, Ms Powell racked up seven mentions of Oasis material in the 50-second recap of the parliamentary year in the Commons on Thursday, ending by saying she hopes the Labour Government will 'Live Forever'. Her comments came in the last Business Questions before the parliamentary recess, which will begin next Tuesday. The Manchester Central MP said: 'I couldn't let this opportunity pass without telling the House that Manchester is buzzing right now with its bucket hats, its music, and even parkas in this hot weather. As we've all come together to celebrate the Oasis reunion. 'When Oasis were last performing at Heaton Park it was under a Labour government, and the shadow leader (Jesse Norman) invited me to give the House a few more groaning puns, so if he'll forgive me. 'Some Might Say this Government has a Masterplan for change, of course, I know it's not been a great year for the party opposite since their biggest election defeat in history, but perhaps they need to Stop Crying Their Heart Out, Don't Look Back In Anger, and hope that Reform Fade Away. 'Talking of which, last year we have seen Reform come on the scene in the House of Commons, some of their MPs have had better attendances than others. 'The honourable member for Clacton (Nigel Farage), as usual, is probably on a beach Half A World Away. 'There's more, there's one last one. Let's hope this Labour Government Live Forever.' An Oasis fan in Cardiff ahead of the first show in the band's long-awaited reunion tour earlier this month (PA) Commons deputy speaker Nusrat Ghani responded and called the comments 'interesting'. Ms Powell had been asked by Conservative shadow leader Mr Norman what the Government planned to do to protect veterans who had served in Northern Ireland from prosecution. He said: 'Hundreds and thousands of men and women went to Northern Ireland, not of their own accord but under orders and in the chain of command, on the Queen's business, to combat the most serious terrorist organisation in the world at the time, and to protect human lives and human society.' He said the decisions by Labour to abandon the Legacy Act had left veterans in their 70s and 80s 'exposed to legal harassment, anxiety and trauma'. Ms Powell replied: 'This is a complex situation, and we need to resolve it. He might disagree with this, but the previous government's Legacy Act was found to be unlawful and unworkable and is now subject to further court action. 'That means currently that nobody is protected by it, and nor does it give people the justice that they want, because there would be so much legal uncertainty about the status of doing so. 'That is why our priority is finding a way forward that gives veterans, survivors and communities confidence in the process. We will take our time to do this.'
