
Can A Birth Control Startup Become The Future Of Medicaid-Friendly Digital Health?
For too long, women's and reproductive healthcare has been underfunded, overlooked, and underserved. But a new wave of mission-driven companies is rewriting that script. At the forefront is Twentyeight Health, the Gen Z renegade that launched in 2018 and quickly made its mark by delivering inclusive, affordable access to birth control and sexual health services. With a focus providing on providing frictionless access, the platform has earned trust where others have ignored need.
Now, Twentyeight is expanding its services and moving beyond contraception into areas like prenatal care, STI testing, and mental health referrals. In doing so, it is laying the foundation for a full-spectrum, financially accessible digital health platform tailored to those most often left out.
Closing the Coverage Gap
Founded in 2018, Twentyeight Health now operates in over 30 states, delivering reproductive healthcare to communities often left behind by traditional systems. The company's Chief Operating Officer, Mara Castro, describes the company's founding insight this way: 'We saw a huge opportunity to bring dignity and discretion to reproductive care for individuals who are often left out of innovation.'
Mara Castro is the COO of Twentyeight Health.
The need is substantial. More than 70 million Americans are enrolled in Medicaid, and data consistently show they face heightened barriers to care. This ranges from transportation and scheduling conflicts to language access and opaque billing systems. While many direct-to-consumer health platforms target commercially insured users, Twentyeight has chosen a more complex path, and doing so, is proving that trust can be built in the most fragmented corners of the healthcare system.
Fintech as a Bridge, Not a Bolt-On
Twentyeight Health has long been a champion for flexible payment options.
One of Twentyeight Health's early insights was the need for flexible payment methods. 'We accept prepaid debit cards, flexible savings accounts, and even cash-like payment methods. Meeting people where they are is key,' said Castro.
What sounds like a simple operational choice is actually a powerful signal. Platforms like Twentyeight must think not just about who they serve, but how those users transact. Embedded finance—through instant payments, earned wage access, or installment billing—has already reshaped consumer commerce. Yet in healthcare, most fintech innovation has stopped short of the real bottlenecks: affordability, reimbursement, and compliance.
That opens up white space. Imagine if digital health platforms enabled sliding scale payments, automated Medicaid copay lookups, or used BNPL infrastructure for procedures not covered by insurance. The same rails powering Afterpay and Klarna could be leveraged to reduce the significant portion of patients who delay or forgo care due to cost.
Castro noted, 'Fintech integrations will be part of how we scale, especially for services that aren't reimbursed. We have to make payment as frictionless as possible.'
Twentyeight's Next Chapter
Twentyeight has always operated at the intersection of equity and innovation, serving patients often excluded from traditional healthcare—particularly Medicaid-eligible and uninsured women. Now, as demand for GLP-1 medications, medical-grade skincare, and digitally delivered care surges, the company is entering a new phase of mission-driven growth.
Today Twentyeight is announcing the launch of its Personalized Care Program, expanding beyond reproductive health into:
This expansion reflects both rising consumer demand and a continued focus on affordability, with services starting at $17.99/month.
In many ways, this is a natural evolution of the company's long-term vision. And as fintech tools like installment billing and real-time eligibility checks become critical enablers of care, Twentyeight offers a blueprint for how healthcare can scale with empathy, trust, and accessibility at its core.
As Castro observed, 'There's so much talk in digital health about scale, but very little about sustainability. If your users can't afford what you're offering, scale becomes irrelevant.'
For both founders and investors, the implications are clear: the future of care is inclusive, distributed, and financially attuned.
The Takeaway
The intersection of fintech and women's health remains underexplored, but the connections are profound. As platforms like Twentyeight Health earn trust at the margins, they are crafting a new standard for care that is both accessible and human-centered.
For those building in either ecosystem, the message is simple: design with empathy. Prioritize usability. And never underestimate the impact of giving patients a way to pay.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Advocates worry new White House order on homelessness could hurt vets
Advocates and critics are warning that a recent White House order aimed at getting homeless individuals off city streets and public parks could cause significant problems for efforts to help veterans without stable housing. They argue that the executive order, signed July 24, would force veterans into institutions without considering their available options and discourage individuals from seeking help for multiple, interrelated issues. 'Veterans fought for this country,' officials from the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans said in a statement on Friday. 'They have earned the dignity of a hand up in the way of investments in housing, mental health, and substance abuse treatment, and additional supportive services — not surveillance and detention.' President Donald Trump's executive order — 'Ending crime and disorder on America's streets' — would allow local officials to remove homeless individuals from public areas and permit those authorities to commit those Americans to drug treatment centers or other public health institutions. Advocates for homeless vets wary over proposed changes to VA programs 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order,' the president's order states. 'Surrendering our cities and citizens to disorder and fear is neither compassionate to the homeless nor other citizens.' The document also outlines ending support for 'housing first' policies, which administration officials argue 'deprioritize accountability and fail to promote treatment, recovery, and self-sufficiency.' Homeless advocates have said that research shows the opposite. They insist that providing stable housing to individuals facing a host of mental health and financial problems gives them more security to clean up other aspects of their lives without worrying about where they will sleep at night. 'This deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness,' officials from the National Homelessness Law Center said in a statement shortly after the White House release. 'This executive order is rooted in outdated, racist myths about homelessness and will undoubtedly make homelessness worse.' The Department of Housing and Urban Development's annual point-in-time count conducted in early 2024 found roughly 33,000 veterans living on the street without stable housing, a reduction of about 2,700 individuals from the 2023 count. That number is less than half the estimated 74,000 homeless veterans nationwide in 2010, when then-President Barack Obama announced a federal government goal of ending veteran homelessness. But some areas — in particular, Los Angeles — have struggled to reduce those totals further in recent years. Advocates have pushed for more resources and fewer restrictions for community groups, but conservatives have questioned whether more funding will produce continued results. Officials from NCHV warned that involuntary hospitalization and institutionalization of homeless individuals instead of relying on community coordination of care may actually worsen the problem. 'For veterans — many of whom live with service-connected trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder or other mental health conditions — forced treatment can retraumatize rather than heal,' they said in their statement. 'Moreover, institutionalization is often more expensive than providing housing and outpatient care and can be traumatic for individuals who are mandated into treatment settings without their consent. Veterans deserve access to voluntary, trauma-informed care in community settings, not confinement.' Trump's executive order drew immediate condemnation from Democratic critics, who said it was motivated by cost-cutting illusions rather than sound problem-solving policies. 'Hundreds of thousands of veterans rely on the incredibly successful HUD and VA housing assistance programs,' House Veterans' Affairs Committee ranking member Mark Takano, D-Calif., said. 'This directive misdiagnoses the root causes of homelessness – particularly among veterans – and proposes punitive measures that will punish and endanger the very people it claims to help. 'Instead of getting veterans off the street, this misguided approach delays that process and puts handcuffs on those vulnerable veterans. It will exacerbate the homelessness crisis.' White House and Department of Justice officials have not yet outlined exactly how the new order will be enforced, and when local officials might be able to change their approach to homeless response without legal concerns. Veterans Affairs officials have not announced any changes in their grant programs or assistance efforts as a result of the new order. In May, VA Secretary Doug Collins said that officials had begun work on Trump's ideas for a new 'National Center for Warrior Independence' in Los Angeles to provide more housing and employment support for the estimated 3,000 homeless veterans living there. He also promised continued focus on the issue in coming months. Solve the daily Crossword


NBC News
33 minutes ago
- NBC News
Live updates: Trump meets with U.K. Prime Minister Starmer on trade, Gaza war
Speaking at a steel mill in Canton, Ohio, Vice President JD Vance defended the president's new domestic policy law known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill" and touted the measure's health care provisions. "We are very confident that the way we structured the Big, Beautiful Bill is that a lot of what people are saying that you're going to somehow see reduced health care outcomes. I don't believe that's going to happen for a second," Vance said in response to a question from NBC News. "We actually are increasing funding to rural hospitals. We're increasing funding to needy people. What we're not doing is we're not allowing illegal immigrants to collect the American people's Medicaid benefits, because it's going to bankrupt that program." "If you want to protect Medicaid, and President Trump certainly wants to, then the best way to protect Medicaid is to ensure only the needy get access to Medicaid, not people who don't even have the legal right to be in our country to begin with," Vance added. Undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid benefits.


The Hill
40 minutes ago
- The Hill
Top medical group presses RFK Jr. to keep health screening panel
A top U.S. health lobbying group is calling on Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to not dismiss a preventive task force following a report he's planning to remove all of its members in the same way he ousted an entire vaccine advisory board earlier this year. The American Medical Association (AMA) wrote to Kennedy on Sunday to express its 'deep concern' over reporting that Kennedy is planning to dismiss all members of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). 'USPSTF members have been selected through an open, public nomination process and are nationally recognized experts in primary care, prevention and evidence-based medicine. They serve on a volunteer basis, dedicating their time to help reduce disease and improve the health of all Americans—a mission well-aligned with the Make America Healthy Again initiative,' the AMA wrote in a letter to Kennedy. The Wall Street Journal reported late last week that Kennedy was planning to dismiss the entire 16-member panel for being too 'woke' in his eyes, citing people familiar with the decision. The report comes after Kennedy in June dismissed the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, replacing the members with some known spreaders of vaccine information. When reached for comment by The Hill, a spokesperson the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said, 'No final decision has been made on how the USPSTF can better support HHS' mandate to Make America Healthy Again.' Just last month, the USPSTF's powers to make recommendations survived legal scrutiny when the Supreme Court upheld their constitutionality. Plaintiffs in the case argued the panel was unconstitutional. The case began when a Texas business did not wish to cover HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, which is recommended by the USPSTF. 'Given the essential role USPSTF members play in weighing the benefits and harms of preventive services such as screenings, behavioral counseling, and preventive medications, and making evidence-based recommendations for implementation in primary care settings, we urge you to keep the previously appointed USPSTF members and continue the task force's regular meeting schedule to ensure recommendations are put forth, updated, and disseminated without delay,' the AMA told Kennedy.